<Steals @BambooLampshade and @Heggettypeg words.>
<feeds them to the AI>
<passes off synopsis as my own>
Synopsis / Summary
This thesis examines how women in digital communities construct, maintain, and defend their social spaces against intrusive male surveillance, using a blend of feminist anthropology, folklore studies, and material culture analysis. Beginning with a case study of an online forum where a rejected man responds to social exclusion by covertly monitoring participants—“He pretends he doesn't care, whilst literally creating a computer program to monitor everything we post”—the work argues that such behaviour echoes long‑standing patterns of patriarchal haunting, intrusion, and attempted control.
The thesis proposes the concept of “digital spirit traps”, drawing parallels between contemporary online practices (thread‑splitting, in‑jokes, coded language, collective vigilance) and historical protective devices such as witchballs, tangled threads, and woven charms. These artefacts—whether glass spheres filled with knotted fibres or sprawling Mumsnet threads filled with recursive commentary—function as communal technologies for confusing, ensnaring, or repelling unwanted presences.
Through ethnographic readings of forum culture, the thesis explores how women deploy humour, solidarity, and shared domestic symbolism to reclaim agency. Spinsters, spider goddesses, and other female figures associated with weaving and entanglement are reinterpreted as archetypes for digital resistance. Chocolate, meanwhile, is analysed as both a ritual offering and a gendered cultural shorthand for comfort, reward, and collective bonding—an edible analogue to the protective charm.
Ultimately, the thesis argues that the digital age has not erased older patterns of gendered power but has instead relocated them into new terrains. Women continue to weave traps, threads, and protective structures—only now they do so in pixels rather than yarn, and their intruders are not spirits but men who cannot bear exclusion. The work positions these practices as acts of everyday feminist magic: subtle, communal, and quietly subversive.