Professor who stopped puberty blockers trial has withdrawn because of liking JKR tweets

So I cant quite grasp this.

He took a position on a medical issue based on his medical knowledge, but now because of what he said in tweets, he is no longer medically qualified?

Or they are saying he stopped the puberty trials not for medical reasons but because of his personal believes?

And so has to "recuse" himself.

So he is admitting to one or the other or ???????????

(I hadn't realised that Cathy Newman was such a hand maiden.)

This is enraging.

As it says in that SEEN article posted above, "a medic who understands that sex is real and important has been removed from a role overseeing research on children which intimately concerns biological sex, while others who take a strongly trans affirmative position (publicly so) remain in place."

I hope they uncover a pile of batshit pro-trans posts by the others involved and expose just how captured this whole field of "science" truly is. Every study I have ever seen on this topic has been run by die hard genderists. They get away with ignoring most of their findings and reorganizing their studies to report some teeny tiny, non-clinically relevant benefit in some obscure outcome. Where is the outrage at the obvious bias there?

This is enraging.

As it says in that SEEN article posted above, "a medic who understands that sex is real and important has been removed from a role overseeing research on children which intimately concerns biological sex, while others who take a strongly trans affirmative position (publicly so) remain in place."

I hope they uncover a pile of batshit pro-trans posts by the others involved and expose just how captured this whole field of "science" truly is. Every study I have ever seen on this topic has been run by die hard genderists. They get away with ignoring most of their findings and reorganizing their studies to report some teeny tiny, non-clinically relevant benefit in some obscure outcome. Where is the outrage at the obvious bias there?

The professor who intentionally halted a controversial puberty blockers trial has been withdrawn from any further involvement after accusations of bias.

Professor Jacob George, who was appointed chief medical and scientific officer at the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in January, raised new concerns about the Pathways trial of puberty blockers in February.

Scientists and lawyers have since raised concerns over George's involvement, questioning crucial misunderstandings about clinical trials and medical law.

The professor intervened five months after the trial was approved by his colleagues and more than a month after it was set to start, raising concerns that included participants being as young as 10.

Yet the recent surfacing of a series of social media posts by George indicate a strong gender-critical stance, with an added admiration for JK Rowling.

In the now deleted posts, the professor slated the 'well-meaning idiocy' of the NHS through its denial to adhere to the 'basic biological fact' that gender is set at birth.

Article continues at https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15601843/Professor-stopped-puberty-blockers-trial-withdraws-bias-row-JK-Rowling.html