Kellie-Jay Keen (AKA Posie Parker) removed from IWD event by police

Well, despite transwomen being in a very small minority, I have never been assaulted by a man but I have been assaulted by a transwoman. We were alone together in a single sex women's dormitory at a youth hostel, long before transwomen were allowed to use them. He was pretending to be a woman and I had just unknowingly changed into my nightwear in front of him. It wasn't a sexual assault, but it came out of the blue and was shocking enough. When the police interviewed me they told me that he had also been reported as exposing himself to a young girl in a ladies' public toilet.
I'm sure you're right that there are a lot of cases of mental illness etc, and strangely enough that doesn't make me any keener to welcome those men into women's spaces.

Condoning the sexist idea that the difference between men and women is fundamentally mental rather than physical is disrespectful to everyone.

Addressing people as they prefer to be addressed only works if they pick neutral or non-pre-existing terms. Addressing them as something they are not but someone else is is an act of appropriation. It is exercising social power over their target group.

You are indulging your friend's sexist ideas about men and women in the belief that his needs are more important. It is not ok.

He is not here. So it isn't about respect is it?

Why do you feel the need to call him 'she' when he isn't even watching or listening?

It isn't about waiting until you are assaulted or threatened personally, is it? It is about the reason we have single sex spaces in the first place.

I find this utterly bizarre. He looks and talks like a man, there is nothing about him that suggests on iota that he even might be 'identifying' as another other than a man. He is huge. He is dressed in normal male clothes. It is absolutely crazy that you are calling him 'her'

Theres been an employment tribunal running this week where an employer’s trans inclusive policy extended to expecting women to accept trans identifying males in the open plan showers at their workplace. If you worked there, how comfortable would you feel using those showers at the same time as your friend?

Because it's respectful to treat people with respect? Transpeople have a really difficult time of it, I suspect there are a lot of people with mental illness and/or neurodiverse conditions within their community, who are trying to change who they are to solve how they feel (whereas you or I might think 'this buzz cut makes me look masculine' but never need to take that thought further because we don't have gender dysphoria).
If any man wanted to go into a women's space to harm a woman or multiple women, I don't think he'd need to dress as a woman to do so: he'd just walk in.
I've only ever been assaulted or threatened by men that identify as men, never had an issue with transwomen.

I was a civil engineer and have a no 4 on the sides and a no 7 on top. I spent half my life on building sites. So that's the introductions sorted.

Regardless of respect, why would anyone in the street look at that video and think 'definitely a she/her'? So why do you? Is he reading this and making notes on you?

FEMALE is NOT a GENDER IDENTITY it's a biological category, you cannot identify as female, your DNA identifies what your sex is, it's not a choice it's a fact. Women=Adult Human Female, your friend is not female therefore he is not a women. She is the female pronoun, your friend is not female so he is not a she.

Then why does he use female sex-based provisions?

I suppose because it's respectful to use a person's preferred pronouns? I've gone through phases of having very short, buzzed hair and I rarely dress in a stereotypically feminine way but even then I would not want to be referred to as he/him/they/them rather than she/her because I am she/her/female, both biologically and as an identity.

Both work but never "in der Kindergarten" despite it being "der Kindergarten". If it were a school (die Schule) however rather than a Kindergarten it would be "in der Schule".

So you know he is a man but for some reason you refer to him as 'her'. Why?

So if not toilets, what are the "women's spaces" that your friend is referring to here?

Q. "Do you go in to women's spaces?"

1:44 "I use women's loads."

https://x.com/judge148/status/1981375479618642085

Why does him saying that he identifies as a woman make it any more acceptable for him to be in women's toilets? And he's clearly been in them.

No, not biologically. Her SEX is male (XY chromosomes) but her GENDER IDENTITY is female.

In dem => im (or not?)

Perhaps you can if you yourself are a male with the same beliefs….

Your friend had the option of refusing to engage.

And after all, many women have not been given a choice about 'consenting' to whether or not they want men in their spaces. I know that's not the same thing, but why should the privilege of consent be given to men and not to women?

You cannot think that man in the video is a woman.

I'm not the person in the video! But my friend should never have been approached, interrogated, and filmed for YouTube (presumably without consent). It's not as if she was there protesting against the tribunal, she was approached by the people filming.

Is it just me or is anyone else thinking that Waheymum and the TIM friend are one and the same?!

Selective question answering and ignoring obvious points to re-iterate the same nonsense from the video. If WM was a friend they might have commented by now on how the video doesn't match what was allegedly reported. Instead they are still wanging on about toilets like the guy in the video....

A least he's going to a men's prison, the fact that they even letting a convicted child rapist declaring himself a women is fucking outrageous.

Not A Women's Crime. 🤬

And to prove the point I was just making in my last post, i've just come across this story:

Ex Met Special Police Constable James Bubb who raped children as young as twelve and now identifies as a woman called Gwyn Samuels will be sent to a male prison.

Now whether he has conveniently started identifying as a woman in the hope of keeping himself from getting a god almighty battering in a men's prison, or whether identifying as a woman is just one strand of his many kinks and predilictions, who can know? But what we do know is that he is a trans identified man we clearly can't afford to have in women's spaces because he is a dangerous sexual predator.

Having watched that conversation between KJK and the extremely large and masculine "friend", who didn't appear even to be attempting to look like a woman, he came across like all the others in one key respect: it had clearly not even occurred to him to think about the affect of his behaviour on women. He had only thought about himself, and couldn't even understand the suggestion that he should consider other people. And it's clear that he has been using women's toilets. He says "I will use the disabled toilet" in the future tense.