Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Bid in Lords to overturn move to decriminalise abortion for women

906 replies

IwantToRetire · 18/03/2026 21:30

A landmark move to decriminalise women terminating their own pregnancies could be overturned as legislation is considered in the House of Lords.

In June, MPs in the Commons voted in favour of decriminalisation, with one saying it would remove the threat of “investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment” of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. ...

But, with the Bill making its way through the Lords, an amendment has been tabled to remove the relevant clause. ...

https://nation.cymru/news/bid-in-lords-to-overturn-move-to-decriminalise-abortion-for-women/

Bid in Lords to overturn move to decriminalise abortion for women

A landmark move to decriminalise women terminating their own pregnancies could be overturned as legislation is considered in the House of Lords. In June, MPs in the Commons voted in favour of decriminalisation, with one saying it would remove the threa...

https://nation.cymru/news/bid-in-lords-to-overturn-move-to-decriminalise-abortion-for-women/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/03/2026 13:06

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:58

I think to be ethically consistent I'd say theoretically there's ground for that.

But in practice that's not a law I'd want there to be some mass movement to pasx now, or enforce. Any woman trying to commit suicide while heavily pregnant probably has severe mental health issues, lack of support etc or worse

I feel Carla Foster's case is very unusual also because it was discovered. Often late term abortions are not.

I don't think there should be a focus on hunting down women who perform illegal late term abortions and/or attempt suicide while heavily pregnant. The focus should be on support and prevention. I do think that in cases like Foster's, where the action is found out explicitly, the law has to be enforced.

The focus should be on support and prevention.

Decriminalising her actions is the most reliable legislative approach to enabling support and prevention.

If a woman discloses that she wishes she wasn't pregnant and is signposted to support, then suffers a genuine stillbirth, that disclosure could be interpreted as evidence that she self-aborted. This creates a perverse incentive for her not to make that disclosure and seek that help, increasing the chance of her self-aborting.

OtterlyAstounding · 25/03/2026 13:06

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:58

I think to be ethically consistent I'd say theoretically there's ground for that.

But in practice that's not a law I'd want there to be some mass movement to pasx now, or enforce. Any woman trying to commit suicide while heavily pregnant probably has severe mental health issues, lack of support etc or worse

I feel Carla Foster's case is very unusual also because it was discovered. Often late term abortions are not.

I don't think there should be a focus on hunting down women who perform illegal late term abortions and/or attempt suicide while heavily pregnant. The focus should be on support and prevention. I do think that in cases like Foster's, where the action is found out explicitly, the law has to be enforced.

I agree that more support for vulnerable women, and prevention via better contraception and easier early abortion access, are the important factors in reducing late term self abortions.

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 13:04

Whyohwhyohwhy26 · 25/03/2026 12:54

Nature doesn't demand women keep their pregnancies, you're back to using nature as an excuse to enforce societies Christian patriarchal ideas about life and women's bodies that aren't universal "natural" facts. Women have aborted for thousands of years, planet have been literally used to extinction for that purpose, society doesn't insist that you treat women with disdain and shrug your shoulders and say it doesnt demand the same as men.

ETA cos I asked PP before and I think I asked you and it keeps getting ignored. If you're going to talk about nature giving women the role of pregnancy why won't you address nature giving mens sperm quality such a significant effect of pregnancy and fetal health? And why can't we then enforce men to adjust their lifestyles to support the best possible pregnancy outcomes?

Edited

I've stated several times on this thread that I support abortion within the legal limits.

I don't know why you keep implying that I'm against all or most abortion when I've never said that.
Most abortions are not beyond the legal limits.

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 13:00

Whyohwhyohwhy26 · 25/03/2026 12:54

Nature doesn't demand women keep their pregnancies, you're back to using nature as an excuse to enforce societies Christian patriarchal ideas about life and women's bodies that aren't universal "natural" facts. Women have aborted for thousands of years, planet have been literally used to extinction for that purpose, society doesn't insist that you treat women with disdain and shrug your shoulders and say it doesnt demand the same as men.

ETA cos I asked PP before and I think I asked you and it keeps getting ignored. If you're going to talk about nature giving women the role of pregnancy why won't you address nature giving mens sperm quality such a significant effect of pregnancy and fetal health? And why can't we then enforce men to adjust their lifestyles to support the best possible pregnancy outcomes?

Edited

A lot of men make poor health choices that affect sperm quality too. That's bad...

But I don't suppprt criminalising that. Or criminalising pregnant women for drinking or smoking

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/03/2026 12:59

Whyohwhyohwhy26 · 25/03/2026 12:54

Nature doesn't demand women keep their pregnancies, you're back to using nature as an excuse to enforce societies Christian patriarchal ideas about life and women's bodies that aren't universal "natural" facts. Women have aborted for thousands of years, planet have been literally used to extinction for that purpose, society doesn't insist that you treat women with disdain and shrug your shoulders and say it doesnt demand the same as men.

ETA cos I asked PP before and I think I asked you and it keeps getting ignored. If you're going to talk about nature giving women the role of pregnancy why won't you address nature giving mens sperm quality such a significant effect of pregnancy and fetal health? And why can't we then enforce men to adjust their lifestyles to support the best possible pregnancy outcomes?

Edited

planet [sic] have been literally used to extinction for that purpose

The plant was known to the Romans as sylphium, and yes, it was harvested to extinction for use as a abortifacient.

Whyohwhyohwhy26 · 25/03/2026 12:59

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/03/2026 12:27

The time limits refer to the ability of HCPs to perform abortions. What women do to themselves is decriminalised at all stages of pregnancy in NI.

I am really sick of having to explain this distinction.

It's exhausting isn't it that people want to argue about legislation they refuse to read even when you kindly explain it to them against and again.

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:58

OtterlyAstounding · 25/03/2026 12:42

Wait, so are you saying that you think a pregnant woman (past 24 weeks) should be charged with a crime if she attempts suicide?

I think to be ethically consistent I'd say theoretically there's ground for that.

But in practice that's not a law I'd want there to be some mass movement to pasx now, or enforce. Any woman trying to commit suicide while heavily pregnant probably has severe mental health issues, lack of support etc or worse

I feel Carla Foster's case is very unusual also because it was discovered. Often late term abortions are not.

I don't think there should be a focus on hunting down women who perform illegal late term abortions and/or attempt suicide while heavily pregnant. The focus should be on support and prevention. I do think that in cases like Foster's, where the action is found out explicitly, the law has to be enforced.

OtterlyAstounding · 25/03/2026 12:57

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:51

It's not misogyny : misogyny would be if women were always charged whether pregnant or not.
.
Men can't get pregnant. That doesn't mean that to be fair, laws should disregard pregnancy entirely.
Like it or not, (and I'd agree that nature is a bastard to women reproductive-wise in several ways), women can carry another life iside them, and that life has value too when it becomes viable in particular.

It is the hatred of women to decide that women should not have control over how others' use their body, while simultaneously ensuring that any infringement on bodily autonomy that might affect men as well - no matter how minor - is considered utterly anathema.

You cannot argue it isn't misogyny when people are trying to say that yes, children should die for lack of blood or marrow because you can't force men and women to be jabbed with a needle....but of course you can force a woman to be pregnant for months and become a mother - otherwise a viable life might die!

The idea of putting a woman on trial for trying to kill herself while heavily pregnant is so bleakly awful that I almost have to laugh. She's so mentally disordered or utterly desperate that she thinks dying is better than living, and so the government's clever plan is to...make her life even more abjectly miserable?

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/03/2026 12:57

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:51

It's not misogyny : misogyny would be if women were always charged whether pregnant or not.
.
Men can't get pregnant. That doesn't mean that to be fair, laws should disregard pregnancy entirely.
Like it or not, (and I'd agree that nature is a bastard to women reproductive-wise in several ways), women can carry another life iside them, and that life has value too when it becomes viable in particular.

It's misogyny to treat women worse than men in law, whether it's because we happen to be pregnant right now or for any other reason.

Whyohwhyohwhy26 · 25/03/2026 12:54

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:51

It's not misogyny : misogyny would be if women were always charged whether pregnant or not.
.
Men can't get pregnant. That doesn't mean that to be fair, laws should disregard pregnancy entirely.
Like it or not, (and I'd agree that nature is a bastard to women reproductive-wise in several ways), women can carry another life iside them, and that life has value too when it becomes viable in particular.

Nature doesn't demand women keep their pregnancies, you're back to using nature as an excuse to enforce societies Christian patriarchal ideas about life and women's bodies that aren't universal "natural" facts. Women have aborted for thousands of years, planet have been literally used to extinction for that purpose, society doesn't insist that you treat women with disdain and shrug your shoulders and say it doesnt demand the same as men.

ETA cos I asked PP before and I think I asked you and it keeps getting ignored. If you're going to talk about nature giving women the role of pregnancy why won't you address nature giving mens sperm quality such a significant effect of pregnancy and fetal health? And why can't we then enforce men to adjust their lifestyles to support the best possible pregnancy outcomes?

Whyohwhyohwhy26 · 25/03/2026 12:52

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:21

It benefits society because she tool a viable life, and that can't be acceptable. There has to be some consequences for that, legally.

No you're gonna have to go deeper on that. She is a mother to more than one child,.one with additional leads. Where is the benefit to society of prosecuting her to lock her up away from her children for longer than a man who commits a violent crime?

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:51

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/03/2026 12:39

Can you not see the glaring misogyny inherent in having a law where a man attempts suicide and has committed no crime, but a woman attempts suicide and can be charged because she's pregnant?

It's not misogyny : misogyny would be if women were always charged whether pregnant or not.
.
Men can't get pregnant. That doesn't mean that to be fair, laws should disregard pregnancy entirely.
Like it or not, (and I'd agree that nature is a bastard to women reproductive-wise in several ways), women can carry another life iside them, and that life has value too when it becomes viable in particular.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/03/2026 12:49

OtterlyAstounding · 25/03/2026 12:42

Wait, so are you saying that you think a pregnant woman (past 24 weeks) should be charged with a crime if she attempts suicide?

The lack of critical thinking displayed on this thread is how "foetal endangerment" laws get on the statute books and women end up in court after enduring a stillbirth.

It's alarming, very very alarming.

Whyohwhyohwhy26 · 25/03/2026 12:46

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:03

I didn't say it out of the blue, I was commenting on what another poster said.

I know in response to their very reasonable point about consent to add your opinion that consent to sex is consent to pregnancy. It doesn't need to be put of the blue to be worrying and wrong.

OtterlyAstounding · 25/03/2026 12:42

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:33

Hmm....well to be ethically consistent, I think a woman who attempts suicide could be charged if she is past 24 weeks. Terrible situation... 😢 Surely this not very common? I suspect most common in DV situations.

Wait, so are you saying that you think a pregnant woman (past 24 weeks) should be charged with a crime if she attempts suicide?

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/03/2026 12:39

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:33

Hmm....well to be ethically consistent, I think a woman who attempts suicide could be charged if she is past 24 weeks. Terrible situation... 😢 Surely this not very common? I suspect most common in DV situations.

Can you not see the glaring misogyny inherent in having a law where a man attempts suicide and has committed no crime, but a woman attempts suicide and can be charged because she's pregnant?

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/03/2026 12:35

OtterlyAstounding · 25/03/2026 12:26

Is a miscarriage or stillbirth manslaughter, then? Or if a woman takes a substance or does something she knows could harm the foetus, is she endangering or abusing a child?

Personally, I see little point in criminalising someone for something that could be dealt with via a health based approach.

There are US states in which women face legal sanction for "foetal endangerment".

Personally, I see little point in criminalising someone for something that could be dealt with via a health based approach.

Exactly. We don't criminalise people for taking drugs, only for possessing or supplying them, because we recognise that the benefit of people who have taken drugs being able to attend hospital without fearing arrest trumps the benefit of punishing people for taking drugs.

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:33

OtterlyAstounding · 25/03/2026 12:28

Yes, I mean attempted (although technically, one can commit illegal acts and then kill themselves before they're charged, eg. Murder-suicide).

Hmm....well to be ethically consistent, I think a woman who attempts suicide could be charged if she is past 24 weeks. Terrible situation... 😢 Surely this not very common? I suspect most common in DV situations.

OtterlyAstounding · 25/03/2026 12:32

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:28

Miscarriages and stillbirth are usually not something people want to induce. Especially as we have safe abortion available.

Taking a substance like alcohol won't take the foetus' life.

I also differentiate between a viable foetus and one in the earlier stages.

And manslaughter isn't something people want to cause either, or it'd be murder. It's an accidental death. So how is that different to a stillbirth where the woman's choices may have had an ill effect on the foetus and contributed to the death? If killing a viable foetus is comparable to murder in your opinion, would accidental death not be comparable to manslaughter?

Would drinking any alcohol whatsoever be child abuse? Caffeine? Smoking? Vaping?

OtterlyAstounding · 25/03/2026 12:28

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:20

No it's not. If a woman commits suicide she cannot be charged for obvious reasons. Unless you mean attempted suicide?

Yes, I mean attempted (although technically, one can commit illegal acts and then kill themselves before they're charged, eg. Murder-suicide).

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:28

OtterlyAstounding · 25/03/2026 12:26

Is a miscarriage or stillbirth manslaughter, then? Or if a woman takes a substance or does something she knows could harm the foetus, is she endangering or abusing a child?

Personally, I see little point in criminalising someone for something that could be dealt with via a health based approach.

Miscarriages and stillbirth are usually not something people want to induce. Especially as we have safe abortion available.

Taking a substance like alcohol won't take the foetus' life.

I also differentiate between a viable foetus and one in the earlier stages.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/03/2026 12:27

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:19

I don't think this is accurate about NI though. Abortion beyond 24 weeks is only legal there in cases of severe foetal abnormality or danger to mother's life. Their laws doesn't seem to be hugely different from the rest of the UK.

The time limits refer to the ability of HCPs to perform abortions. What women do to themselves is decriminalised at all stages of pregnancy in NI.

I am really sick of having to explain this distinction.

OtterlyAstounding · 25/03/2026 12:26

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:21

It benefits society because she tool a viable life, and that can't be acceptable. There has to be some consequences for that, legally.

Is a miscarriage or stillbirth manslaughter, then? Or if a woman takes a substance or does something she knows could harm the foetus, is she endangering or abusing a child?

Personally, I see little point in criminalising someone for something that could be dealt with via a health based approach.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/03/2026 12:24

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:20

No it's not. If a woman commits suicide she cannot be charged for obvious reasons. Unless you mean attempted suicide?

We decriminalised attempted suicide for good reasons.

It's counter-productive to criminalise self-induced abortion when attempted suicide is decriminalised for pregnant women. It creates a perverse incentive for a pregnant woman to attempt suicide to avoid giving birth.

Carla786 · 25/03/2026 12:21

OtterlyAstounding · 25/03/2026 12:14

But how does it benefit society, or her, or the victim's family (also her, as well as her existing children who she apparently cared for well, and an ex boyfriend who wasn't in the scene), to criminalise her?

It benefits society because she tool a viable life, and that can't be acceptable. There has to be some consequences for that, legally.