“Heated Rivalry” author Rachel Reid on J. K. Rowling - “the bar is pretty high in how evil you have to be,” “ I’m extremely the opposite of everything she believes”

Something about being responsible for the situation in the Middle East I think.

Interesting. How, I wonder?

She is a symbol for western imperialism, I think. And is helping the far right???

I must’ve completely missed where you’ve explained how and why she is considered evil. Probably because you’ve said absolutely nothing that explains how she is evil. Well nothing that makes any sense.

I must’ve completely missed where you’ve explained how and why she is considered evil. Probably because you’ve said absolutely nothing that explains how she is evil. Well nothing that makes any sense.

I’m confused.

No men are allowed in a single sex space for women. There is no test to establish whether they are more or less representative of men. That is the point.

Where has it been expressed on this thread?

It does seem that you have a deep prejudice about her.

The premise of the thread is why JKR is considered evil. I'm simply explaining why. That you 'forget' this is indicative of your own bias not mine.

And what exactly has amplifying women's voices in Iran to westerners on twitter achieved? Their freedom? Exactly the opposite: manufacturing public consent to their country becoming an economic basket case like Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan via military intervention that only serves to further enslave women.

Outcomes matter & she's smart enough to know exactly where this is going. Shame on her!

It does seem that you have a deep prejudice about her.

The premise of the thread is why JKR is considered evil. I'm simply explaining why. That you 'forget' this is indicative of your own bias not mine.

And what exactly has amplifying women's voices in Iran to westerners on twitter achieved? Their freedom? Exactly the opposite: manufacturing public consent to their country becoming an economic basket case like Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan via military intervention that only serves to further enslave women.

Outcomes matter & she's smart enough to know exactly where this is going. Shame on her!

It does seem that you have a deep prejudice about her.

The premise of the thread is why JKR is considered evil. I'm simply explaining why. That you 'forget' this is indicative of your own bias not mine.

And what exactly has amplifying women's voices in Iran to westerners on twitter achieved? Their freedom? Exactly the opposite: manufacturing public consent to their country becoming an economic basket case like Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan via military intervention that only serves to further enslave women.

Outcomes matter & she's smart enough to know exactly where this is going. Shame on her!

It's amazing how many folk have been tripping over each other in their rush to condemn JKR over the past few years...but then what's not to like when you can use her fame to bolster your profile and virtue signal at the same time.

It's a win-win for the unimaginative and the tedious.

Errr… this doesn’t make sense. Is anyone claiming that male people with transgender identities are ‘representative of all’ male people? No.

You lie & you know it because its been clearly expressed on this thread & on this forum repeatedly.

Errr… this doesn’t make sense. Is anyone claiming that male people with transgender identities are ‘representative of all’ male people? No.

You lie & you know it because its been clearly expressed on this thread & on this forum repeatedly.

What are the ‘fruits of her actions’ ?

Seriously? She is amplifying women’s voices when there was no media outlet doing it.

It does seem that you have a deep prejudice about her. On one hand you demonise her for not doing enough for political interests of your own, and on the other hand you demonise her for having personal political interests at all.

You also demand that she adhere to standards that media agencies aren’t expected to making disclaimers on articles that some hard of thinking person might take as contributing to negative stereotypes about groups.

I think this post of yours though puts it all into perspective.

Errr… this doesn’t make sense. Is anyone claiming that male people with transgender identities are ‘representative of all’ male people? No.

You lie & you know it because its been clearly expressed on this thread & on this forum repeatedly.

She’s a middle aged woman, married to a man, cosplaying at gay identity because it makes the big money right now.

If anyone is getting a hard on it’s you, over JKR.

Not sure why you think she owe’s you an opinion on Gaza, Iran, who’s going to win an Oscar or if pineapple belongs on pizza.

”Irrelevant to the point that lesbians are not representative of all women as trans women are not representative of all men.”

Errr… this doesn’t make sense. Is anyone claiming that male people with transgender identities are ‘representative of all’ male people? No. We are saying they are part of that general group of male people so should not be treated differently.

Which was the point that I was making that women with the sexual orientation of same sex attraction are not treated as a separate group for the purposes of safeguarding. I was also pointing out that your comparison of domestic violence by women who are same sex attracted has multiple flaws and doesn’t work the way you attempted to claim it did.

Again, what are the fruits of her actions? Where is she going with this?

War & regime change.

If she was in the slightest concerned about journalistic censorship you may have heard a whisper from her about the systemic murder of a multitude of journalists in Gaza where no independent media has been allowed to report on the ground.

The facts are JKR's 'concerns' & more importantly outcomes align with western imperialism.

She is weaponising women's rights just like the far right do in their sudden interest in women's sports as means to end of their white supremacy.