Watch in real time as Trans Reddit turns on one of it's own for suggesting that maybe they are biological men and arguing they are not makes them look unstable.

None of the recent versions have worked for me. Could have done with some more Orville.

I am not convinced that the visitor was young.

They said they had a child.

What seems to happen is that some people get just enough information to find something credible. Like the whole uterus transplant rabbit hole, or the its a vagina because someone can stick a penis into it.

Whoever they are, they are operating on sound bites being fed to them and a heap of other people and considering it is expert knowledge. Hence the demeaning and belittling that keeps coming such as 'how do you not know this' exclaimations.

Reader: we don't know 'this' because it was misinformation. We have already heard it, checked it and found it to be a falsity. Either completely false or a misrepresentation of the truth.

I am not convinced that the visitor was young.

They said they had a child.

What seems to happen is that some people get just enough information to find something credible. Like the whole uterus transplant rabbit hole, or the its a vagina because someone can stick a penis into it.

Whoever they are, they are operating on sound bites being fed to them and a heap of other people and considering it is expert knowledge. Hence the demeaning and belittling that keeps coming such as 'how do you not know this' exclaimations.

Reader: we don't know 'this' because it was misinformation. We have already heard it, checked it and found it to be a falsity. Either completely false or a misrepresentation of the truth.

So many of them will smugly say 'educate yourself!' and come out with the ageist and sexist assumption that we didn't have any science education to speak of. They are, of course, very wrong there. It's obvious many posters here have really advanced understanding of biology and especially sex and genetics. My science education consists of O level Biology grade B from 1977 but I don't think any of the fundamentals of genetics and reproduction I was taught back then have changed, or it would have been headline news all over the world and led to a Nobel Prize.

As in so many other fields, you need a certain base level of knowledge to grasp how little you really know and understand and to appreciate how much the experts know. I remember that numpty Sarah Palin giving a speech about wasteful government funding where she expressed amazement that there was funding for research into fruitflies. Even I know that they are absolutely fundamental to research in lots of areas because their reproductive cycle is very short so you can see how something goes through many generations in a matter of weeks.

Thank you. Pales in comparison to the terrible things that many of the women here have gone through, but I just wanted to say it. Living with a female reproductive system is so much more than having a hole between our legs and it is really the most vile misogyny to reduce it to such.

A neovagina has more in common with the hole my cat made in my arm yesterday than with my actual vagina. Both will close up eventually and are not meant to be there.

Also, AmpleScroller's obsession with sexual stimulation is ew.

Certainly the non-trans women who have a vaginoplasty procedure following cancer treatment appreciate your thoughts.

And those women have nothing to do with male people who have a cavity inserted in their groin that is never going to be a vagina.

It is an act of misogyny to force team those female cancer sufferers with male people who have that cavity inserted in their groin and call it any type of vagina.

And those women have nothing to do with male people who have a cavity inserted in their groin that is never going to be a vagina.

It is an act of misogyny to force team those female cancer sufferers with male people who have that cavity inserted in their groin and call it any type of vagina.

Quite. Women who, having suffered from cancer, require or want reconstructive surgery to treat something that was already there, without the presence of which they would not have got that type of cancer, cannot be compared to men creating holes that go to nowhere, made out of their cock or colon.

The clue is in the RE. you cannot RE construct something that was never there.

Drawing that comparison is vile but then I should expect that from uber misogynist onepostwonder.

This is certainly a belief within the larger sex essentialist value system.

Well where does this gaping wound go? Amd what's it there for?

Well, firstly it ceases to be a wound when the tissue heals. Sex realist ideas about vaginoplasty are wrong in so many ways. It serves no one to attempt to clarify reality, as they will continue to create their own stories.

What’s it for?