Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

John Davison BAFTA Tourette’s incident and competing rights

866 replies

slet · 24/02/2026 15:39

It’s interesting how this is being discussed atm. I see Ash Sarkar has framed it as an example of competing rights between disabled people and victims of racism, forgetting about intersectionality. But there is a struggle from those on the extreme left to see how women’s rights are compromised by ceding to TRAs.

not expressing myself very well but thought it had some interesting parallels with the sex and gender debate.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
NewYearSameMe16 · 24/02/2026 22:53

BlueEyedBogWitch · 24/02/2026 22:37

‘On your own special night’?

Are they 6?

Are you 6? Choosing to argue over whether the being nominated at the BAFTAs constitutes ‘a special night’ shows you have no response to a valid point, so thanks.

ticktickticktickBOOM · 24/02/2026 22:52

GenderlessVoid · 24/02/2026 22:43

I was trafficked as a child and someone shouting that at me might trigger my PTSD. (Note to whomever hates that word, I learned it from my doctors and psychotherapists. It's a perfectly valid word that accurately describes how certain events, stimuli, or situations can cause the inception or exacerbation of PTSD symptoms.) I know it is deeply hurtful to many black people even if they know the use is not intentional. It still hurts.

I also have Tourettes so I very much understand how verbal tics are involuntary. It reminds me of my PTSD in that both can be set off by external things and I have no control at all over them. I know how I'm prone to blurt out the most mortifying thing I can think of when I'm under stress. It's like the command "don't think of an elephant" leads to thinking of elephants (bc your mind first conjures the thing, then applies the prohibition). I would still feel awful if I blurted it out and would understand that some people are very likely to be hurt by it, even if they understand it was involuntary. If possible, I'd apologize for hurting them but I would also try to educate them about Tourettes and how I had no control over what I blurted out. With luck, they might explain their hurt and both sides would learn something. Or not but I would want to acknowledge that I'd unintentionally hurt them and that their hurt was real.

Edited

We are each different. I do not have PTSD so I am not triggered by words like that. I am sorry that you have an ongoing struggle with this.

I am lucky not to have PTSD and therefore I can choose how I react when I understand the context of a situation. If I thought those words were called out on purpose by a person in order to emotionally harm me - I would be angry and upset. As a person informed of the context - no upset would occur. I would actually feel for the person who had involuntarily drawn huge negative attention to themselves when they were probably just trying to get through the evening.

I just can't see how the famous actors, knowing the context of John Davidsons utterances, could be at all offended by the words they heard.
They just must be very self absorbed and not able to understand the plight of other people. At all.

RedToothBrush · 24/02/2026 22:52

OtterlyAstounding · 24/02/2026 22:47

That's just not true.

He wasn't yelling it at no one. He was yelling it at the two black men.

Again, I know he didn't want to, or intend to, but nonetheless they were the targets of that word.

No he wasn't yelling.

He wasn't doing anything.

His brain was misfiring causing his body to do something that he wasnt in control of.

He doesn't have the capacity to prevent this.

This wasn't his action. This was a neurological symptom of a disability. Like an allergic reaction if you will.

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 22:51

OtterlyAstounding · 24/02/2026 22:47

That's just not true.

He wasn't yelling it at no one. He was yelling it at the two black men.

Again, I know he didn't want to, or intend to, but nonetheless they were the targets of that word.

It really is.

The concept of a target requires intent. Otherwise you are just randomly hitting something.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 24/02/2026 22:50

NewYearSameMe16 · 24/02/2026 22:44

Because they’re famous, they’ve never been through anything? I’m sure life went perfectly for 73 year old Delroy Lindo who grew up in the civil rights era 👍

No one has said they’ve never experienced hardship. They haven’t got Tourette’s though
and I’d bet my last bottle of Sauv B they haven’t been through the shit John Davidson has been through, all through his life. All in the film/docs.

RedToothBrush · 24/02/2026 22:49

OtterlyAstounding · 24/02/2026 22:32

No. That doesn't hold true. He said the N word because they were black. I doubt he would have said the N word if there were two white women up on stage instead. The tic was triggered by the people on stage, so yes, it was at them, or because of them, if that sounds better to you.

That isn't to say he had intent, or that he's to blame, or that he was being racist.

But verbal Tourette's tics are clearly frequently directed towards specific individuals, not just random obscene words shouted into the air (although I'm sure they can be that too)!

No I wouldn't say it's directed at individuals. I would say it's directed at situations.

Stress and excitement makes it worse - the person reacts to the situation they find themselves in. Their anxiety is about the situation not individuals.

Going to see the Queen whilst it's about an individual it's really about the situation of being on your best behaviour to meet someone you absolutely must be your most polite and respectful ever too. It's not about her as an individual.

Going to the BAFTAs is about the anxiety and excitement of the occasion and being on TV. And then you think, What's the worst thing I can do? Because you have been through it before and it's almost like a PTSD type response where you can't help but think the worst and then it becomes self forfilling.

Whoever was going on that stage at that moment was going to trigger an offensive tic. It just happened to be two black guys. If he had staged in the room he'd probably have said more. Because once you start off badly it's stresses and can send you spiralling.

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 22:49

NewYearSameMe16 · 24/02/2026 22:44

Because they’re famous, they’ve never been through anything? I’m sure life went perfectly for 73 year old Delroy Lindo who grew up in the civil rights era 👍

Plenty of people who are 73 have lived through a lot for many reasons. That does not mean they have no ability to understand a condition like Tourettes.

Although this thread does reveal that many people are indeed seemingly incapable of understanding a condition like Tourettes.

OtterlyAstounding · 24/02/2026 22:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

NewYearSameMe16 · 24/02/2026 22:48

ticktickticktickBOOM · 24/02/2026 22:33

Yes that's fine. Stay in your narrow field of vision. It seems very bleak in there.

It’s your field of vision that is narrow and excludes the lived experiences of two black men. My original point was that both John and MBJ and DL deserved to be included and celebrated on their special nights and they were all let down by BAFTA and the BBC, so get your facts straight.

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 24/02/2026 22:48

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 22:45

If there is no intent there can be no target.

Crazy logic 🙌🥰

OtterlyAstounding · 24/02/2026 22:47

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 22:45

If there is no intent there can be no target.

That's just not true.

He wasn't yelling it at no one. He was yelling it at the two black men.

Again, I know he didn't want to, or intend to, but nonetheless they were the targets of that word.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 24/02/2026 22:46

HildegardP · 24/02/2026 22:40

I haven't bothered collecting screenshots because the very widespread ableism & crass stupidity really were too much, but here's quite a mild example of the genre. There's plenty more.

Oh God yeah, another is ‘he never seems to tic in interviews’ 🙄

OtterlyAstounding · 24/02/2026 22:46

GenderlessVoid · 24/02/2026 22:43

I was trafficked as a child and someone shouting that at me might trigger my PTSD. (Note to whomever hates that word, I learned it from my doctors and psychotherapists. It's a perfectly valid word that accurately describes how certain events, stimuli, or situations can cause the inception or exacerbation of PTSD symptoms.) I know it is deeply hurtful to many black people even if they know the use is not intentional. It still hurts.

I also have Tourettes so I very much understand how verbal tics are involuntary. It reminds me of my PTSD in that both can be set off by external things and I have no control at all over them. I know how I'm prone to blurt out the most mortifying thing I can think of when I'm under stress. It's like the command "don't think of an elephant" leads to thinking of elephants (bc your mind first conjures the thing, then applies the prohibition). I would still feel awful if I blurted it out and would understand that some people are very likely to be hurt by it, even if they understand it was involuntary. If possible, I'd apologize for hurting them but I would also try to educate them about Tourettes and how I had no control over what I blurted out. With luck, they might explain their hurt and both sides would learn something. Or not but I would want to acknowledge that I'd unintentionally hurt them and that their hurt was real.

Edited

This is a really helpful comment, thank you!

It's like the command "don't think of an elephant" leads to thinking of elephants (bc your mind first conjures the thing, then applies the prohibition).

It sounds awful. I would hope that the vast majority of people would be understanding once they know you have Tourette's, though.

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 22:45

OtterlyAstounding · 24/02/2026 22:44

If it was colour blind he would've called the Queen an N word, and the two black men a pair of queens.

I don't know why people argue that the Tourette's doesn't target people? Acknowledging that the words are 'chosen' by the brain based on appropriateness to the person they're shouted at is not the same thing as saying he has intent, he wanted to say it, he's racist, or he's targeting them. But the slurs or insults clearly 'match' the recipient.

If there is no intent there can be no target.

onlytherain · 24/02/2026 22:45

The BBC should have sat down with those getting awards before the show and made them aware that something offensive might be yelled at them while on stage. They could have discussed possible reactions, so that those on stage would not have been taken by surprise, but would have had the chance to take control of the narrative and be empathetic at the same time. They could have explained again what Tourette's is or made an inclusive joke. They could have discussed possible responses with John Davidson. That would have been truly inclusive and in everyone's best interest.

NewYearSameMe16 · 24/02/2026 22:44

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 22:28

Yes, the onus is on the two famous actors to show grace to the man who has a life destroying condition.

Because they’re famous, they’ve never been through anything? I’m sure life went perfectly for 73 year old Delroy Lindo who grew up in the civil rights era 👍

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 22:44

OtterlyAstounding · 24/02/2026 22:32

No. That doesn't hold true. He said the N word because they were black. I doubt he would have said the N word if there were two white women up on stage instead. The tic was triggered by the people on stage, so yes, it was at them, or because of them, if that sounds better to you.

That isn't to say he had intent, or that he's to blame, or that he was being racist.

But verbal Tourette's tics are clearly frequently directed towards specific individuals, not just random obscene words shouted into the air (although I'm sure they can be that too)!

The fact that a tics is situation specific does not mean that it is targeted at an individual.

OtterlyAstounding · 24/02/2026 22:44

RedToothBrush · 24/02/2026 22:40

Weirdly this demonstrates just how Tourettes is effectively 'colour blind'.

People with it say the most offensive thing for the situation they are presented with. It doesn't matter who. It's not targeted. It's not intentional.

If it was colour blind he would've called the Queen an N word, and the two black men a pair of queens.

I don't know why people argue that the Tourette's doesn't target people? Acknowledging that the words are 'chosen' by the brain based on appropriateness to the person they're shouted at is not the same thing as saying he has intent, he wanted to say it, he's racist, or he's targeting them. But the slurs or insults clearly 'match' the recipient.

GenderlessVoid · 24/02/2026 22:43

ticktickticktickBOOM · 24/02/2026 22:27

Ok, a bit outing but I am a victim of grooming and rape. If I were on stage in the scenario you describe I would not give a hoot if John Davidson called out cunt, whore or slag. I would totally understand.

Only people that do not understand tourettes would be offended by tourettes.

Hence the film being called I SWEAR in great big capital letters.

Oh the irony of the offended on this thread is absolutely astounding.

Edited

I was trafficked as a child and someone shouting that at me might trigger my PTSD. (Note to whomever hates that word, I learned it from my doctors and psychotherapists. It's a perfectly valid word that accurately describes how certain events, stimuli, or situations can cause the inception or exacerbation of PTSD symptoms.) I know it is deeply hurtful to many black people even if they know the use is not intentional. It still hurts.

I also have Tourettes so I very much understand how verbal tics are involuntary. It reminds me of my PTSD in that both can be set off by external things and I have no control at all over them. I know how I'm prone to blurt out the most mortifying thing I can think of when I'm under stress. It's like the command "don't think of an elephant" leads to thinking of elephants (bc your mind first conjures the thing, then applies the prohibition). I would still feel awful if I blurted it out and would understand that some people are very likely to be hurt by it, even if they understand it was involuntary. If possible, I'd apologize for hurting them but I would also try to educate them about Tourettes and how I had no control over what I blurted out. With luck, they might explain their hurt and both sides would learn something. Or not but I would want to acknowledge that I'd unintentionally hurt them and that their hurt was real.

NewYearSameMe16 · 24/02/2026 22:42

Anactor · 24/02/2026 22:28

Newyearsameme16
You seem to be saying that black people from the US suffer PTSD from the use of the n-word.

And since they have PTSD, then someone with a disability - should apologise because their disability triggered their PTSD?

Edited

Nope. I’m saying that two black men should be able to go to film ceremony and not have to experience this while onstage in front of millions. If they unfortunately do, as in this case, that this negative experience and the embarrassment along with it can be recognised and not dismissed (not apologised for by John Davidson).

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 24/02/2026 22:41

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Still not telling me what I have done that is racist, or why.

I see you're not one of those people who has discussions, just one who get more and more high pitched and shouts the same insult again and again.

Good day to you sir.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 24/02/2026 22:41

I think the simplest way is to echo the PP - those who understand Tourette’s will not be offended by Tourette’s. That’s not to say those actors aren’t entitled to feel what they felt in that moment, but again to repeat, you would hope those two non-Tourette’s sufferers would show grace and compassion to John Davidson. And I hope they will and everyone else can go away and educate themselves.

OtterlyAstounding · 24/02/2026 22:41

Talkinpeace · 24/02/2026 22:35

FFS
His brain makes him say the LEAST appropriate word.
hence bomb jokes with the police
bitch jokes with the queen
queer jokes with anybody gay
dying jokes with a cancer patient

the more stressed he is, the more extreme the word
so the queen was more grown up than those silly actors

Yes. So how are we disagreeing? I said: "I understand that his involuntary tics mean that he shouted the n word at them, without wanting to." and someone argued that it wasn't AT them. But it seems you agree that it is triggered by his brain making him say the least appropriate thing for the person. So towards/at/because of them, without any malicious intent on his part.

HildegardP · 24/02/2026 22:40

MyThreeWords · 24/02/2026 16:25

How can it be seen as a matter of competing rights? This wasn't a situation where there are specific rights relating to Tourette's on the one hand and being Black on the other hand. The guy with Tourette's isn't claiming a 'right' to free speech that includes the right to say that offensive word. And I haven't heard any Black person claiming a 'right' to silence him.

Both parties have the same entitlement to understanding and respectful treatment. and they were both let down by a very poorly managed situation. It's analogous to a situation in which someone needed to use a wheelchair to get onto the stage, but access was so poorly designed that the wheelchair fell onto an audience member, injuring them. No one would call that a conflict of rights!!

I haven't bothered collecting screenshots because the very widespread ableism & crass stupidity really were too much, but here's quite a mild example of the genre. There's plenty more.

John Davison BAFTA Tourette’s incident and competing rights
RedToothBrush · 24/02/2026 22:40

NewYearSameMe16 · 24/02/2026 22:26

Lol you’re literally agreeing with me but ok. He said ‘fuck you Queen’ because he was with the queen, he didn’t say it in the supermarket. He said he had a bomb because he was in an airport, he wouldn’t have said that sitting on his sofa at home. He yelled the N word because he saw two black men onstage. Unintentionally and due to his tic but let’s not pretend the people in front of him are totally irrelevant.

And of course the onus is entirely on the two black men to show grace and absolutely none on JD to recognise how they might’ve felt in that moment.

Weirdly this demonstrates just how Tourettes is effectively 'colour blind'.

People with it say the most offensive thing for the situation they are presented with. It doesn't matter who. It's not targeted. It's not intentional.