Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Kellie-Jay Keen (AKA Posie Parker) removed from IWD event by police

561 replies

ImTooMessyButImTooClean · 06/03/2026 18:02

https://x.com/theposieparker/status/2029940578528473283?s=46&t=p6GESSn09HWHVXYgTLIbJg

“My removal from the international women’s day event by the police.

I had been asking women’s organisations whether their services were for women only. This caused alarm and distress and the venue, claimed to be privately owned when it’s owned by the council, asked me to leave for asking questions.

I have footage of every interaction that I will upload later so you can see what those questions were and you can judge for yourself.”

Kellie-Jay Keen (@ThePosieParker) on X

My removal from the international women’s day event by the police. I had been asking women’s organisations whether their services were for women only. This caused alarm and distress and the venue, claimed to be privately owned when it’s owned by the...

https://x.com/theposieparker/status/2029940578528473283?s=46&t=p6GESSn09HWHVXYgTLIbJg

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
Datun · 07/03/2026 11:02

MissScarletInTheBedroom · 07/03/2026 07:04

Personally, I've no time for Posie Parker or for those who support her and I'm pleased to hear that Nottingham police took this stance.
This is not about silencing women, however much some people - including Paker herself - would like to believe it is; it's about the removal of a deeply repugnant figure who uses her platform to spread hate-speech.

Parker is infamous for her aggressive right-wing stance, her repeated praise of far-right figures such as Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (Tommy Robinson), and her ties to white supremacy groups and ideologies (she has repeatedly written for right-wing publications such as The Spectator, is on friendly terms with neo-Nazi and holocaust denier Hans Jørgen Lysglimt Johansen, was interviewed by the far-right network Soldiers of Christ Online, and used a Barbie doll wearing a Nazi uniform as her profile picture on the social media site Spinster).
And those are just a tiny handful of examples; a full breakdown of her associations to the far-right would require an entire thread. Probably several.

Where anti-trans and women's rights are concerned, she's no less controversial.

Jean Hatchet, a genuine GC advocate and activist, cut all ties with Parker over her neo-facist affiliations.

Her hostile behaviour is so bad that Woman's Place UK - itself a group opposed to gender self-identification for trans people - had to cut links to Parker citing "her stated views on race and religion" as the reason.
Under pressure, that same group had to reiterate their continued distance from her in 2022 when they supplied evidence of her racist social media posts as continued justifcation for their position.

And let us not forget the overwhelming global opposition to the hate she spreads. After her Australian rally was attended by a large number of neo-Nazis (and not just ideologically; actual Nazi saluting neo-Nazis), her subsequent attempt to hold rallies in New Zealand was met with such opposition that Parker - rightly in my view - was compelled to leave the country.

So, in summation, I repeat that we should be very careful tying ourselves to figures like this simply because one aspect of what they're saying aligns with our personal beliefs.
She is not a champion of women's rights. She is a hate-filled, neo-Nazi sympathising, racist who feeds off controversy and then cries foul when society in general says "No, we are not going to accept you in our community".

lol.

... and yet, and yet, men still aren't allowed in women spaces

TempestTost · 07/03/2026 10:48

Shithotlawyer · 07/03/2026 10:39

If you are trans and you also believe in the God of the bible then yeah, you also have to believe God hates you! Why would someone be offended by having that pointed out?

You may think it's morally ok to have gender fluidity - fine. You can think that trans rights are human rights, and/or you can acknowledge issues about equity and access to rights in a currently patriarchal society. Or you can think the Christian view is correct, and men and women should behave according to the 2k year old book, with the guy who is the epitome of patriarchy, on pain of God's displeasure.

It is logically impossible to think both.

What?

No Christian has to think God hates them, even the most horrific criminal. That's actually the opposite of what Christianity teaches.

So no, not illogical on that account anyway.

climbintheback · 07/03/2026 10:46

Waheymum · 06/03/2026 19:53

Good! She verbally abused a close friend of mine that happens to be transgender a while ago and really damaged my friend's mental mental wellbeing. I think there are ways to protest without verbal abuse of individuals.

sheesh what a bloody wallflower - did she have the temerity to call him a man!

Imnobody4 · 07/03/2026 10:39

Oh dear! I almost feel sorry for the poor bloke. The Assistant PCC is a disgrace.

The assistant PCC won’t speak to me and her comms officer can’t string a sentence together.

https://x.com/i/status/2029942906153242721

Kellie-Jay Keen (@ThePosieParker) on X

The assistant PCC won’t speak to me and her comms officer can’t string a sentence together.

https://x.com/i/status/2029942906153242721

Shithotlawyer · 07/03/2026 10:39

If you are trans and you also believe in the God of the bible then yeah, you also have to believe God hates you! Why would someone be offended by having that pointed out?

You may think it's morally ok to have gender fluidity - fine. You can think that trans rights are human rights, and/or you can acknowledge issues about equity and access to rights in a currently patriarchal society. Or you can think the Christian view is correct, and men and women should behave according to the 2k year old book, with the guy who is the epitome of patriarchy, on pain of God's displeasure.

It is logically impossible to think both.

Helleofabore · 07/03/2026 10:39

I did question why we were ‘closeted’… 😁

EvangelineTheNightStar · 07/03/2026 10:29

Ah x POSTED with @Helleofabore
(edited from spellchecks closeted! 😳)

EvangelineTheNightStar · 07/03/2026 10:29

Walkden · 07/03/2026 10:18

"Why should a person not want to explain the policies of the group or organisation they support on camera"

Yes because no one has ever been sidelined in their position / been subject to discrimination / fired from their role or has to go to tribunals or court due to their views on "inclusiveness"....

Why would their work/support group take them to court or tribunal for enthusiastically speaking about the policies they espouse?

Helleofabore · 07/03/2026 10:28

Walkden · 07/03/2026 10:18

"Why should a person not want to explain the policies of the group or organisation they support on camera"

Yes because no one has ever been sidelined in their position / been subject to discrimination / fired from their role or has to go to tribunals or court due to their views on "inclusiveness"....

Sorry? For explaining the policies of the organisation that they are representing at that time?

Why would the person be subject to any legal action if they are accurately explaining that policy?

Walkden · 07/03/2026 10:25

"Did anyone say that they would happily talk to her but didn't want to be filmed?"

Well she filmed "every interaction" so what they wanted didn't matter apparently....

Shedmistress · 07/03/2026 10:21

Did anyone say that they would happily talk to her but didn't want to be filmed?

Or did they just call the cops?

Walkden · 07/03/2026 10:18

"Why should a person not want to explain the policies of the group or organisation they support on camera"

Yes because no one has ever been sidelined in their position / been subject to discrimination / fired from their role or has to go to tribunals or court due to their views on "inclusiveness"....

EvangelineTheNightStar · 07/03/2026 10:15

Walkden · 07/03/2026 10:11

"You can dislike KJK and still be outraged that she was ejected from a women's event by asking if organisations for women excluded men"

But she was ejected for upsetting other women at the event. She further said she has video records of all these discussions. Perhaps some of those women were unwilling to be filmed and she obviously filmed them anyway. Regardless multiple women must have complained.

Some of these women might have been employed of whatever organisation they were representing and not in charge of deciding policy but still subject to code of conduct etc.

Is that the original aspect of woman or
the brave new world “womxn” for
whom the crime of upsetting them is as pp, responded to with doxxing, threats of violence, rape, beheading?
So POLICE because they’re ‘upset’ but others being upset is fine?

Helleofabore · 07/03/2026 10:13

Walkden · 07/03/2026 10:11

"You can dislike KJK and still be outraged that she was ejected from a women's event by asking if organisations for women excluded men"

But she was ejected for upsetting other women at the event. She further said she has video records of all these discussions. Perhaps some of those women were unwilling to be filmed and she obviously filmed them anyway. Regardless multiple women must have complained.

Some of these women might have been employed of whatever organisation they were representing and not in charge of deciding policy but still subject to code of conduct etc.

Why should a person not want to explain the policies of the group or organisation they support on camera?

Helleofabore · 07/03/2026 10:11

What would be remarkable is if this interaction with a poster’s friend is not on the hundreds of hours of footage that KJK collects. And collects for her own safety as much as for publishing.

Given that she is collecting footage, I also doubt she would ‘abuse’ someone as she has been accused here on this thread. It would also be remarkable that she would have two conversations with a person with a transgender identity where she mentions god and mentions their mother.

And if she has had more than one of these interactions and the one posted is not the one being referred to, what are the chances that it was ‘abusive’ when this one linked to the thread was not.

I think when the term ‘abuse’ is applied to someone being told they are male when they are indeed male, that perhaps the term becomes meaningless

Walkden · 07/03/2026 10:11

"You can dislike KJK and still be outraged that she was ejected from a women's event by asking if organisations for women excluded men"

But she was ejected for upsetting other women at the event. She further said she has video records of all these discussions. Perhaps some of those women were unwilling to be filmed and she obviously filmed them anyway. Regardless multiple women must have complained.

Some of these women might have been employed of whatever organisation they were representing and not in charge of deciding policy but still subject to code of conduct etc.

Lovelyview · 07/03/2026 10:04

Waheymum · 06/03/2026 19:53

Good! She verbally abused a close friend of mine that happens to be transgender a while ago and really damaged my friend's mental mental wellbeing. I think there are ways to protest without verbal abuse of individuals.

Is this the kind of 'verbal abuse' you mean? Because that's just asking a man to leave a women's toilet.https://youtube.com/shorts/zITVOItE2U4?si=ExxyOp_jZeTzE4vq

Helleofabore · 07/03/2026 10:02

FallenSloppyDead4 · 07/03/2026 09:50

Thank you.

So, a LWS rally was allowed to be drowned out on IWD in Nottingham by a group of largely men, but a group of people centring male people effectively. Because let’s face it, when someone yells ‘trans rights are human rights’ it is not really in support of female people with transgender identities who are protected under those rights that protect female people.

What a remarkable day. When male people are centred instead of female people.

Reminds me that Sal Grover had her ticket rejected for a group of male people holding an exclusively male IWD in Australia. Surely they cannot reject someone legitimately purchasing a ticket when you consider lesbians cannot hold female only events there?

soupycustard · 07/03/2026 09:59

EdithStourton · 07/03/2026 08:06

You can dislike KJK and still be outraged that she was ejected from a women's event by asking if organisations for women excluded men.

It strikes me as an entirely reasonable question.

And I wasn't aware that writing for the Spectator is incontrovertible proof that someone is a fascist.

This. Honestly, the absolute silliness of the TRA stance on everything. It's like listening to a 13 year old. Or a 4 year old. (No offence meant to kids!)

MuckSavage · 07/03/2026 09:41

Waheymum · 06/03/2026 19:53

Good! She verbally abused a close friend of mine that happens to be transgender a while ago and really damaged my friend's mental mental wellbeing. I think there are ways to protest without verbal abuse of individuals.

Is this a real friend or one of the voices?

Shedmistress · 07/03/2026 09:38

Nottingham is a quiet stronghold of the WPATH child mutilation network so it is no wonder that they will hold out until the whole shitshow collapses, like the preverbial soldier in the forest. It usually keeps schtum on the topic until KJK shines a spotlight on it.

ETA Although Julie Bindel did sue the NCC for refusing to allow her to speak in a small library a few years back. Not sure any of the other TM approved 'Genuine GC Activists' have ever done anything else there in recent times.

Helleofabore · 07/03/2026 09:35

Soontobe60 · 07/03/2026 09:22

According to the police officer, she caused ‘alarm and distress’ by asking some people of the service they provided were actually single sex services.
Why that would cause anyone alarm or distress is very odd. Surely you’d just answer yes or no? Maybe they were alarmed or distressed at the thought of being outed by KJK if their supposed women only services actually included men in the definition of women.

Yeah, I would think that it is more that they didn’t want their services to be outed as being mixed sex.

FallenSloppyDead4 · 07/03/2026 09:35

Well I'm proud of Nottingham police who have helped to produce a great video clip which will get traction on SM, a thread on MN and peak more people than if they had just ignored KJK.
Seems that the IWD event was run by the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Nottinghamshire, so I can imaging there are going to be questions around their use of the police as bouncers.

Greyskybluesky · 07/03/2026 09:32

Nottingham has a large and vocal anti-women contingent.
The phrase "big units" is appropriate here.
All fully supported by local brain-of-Britain MP Nadia Witless.
Tell me they had nothing to do with this.
They boasted of driving KJK out of town when she did the LWS in Notts.
Which, incidentally, Jean Hatchet was at.

Swipe left for the next trending thread