Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

John Davison BAFTA Tourette’s incident and competing rights

866 replies

slet · 24/02/2026 15:39

It’s interesting how this is being discussed atm. I see Ash Sarkar has framed it as an example of competing rights between disabled people and victims of racism, forgetting about intersectionality. But there is a struggle from those on the extreme left to see how women’s rights are compromised by ceding to TRAs.

not expressing myself very well but thought it had some interesting parallels with the sex and gender debate.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 24/02/2026 20:59

The treatment and criticizing he has come in for just shows how shallow and meaningless their much boasted DEI slogans and virtue signing is. When face with a real situation where kindness was required they totally failed to live up to their to own mantra's.

NewYearSameMe16 · 24/02/2026 20:54

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 24/02/2026 20:46

You think they are immune from offensive tics?! Oh please people watch this fucking film or the documentaries.

Name me a slur he could’ve called an able bodied, straight, Christian/non-religious white man that’s on par with the N word and would’ve caused hurt and humiliation to the people presenting and global outrage? I’ll wait…

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 24/02/2026 20:54

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 20:50

From what I understand, he has been beaten up by plenty of white able bodied men who didn't understand his condition and were offended by his tics.

He has, and been arrested.

DuchessofStaffordshire · 24/02/2026 20:51

OhDear111 · 24/02/2026 20:26

@nicepotoftea So Black people should have excluded themselves? How would that be acceptable? That’s segregation isn’t it and no one would agree to that. Maybe I’m moving towards no “cause” films. It’s all a bit virtue signalling.

But they had the CHOICE to leave and 'segregate' themselves following a warning informing them that he may make offensive tics. He had no CHOICE re the timing or the content of his tic.

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 20:50

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 24/02/2026 20:46

You think they are immune from offensive tics?! Oh please people watch this fucking film or the documentaries.

From what I understand, he has been beaten up by plenty of white able bodied men who didn't understand his condition and were offended by his tics.

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 20:48

OhDear111 · 24/02/2026 20:35

@AccidentallyWesAnderson Yes but the black people were there. It’s inevitable there would be swearing. Not entirely sure it’s completely random - did the situation “suggest” the word?

It wasn't 'random' because the nature of coprolalia is that the person who has the condition says something grossly offensive or inappropriate in the circumstances, hence him saying 'fuck the queen' when being awarded an MBE. In the documentary about his childhood he is filmed in a supermarket shouting that his mother is a slag.

None of that means that he is singling out anyone for abuse.

INeedAPensieve · 24/02/2026 20:47

I think the film is so powerful and basically demonstrates the misunderstanding and intolerance of a totally awful disability. Which then manifested itself at the baftas and the intolerance and misunderstanding has been proven on social media.

Years ago when I was walking down argyle street in Glasgow a man who was jerking about and moving weirdly caught my eye and he shouted at me "I'll rape you with a spiked stick". I was so shocked and upset but then I could see from his demeanor and manner that he didn't mean it, his eyes were teary. I didn't know a bloody thing about tourettes but I immediately understood that what he'd shouted was involuntary and he looked in a lot of pain. I just raised my palm in a kind of 'its ok' gesture and walked on. It was still a shock to hear but my offence did not matter compared to him having to live with that each day. I feel for John, he should not be getting abused on social media. I also feel for the actors, but again, they can do what I did and realise that something like that is not an intent to be bad, it's not. It's a disability. And an awful one at that.

AgentPidge · 24/02/2026 20:47

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 24/02/2026 16:52

Well what you are suggesting IS segregation. Hiding the disabled people away so they don’t upset people. It defeats the whole purpose of the film.

He either "hides himself away" - i.e. doesn't attend - or he turns up, knowing that he is likely to shout out something embarrassing. We know it was the latter, and he says he is deeply humiliated. Neither option is perfect. But it was his choice to attend, and take the risk. I don't think the BBC should be shouldering all the blame here.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 24/02/2026 20:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You think they are immune from offensive tics?! Oh please people watch this fucking film or the documentaries.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 24/02/2026 20:44

OhDear111 · 24/02/2026 20:35

@AccidentallyWesAnderson Yes but the black people were there. It’s inevitable there would be swearing. Not entirely sure it’s completely random - did the situation “suggest” the word?

They should’ve been briefed then on coprolalia, the consequences and then could’ve made an informed decision. Take the malicious intent out of the word, as there wasn’t any.

I’m sure you could’ve looked this up yourself but your brain thinks of the most offensive thing it can say, despite your personal beliefs being the opposite.

Tunnockstester · 24/02/2026 20:41

There couldn't have been a better demonstration of the intolerance shown to sufferers of Tourettes. What happened to tolerance and understanding? What was the point of the film?
Words are only offensive if they are intended.
I hear lots of words I don't like but if they aren't intentionally aimed at me or anyone else, so what.

ticktickticktickBOOM · 24/02/2026 20:39

Wow, this film went completely over the heads of most people.

NewYearSameMe16 · 24/02/2026 20:39

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

OhDear111 · 24/02/2026 20:35

@AccidentallyWesAnderson Yes but the black people were there. It’s inevitable there would be swearing. Not entirely sure it’s completely random - did the situation “suggest” the word?

BuffetTheDietSlayer · 24/02/2026 20:35

OhDear111 · 24/02/2026 20:26

@nicepotoftea So Black people should have excluded themselves? How would that be acceptable? That’s segregation isn’t it and no one would agree to that. Maybe I’m moving towards no “cause” films. It’s all a bit virtue signalling.

You’re ok with suggesting that disabled people should segregate themselves though? Why is that acceptable to you? Why is a film about disability ‘virtue signalling’?

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 20:35

OhDear111 · 24/02/2026 20:26

@nicepotoftea So Black people should have excluded themselves? How would that be acceptable? That’s segregation isn’t it and no one would agree to that. Maybe I’m moving towards no “cause” films. It’s all a bit virtue signalling.

The audience should have been warned in advance and anyone who felt they might me unable to cope with his tics should have excluded themselves.

I do not think that black people are uniquely unable to to cope with people with coprolalia.

DamsonGoldfinch · 24/02/2026 20:32

BlushingBrightly · 24/02/2026 20:20

Richardson?

'Everyone knew' - there are varying accounts of this. Plus Warner Bros immediately raised it as an issue but the BBC broadcast team, one of the most skilled and experienced there is, didn't hear it clearly? OK.

Sorry, Davidson.

Bafta sent a message to all attendees warning them. Everyone who could potentially been offended could have chosen to self exclude. Which basically means anyone who could be potentially slurred.

or they could all act like grown ups.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 24/02/2026 20:31

OhDear111 · 24/02/2026 20:26

@nicepotoftea So Black people should have excluded themselves? How would that be acceptable? That’s segregation isn’t it and no one would agree to that. Maybe I’m moving towards no “cause” films. It’s all a bit virtue signalling.

Well it’s not just black people is it. Tourette’s sufferers don’t know how their tics will manifest. Could be directed at anyone, as the previous documentaries show. Ginger, white, fat, thin. It’s the tics not them.

NewYearSameMe16 · 24/02/2026 20:29

DamsonGoldfinch · 24/02/2026 20:11

Everyone there knew. They’d all been warned.

And the only solution to this is to exclude people with Tourette’s in case they offend someone. Given that Richardson was there because a film that was about him and him life was up for best film award (and won), then he should have been the last person excluded.

instead, the people who thought that they might have hurt feelings because of his disability should have excluded themselves.

A few words were said minutes before the ceremony began; they might’ve thought they’d hear a few swear words but without a proper briefing, if someone shouts the N word at you while you’re on stage presenting an award, I think you would still be totally shocked.

MBJ and DL had as much right to be there as John as their film had 13 nominations and they were presenting.

OhDear111 · 24/02/2026 20:26

@nicepotoftea So Black people should have excluded themselves? How would that be acceptable? That’s segregation isn’t it and no one would agree to that. Maybe I’m moving towards no “cause” films. It’s all a bit virtue signalling.

BuffetTheDietSlayer · 24/02/2026 20:26

@attichoarder What other events/places should a person with Tourettes not attend? Funerals, weddings, school plays, the supermarket, a hospital? Are there any other restrictions you think should be imposed on them?

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 20:25

attichoarder · 24/02/2026 20:22

I think where the language used is so offensive that those who use it should avoid some situations. I think given the reason for attending this ceremony I believe that maybe arrangements could have been made or separate rooms perhaps but I do that there are some cases where someone with Tourette’s which may result is such offensive language should not attend certain events. Not everyone can do everything, if you are blind you can’t drive - fact so there are cases where disability does exclude people and I think this should be another case

So in what kind of situation do you think his presence can be tolerated?

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 20:23

OhDear111 · 24/02/2026 20:19

@BuffetTheDietSlayer It is a balance though isn’t it. I have heard the most upset person is the guy who shouted the word. Sometimes self preservation needs to be considered. This was likely to happen so what did he want? To be upset? Not sure that’s a great outcome for him?

Maybe everyone who thought they might be offended could have excluded themselves?

attichoarder · 24/02/2026 20:22

BuffetTheDietSlayer · 24/02/2026 20:12

So you want people with certain disabilities to not take full part in life?
Its like we’ve not moved on from the thousands of years of oppression, cruelty and segregation that disabled people have faced.

I think where the language used is so offensive that those who use it should avoid some situations. I think given the reason for attending this ceremony I believe that maybe arrangements could have been made or separate rooms perhaps but I do that there are some cases where someone with Tourette’s which may result is such offensive language should not attend certain events. Not everyone can do everything, if you are blind you can’t drive - fact so there are cases where disability does exclude people and I think this should be another case

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 20:22

attichoarder · 24/02/2026 19:52

The discussion of this issue over the past days have been important into raising a number of issues, Tourettes is not fully understood so it has raised awareness, it has also raised the issues of how there are conflict is how we deal with situations where different groups are concerned. I think the OP raises a very interesting point, I had been thinking myself about how this. I was orignially of the view that those at the awards were aware of the issue and therefore give en the film portrayed this maybe should have been aware of this (or made aware etc), however, having listened more to the debate and having thought about how this applies to other groups I have altered my views. I now think that the language used was so offensive and directed at individuals that if it is not possible to refrain from making these comments individuals should not attend, I agree that they might make those comments "in the street" but in this instance it was an event where it was likely to cause stress and there was a possibility of shouting out offensive comments.

I now think that the language used was so offensive and directed at individuals

The nature of his condition is that his tics are very offensive and directed at individuals.

If the Queen could tolerate him shouting 'fuck the Queen' when she was awarding him an MBE, why can't other people, at an awards ceremony featuring a film about his life, be expected to show understanding?