Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Zoe Williams in The Guardian on Girl Guides removing Trans Girls

105 replies

Arran2024 · 27/03/2026 15:34

Did she do any research for this article? If so, she should have discovered that it's not as easy as the Guides just "changing their name". It is all about their charitable aims. Anyway, typical pro trans girl inclusion article from ZW.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/mar/27/girlguiding-trans-members-supreme-court?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

Girlguiding didn’t have to do this to its trans members. There was another way | Zoe Williams

Girlguiding’s response to last year’s supreme court ruling is not the humane option – and changes the organisation’s identity, says Guardian columnist Zoe Williams

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/mar/27/girlguiding-trans-members-supreme-court?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
7
99bottlesofkombucha · 29/04/2026 02:25

Pearl69 · 29/03/2026 17:33

I’m a Guiding Leader too. I’m relieved about the ruling but the emails and communication from HQ are embarrassing. All this hand wringing and expensive consulting , yet GGUK don’t even know how many members are affected, For any members that do have to leave, I hope they’ll find their home in Scouts and are happy there.

We to have long waiting lists so I looks the the majority of our parents and carers are ignoring HQ and supporting local Guiders who are just cracking on doing what we do - girl lead activities in a girl only space.

Have you suggested to all the complainers that there’s an opening for them to establish their own group, the girlesque guides would be a suitable name?

LeftieRightsHoarder · 29/04/2026 02:21

Can even ZW really think the problem of boys in Girlguiding would be solved by changing the name to something unisex? When the whole point is that it was set up for girls to flourish in in a male-free space? Is she just pretending to be so dim?

I miss the Guardian. But reading the dishonest nonsense it now spouts is too painful.

LeftieRightsHoarder · 29/04/2026 02:13

GallantKumquat · 27/03/2026 18:43

Setting aside whether Girl Guides could just change their name and their remit to serve both sexes (probably not), the fact is that that's not acceptable to TRAs - what they want is is single sex service that affirms their identities not access to the service itself. Anything less would have drawn just as much criticism from TRAs, and Zoe Williams would dutifully select some other angle to criticise them on.

Exactly.

AccordingToWhom · 28/04/2026 17:13

Why can't they just leave little girls alone ffs!

"If you have a daughter in Girlguiding who says she’s been designing badges, it might be worth asking a few follow-up questions.

Because activists are circulating a template encouraging girls to design badges for Pride month.

These are not official Girlguiding materials, but the work of the group Guiders Against Trans Exclusion (GATE), which opposes the new rules excluding boys - including those who 'identify' as girls - from Girlguiding."

https://x.com/i/status/2049131691533369625

Their Instagram account:

https://www.instagram.com/guidersagainsttransexclusion?igsh=N3h5a2RrOWZxOHk3

Janet Murray (@jan_murray) on X

If you have a daughter in Girlguiding who says she’s been designing badges, it might be worth asking a few follow-up questions. Because activists are circulating a template encouraging girls to design badges for Pride month. These are not official Gi...

https://x.com/i/status/2049131691533369625

AccordingToWhom · 20/04/2026 17:14

Two very concerning men really want to keep boys in the Girl Guides: Sarah Jane Baker and Melissa Poulton (there are videos in the linked tweets).

https://x.com/i/status/2043985420002656661

https://x.com/i/status/2000213911052644704

https://x.com/i/status/2046240887466803551

Zoe Williams in The Guardian on Girl Guides removing Trans Girls
Zoe Williams in The Guardian on Girl Guides removing Trans Girls
Abhannmor · 30/03/2026 17:34

earlyr1ser · 29/03/2026 16:02

Seriously, don't be jealous. I went there and have never met so many psychopaths in one place. A kind of hungry malice stalked the quads: the real-world job market was waiting at the end of the Oxford rainbow, and entitlement doesn't like being forced to compete. Beneath the patina of success, people like ZM are terrified of being cut out of the network - losing their slim footing on the ice-cliff of public opinion. One false step, one failure to mouth the correct opinions, and she'll be another dead climber. And so on she goes, inhaling her own obvious nonsense. Awful fate.

Sounds awful when you put it like that !

MyAmpleSheep · 29/03/2026 21:49

moto748e · 29/03/2026 19:42

TBF, I expect a lot of Sun journalists went to Oxbridge too. it's hardly just the Graun.

I thought Sun journalists were smart people pretending to be stupid. ZW is the other way around.

moto748e · 29/03/2026 19:42

TBF, I expect a lot of Sun journalists went to Oxbridge too. it's hardly just the Graun.

Arran2024 · 29/03/2026 19:38

Thisle · 29/03/2026 07:43

It's such a bad faith piece. It is a single-sex space that has nothing to do with how "gender-neutral" the activities are. The two can and indeed should co-exist. You have to accept her ridiculous beliefs for the whole thing to even vaguely make sense.

@Arran2024 Maybe, but not inevitably, I went to a girls' (state, Catholic) school for the majority of my secondary education and it has had very much the opposite effect on me.

I do read and often still enjoy the Guardian but last year I googled as many of the regular writers as I could to see where they were educated and was really shocked to see that only a tiny minority didn't go to Oxbridge. Not in line with their branding at all and I resent some of these people preaching to me honestly when I feel like I am far more in touch with the actual world than they are.

She has made some comments about her school - something like "you think all girl spaces are kind?!"

OP posts:
Carla786 · 29/03/2026 18:20

moto748e · 29/03/2026 18:15

The thing is, they should just fully lean in to being TERFy

Not while Viner's in charge, I think.

Depressing a female editor is the one enforcing this rubbish...

Carla786 · 29/03/2026 18:20

Thisle · 29/03/2026 07:43

It's such a bad faith piece. It is a single-sex space that has nothing to do with how "gender-neutral" the activities are. The two can and indeed should co-exist. You have to accept her ridiculous beliefs for the whole thing to even vaguely make sense.

@Arran2024 Maybe, but not inevitably, I went to a girls' (state, Catholic) school for the majority of my secondary education and it has had very much the opposite effect on me.

I do read and often still enjoy the Guardian but last year I googled as many of the regular writers as I could to see where they were educated and was really shocked to see that only a tiny minority didn't go to Oxbridge. Not in line with their branding at all and I resent some of these people preaching to me honestly when I feel like I am far more in touch with the actual world than they are.

Yes, I like Marina Hyde usually but I was surprised to find out she's the daughter of a baronet. Wonder how many others there are...🤔

Carla786 · 29/03/2026 18:16

moggerhanger · 27/03/2026 19:47

The excellent Audrey Ludwig made this comment - hard agree

Good point about Roma girls. Like boys, they are often withdrawn from school earlier and overlooked so guides being open could potentially be very helpful to some who could go

moto748e · 29/03/2026 18:15

The thing is, they should just fully lean in to being TERFy

Not while Viner's in charge, I think.

Carla786 · 29/03/2026 18:11

moggerhanger · 27/03/2026 17:08

Oh agreed - but it's the Guardian, hence my mild surprise.

To be fair the Guardian did have journalists like Bindel, Freeman, Moore, Sodha who all stuck up for women, only 3 of those were driven out by TRAs.
The thing is, they should just fully lean in to being TERFy. At the moment they're pleasing no one. If you go on trans reddit, they hate the Guardian & BBC due to a few critical things being published by each.

Pearl69 · 29/03/2026 17:33

Easterbunnyaddict · 28/03/2026 20:07

I'm a Guiding volunteer. I am delighted about this ruling however, due to all the hand wringing and appeasing language from Girlguiding, I certainly don't feel I'm openly able to celebrate this. The fact that they don't have numbers to say how many boys/men this will effect means that it's such a small percentage. Again why are we, as women, wasting our time on this issue when the mental health of our girls is at an all time low? Also the waiting list in our area is huge so it's not putting parents/guardians off! Would be interesting to see how many defect to Scouts. No way I want to run a Cubs session!

I’m a Guiding Leader too. I’m relieved about the ruling but the emails and communication from HQ are embarrassing. All this hand wringing and expensive consulting , yet GGUK don’t even know how many members are affected, For any members that do have to leave, I hope they’ll find their home in Scouts and are happy there.

We to have long waiting lists so I looks the the majority of our parents and carers are ignoring HQ and supporting local Guiders who are just cracking on doing what we do - girl lead activities in a girl only space.

SinnerBoy · 29/03/2026 17:15

moto748e · 28/03/2026 02:22

I saw this earlier on SM, my comment was, 'Zoe speaks her branes again'. Even back in the days when I was happily a Guardian reader, she was never taken seriously by most readers, I think.

Remember the Other Place, where she was referred to universally as Woe Zilliams? I must say, every point I'd thought of has already been made here.

Particularly just changing the name and refusing point blank to consider girls, whi want a boy free space.

She's Queen Chump.

LadyMonicaBaddingham · 29/03/2026 16:58

trans girls she spelt boys wrong.

Tigerbalmshark · 29/03/2026 16:44

moto748e · 28/03/2026 02:22

I saw this earlier on SM, my comment was, 'Zoe speaks her branes again'. Even back in the days when I was happily a Guardian reader, she was never taken seriously by most readers, I think.

Reminds me of “send us your reckons”. She’s completely uninformed but definitely reckons something about it. And for some reason the Guardian is publishing it.

Llamamaman · 29/03/2026 16:35

nauticant · 29/03/2026 16:05

That is borderline child abuse. I read a few of the posts from him and it’s disgusting and that child is going to grow up all shades of fucked up and the parents will blame ‘society’ rather than understand their abuse of their little boy. Who looks like a boy and will continue to do so even more as the years go by. Poor thing.

1984Now · 29/03/2026 16:34

Arran2024 · 28/03/2026 16:52

This came up on my X feed - she actually said this about women's football a few years ago ! https://x.com/BasilTheGreat/status/2037925838117630216?s=20

Imagine, in the world according to Zoe, men's football would not have existed if the women's league had been allowed to continue after WW1. All those miners and brickies and ex-soldiers and machine workers would have been either obligated to watch the women's game, or no game at all. Or well over half of men in the game would never have made it as teams would have predominantly been women.
No wonder Zoe sees no issue with men in women's sport, they're no risk to women, women would always have been on top.
The woman is certifiably insane.

SquallyShowersLater · 29/03/2026 16:34

RoyalCorgi · 29/03/2026 16:27

Yes. But birth certificates are not dramatic enough for people like Williams, who have to conjure up lurid fantasies to support their otherwise weak point. Previously I'd thought it was just the middle-age male pervert trans activists who were getting excited at the thought of genital inspections. Lord knows what is going through Williams's head that she is parroting this stuff.

So for the second time in as many weeks I am forced to ask 'what on earth is the editor at the Guardian actually for?'

The quality of journalism at that rag is beyond shocking.

RoyalCorgi · 29/03/2026 16:27

SquallyShowersLater · 29/03/2026 16:08

A birth certificate is all that's needed, surely? You have to show when your child starts school, so it's not that much of an imposition.

Yes. But birth certificates are not dramatic enough for people like Williams, who have to conjure up lurid fantasies to support their otherwise weak point. Previously I'd thought it was just the middle-age male pervert trans activists who were getting excited at the thought of genital inspections. Lord knows what is going through Williams's head that she is parroting this stuff.

1984Now · 29/03/2026 16:26

Bertiebiscuit · 29/03/2026 16:03

Damned right! 👌💐💐💐💐

I mean, I get it that the dead hand of the likes of Ian Dunt and Otto English keep flogging this dead horse, but what is it with Zoe? Is this really the fate of midwits in the media from her perspective that has to be identical to misogynists like Dunt and English? She has no humility at all.

Llamamaman · 29/03/2026 16:10

I was a guardian read but stopped about 5 years ago, precisely because of rubbish such as this. My family stopped reading it too. It’ll be over soon id imagine at the rate they’re haemorrhaging readers.

SquallyShowersLater · 29/03/2026 16:08

Toseland · 27/03/2026 16:10

“Will volunteers be expected to carry out additional checks or ask for proof?” (The good news, folks, is that they won’t; the mind boggles at what those additional checks might be that didn’t breach at least some safeguarding protocols.)"
Zoe suggesting genital inspections! She's a full on transactivist and knows all the pathetic arguments! Idiot.

A birth certificate is all that's needed, surely? You have to show when your child starts school, so it's not that much of an imposition.

Swipe left for the next trending thread