Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

International Olympic Committee announcement today! Will it be regarding female sports?

370 replies

Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 12:41

The IOC is making an announcement today. Here is the Youtube link for the live stream.

15.15 UK time. Let's hope it is the speculated announcement that they have decided to exclude any male person who has undergone androgenisation at puberty.

https://t.co/rm06rZDB0u

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
Bobblebottle · 26/03/2026 14:25

Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 14:12

From memory, any Olympic sport will need to follow these guidelines at a minimum.

Thanks, that should be interesting to see what happens with Lin Yu Ting

Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 14:23

I really hope so ItsCoolForCats.

I also suspect some player retirements will be announced for FIFA when they finally change the policy.

OP posts:
NotDarkGothicMama · 26/03/2026 14:23

About time. It's a pity this decision has come too late for the women injured or displaced by male athletes.

ItsCoolForCats · 26/03/2026 14:22

I wonder if FIFA will move now?

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 26/03/2026 14:21

ItsCoolForCats · 26/03/2026 14:16

I just saw a clip on Sky News where the reporter must have said biological sex and biological women about 20 times 🤭 Heads will be exploding all over the country at such transphobic language, what with biological sex being such a nebulous category, apparently.

Poor old India Willoughby has had to flee to Germany to escape hearing such hurty words, like No. With any luck they'll stay there.

Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 14:21

I am also going to be watching Sports Australia for their reaction too. I hope that Kieran Perkins will finally acknowledge this.

OP posts:
ItsCoolForCats · 26/03/2026 14:16

I just saw a clip on Sky News where the reporter must have said biological sex and biological women about 20 times 🤭 Heads will be exploding all over the country at such transphobic language, what with biological sex being such a nebulous category, apparently.

WandaSiri · 26/03/2026 14:16

For those asking, the policy is not retroactive.

murasaki · 26/03/2026 14:16

Tiddlywinkly · 26/03/2026 14:13

That's great news. Sadly, a tad late. I assume it's not retrospective?

It won't be. Although they do manage to redistribute medals after time delayed doping violations come to light, so they could.....but they won't.

Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 14:15

Tiddlywinkly · 26/03/2026 14:13

That's great news. Sadly, a tad late. I assume it's not retrospective?

No. It does say it is not in the new policy sadly.

OP posts:
murasaki · 26/03/2026 14:15

The Guardian has picked it up and even says that Khelif has male chromosomes. Took them long enough.

Tiddlywinkly · 26/03/2026 14:13

That's great news. Sadly, a tad late. I assume it's not retrospective?

Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 14:12

Bobblebottle · 26/03/2026 14:09

Does this mean olympic boxing will have to follow these rules or is it still devolved to World Boxing?

From memory, any Olympic sport will need to follow these guidelines at a minimum.

OP posts:
Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 14:10

WandaSiri · 26/03/2026 14:05

Gah.
I'm with you! I hate to be a curmudgeon but I surely male CAIS athletes should also be prohibited from competing in the female category. All males should be because the category is for females.
The policy focuses on the effect of testosterone, but male muscle and skeletal development is still different to female, and confers an advantage - albeit much smaller - regardless of the inability to benefit from testosterone.
This policy is much better and much clearer than the previous dog's dinner but it is still not entirely fair to women and girls. Plus the restriction of its application to elite competition undermines the whole policy.

I suspect that there will be more research and performance reviews about those athlete's performance.

OP posts:
PauliesWalnuts · 26/03/2026 14:09

Fantastic news!

Bobblebottle · 26/03/2026 14:09

Does this mean olympic boxing will have to follow these rules or is it still devolved to World Boxing?

ItsCoolForCats · 26/03/2026 14:06

From what I have seen so far, the policy looks great. I can't see any loopholes. Please let this be the beginning of the way back to sanity for many other orgs.

WandaSiri · 26/03/2026 14:05

nauticant · 26/03/2026 13:43

As I understand things, people with PAIS and CAIS have the SRY gene. Which means this could be a broad and useful prohibition against males in the female category.

Edit: Ahh, should have read more carefully, CAIS will have its own loophole.

Edited

Gah.
I'm with you! I hate to be a curmudgeon but I surely male CAIS athletes should also be prohibited from competing in the female category. All males should be because the category is for females.
The policy focuses on the effect of testosterone, but male muscle and skeletal development is still different to female, and confers an advantage - albeit much smaller - regardless of the inability to benefit from testosterone.
This policy is much better and much clearer than the previous dog's dinner but it is still not entirely fair to women and girls. Plus the restriction of its application to elite competition undermines the whole policy.

TheKeatingFive · 26/03/2026 14:05

Great news.

Helleofabore · 26/03/2026 14:01

This part is also interesting as a summary:

Performance Advantage:

o Consistent with the functional effects of higher circulating testosterone levels, Males have larger and stronger skeletal muscle and bone, larger and stronger hearts, larger lung size, more red blood cells, and lower body fat than Females trained to the equivalent level.

Together these attributes afford Males individual sex-based performance advantages in sports and events that rely on strength, power and/or endurance.

o Female athletes experience performance disadvantages relative to Males, associated with Female anatomy and physiology, that contribute to overall Male performance advantage in sports and events that rely on strength, power and/or endurance. These disadvantages may include, for example, the menstrual cycle, gestation and anatomical differences such as periodic ligament laxity (looseness), wider hips and more breast tissue.

o XY Transgender athletes and athletes with certain XY differences/disorders in sex development (DSD) (as defined in Schedule 1) have anatomical and physiological advantages in line with being Male even as their legal sex, the manner in which they were raised, and/or their gender identity may vary. XY transgender athletes and athletes with XY-DSD typically have testes/testicles and testosterone levels in the Male range. The clear majority are androgen-sensitive, meaning that their bodies are receptive to and make use
of that testosterone during growth and development and throughout their athletic career.

o Androgen-sensitive XY-DSD and XY Transgender athletes retain Male performance advantage due in part to training effects and fixed traits. There is no current evidence that testosterone suppression or gender-affirming hormone treatment eliminates this advantage.

o XY-DSD athletes with Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (CAIS) (defined in Schedule 1) and other rare XY DSDs that do not benefit from the anabolic and/or performance-enhancing effects of testosterone should, on that basis, be included in the Female Category.

• Magnitude of Advantage: At the elite level, the magnitude of the Male performance advantage is different depending on the sport or event:

o There is a 10-12 per cent Male performance advantage in most running and swimming events.

o There is a 20+ per cent Male performance advantage in most throwing and jumping events.

o The Male performance advantage can be greater than 100 per cent in events that involve explosive power, e.g. in collision, lifting and punching sports.

• Variation in Advantage: The extent of the performance advantage (and its implications) varies across sports and events and from occasion to occasion, depending on the athletes involved.

• Safety risks: In contact sports (e.g., individual and team combat, collision, projectile sports), the strength and power differential between Males and Females increases safety risks to Female athletes.

OP posts:
TigTails · 26/03/2026 13:58

Mantrums incoming….

lemonraspberry · 26/03/2026 13:56

Absolutely right. No problem with trans people living their lives but it is their choice and with every choice comes compromise and sacrifice. Their choices must not impinge on others rights.

Their choice to have medical treatment to change their body means they can still compete, but only as their biological sex, not chosen gender.

biwr · 26/03/2026 13:55

it would be good if the male athletes allowed to compete against female athletes, had their medals removed. Winning by cheating isn’t winning.

Brewdug · 26/03/2026 13:54

Women’s category will be ‘limited’ to biological females according to the BBC. What a strange choice of words.

International Olympic Committee announcement today! Will it be regarding female sports?
Swipe left for the next trending thread