Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Not again! - Government is proposing to allow trans-identifying boys into under 18s girls’ school sport - unless it is deemed unsafe

213 replies

Another2Cats · 06/04/2026 10:29

Very much as the title. An account I follow on Twitter/X @ SEENinSport posted this tweet.

https://x.com/SportSEENuk/status/2041037786082329070?s=20

Apparently there is an open consultation from the Dept for Education

'Keeping children safe in education: 2026 proposed revisions'

One of these revisions is that schools may choose to allow boys to take part in girls sports. There are also other issues about 'social transitioning'

It says that there are "some" sports that "may" need to be played in single-sex groups from a certain age. Frankly though, I can't think of any school sports that shouldn't be single-sex activities.

Apart from these sort of 'maybe' sports, the new guidance says that schools will need to consider any boys requesting to play in girls sports in light of the advice on "considering requests for support with social transition"

This is from paras 96 and 97 of the draft proposed changes:

96 Some sports may need to be played in single-sex groups from a certain age to ensure children’s safety, and where this is the case there should be no exceptions. In other cases, schools or colleges may have adopted a policy of single-sex sports for reasons related to fairness.

97 Where there are no safety concerns and a child makes a request relating to
how they participate, schools and colleges will need to consider the request in light of the advice on “considering requests for support with social transition”. This means that the school or college would need to take into account all the relevant factors, including whether supporting social transition is overall in the best interests of the child, as well as considering the impact on other children and the aim of creating safe and fair environments for children to participate in PE.

Frankly, the whole thing about even considering "supporting social transition" is entirely wrong, I feel.

Link to the proposed revisions:

https://consult.education.gov.uk/independent-education-and-school-safeguarding-division/keeping-children-safe-in-education-2026-revisions/supporting_documents/keeping_children_safe_in_education_2026_draft_for_consultationpdf-1

.

SEENinSport has suggested the following:

The survey has 41 questions but Q35 is the key one for sport

If you only have a couple of minutes, you can press return for each question till you reach Q35

They also have a link to suggested answers here:

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/67fa41451fd5090aa3fb410b/t/69ceb2a41c966b1fc3a00b94/1775153828864/KCSIE+SEEN+in+Sport+response+Feb+2026+%286%29.pdf

and their website page on the issue is here:

https://www.seeninsport.org/consultation-on-kcsie-2026

The consultation is open until 22nd April and if you wish to contribute your thoughts on any of the questions then the government consultation form is here:

https://consult.education.gov.uk/independent-education-and-school-safeguarding-division/keeping-children-safe-in-education-2026-revisions/consultation/intro/

https://consult.education.gov.uk/independent-education-and-school-safeguarding-division/keeping-children-safe-in-education-2026-revisions/supporting_documents/keeping_children_safe_in_education_2026_draft_for_consultationpdf-1

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Shedmistress · 06/04/2026 18:12

AStonedRose · 06/04/2026 17:55

You have literally just defended a post comparing confused kids to a convicted adult rapist.

Again, it's possible to discuss the issues without resorting to this.

Sensible, reasonable people with nuanced views read these forums. It's quite useful when you show them where you're really coming from.

No that is called 'reaching'.

Again, people are allowed to say what they want. If you think it breaks talk guidelines then report it.

Sensible people know that male should not be in female spaces. And where I am really coming from is pointing out that any male entering a female space is behaving in a predatory fashion. Why shouldn't people compare boys who enter female spaces to rapists, we have no idea what they plan to do?

I've not wavered in this in over a decade, it really is pretty simple to understand.

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 06/04/2026 18:05

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

AStonedRose · 06/04/2026 17:57

HermioneWeasley · 06/04/2026 17:54

On average there is one rape a day in UK schools. God knows how many sexual assaults. Of course teenage boys are a threat to girls and there is no evidence that the subset of male who claim a female identity are less risk. In fact there’s quite a lot to say they have a higher rate of sexual offending the other males.

So, yes, you're defending mocking confused trans kids by comparing them to adult rapists.

AStonedRose · 06/04/2026 17:55

Shedmistress · 06/04/2026 17:51

Any male who invades female spaces is a potential threat and a risk to women and girls. It is predatory behaviour through and through.

I don't defend or support anything anyone else says, they have a right to say what they want.

You have literally just defended a post comparing confused kids to a convicted adult rapist.

Again, it's possible to discuss the issues without resorting to this.

Sensible, reasonable people with nuanced views read these forums. It's quite useful when you show them where you're really coming from.

HermioneWeasley · 06/04/2026 17:54

AStonedRose · 06/04/2026 17:45

Comparing trans kids to Isla Bryson - which the poster is obviously doing - is hateful and repellent.

It's possible to debate the issues without stopping to mocking children.

Are you seriously defending that?

Edited

On average there is one rape a day in UK schools. God knows how many sexual assaults. Of course teenage boys are a threat to girls and there is no evidence that the subset of male who claim a female identity are less risk. In fact there’s quite a lot to say they have a higher rate of sexual offending the other males.

Shedmistress · 06/04/2026 17:51

AStonedRose · 06/04/2026 17:45

Comparing trans kids to Isla Bryson - which the poster is obviously doing - is hateful and repellent.

It's possible to debate the issues without stopping to mocking children.

Are you seriously defending that?

Edited

Any male who invades female spaces is a potential threat and a risk to women and girls. It is predatory behaviour through and through.

I don't defend or support anything anyone else says, they have a right to say what they want.

AStonedRose · 06/04/2026 17:45

Shedmistress · 06/04/2026 17:44

Are you saying pink leggings with penis showing is a 'stereotype' of 'trans people'? Or somehow 'mocking' them?

And this is about single sex sports and changing in schools, not an adult yoga class.

Comparing trans kids to Isla Bryson - which the poster is obviously doing - is hateful and repellent.

It's possible to debate the issues without stopping to mocking children.

Are you seriously defending that?

Shedmistress · 06/04/2026 17:44

AStonedRose · 06/04/2026 17:32

This stereotyping and mocking of trans people is fucking offensive.

90%+ of the posts on this forum are basically civil, but every so often the nasty transphobic mask slips.

Every yoga class I've ever been to has been mixed. Never a problem.

Are you saying pink leggings with penis showing is a 'stereotype' of 'trans people'? Or somehow 'mocking' them?

And this is about single sex sports and changing in schools, not an adult yoga class.

AStonedRose · 06/04/2026 17:39

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

So easily rattled...

PrettyDamnCosmic · 06/04/2026 17:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

AStonedRose · 06/04/2026 17:32

KnottyAuty · 06/04/2026 16:49

Im sure he’d look fabulous in “Bryson pink” leggings with his penis on show. Why would they ever mind?

This stereotyping and mocking of trans people is fucking offensive.

90%+ of the posts on this forum are basically civil, but every so often the nasty transphobic mask slips.

Every yoga class I've ever been to has been mixed. Never a problem.

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 06/04/2026 17:08

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

KnottyAuty · 06/04/2026 16:57

InfoSecInTheCity · 06/04/2026 16:45

@MyAmpleSheep my question was whether these new requirements would affect PE classes in general and whether the decisions to allow some boys to self identify as girls for some sports would also mean that those boys would be able to self identify into other aspects of PE that are often sex segregated.

My personal view is that no boys should ever be able to self identify into any provisions, services or sports that have been designated as being for girls only. Just to be explicitly clear.

Yes I do think that covering sensitive topics like puberty in a sex segregated environment is important. Those topics will also be covered in PSHE and science classes, and should be to ensure that consistent information is provided to all children. Having additional sex segregated sessions means that girls can have discussion amongst other girls about what they are actually experiencing or what they can expect to happen. Being able to speak about assaults, and learn tactics to get safe in an environment where they may feel comfortable enough to disclose things that have already happened or may be happening is important.

The converse is true for boys, they also need opportunities to speak about issues that affect only boys with only boys. A girl pretending to be a boy will never experience a wet dream, will never get a surprise boner mid PE lesson and not know what to do, boys may be feeling pressure to be macho or to be protectors due to social messaging that a girl may not have been raised with.

If the government decides that boys can be girls for some sports, will those boys also be considered girls for getting changed and for sex segregated classes and for toilet facilities? Where is the boundary, what are the rules for when they are and when they aren’t girls?

This is a good point so worth saying again and to be raised in any consultation responses:

If the government decides that boys can be girls for some sports, will those boys also be considered girls for getting changed and for sex segregated classes and for toilet facilities? Where is the boundary, what are the rules for when they are and when they aren’t girls?

How can a school socially transition a child so they join the girls’ trampoline class, and then trot off to the boys’ changing room?! It’s going to cause a lot more upset and distress for all sides than just sticking with simple sex based rules at all times. Confusing or what?

KnottyAuty · 06/04/2026 16:49

Pingponghavoc · 06/04/2026 13:41

I think a lot of people think of 'trans kids' as being 7, or someone who the class has known. only as presenting as the opposite sex for the whole of their school life.

What about the 15 year old boys who discovers his inner trans? Why would girls be happy to be in a yoga class with him?

Im sure he’d look fabulous in “Bryson pink” leggings with his penis on show. Why would they ever mind?

InfoSecInTheCity · 06/04/2026 16:45

@MyAmpleSheep my question was whether these new requirements would affect PE classes in general and whether the decisions to allow some boys to self identify as girls for some sports would also mean that those boys would be able to self identify into other aspects of PE that are often sex segregated.

My personal view is that no boys should ever be able to self identify into any provisions, services or sports that have been designated as being for girls only. Just to be explicitly clear.

Yes I do think that covering sensitive topics like puberty in a sex segregated environment is important. Those topics will also be covered in PSHE and science classes, and should be to ensure that consistent information is provided to all children. Having additional sex segregated sessions means that girls can have discussion amongst other girls about what they are actually experiencing or what they can expect to happen. Being able to speak about assaults, and learn tactics to get safe in an environment where they may feel comfortable enough to disclose things that have already happened or may be happening is important.

The converse is true for boys, they also need opportunities to speak about issues that affect only boys with only boys. A girl pretending to be a boy will never experience a wet dream, will never get a surprise boner mid PE lesson and not know what to do, boys may be feeling pressure to be macho or to be protectors due to social messaging that a girl may not have been raised with.

If the government decides that boys can be girls for some sports, will those boys also be considered girls for getting changed and for sex segregated classes and for toilet facilities? Where is the boundary, what are the rules for when they are and when they aren’t girls?

Coatsoff42 · 06/04/2026 16:41

@Another2Cats well this is deeply unequal treatment for ordinary boys/girls then. If the single sex safety and fairness rules suddenly go out of the window for a boy who says he’s a girl and wants to do yoga, but not for any other boy, how is that equal treatment? I can’t see how one risk assessment would be for one boy and one for another? It’s not like it gets fairer, or the girls are less uncomfortable?

I hate people putting girls in a position where they have to pretend everything is ok and just be silently uncomfortable, it’s terrible lesson for life.

MyAmpleSheep · 06/04/2026 16:23

InfoSecInTheCity · 06/04/2026 15:55

I never said that they didn’t, I said that some PE classes were separated by sex, that in those classes these things were discussed. You for whatever reason chose to read that as me saying girls should never learn about condoms and boys should never learn about periods.

It may just be that you have poor comprehension skills or it may be that you have a specific point you’re trying ineffectually to make. I don’t know, but I can go back and read what I wrote and so can you.

I am hard of understanding. Sometimes things need to be spelt out more clearly for me than for others.

Did the girls learn also about condoms? Did they do it while the boys were learning about condoms? When were the boys taught self defence?

Did you mean to say that the girls and boys were both taught about condoms, but separately?

Or is my inference that only girls were taught about self defence and only boys about condoms correct?

If that is correct, do you feel it was a good thing or a bad thing? Has your opinion changed at all since that time?

InfoSecInTheCity · 06/04/2026 15:55

MyAmpleSheep · 06/04/2026 14:35

That’s an argument for boys and girls to learn about condoms and self defence separately. Not an argument that girls don’t need to know about condoms nor that boys don’t need to learn self defence.

Again: Why do girls not need to know about condoms and boys about self defence?

I never said that they didn’t, I said that some PE classes were separated by sex, that in those classes these things were discussed. You for whatever reason chose to read that as me saying girls should never learn about condoms and boys should never learn about periods.

It may just be that you have poor comprehension skills or it may be that you have a specific point you’re trying ineffectually to make. I don’t know, but I can go back and read what I wrote and so can you.

bkclb · 06/04/2026 15:40

MyAmpleSheep · 06/04/2026 13:26

The EA says the only permissible reason to segregate sport is for either or both of safety and fairness. If a school offers segregated sports it has already decided that either fairness or safety will be compromised by mixed sex participation.

The guidance says that fairness can (not must, but can) be overridden as a criterion.

There are two options then:

either it’s suddenly not unfair to allow a cross-sex child to participate in which case the law says in black letter that it must be mixed sex throughout and this policy is moot -

or else that fairness (and it will never be unfair to boys, unfairness to girls) is sacrificed.

If a sport is segregated it must be for a good reason, and must stay so. If it’s possible to make exceptions then it must not be segregated at all.

They will simply say what they have said in the past - it's only one or two transgirls, so it really doesn't make much difference and it's unfair to the transgirls to say no. Or, this particular transgirl isn't that good at sport anyway, etc.

BonfireLady · 06/04/2026 15:34

Kiminki · 06/04/2026 12:44

The only relevant case law is you can only have some thing single sex if you rely on the EA exemptions and in that case it must be single sex. Any case prior to FWS that might suggest different is now dead.

This.

Schools can either apply the single-sex exemption across all PE lessons (as a propionate means of achieving a legitimate aim e.g. it's the only way they can make timetabling work because there are too many sports where mixed-sex participation would be inappropriate) or they could apply it to specific sports only.

Once they've decided how they want to approach it, nobody can socially transition into a sport/lesson that has been classified as single-sex.

My daughters' school made all sports lessons mixed-sex. They tell me that the vast majority of girls hate this, for multiple reasons.

EvelynBeatrice · 06/04/2026 15:25

PrettyDamnCosmic · 06/04/2026 15:07

As I thought. It's just wild speculation.

Yes - once I would have thought the same but, since then I have watched in amazement as ( amongst other things):

  • a senior cabinet minister declares that a man can grow a cervix,
  • the now PM said that it isn’t true that only men have penises
  • a father in the U.K. is actually having to go to court in a judicial review to prevent males having the right to access his daughter’s changing room at school.
Therefore I find myself unable to have any faith in the decency, honesty or common sense of such persons.
OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 06/04/2026 15:11

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

PrettyDamnCosmic · 06/04/2026 15:07

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

As I thought. It's just wild speculation.

Kiminki · 06/04/2026 15:05

And with safety - you have a small slight ten year old boy playing with the girls. At 12 he hits puberty and shoots up to a sturdy 5’10” - at what point do you tell him that the girls no longer need to pretend he is a girl?