Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

The Nick Wallis wrote up of Graham Linehan’s retrial deserves its own thread as it’s so interesting. Also quite barking mad.

250 replies

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 01/05/2026 07:15

https://genderblog.net/glinner-rides-again/

I knew a lot of this but the machinations exposed clearly are fascinating.

(it’s probably been linked 20 pages deep in another thread but…)

Glinner Rides Again

or: Day 1 of Graham Linehan’s appeal against his conviction for criminal damage at Southwark Crown Court Another day, another London court – Graham Linehan on arrival this morning The first a…

https://genderblog.net/glinner-rides-again/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
FaithHopeCarnage · 03/05/2026 18:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

thirdfiddle · 03/05/2026 19:12

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I wonder how glinner's private detective idea is going. Obviously won't expect that to be answered if it is ongoing, private investigation works better in private. Anything on here from the time? Twitter is so chaotic I doubt I'd be able to track any organized digging.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 03/05/2026 19:42

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

RoyalCorgi · 03/05/2026 20:13

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SabrinaThwaite · 03/05/2026 20:19

Filters can do strange and wonderful things.

The Nick Wallis wrote up of Graham Linehan’s retrial deserves its own thread as it’s so interesting. Also quite barking mad.
The Nick Wallis wrote up of Graham Linehan’s retrial deserves its own thread as it’s so interesting. Also quite barking mad.
DeanElderberry · 03/05/2026 20:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

DeanElderberry · 03/05/2026 20:26

Apols for unladylike terminology, he doesn't bring out the best in me.

SabrinaThwaite · 03/05/2026 20:37

The Fruit Farmers have picked up on the CH stuff again today (although I think it’s going round in circles).

And Glinner on X apparently has an evidence bundle re Tarquin.

AccordingToWhom · 03/05/2026 21:29

SabrinaThwaite · 03/05/2026 20:19

Filters can do strange and wonderful things.

Yikes.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 03/05/2026 21:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

thirdfiddle · 04/05/2026 09:58

What an odd bunch. Whatever's the point of it all? Attention seeking?

SpidersAreShitheads · 04/05/2026 19:42

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Do you think that’s the same person as this?

The Nick Wallis wrote up of Graham Linehan’s retrial deserves its own thread as it’s so interesting. Also quite barking mad.
Katasaurus · 04/05/2026 23:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I think this is Brooks's friend, Thomas. He was in the public gallery for the first part of the hearing last week but was then asked to leave because the defence was possibly going to call him as a witness the next day, though in the end they didn't for the same reason they didn't put Fiona McAnena, Maria MacLachlan or Graham himself on the stand - all of whom were originally going to testify in support of the provocation defence (as I understand it).
Happily, they succeeded on the other strand of the defence, which was that they couldn't be sure Graham had been responsible for the supposed damage to Brooks' old phone.
The story concerning Thomas is that Brooks infiltrated a TERF Whatsapp group by claiming to be a female detransitioner and he brought Thomas into that group. They harvested all the phone numbers of women in that group. The woman who was initially conned was devastated when she found out. Btw, she is Russian and she says Brooks speaks fluent Russian. He said he has a Russian grandmother and Lithuanian parents. All the stuff suggesting he's Turkish is a false trail.

Katasaurus · 04/05/2026 23:24

SpidersAreShitheads · 04/05/2026 19:42

Do you think that’s the same person as this?

Show quote history

I don't think this is Thomas. I saw Thomas close-up, this guy looks different and has very different hair.

SpidersAreShitheads · 05/05/2026 00:29

Katasaurus · 04/05/2026 23:24

I don't think this is Thomas. I saw Thomas close-up, this guy looks different and has very different hair.

Show quote history

Yes, looking again I think you’re probably right. This is the other photo I had of that individual, if that helps.

The photo I posted was of another wailing trans identifying male from another recent thread. (Luckily deleted items are accessible for 30 days on Apple!) I briefly wondered if they were one and the same.

The younger ones do all enjoy the brooding, angst-driven vibe though for sure.

The Nick Wallis wrote up of Graham Linehan’s retrial deserves its own thread as it’s so interesting. Also quite barking mad.
Katasaurus · 05/05/2026 00:43

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Emilesgran · 05/05/2026 05:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I don’t think so - I’m all ears!

SabrinaThwaite · 05/05/2026 08:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

BezMills · 05/05/2026 13:06

Who knows. I think the sum total of all his activities will turn out to be ultimately inconsequential. If anything overall I'm going to say the lad is worse than a man short.

Katasaurus · 06/05/2026 22:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

He's not involved with that company. According to my information, he took the name of someone who is involved.

Katasaurus · 06/05/2026 22:31

Emilesgran · 05/05/2026 05:58

I don’t think so - I’m all ears!

Show quote history

I've no idea what I said in the post that was deleted or what rule I broke.

Emilesgran · 06/05/2026 22:46

Katasaurus · 06/05/2026 22:31

I've no idea what I said in the post that was deleted or what rule I broke.

Show quote history

I can’t remember either - wasn’t it about who someone was? Do you not get a copy of the deleted mail when it’s removed?

SabrinaThwaite · 06/05/2026 23:21

Katasaurus · 06/05/2026 22:29

He's not involved with that company. According to my information, he took the name of someone who is involved.

Show quote history

Well that’s not weird and creepy at all.

thirdfiddle · 07/05/2026 00:10

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

thirdfiddle · 07/05/2026 00:11

Deleted post alluded to an alleged incident outside the courtroom, not involving any parties to this case.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page