Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Enby they/them pronouns - what's the law on this?

390 replies

SirChenjins · 03/03/2026 10:08

New person coming into my team who I think may want others to use they/them. I have a standard team signature that I don't want altered, but if my suspicions are correct and she starts bringing her whole enby self to work, where do we stand legally if I or anyone else says nope, not doing that?

I know the moral arguments on each side of the debate so don't want a rehash of the for's and against's, just want to know where I stand in law .

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Shedmistress · 17/03/2026 13:19

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 16/03/2026 08:39

Cheers, I know exactly the difference between sex, gender and sexuality.

Having a trans son who is far more trad 'feminine' than me has been quite the eye-opener, even if I hadn't had a lifetime of being gnc 😁

Being trans or non-binary is just something you are. I do wish transphobic people calling trans women 'blokes in dresses' would understand how reductive that is - because it only adds to their dysphoria & pushes them towards surgery.

Trans boys stop binding at home when they are accepted & respected.

Seriously, why are you all fixated on trans people? They're just normal.

How can someone be 'gender non conforming' if they were 'baffled by the concept of male or female'?

CassOle · 17/03/2026 13:02

Who was that actor who was arrested and kept saying 'I'm trans non-binary!'?

Ezra something. That video was eye-opening.

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 17/03/2026 12:45

Are non-binary people trans? Does it depend on the individual and whether they themselves claim to be trans, as opposed to them "falling under the trans umbrella" whether they think they are or not when they say they are non-binary? None of the ones I know have had their meat and two veg excised, nor their tits removed, nor taken any drugs for it, so they seem to me very much to be leaving their options open and just saying it – with perhaps less permanency than having a tattoo.

I regard this as a thoroughly good thing, because mutilating yourself or setting up lifelong dependencies when you are in your teens is as stupid, to me, as getting yourself hooked on heroin would be.

Davros · 17/03/2026 11:46

Why do people come onto the FWR board and ask why we’re “fixated on trans people”. You’re on the part of MN that was set aside to allow us to do this. If you don’t like it, why not pop onto Home Decoration or Films etc?

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 17/03/2026 09:50

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 15/03/2026 19:08

Uh, yes I am neurodivergent. (So are all my sons. Very common within my family.)

As are a lot of trans & nb people. Probably because they can't mask who they really are.

You don't say "hi, they/them" to someone's face, just when referring to them. I don't say "hi, he/him" to my kid either.

He's just him. Same as I know my step-gran wasn't my real gran, but called her that anyway.

The most common response when I told my friends about the boy's transition was: oh no, what if I mess that up? I reassured them he wouldn't mind accidental deadnaming etc, it's normal. But all of them met him, realised it was no big deal & just stopped worrying.

It's hard to explain, but when someone transitions (by which I mean drop the pretence of who they felt they had to be) it's a huge change. A whole new, totally authentic person is revealed to you. And you realise: this is who they always were. It feels right.

It's the opposite of pretence.

I felt humbled, because my god I wished I'd known earlier. He had been out to his friends for years before telling me. I felt like I'd only ever known a fraction of him.

It's not a case of 'lost a daughter, gained a son'. He is my child, and exactly the same person - except he now trusts me with knowing who he really is.

And being trans is the very least of that. He isn't permanently playing a character - just no longer living a lie. Even though he has had no treatment whatsoever, I see him as...himself. We talk about periods, street harassment, contraception, how to keep himself safe. I'm not buying into a pretence - just accepting reality.

Sorry, that's a lot! But there is nothing to fear from the truth, which is that trans and nb people exist.

As are a lot of trans & nb people. Probably because they can't mask who they really are.

Well that's one theory! 😂

Even though he has had no treatment whatsoever,

Well, you're the lucky parent then, aren't you? That's like saying "my kid told me he's a junkie" and how lovely that he feels authentic and I know all about him now even though he's never taken any heroin whatsoever.

If your son starts taking any "treatment" he'll soon have much bigger problems than authenticity. It's lovely that you talk about periods but do you talk about incontinence? Because if your son thinks about starting testosterone then he needs to think very seriously about that too.

"Deadnaming". Sheesh. What a cruel concept and you and your child have swallowed it whole.

BeSpoonyTurtle · 17/03/2026 09:27

JumpingPumpkin · 03/03/2026 13:20

Back to the legal situation, I think it's unclear where the line exactly is. I think if you use words (even everyday ones like "she") about someone who has specifically asked not to be called she you could be accused of bullying/harassment. If you avoid they and just use her name I think you'd be on fairly safe ground.

Would be worth looking at Audrey Ludwig's feed on X or LinkedIn to see if she has talked about this.
(She's an employment lawyer who is also a sex realist. Definitely worth a follow.
Tanya de Grunwald may also have covered it in her podcasts or LinkedIn posts.

MyAmpleSheep · 16/03/2026 16:03

tokennamechange · 16/03/2026 15:52

again you are picking and choosing. I can guarantee that there are many, many offices in the country whereby if you called the CEO 'smithy' or repeatedly offered Fatimah a biscuit after she had told you please not to, you would be subject to disciplinary proceedings. Which is what OP is actually asking - what is the law? Not 'how much of a twat can I get away with being - legally versus socially?'

I have no idea what you're on about in regard to 'violating their dignity' as that's not something I mentioned, nor (obviously) anything OP's as yet un-met colleague could have had the chance to accuse anyone of. So you're arguing against something nobody has said. Which, on the scale of stupidity, is certainly up there.

Obviously nobody should be made to use someone else's pronouns if they disagree with them. But in a case whereby there's a perfectly simple solution that means you don't have to do that, it would be the person continuing to be awkward just to make a point who should get in trouble.

I can guarantee that there are many, many offices in the country whereby if you called the CEO 'smithy' or repeatedly offered Fatimah a biscuit after she had told you please not to, you would be subject to disciplinary proceedings. Which is what OP is actually asking - what is the law?

That’s part of the point, isn’t it? In consecutive sentences you are conflating what may trigger a disciplinary proceeding, and what the law says. They’re obviously not the same.

tokennamechange · 16/03/2026 15:52

MyAmpleSheep · 06/03/2026 19:55

No.

It doesn't matter how many times I thoughtlessly call Smithy "Mr. Smith" or offer Fatimah a biscuit during Ramadan. I cannot be accused of violating their dignity.

Obviously if I offer the one religious Jewish guy prawn crackers four times a day to wind him up, that's different. But we're not talking about intending to wind someone up by referring to them - not even in their presence! - as "she" instead of "they". Entirely different.

You can't pick and choose parts of the analogy and then call it stupid.

Yes I can. As an analogy it's stupid.

again you are picking and choosing. I can guarantee that there are many, many offices in the country whereby if you called the CEO 'smithy' or repeatedly offered Fatimah a biscuit after she had told you please not to, you would be subject to disciplinary proceedings. Which is what OP is actually asking - what is the law? Not 'how much of a twat can I get away with being - legally versus socially?'

I have no idea what you're on about in regard to 'violating their dignity' as that's not something I mentioned, nor (obviously) anything OP's as yet un-met colleague could have had the chance to accuse anyone of. So you're arguing against something nobody has said. Which, on the scale of stupidity, is certainly up there.

Obviously nobody should be made to use someone else's pronouns if they disagree with them. But in a case whereby there's a perfectly simple solution that means you don't have to do that, it would be the person continuing to be awkward just to make a point who should get in trouble.

SirChenjins · 16/03/2026 15:08

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 16/03/2026 12:51

Smiling tolerance is the way to approach other people's little quirks. We can't all agree about everything at work but we do make allowances for each other. And equally I would expect her to tolerate with a smile quite a high level of forgetfulness about her they/thems. I wouldn't be going legalistic about it, the legal position isn't clear so don't meet trouble halfway.

I agree and I certainly won't be throwing legalise at this from the outset before the issue has even been raised - I've been clear on that. What I've said though is that I'd like to be prepared in case the smiling tolerance approach doesn't work and I start to see any level of compelled speech or intentional inappropriate behaviour from anyone. Forewarned etc, and the cases mentioned have been very helpful.

OP posts:
AmaryllisNightAndDay · 16/03/2026 12:51

Smiling tolerance is the way to approach other people's little quirks. We can't all agree about everything at work but we do make allowances for each other. And equally I would expect her to tolerate with a smile quite a high level of forgetfulness about her they/thems. I wouldn't be going legalistic about it, the legal position isn't clear so don't meet trouble halfway.

SwirlyGates · 16/03/2026 11:01

@TransParentlyAnnoyed This whole thread was started because the OP did not want to be polite and respectful to someone different to them.

Why are trans people/nonbinary people not polite and respectful to us, by not forcing us to play along with their delusions? Every time I have to use "she" for a man, it's a headfuck.

PrettyDamnCosmic · 16/03/2026 10:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/03/2026 10:44

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 16/03/2026 08:39

Cheers, I know exactly the difference between sex, gender and sexuality.

Having a trans son who is far more trad 'feminine' than me has been quite the eye-opener, even if I hadn't had a lifetime of being gnc 😁

Being trans or non-binary is just something you are. I do wish transphobic people calling trans women 'blokes in dresses' would understand how reductive that is - because it only adds to their dysphoria & pushes them towards surgery.

Trans boys stop binding at home when they are accepted & respected.

Seriously, why are you all fixated on trans people? They're just normal.

If that’s directed at me, you specifically told someone that their husband should try out “dressing as a visible trans woman”. As he wouldn’t actually be trans identified, he’d literally be a bloke in a dress wouldn’t he. The fact that I don’t actually make much of a distinction between those two different males is by the by, it was your thought experiment. It seems that post has gone now though, hey ho.

CassOle · 16/03/2026 10:20

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 15/03/2026 23:04

One of my family has severe LD & he can grasp the concept that some people are trans, so please don't give me that ridiculous, ableist excuse for lack of respect.

I can grasp that some people identify as trans. What I cannot do is lie, to the point that I lose the capacity to speak. Lying is a fundamentally disrespectful act, so I have no idea how you can have the brass neck to pretend that it's somehow respectful to do so about a person's sex.

Your ignorance about and denial of the impact of selective mutism is the only ableism on this thread.

Edited

I remember the huge fuss that was made when a girl with Down syndrome couldn't get 'preferred pronouns' correct and ran and hid (from the male who identified as a woman) as she became so distressed by the situation and the 'corrections'. She was absolutely torn apart by the TRAs online, and her disability was, according to them, no excuse.

OldCrone · 16/03/2026 10:07

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 16/03/2026 08:39

Cheers, I know exactly the difference between sex, gender and sexuality.

Having a trans son who is far more trad 'feminine' than me has been quite the eye-opener, even if I hadn't had a lifetime of being gnc 😁

Being trans or non-binary is just something you are. I do wish transphobic people calling trans women 'blokes in dresses' would understand how reductive that is - because it only adds to their dysphoria & pushes them towards surgery.

Trans boys stop binding at home when they are accepted & respected.

Seriously, why are you all fixated on trans people? They're just normal.

Being trans or non-binary is just something you are.

What is it, though?

You say your daughter identifies as trans, but that she's quite feminine, and she is comfortable with her female body. So for her, it's neither about stereotypes nor about dislike of her body. So why does she want to pretend she's a boy? Surely she's just a normal girl with her own personality and interests.

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 16/03/2026 09:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

MyAmpleSheep · 16/03/2026 08:54

I do wish transphobic people calling trans women 'blokes in dresses' would understand how reductive that is

It’s the truth, and more truth - not less - is what we need, to cut through the lies and obfuscations foisted on us.

are you saying there’s something wrong with being a man who wears a dress?

Ronnyfrau · 16/03/2026 08:42

Well sex hasn't evolved. It's still binary.

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 16/03/2026 08:39

OldCrone · 15/03/2026 23:58

But I grew up baffled by the concept of male and female, and never felt I fitted the word 'female'.

You seem to be confusing sex and gender. Female is a sex and it fits you if you have a female body. You say you have children. If you have given birth to children you know you have a female body, so of course you are female.

And you can't be that baffled by the concept of male and female since you obviously knew what you and your male sexual partner needed to do in order to have children.

You can't just opt out of your sex, it's not a choice.

Perhaps you mean that you don't think of yourself as particularly feminine. You have that in common with large numbers of other women, and most of us don't feel the need to give ourselves special labels (or pronouns) or make announcements about it.

Feminine and masculine are genders. Everyone is free to be as masculine or as feminine as they want.

Female and male are sexes. You can't choose or change your sex.

Cheers, I know exactly the difference between sex, gender and sexuality.

Having a trans son who is far more trad 'feminine' than me has been quite the eye-opener, even if I hadn't had a lifetime of being gnc 😁

Being trans or non-binary is just something you are. I do wish transphobic people calling trans women 'blokes in dresses' would understand how reductive that is - because it only adds to their dysphoria & pushes them towards surgery.

Trans boys stop binding at home when they are accepted & respected.

Seriously, why are you all fixated on trans people? They're just normal.

TakingMyChancesWithTheRabbits · 16/03/2026 08:35

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 15/03/2026 19:20

I'm neurodivergent, as are many trans/nb people. And I have no issue with being polite.

One of my family has severe LD & he can grasp the concept that some people are trans, so please don't give me that ridiculous, ableist excuse for lack of respect.

Perhaps you don't remember the previous fight for inclusive language, when more women entered the workplace. My God the pushback against the use of 'chair' and 'chairperson'. The way so many people pronounced "Ms" with audible scorn. Even protesting at Star Trek saying "where no one has gone before."

Language evolves, so does society. It moves to include more people who previously were excluded.

Ableism, homophobia, racism, Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, misogyny and yes, transphobia are tackled at root by inclusive language. Respect for someone different to you costs absolutely nothing. Existence is not violence.

You clearly do have an issue with being polite, as you're not willing to extend consideration to people who have different needs to you if it means going against your political position. The kinds of neurodivergence that you are familiar with aren't the only ones that are relevant here, and using a specific person with learning difficulties that you know doesn't override the impact of your unreasonable expectations on people with other cognitive difficulties, you're just using them as cover for your own ableism, in a similar manner to someone who says "I have a black friend and they don't mind" when told they've done something racist. Repeatedly wanging on about how respect costs absolutely nothing just shows how self-centred you're being, as you still refuse to consider the mental load you're requiring of people, even when posters have shown you examples such as the Stroop Effect, that demonstrate how trying to override automatic recognition processes slows our capacity to complete cognitive tasks.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/03/2026 04:37

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 15/03/2026 19:46

No, being non-binary is very different. I am nb. But I never previously had the words for it.

I still use the word 'woman' to refer to my life, as that's how other people see me.

(Incidentally, being categorised as 'not cis male' is the sole experience all women - cis, trans or nb but female presenting - have in common. It's not babies, periods or feelings - it's fear of misogynistic male violence.)

But I grew up baffled by the concept of male and female, and never felt I fitted the word 'female'. I don't use 'they/them' but am changing to 'Mx' as it just fits me better. I'm overjoyed to discover it's not just me - and support everyone who uses they/them. They're braver than me.

No, the definition of female is not “being afraid of misogynistic male violence” 🙄 so you can shoehorn some men you want to include. It’s a person of the sex which is typically (ie if all is healthy and during that person’s fertile years) the producer of large gametes. As opposed to the male sex which is typically etc the producer of small gametes.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/03/2026 04:27

How do you think any old bloke putting on a dress is anything other than “visible”? Or do you mean he could technically “dress as a trans woman” making zero effort whatsoever to look like a “woman”? Do keep going, it’s great.

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 16/03/2026 02:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 16/03/2026 02:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

OldCrone · 15/03/2026 23:58

TransParentlyAnnoyed · 15/03/2026 19:46

No, being non-binary is very different. I am nb. But I never previously had the words for it.

I still use the word 'woman' to refer to my life, as that's how other people see me.

(Incidentally, being categorised as 'not cis male' is the sole experience all women - cis, trans or nb but female presenting - have in common. It's not babies, periods or feelings - it's fear of misogynistic male violence.)

But I grew up baffled by the concept of male and female, and never felt I fitted the word 'female'. I don't use 'they/them' but am changing to 'Mx' as it just fits me better. I'm overjoyed to discover it's not just me - and support everyone who uses they/them. They're braver than me.

But I grew up baffled by the concept of male and female, and never felt I fitted the word 'female'.

You seem to be confusing sex and gender. Female is a sex and it fits you if you have a female body. You say you have children. If you have given birth to children you know you have a female body, so of course you are female.

And you can't be that baffled by the concept of male and female since you obviously knew what you and your male sexual partner needed to do in order to have children.

You can't just opt out of your sex, it's not a choice.

Perhaps you mean that you don't think of yourself as particularly feminine. You have that in common with large numbers of other women, and most of us don't feel the need to give ourselves special labels (or pronouns) or make announcements about it.

Feminine and masculine are genders. Everyone is free to be as masculine or as feminine as they want.

Female and male are sexes. You can't choose or change your sex.

Swipe left for the next trending thread