Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Kellie-Jay Keen (AKA Posie Parker) removed from IWD event by police

561 replies

ImTooMessyButImTooClean · 06/03/2026 18:02

https://x.com/theposieparker/status/2029940578528473283?s=46&t=p6GESSn09HWHVXYgTLIbJg

“My removal from the international women’s day event by the police.

I had been asking women’s organisations whether their services were for women only. This caused alarm and distress and the venue, claimed to be privately owned when it’s owned by the council, asked me to leave for asking questions.

I have footage of every interaction that I will upload later so you can see what those questions were and you can judge for yourself.”

Kellie-Jay Keen (@ThePosieParker) on X

My removal from the international women’s day event by the police. I had been asking women’s organisations whether their services were for women only. This caused alarm and distress and the venue, claimed to be privately owned when it’s owned by the...

https://x.com/theposieparker/status/2029940578528473283?s=46&t=p6GESSn09HWHVXYgTLIbJg

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
MissScarletInTheBedroom · 09/03/2026 12:32

KnottyAuty · 09/03/2026 12:29

LOL that was sarcasm - inference tricky for you?

I take it you have a problem with freedom of speech and space to allow women to discuss their human rights?

I take it you have a problem with freedom of speech and space to allow women to discuss their human rights?

Then you take it incorrectly.

Why do you think that? Please elaborate.

KnottyAuty · 09/03/2026 12:29

MissScarletInTheBedroom · 09/03/2026 09:23

Let's have a rare moment of honesty on MN; Jezebel aren't exactly wrong in taking that view.

LOL that was sarcasm - inference tricky for you?

I take it you have a problem with freedom of speech and space to allow women to discuss their human rights?

MissScarletInTheBedroom · 09/03/2026 12:23

Soontobe60 · 09/03/2026 12:22

It hasn’t been captured at all. In fact, it has been released from the shackles imposed on it in former years by those who demanded everyone to believe that people could change sex - Stonewall in the main.
At the start of the 2020s, subscribers would be warned by MN if they dared say ‘but people can’t change sex, so how can men become women?’. Now we are able to be open, honest and factually correct. Why do you see that as a problem?

Please tell me more. Why do you think that? How did you come to that conclusion? Please post more, much more, about this subject. Thanks 😊

Soontobe60 · 09/03/2026 12:22

MissScarletInTheBedroom · 09/03/2026 11:43

What do you think counts as transphobia, and when do you think MN started to be captured by anti-trans ideology?

Please do answer as I'm genuinely interested. The more engagement the better, regardless of the tone of that engagement.

It hasn’t been captured at all. In fact, it has been released from the shackles imposed on it in former years by those who demanded everyone to believe that people could change sex - Stonewall in the main.
At the start of the 2020s, subscribers would be warned by MN if they dared say ‘but people can’t change sex, so how can men become women?’. Now we are able to be open, honest and factually correct. Why do you see that as a problem?

Gloriia · 09/03/2026 12:17

'when do you think MN started to be captured by anti-trans ideology?'

Why do you think anyone is anti trans? Most if not all support anyone's right to dress as they please but you cannot change sex and then access women's areas. That is not anti trans it is factual.

MissScarletInTheBedroom · 09/03/2026 11:43

EdithStourton · 09/03/2026 11:07

I can't help but feel that your opinion of KJK is coloured by your view of what counts as transphobia.

What do you think counts as transphobia, and when do you think MN started to be captured by anti-trans ideology?

Please do answer as I'm genuinely interested. The more engagement the better, regardless of the tone of that engagement.

Maaate · 09/03/2026 11:42

MissScarletInTheBedroom · 07/03/2026 07:04
Personally, I've no time for Posie Parker or for those who support her

Oh good, does that mean you won't be engaging with this thread...

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 09/03/2026 11:39

ItsNotOrwell · 09/03/2026 09:56

Where did I suggest she is a racist? In any case, I did suggest her Twitter feed. Did you miss that? Or am I supposed to copy and paste mountains of tweets for posters here to then only say, “She didn’t mean that, but this …” I’m not a mug.

Yes, you don't have to copy and paste them all, just enough to make your case, put up or shut up.

Shedmistress · 09/03/2026 11:24

ItsNotOrwell · 09/03/2026 10:37

Hmm - I saw at least one that wasn’t. I wouldn’t say it called for for her removal from the event, but it was far from polite.

Which one are you talking about?

CraftandGlamour · 09/03/2026 11:12

borntobequiet · 09/03/2026 06:19

KJK is well hated by reality deniers, which tells you all you need to know about them.

Saves me typing out exactly the same observation, tah. (Just corrected my own typo: sane thing. Maybe I should have left it)

EdithStourton · 09/03/2026 11:07

MissScarletInTheBedroom · 09/03/2026 09:23

Let's have a rare moment of honesty on MN; Jezebel aren't exactly wrong in taking that view.

I can't help but feel that your opinion of KJK is coloured by your view of what counts as transphobia.

ItsNotOrwell · 09/03/2026 10:37

FemaleAndLearning · 09/03/2026 09:59

All her interactions were recorded and are on her You Tube channel. She was polite and not at all disrespectful. She asked plain English questions. The people chatted to her willingly and with consent.

Hmm - I saw at least one that wasn’t. I wouldn’t say it called for for her removal from the event, but it was far from polite.

Imnobody4 · 09/03/2026 10:14

ItsNotOrwell · 09/03/2026 04:31

Gracious. We can’t discuss KJK on a thread about KJK - it’s “derailing”. We must only discuss KJK in the gentlest, most congratulatory terms.

Do resume discussing KJK while not discussing KJK.

I'm not discussing KJK. I'm discussing the intolerant, unlawful behaviour of the police and the Deputy PCC when questioned about their previous discriminatory behaviour of failing to protect women's right to speak.
I find it ironic that an event for International Women's Day is when this happened. It's a vacuous publicity stunt to hold an event which excludes the views of a huge number of women. That Deputy PCC ain't no feminist.

ThatBlackCat · 09/03/2026 10:11

ItsNotOrwell · 09/03/2026 09:45

Anyone who is being disruptive and disrespectful to others should be removed from events, yes. Not necessarily by police, though. I don’t believe PP was removed because of her opinions, but due to her behaviour and actions.

How does that explain the others that were removed?

FemaleAndLearning · 09/03/2026 09:59

ItsNotOrwell · 09/03/2026 09:45

Anyone who is being disruptive and disrespectful to others should be removed from events, yes. Not necessarily by police, though. I don’t believe PP was removed because of her opinions, but due to her behaviour and actions.

All her interactions were recorded and are on her You Tube channel. She was polite and not at all disrespectful. She asked plain English questions. The people chatted to her willingly and with consent.

MissScarletInTheBedroom · 09/03/2026 09:58

ItsNotOrwell · 09/03/2026 09:45

Anyone who is being disruptive and disrespectful to others should be removed from events, yes. Not necessarily by police, though. I don’t believe PP was removed because of her opinions, but due to her behaviour and actions.

Quite right. And those actions were consistently on form for PP.

ItsNotOrwell · 09/03/2026 09:56

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 09/03/2026 06:08

You're not discussing anything, you casting unsupported aspersions at KJK, the pushback you're getting is because of that. You can make any claims you like, you just need to back them up, you should be able to if you're claims had any merit. Where is your evidence she's a racist?

Where did I suggest she is a racist? In any case, I did suggest her Twitter feed. Did you miss that? Or am I supposed to copy and paste mountains of tweets for posters here to then only say, “She didn’t mean that, but this …” I’m not a mug.

ItsNotOrwell · 09/03/2026 09:45

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/03/2026 06:21

Do you think she should be removed from events by the police @ItsNotOrwell? And how far would you go with that? Who else should be removed from events by the police, just people with unpalatable opinions about Islam?

Anyone who is being disruptive and disrespectful to others should be removed from events, yes. Not necessarily by police, though. I don’t believe PP was removed because of her opinions, but due to her behaviour and actions.

Datun · 09/03/2026 09:29

MissScarletInTheBedroom · 09/03/2026 09:23

Let's have a rare moment of honesty on MN; Jezebel aren't exactly wrong in taking that view.

See that bin in the corner? That's where all the masks that get dropped go. Please clear up after yourself and pop it in there.

climbintheback · 09/03/2026 09:24

She stands up for and fights for women and girls safety she loves her country and sees the crime stats and no go areas and grooming gang issues, housing, schools, GP, dentists and just like millions of us do, even the Government appears to be realising that the next election is lost without changing tack. Whether you like it or not, good on her and good on all the other women (and men) who have stuck their heads up over the parapet at great risk to themselves and their family - and thankyou.

MissScarletInTheBedroom · 09/03/2026 09:23

quantumbutterfly · 09/03/2026 08:09

'a toxic breeding ground for trans phobia?'

How alarming.

Let's have a rare moment of honesty on MN; Jezebel aren't exactly wrong in taking that view.

Shedmistress · 09/03/2026 09:13

Surely the only people that knew she was on a far fight podcast were people....watching far right podcasts?

And I will happily say that I dont care who she spoke to in terms of trying to stop the onslaught of mutilation and castration of kids.

At the time not one centrist or left person would dare mention the issue. So opening up the conversation obviously worked.

Hope that helps.

Datun · 09/03/2026 09:00

The most compelling bit of evidence that KJK is a white nationalist is when she once fiddled with her hoody zip in an interview and made a secret sign with her fingers which was only recognisable to other white nationalists.

She even had the gall to laugh about it afterwards. On TV!

That nailed it, clearly.

ThatBlackCat · 09/03/2026 08:54

MissScarletInTheBedroom · 09/03/2026 07:32

"You only need to browse through her Twitter feed"
Absolutely. The evidence is abundant of KJK's swing to white nationalism.

Unfortunately, some people are either too lazy or, what I suspect is actually happening here, disinclined to undertake any research that contradicts their fragile bias.

Of possible relevance to what may be happening on this thread and forum, in an article that covers KJK's interview with Canadian far-right nationalist Jean-François Gariépy, Jezebel noted - and I quote - "On the British parenting website Mumsnet, which has become a toxic breeding ground for transphobia, many women praised Parker for appearing on Gariépy’s show. One commenter thanked her for “bringing the truth about genderism to a wider audience.” The approval often noted how hateful Gariépy’s ideologies are before setting that concern aside and agreeing that it’s good to spread the word on anti-trans bigotry"

"How did you make the leap"
Because that is precisely the brand of mental gymnastics perpetrated by certain people. When you attack, or even point out, that figures they idolise are not only not what they seem but are in fact the sort of people that should give any sensible, reasonable member of society pause, they react with illogical nonsense such as you mustn't care about the oppression of women if you have a problem with a white-nationalist.
It'd be laughable if it wasn't so pernicious.

You are the one making the assertions. It is up to you to prove your assertions, not up to us to prove/disprove a negative. It is just laziness, or perhaps lies, that means you can't be bothered to back up your assertions with evidence.

quantumbutterfly · 09/03/2026 08:09

'a toxic breeding ground for trans phobia?'

How alarming.

Swipe left for the next trending thread