Suzie Eddie Izzard

If he was going to have them, my guess would be surrogacy.

He is a complete dicksplat of a man.

🍌💦

I think Eddie needs to read exactly what he said. He's a heterosexual man in a dress. He's acting out a fetish in public. I'm really so cheesed off with all of this. Beam me up Scotty!

He has many many problems. Thinking putting a dress and lippy on makes him a woman being amongst them.

I am trans, but I fancy women, I've always fancied women, never fancied boys or men, it just doesn't work for me

So an ordinary heterosexual male sex fetishist then. With ordinary male privilege, eg to threaten teenage girls who object to finding him in the women’s toilets.

Nothing says 'I'm a man' like choosing to become a parent in your 60s, does it Suzyeddy?

In fairness, the Daily Mail headline is a bit clickbaity.

The quote from the article says:

"Izzard spoke to Gyles Brandreth on the Rosebud podcast and said: 'I would be very happy to have children. But at the moment it's not there. Never say never.'
She added: 'I am trans, but I fancy women, I've always fancied women, never fancied boys or men, it just doesn't work for me.' While discussing her love life and hopes for the future, Eddie admitted that she is not actively looking for love right now because she is 'happy' in her own company."

And the other comment was:

"In the podcast chat Mine said to her: 'Of course you're gonna be impacted by your mom's passing forever. You know, we just move with the grief and it becomes part of us one way. But yeah. Do you feel like, so you don't have your own children do you or family...?' Suzy replied: 'No, I would, I would like to have them but umm...' "

So it doesn't really sound as if Eddie is actively setting out to have children in any meaningful way. He is many things, but stupid isn't one of them. I would hope - perhaps naively! - that he would recognise how deeply immoral it would be to have a child in his mid-60s. Either way, he's single at the moment and not even looking for a relationship so hopefully this is all just wishful thinking on his part and nothing more.

Very interesting though, isn't it? I can't think of a woman who would be entertaining having a baby in her mid-60s. So handy for Eddie that he can switch between "girl mode" and "boy mode" as the needs arise. Isn't that just the perfect example of womanhood.....not.

He!

I think she has problems to address and one of them is thinking that she can either have a baby or adopt a baby at 64. Practically and morally it would be wrong.

Who wants a parent 64 years older than them? Such a stupid and selfish idea. It's ridiculous whoever you are.