Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Thread gallery
13
ArabellaScott · 24/02/2026 08:59

researchers3 · 24/02/2026 07:51

Frankenstein baby? Hardly.

I can imagine it would be more upsetting to know that strangers who know very little about this, and nothing about their family, passing judgement on them?

Are you opposed to organ transplants in general?

Where do you draw the line?

The donor herself may not have wanted this to happen. If this is all about feels.

Donation must be informed and consented to, or we are in very risky territory.

Needspaceforlego · 24/02/2026 08:54

whatsgoingoninmybrain · 24/02/2026 08:48

But he isn’t!!!

they’re talking about women with uterine factor infertility.

Thanks for clearing that up. I'm 100% ok with them going into women.

I'd absolutely hate to see the science being abused and wombs being put into men.

My autocorrect keeps correcting to bombs 💣

Needspaceforlego · 24/02/2026 08:51

tirednessbecomesme · 24/02/2026 08:49

I don’t have an issue with it so long as it’s for genuine medical need like this woman’s condition

I have more of an issue with use of donor eggs and sperm and surrogacy than this

Me too.

Needspaceforlego · 24/02/2026 08:50

Oganesson118 · 24/02/2026 08:43

I don't really have a problem with this. I can see the potential concerns around if we were to stray into the territory of having live donors but we're a long way off that by the looks of it.

Live donors, is it much different to donating a kidney, particularly as its likely to be within family close biological match?

Probably better donating a womb to a daughter than to risk being a surrogate in your 50s or 60s.

tirednessbecomesme · 24/02/2026 08:49

I don’t have an issue with it so long as it’s for genuine medical need like this woman’s condition

I have more of an issue with use of donor eggs and sperm and surrogacy than this

whatsgoingoninmybrain · 24/02/2026 08:48

Needspaceforlego · 24/02/2026 08:47

Now that is a horrific thought if he's talking about putting wombs (& the next step ovaries) in men.

I really think that would be a complete mind fuck to a child.

And I'm 100% ok with a womb being transplanted into a woman.

But he isn’t!!!

they’re talking about women with uterine factor infertility.

Needspaceforlego · 24/02/2026 08:47

pariswindow · 24/02/2026 08:15

Am I right to be concerned about these 15,000 women of reproductive age as per this quote from the newspaper article today? I do hope that the Professor is talking about biological women.

Prof Smith, who was at the birth, said the development of the programme depends on funding.
“Both the living and deceased programmes have got capacity for expansion,” he said. “We’re constrained mainly by cash.”
“Probably, we know 5,000 women in the UK are born with no womb, but we also know there’s probably about 15,000 women of reproductive age who would potentially like to have a womb,” he added.

Now that is a horrific thought if he's talking about putting wombs (& the next step ovaries) in men.

I really think that would be a complete mind fuck to a child.

And I'm 100% ok with a womb being transplanted into a woman.

DustyWindowsills · 24/02/2026 08:44

I think it's great. It must be truly wonderful for the parents. I hope they'll get a chance to have a second child before the donated uterus needs to be removed.

I don't understand the negative reactions from some in this thread. If I've read the reports correctly, there was no egg donation, so this little boy will be brought up by both his bio parents. I'm adopted, so I didn't get that. It matters.

Oganesson118 · 24/02/2026 08:43

I don't really have a problem with this. I can see the potential concerns around if we were to stray into the territory of having live donors but we're a long way off that by the looks of it.

OtterlyAstounding · 24/02/2026 08:37

whatsgoingoninmybrain · 24/02/2026 08:19

There are plenty of women who do not ever want children who I imagine would be happy to donate.

what makes the womb different to a heart? Or lung? There’s no difference

I made it clear that I feel it is different, on an emotional level. That's just how I feel, not a statement of fact or a claim that it is different.

And even leaving the ovaries intact, hysterectomy raises the risk of prolapse, premature menopause, and early dementia (off the top of my head). It is a major operation to go through, with more serious, long-lasting potential effects for the donor than a kidney transplant.

Plus, women are uniquely at risk of being trafficked, coerced, financially pressured, or even just socially pressured - 'you've finished your family, how can you withhold the joy of children from your sister??' - into undertaking this risky operation. Just look at surrogacy and egg donation, and how on a global scale it's resulted in many women being held prisoner, used like breeding animals.

The potential misuses are ethically concerning to me.

deadpan · 24/02/2026 08:37

whatsgoingoninmybrain · 24/02/2026 08:34

But that’s a hypothetical that is, at a minimum, 25 years away.

The work this charity is doing is nothing short of amazing. They’re offering so many women a lifeline when they may feel incredibly hopeless. I’ve not seen a real argument against it other than “it feels wrong” and “it could be used for trans women one day”

As I said, it's a sex and gender discussion so I thought I'd throw it out there for people to discuss.
I personally think it's too risky a surgery to undergo to then grow a baby inside. Which sets it apart from other organ transplants. And I've never seen the stigma attached to adoption. I tried to myself, but for the actions of a dreadful social worker and her dept I would have.

Mumof2heroes · 24/02/2026 08:36

hholiday · 24/02/2026 07:51

As others have said, I think a lot more thought needs to be given to the children in this scenario. Effectively they have a whole family they have never met – a whole family history they may some day wish to know about. My husband’s father never knew his own father and, despite having been raised in a reasonably close-knit family, the mental health repercussions of that still live on with him at the age of 80 and have reverberated down the lives of the whole family - he was, for example, never able to form a proper relationship with his own sons. Some may argue that situation is not comparable but do we honestly know exactly how human attachment works?

They've not used the eggs from the donor and the baby will have received all it's nutrition and immunity from it's mother through the umbilicus. The uterus is simply a vessel for the baby to grow in. There is no need for the baby to go looking for another family when they're older ffs

deadpan · 24/02/2026 08:35

whatsgoingoninmybrain · 24/02/2026 08:29

Womb Transplant UK have stated they will not be carrying out any research into transplanting a womb into men. So, again, you’re upset by an impossibility.

It's lovely that you're so concerned, but really, I'm not upset.

whatsgoingoninmybrain · 24/02/2026 08:34

deadpan · 24/02/2026 08:33

I think we're talking at cross purposes. I don't think males are females or vice versa. And I don't think this procedure should be offered to males. I'm saying that it's possible, at some point, that it could be by a God Complex surgeon. However impractical or unachievable some them aren't put off

But that’s a hypothetical that is, at a minimum, 25 years away.

The work this charity is doing is nothing short of amazing. They’re offering so many women a lifeline when they may feel incredibly hopeless. I’ve not seen a real argument against it other than “it feels wrong” and “it could be used for trans women one day”

TheStudioWasFilled · 24/02/2026 08:34

Friendlygingercat · 24/02/2026 01:14

As a cure for the falling birthrate one day we will have the science to enable babies to be born and nurtured in a lab. This will enable non-fertile women to have children. It will spare those who wish it the pain and horror of childbirth. Individual women will no longer have to incapacitate themselves and go about like a beached whale for nine months more children might be born. A couple will deposit their seed at the birthing center and go back 9 months later to collect their child. Just like picking up the shopping from Asda.

Edited

That's pretty much the movie The Pod Generation.

deadpan · 24/02/2026 08:33

whatsgoingoninmybrain · 24/02/2026 08:26

As I’ve shown you, it’s just not possible. You’re upset by an impossibility.

I think we're talking at cross purposes. I don't think males are females or vice versa. And I don't think this procedure should be offered to males. I'm saying that it's possible, at some point, that it could be by a God Complex surgeon. However impractical or unachievable some them aren't put off

whatsgoingoninmybrain · 24/02/2026 08:30

Mumof2heroes · 24/02/2026 08:27

I actually love the idea that part of me could live on and be useful or save someone's life in the event of my demise. It gives me comfort.

Me too. It’s a lovely idea, isn’t it? My body has served me well up to this point and I hope it does for a long time more. The idea of it helping others too is beautiful.

IceOnTheLake · 24/02/2026 08:30

JoeSikoraTommysStory · 24/02/2026 02:42

For all the pps saying it’s no different to other transplants it actually is; other transplants are to save lives.
This is not a life saving operation it’s fucking ridiculous.

That's just not true. Corneal grafts, bone/skin allografts, hand transplants for example.

PrizedPickledPopcorn · 24/02/2026 08:29

It is really interesting ethically, and it’s right to discuss it. We shouldn’t be shamed for questioning it, because that’s how we know whether it’s appropriate to attempt. It’s a new idea. It’s right the ethics and our own attitudes and other people’s are interrogated.

I think there is so much we have learned very recently about the female body, it would be foolish to assume there’s nothing else. That breastmilk is tailored to the needs of the child- by sex, health, age- is a new discovery. That we and our DC carry elements of each other long after their birth is a relatively new discovery. It is possible wombs do something we haven’t yet noticed. Some people are squeamish enough about wearing someone else’s shoes, let alone their womb!

@supersonicginandtonic can I ask, as you were reflecting on your SiLs fertility problems not your own, do you think that ‘hope’ of medical makes it easier or harder? In the past, couples who didn’t have children had to just wait and see. Over time it became evident that it wasn’t going to happen. They had to resign themselves to it. Were they worse off, emotionally, than couples now who go through gruelling fertility treatments and still end up without a baby?

I’m happy for the new family.

Namechangerage · 24/02/2026 08:29

RogueFemale · 24/02/2026 01:55

Ask a baby who has been born into such grim medical chaos how they feel. I only know being born of two consenting adults, and even then it was an unhappy outcome.

How is it “grim medical chaos”? The baby is very unlikely to know any different seeing as the womb would have been transplanted way before the baby was conceived.

whatsgoingoninmybrain · 24/02/2026 08:29

MsGreying · 24/02/2026 08:28

Because dunno harm has to be top of the list.

Experience tells us that doctors sometimes do bad things.

This sits uneasily with me.

Mostly because of the idea that nen could start clamouring for their own wombs.
And anything serious that goes wrong endangers the foetus and the woman.

Having a baby is one of the riskiest things women can do.

I don't want young healthy women being able to donate wombs or have them stolen.

Womb Transplant UK have stated they will not be carrying out any research into transplanting a womb into men. So, again, you’re upset by an impossibility.

whatsgoingoninmybrain · 24/02/2026 08:29

Beowulfa · 24/02/2026 08:26

Sometimes there's no obvious logic, and it's hard to articulate, but it just feels "wrong".

I worry what kind of pressure families are put under to make difficult decisions quickly, when the recipient needs the organ as "fresh" as possible.

Families shouldn’t really play a role though. Sounds harsh, but you have the option to opt in or out. That’s your bodily autonomy. If I found out my parents were planning to say no after I have made it clear I want my organs to be donated, I would be so unspeakably angry.

this isn’t some US drama where someone might not be dead and they’re taking organs anyway.

MsGreying · 24/02/2026 08:28

whatsgoingoninmybrain · 24/02/2026 08:11

Okay but it’s been done multiple times safely? I would assume the doctors who are carrying out these procedures know a lot more about it than you do.

If all parties consent and are healthy, why do you care?

Because dunno harm has to be top of the list.

Experience tells us that doctors sometimes do bad things.

This sits uneasily with me.

Mostly because of the idea that nen could start clamouring for their own wombs.
And anything serious that goes wrong endangers the foetus and the woman.

Having a baby is one of the riskiest things women can do.

I don't want young healthy women being able to donate wombs or have them stolen.

Mumof2heroes · 24/02/2026 08:27

I actually love the idea that part of me could live on and be useful or save someone's life in the event of my demise. It gives me comfort.

Igneococcus · 24/02/2026 08:26

OverheardBreakup · 24/02/2026 07:43

Wow, just wow to this thread.

I was diagnosed with kidney disease in my early 30s, went on dialysis in my mid 30s. Dialysis can keep you alive and relatively well for decades. However, id just got married and we desperately wanted children.

My best friend wanted to donate her kidney to me very specifically to enable me to have children (it isn’t recommended on dialysis).

I had my kidney transplant and two years later had DS1, followed 2 years later by DS2. Both born without complications, at full term and happy and healthy.

You can absolutely take immune suppressants throughout pregnancy with no harm to the baby.

Both boys aren’t aware they’re born into ‘medical chaos’ nor do they know they are ‘Frankenstein’ children. I’m wondering when I should tell them 🤔

They just know that their mummy needed help to have them and her good friend gave up part of her body to enable that to happen, and that’s why they have part of her name.

There are some weird takes on here

I was asking if there was data about it and even assumed that there was, no need for your several wows.
People are allowed to question medical advances both from an ethical and a medical perspective.