Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Scope is punishing women for wrongthink - Whole choir cancelled from London Marathon because of personal GC views of one person

315 replies

singthing · 24/04/2026 16:18

Choir dropped from London Marathon over founder’s ‘gender-critical views’
Charity cancels singers who raise runners’ spirits owing to Janet Murray’s opposition to gender ideology

A choir has been dropped from the London Marathon over a member’s gender-critical views.

The Singing Striders are frequently booked to stand on the sidelines and raise the spirits of runners, and the group had been invited to support the upcoming marathon by Scope, a leading disability charity.

However, the amateur ensemble was dropped because a single member had been critical of gender ideology.

This is the view that gender is defined by self-identification, rather than biological sex, meaning that those born male can become women.

Janet Murray, the choir founder, was informed that her opposition to this worldview went against Scope’s “commitment to diversity and inclusion”.

Charity bosses also told her “we are concerned about your views because we don’t agree with your views”.

As a writer and journalist, Murray has publicly expressed concerns about the inclusion of biological males in women’s sports and organisations such as Girlguiding.

It is understood that the decision to cancel the choir, which was to perform for no fee, came after Scope received two anonymous complaints about these opinions.

The charity has since defended its stance as it is “committed to the equality and inclusion of trans and non-binary disabled people”.

Janet Murray, the writer
Murray says it is ironic that Scope should bring politics into a space that was simply about supporting charity runners Credit: Belinda Jiao
Ms Murray told The Telegraph: “When cancel culture finds its way into something as joyful as a choir singing for marathon runners, it’s a sobering reminder of how insidious it can be.

“My choir exists to lift people up, helping them through the hardest moments as they raise money for charity. I’ve run the London Marathon myself, and I know how much that support means.”

The writer said that while she did have gender-critical views, they did not enter into her work with the choir, adding: “I leave politics at home when I’m with the choir – and so does everyone else.

“Ironically, it’s Scope that’s brought politics into a space that was simply about supporting charity runners – effectively silencing a choir in the process.”

The cancellation came despite the Singing Striders performing for Scope at past marathons without incident.

The London Marathon has several “cheer points” along the route to boost the morale of runners, and Scope has two dedicated spaces this year, at Tower Hill and Woolwich

The London Marathon will take place on Sunday
The London Marathon will take place on Sunday Credit: Karwai Tang/WireImage
The Singing Striders were set to raise a chorus at the mile-three cheer point in Woolwich, performing from 8.30am to 1pm, with minor expenses for travel covered by Scope.

The choir had practised for months ahead of the marathon, and members were understood to be surprised and disappointed by the decision, and hopeful that an organisation might come forward to offer them a space at the event on Sunday.

Critics of gender ideology have been subjected to cancellation since the issue of transgender identities emerged into public consciousness, with figures such as Graham Linehan, the Father Ted co-writer, being an early victim of censoriousness.

Graham Linehan on the trans debate and new Father Ted material
Read more
In 2024, the debate shifted again when the Cass review cautioned against rushing children into life-changing gender transitions, particularly with the use of potentially harmful puberty blockers.

Scope has defended its decision to cancel the marathon choir, stating that the move “reflects where we stand as an organisation and our commitment to our colleagues, volunteers and supporters”.

John McLachlan, Scope’s chief executive, said: “Concerns were raised to us about the views of the founder and director of Singing Striders, a choir who were due to volunteer to perform for us at the London Marathon. After consideration, we took the decision to not have their choir perform on our behalf.

“We understand and respect the right for people to hold different views about inclusion. At Scope, we are committed to the equality and inclusion of trans and non-binary disabled people. We have trans and non-binary colleagues, volunteers and supporters.

“Scope is committed to equality and inclusion. Our EDI policy sets out our commitment to be an inclusive employer and inclusive charity.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/24/choir-dropped-london-marathon-founder-gender-critical-views/
https://archive.ph/LXP0N

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/24/choir-dropped-london-marathon-founder-gender-critical-views

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
DrBlackbird · 25/04/2026 14:36

TeflonBoot · 25/04/2026 07:52

Another example of how things get destroyed when infected by trans ideology. I'll be so glad when it eventually dies out.

Its not likely to die out, because… men… but I’ll be grateful when women are allowed to reclaim our rights and the words that define us and when health and educational professionals stop transing perfectly healthy children and teenagers. Even that will take a long time as it’s been taking root insidiously but carefully and deliberately.

BusyAzureTraybake · 25/04/2026 14:31

AreYouSureAskedNaomi · 25/04/2026 14:10

It's not only spiteful... I see it as a warning to everyone, to encourage them to ostracise those with GC views...

Could there be a witch gender critical woman in your community? Do not associate with these undesirables. Seek them out, flush tem out, banish them. Otherwise we will find them and you will suffer, too

The other choir members might be GC, indifferent, blissfully unaware or committed TRAs. It doesn't matter. They are all paying the same price. They are collateral damage in the eyes of the cause.

The collective punishment side of this is one of the main reasons why Scope's actions are so shocking.

I would go further and say it is a direct message to the rest of the choir. Get rid of your leader. Punish her for wrongthink. Banish her from something she values and enjoys.
The rest of the story is 'what will the choir members do now?'.

Mumofteenandtween · 25/04/2026 14:27

Direct debit cancelled. Just about to send them an email to tell them why. I’m sure they do not want my bigoted money anyway.

Augarden · 25/04/2026 14:13

"Charity bosses also told her “we are concerned about your views because we don’t agree with your views”."

This is so pathetic, I'm surprised they would actually put it so plainly

SqueakyDinosaur · 25/04/2026 14:11

I noticed in the interview with the marathon event director that he only mentioned transwomen and not transmen when he talked about non-elite runners picking their category. It really is #allaboutthemenz, isn't it?

AreYouSureAskedNaomi · 25/04/2026 14:10

socialdilemmawhattodo · 25/04/2026 10:54

Please do if you feel able to. The choir singers have given up a lot of their time to support Scope, this year and in the past and to cancel at such short notice is spiteful. Is the choir female only - sorry can't remember

It's not only spiteful... I see it as a warning to everyone, to encourage them to ostracise those with GC views...

Could there be a witch gender critical woman in your community? Do not associate with these undesirables. Seek them out, flush tem out, banish them. Otherwise we will find them and you will suffer, too

The other choir members might be GC, indifferent, blissfully unaware or committed TRAs. It doesn't matter. They are all paying the same price. They are collateral damage in the eyes of the cause.

The collective punishment side of this is one of the main reasons why Scope's actions are so shocking.

BusyAzureTraybake · 25/04/2026 13:40

LightDrizzle · 25/04/2026 12:25

Hi!

It’s The Sequel Trust
https://www.thesequaltrust.org.uk/ this is the one that helps with assisted communication.

Another good hands on charity that provides mobility aids is the MobilityTrust https://mobilitytrust.org.uk/meet-the-team/

I don’t actually have a Direct Debit with the latter but not for any good reason.

A lot of people don’t realise that people don’t automatically get the wheelchairs or accessibility aids they need or the best available. I find the idea that someone might only have access to an eye-gaze screen at school and not at home or vice versa quite obscene. These charities step in where NHS or Social Care provision falls short.

A typical example is a lad who had a wheelchair, but it was manual and basic because he has limited weight bearing ability, but he couldn’t keep up with his mates at school and out and about out of school, my husband was involved in an organisation which contributed to the cost of a power assisted chair that also raised and lowered so he could interact face to face with people too, - psychologically very different to always looking up at people who have to look down at you if they are standing. These things are very, very, expensive but can make a huge difference to quality of life.

Thanks for this. I've had a quick look at them and they both seem to be doing excellent, practical work instead of political grandstanding.

I know that there is a place for political advocacy, but for a lot of charities nowadays that is all they seem to do. Practical help for people who need it gets relegated to an 'online community' link.

soupycustard · 25/04/2026 13:35

Following on from @LightDrizzle , there is also a charity called Get Kids Going that provides good and/or quite specialised wheelchairs. I must say I haven't looked into their gender views, but they are a good charity because, unlike Scope and numerous other very wishy-washy organisations, they're super-focused on one thing and do that thing with commitment. They have helped young para-athletes, as an example.

LightDrizzle · 25/04/2026 12:25

BusyAzureTraybake · 24/04/2026 18:21

Thanks for this. Would you consider naming that charity on here? Some women might like to switch the Scope donations that they are cancelling to the charity that you support.

Hi!

It’s The Sequel Trust
https://www.thesequaltrust.org.uk/ this is the one that helps with assisted communication.

Another good hands on charity that provides mobility aids is the MobilityTrust https://mobilitytrust.org.uk/meet-the-team/

I don’t actually have a Direct Debit with the latter but not for any good reason.

A lot of people don’t realise that people don’t automatically get the wheelchairs or accessibility aids they need or the best available. I find the idea that someone might only have access to an eye-gaze screen at school and not at home or vice versa quite obscene. These charities step in where NHS or Social Care provision falls short.

A typical example is a lad who had a wheelchair, but it was manual and basic because he has limited weight bearing ability, but he couldn’t keep up with his mates at school and out and about out of school, my husband was involved in an organisation which contributed to the cost of a power assisted chair that also raised and lowered so he could interact face to face with people too, - psychologically very different to always looking up at people who have to look down at you if they are standing. These things are very, very, expensive but can make a huge difference to quality of life.

Communication Aids | Electronic Communication Aid | Sequal Trust

The Sequal Trust is a communication disability charity that provides funding towards communication aids for people living with disabilities across the UK.

https://www.thesequaltrust.org.uk

NeverDropYourMooncup · 25/04/2026 12:21

socialdilemmawhattodo · 25/04/2026 10:54

Please do if you feel able to. The choir singers have given up a lot of their time to support Scope, this year and in the past and to cancel at such short notice is spiteful. Is the choir female only - sorry can't remember

If the choir is female only, somebody's going to be singing the Tenor and (high) Bass parts. TransSATB, as it were. So they'd be discriminating against people who are publicly subverting gender stereotypes in Music, wouldn't they?

Justme56 · 25/04/2026 11:57

I’d be interested to know how many females who call themselves NB or for a matter of fact some who call themselves TMs, would want a male giving them intimate care if they truly had a choice. It’s never really brought up.

nicepotoftea · 25/04/2026 11:50

socialdilemmawhattodo · 25/04/2026 10:42

Normally I have a massive issue with drag - can't bear it. But that was a very personal story and very relevant to the charity and the support it has given that family. So seems OK in that context.

Scope demonstrating that they are happy to include people who promote something (drag) that is offensive to some people, as long as the people who are offended are women.

99bottlesofkombucha · 25/04/2026 11:41

SCOPEismisogynistic · 25/04/2026 11:17

He isn’t in drag all the time so he is choosing woman face and they’re supporting it.

No one is in drag all the time, isn’t that part of the definition of drag?

SCOPEismisogynistic · 25/04/2026 11:17

socialdilemmawhattodo · 25/04/2026 10:42

Normally I have a massive issue with drag - can't bear it. But that was a very personal story and very relevant to the charity and the support it has given that family. So seems OK in that context.

He isn’t in drag all the time so he is choosing woman face and they’re supporting it.

Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 25/04/2026 11:02

this will be another charity who will be bleating about falling donations, because the boys in high heels can’t drum up that much money ( and they are saving for a new negligee, anyway)

AlexaStopAlexaNo · 25/04/2026 10:57

socialdilemmawhattodo · 25/04/2026 10:42

Normally I have a massive issue with drag - can't bear it. But that was a very personal story and very relevant to the charity and the support it has given that family. So seems OK in that context.

I agree, and charities often choose high profile or affluent runners for events like this, because of the sheer amounts they’re likely to raise.

Pyjamatimenow · 25/04/2026 10:56

BusyAzureTraybake · 25/04/2026 08:39

The article is on the Sport's page. Try this:

https://archive.ph/K0yCR

Thank you

socialdilemmawhattodo · 25/04/2026 10:54

SisterBliss · 25/04/2026 08:54

We’ve had an all staff email about this with links to our employee assistance programme and other wellbeing resourses saying something along the lines of ‘this is may be difficult for colleagues, especially our trans and non binary colleagues’

but not women obviously.

I’m going to flag this to HR on Monday. Also going to request some clarity on the statement about ‘how views are communicated’ and what ‘alienating others’ actually means.

Please do if you feel able to. The choir singers have given up a lot of their time to support Scope, this year and in the past and to cancel at such short notice is spiteful. Is the choir female only - sorry can't remember

BusyAzureTraybake · 25/04/2026 10:53

socialdilemmawhattodo · 25/04/2026 10:42

Normally I have a massive issue with drag - can't bear it. But that was a very personal story and very relevant to the charity and the support it has given that family. So seems OK in that context.

I agree. Though I do look at drag now and just see 'womanface'.

socialdilemmawhattodo · 25/04/2026 10:42

bonfireoftheverities · 25/04/2026 07:39

Normally I have a massive issue with drag - can't bear it. But that was a very personal story and very relevant to the charity and the support it has given that family. So seems OK in that context.

MarieDeGournay · 25/04/2026 10:40

Very well said SCOPEismisogynistic!

I think there's an important role for detailed, well-argued complaints like yours, but also for more succinct emails about how Scope is insultingly - and arguably illegally - dismissive of women, and is losing support as a result, and has shown itself to be spiteful, small-minded and petty.

It probably wouldn't be a great look to sue a charity like Scope. We've looked under the bonnet, and know what's in there, but the general public probably just think it's one of those admirable organisations who help those poor disabled folk, bless..

Publicly dismantling their facade of 'inclusivity' might be a better option - Nick Wallis is doing a good job so far!

SCOPEismisogynistic · 25/04/2026 10:28

Name changed as email was linked to
my IRL name

Dear Scope,

FAO Interim CEO and Board

I am a disability advocate with significant experience in front line work as a carer for adults with autism in a residential setting and other employment, running a key department for a disabled Charity and now as a parent for a child with a significant disability.

Your stance taken today to exclude a choir because one person has sex realist views is shocking - when one considers the implication.

If a parent requests same sex care for their disabled child due to safeguarding concerns would Scope have more regard for the feelings of trans identified colleagues or non-binary people rather than the legal and legitimate rights of the child. Would I be excluded from services because I would object to a biological male who asserts a trans identity providing intimate care to my vulnerable child? I hold sex realistic views - do you not want my financial support or me as a service user.

Non binary is not a protected status in law. Gender recognition has status in some limited circumstances. Sex based rights and disabled rights are protected in law.

Your board and interim CEO would do well to consider the rights of women and children to single sex spaces and single sex care. Those experiencing gender dysphoria require support and care - but you are a charity focused on the rights of those with disabilities. Your priority is to your charitable aims and your service users.

I went on but fuck these misogynists. Taking women’s money and then pissing all over them.

singthing · 25/04/2026 10:27

BusyAzureTraybake · 25/04/2026 10:09

Nick Wallis:
It’s really weird to see a disability charity openly admit they are practising unlawful discrimination simply because… they want to be spiteful? Nice one
@scope. Keep thinking you’re the good guys.

https://x.com/nickwallis/status/2047929515821666503

This reply tweet made me laugh

"I wonder if they support people who say they are trans disabled."

Scope want to hang their petard, then may they also be hung by it.

OP posts:
NotMyRealAccount · 25/04/2026 10:24

TWETMIRF · 25/04/2026 09:50

I'm sure the nasty, non compliant women in the choir were planning to sing 'If a person has a penis he's a man' and that's the issue. It can't be a ban for no reason, right?

#InclusionMeansExcludingWomen

As a marathon participant, I'm now contemplating getting across to the side of the road at the Scope support points and belting out a tuneless rendition of, "If a person has a penis he's a man." But the likelihood of being able to pick them out among the crowds is small.

99bottlesofkombucha · 25/04/2026 10:21

spannasaurus · 25/04/2026 10:16

One of the replies to Nick's post pointed to Scope's EDI page which lists the PCs ' for religion/belief it says

Religion or belief (including no region or belief). Any expression of religious or philosophical beliefs must be in line with Scope’s policies and values.

So do they think the EA only gives protection for beliefs if they align with the employers/service providers beliefs

That’s … a little bit at odds with this statement then! And illegal of course…

Scope is punishing women for wrongthink - Whole choir cancelled from London Marathon because of personal GC views of one person