Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

“Heated Rivalry” author Rachel Reid on J. K. Rowling - “the bar is pretty high in how evil you have to be,” “ I’m extremely the opposite of everything she believes”

764 replies

YankSplaining · 23/02/2026 17:20

Well, this is disappointing.

”[Reid] has a keen desire not to disappoint her fans, especially when they’re sending her photos of freshly inked tattoos of her words on their skin. ‘I know of another author that a lot of people got tattoos of but then wanted them gone. Like, J. K. Rowling,’ she says. ‘The bar is pretty high for how evil you have to be, but I don’t want to let a single person down.’ I ask if she’s a TERF. ‘No, I’m extremely the opposite of everything she believes,’ she replies.”

Well, too late, she let me down. “Extremely the opposite of everything she believes,” huh? I guess Rachel Reid thinks teenage girls should be forced to undress after PE in front of naked male classmates who gawp as their dicks get hard. Or that female inmates should be locked in cells with male inmates serving time for serial rape.

I don’t expect Reid to agree with Rowling on trans issues. It’s the monstering of Rowling that I take issue with - the “evil,” and the framing of Rowling as so extreme that Reid feels the need to be extremely the opposite of everything she believes.

Edit: title should read “on how evil you have to be”

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 22:44

CassOle · 24/02/2026 22:43

I don't want to 'remove you from culture' 🙄 I just know that you haven't changed sex. It's not hard, just use unisex bogs if the mens bogs don't appeal to you. Be a decent human being and obey the law regarding single sex spaces.

We've belonged in single sexed spaces. We continue to belong in single sexed spaces.

CassOle · 24/02/2026 22:43

I don't want to 'remove you from culture' 🙄 I just know that you haven't changed sex. It's not hard, just use unisex bogs if the mens bogs don't appeal to you. Be a decent human being and obey the law regarding single sex spaces.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 22:41

MyAmpleSheep · 24/02/2026 22:39

So, wait, you identify as being female because you were bullied by a bunch of mean boys?

Isn't that something to unpack in therapy rather than in surgery?

No. Does everything sex realists understand have to have a 1:1 correlation?

MyAmpleSheep · 24/02/2026 22:39

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 22:08

Girls were so frightened or socialised of me they grabbed me by the arms and dragged me in before I even started treatment. Boys were so welcoming and inclusive they waited by the nurse's toilet for me to arrive so they could share their inclusivity. There are 1000s of additional experiences that would align on one side of the gender division.

So, wait, you identify as being female because you were bullied by a bunch of mean boys?

Isn't that something to unpack in therapy rather than in surgery?

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 22:34

DistanceCall · 24/02/2026 22:10

Oh boy. By virtue of...?

Slave trade was legal in the UK until it wasn’t. Section 28 was law.

Women know who are women.

Sex realists are in the middle of a transient project to remove trans people from culture. They experienced some luck in being able to insert leadership in critical departments. With the support of religious conservatives, changes in law were won. However, the status of trans people has not changed. The status quo shall prevail eventually.

Helleofabore · 24/02/2026 22:24

And again, that some female people consented to a male person accessing female single sex provisions is irrelevant. Consent isn’t transferable so any female person consenting should not have done so.

Greyskybluesky · 24/02/2026 22:23

No one who was born male is a woman.

It's not a popularity contest. It's just fact.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 22:16

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 22:13

I think by virtue of not having the foggiest idea what a woman is.

The 'woman' I understand seems more popular than the narrow reproductive-focused version sex realists understand.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 22:14

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 22:12

No, you are men, and if a doctor truly treated you as a woman it would be life threatening.

I have been treated by medical professionals my entire life. Some knew of my transition, others did not. I am quite alive and healthy.

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 22:13

DistanceCall · 24/02/2026 22:10

Oh boy. By virtue of...?

I think by virtue of not having the foggiest idea what a woman is.

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 22:12

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 22:09

Trans women don't feel entitled, we are women.

Edited

No, you are men, and if a doctor truly treated you as a woman it would be life threatening.

DistanceCall · 24/02/2026 22:10

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 22:09

Trans women don't feel entitled, we are women.

Edited

Oh boy. By virtue of...?

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 22:09

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

Trans women don't feel entitled, we are women.

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 24/02/2026 22:08

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 22:08

JellySaurus · 24/02/2026 20:41

The path of least resistance, hmm? Women were too frightened or too socialised to speak up against your invasions. And now that women are speaking up for themselves you don't like it. You don't like women womaning our way, only your way.

Your claim that sex realist arguments aren't inclusive is just the same sour grapes. Sex realism is inclusive of the specific sex. Woman and female are terms inclusive of ALL women, however
they present and whatever they believe about themselves. No, they are not terms inclusive of male people, just as cats and felines are not terms inclusive of donkeys and equines.

Girls were so frightened or socialised of me they grabbed me by the arms and dragged me in before I even started treatment. Boys were so welcoming and inclusive they waited by the nurse's toilet for me to arrive so they could share their inclusivity. There are 1000s of additional experiences that would align on one side of the gender division.

Underthinker · 24/02/2026 22:04

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 19:34

I don't believe I've ever met a trans woman who demanded to be granted access to anywhere. We were excluded and took the path of least resistance. We were excluded from manhood by men and included in womanhood by women.

On behalf of the patriarchy, I hereby re-admit you and all transwomen back into manhood, and apologise for the clerical error that led you believe you couldn't be a man if you preferred stereotypically female clothing. We let the work experience lad have a go at maintaining the manhood boundaries and it caused no end of trouble.

solerolover · 24/02/2026 21:09

Women were too frightened or too socialised to speak up against your invasions.

This has played out time and time again. Remember the swimming volunteer, Anne Combes who wandered through the changing rooms where young female swimmers were changing in between competitions? I remember the fact that these girls were absolutely terrified of speaking up against his presence for fear of being labelled bigoted transphobes.

British Swimming eventually changed their rules after parents complained.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12350741/Parents-raised-concerns-transgender-pool-official-using-womens-changing-room-time-young-girls.html

JellySaurus · 24/02/2026 20:41

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 19:34

I don't believe I've ever met a trans woman who demanded to be granted access to anywhere. We were excluded and took the path of least resistance. We were excluded from manhood by men and included in womanhood by women.

The path of least resistance, hmm? Women were too frightened or too socialised to speak up against your invasions. And now that women are speaking up for themselves you don't like it. You don't like women womaning our way, only your way.

Your claim that sex realist arguments aren't inclusive is just the same sour grapes. Sex realism is inclusive of the specific sex. Woman and female are terms inclusive of ALL women, however
they present and whatever they believe about themselves. No, they are not terms inclusive of male people, just as cats and felines are not terms inclusive of donkeys and equines.

Chersfrozenface · 24/02/2026 20:23

Greyskybluesky · 24/02/2026 20:06

They could play at the Trans Mission gig at Wembley. They're sure to find an appreciative audience of likeminded individuals there.

Speaking of which, that takes place a fortnight tomorrow and there's a shedload of tickets not sold yet.

Edited for splung

ElenOfTheWays · 24/02/2026 20:17

EvelynBeatrice · 24/02/2026 19:29

I really don’t understand you. In what way can cats be inclusive of dogs for example in a cat club? Or infants in a club for adolescents?

We have different teams / categories for different purposes. For biological purposes eg toilets and the biological functions that the female human beings conduct there, ( which are not restricted to toileting) we team on a biological basis and have done so for years on safety, privacy and dignity grounds. Whereas if there were to be a team on eg how to arrange long hair, that might be appropriate to organise by gender rather than sex or to include all long haired persons.

But its just silly to think that any one of us can demand and be granted access to every team/ characteristic based on our own wishes without reference to others who have a shared factor that we lack.

Exactly. Inclusive does not mean everyone in the same space as so many people spouting it seem to think. It means there should be a space for everyone.

And furthermore, not everything HAS to be inclusive.

Greyskybluesky · 24/02/2026 20:06

solerolover · 24/02/2026 20:02

I must say, "sex fantasist" would make an amazing band name!😄

They could play at the Trans Mission gig at Wembley. They're sure to find an appreciative audience of likeminded individuals there.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 24/02/2026 20:05

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 19:22

Sex realist arguments will always form a wedge. They are not inclusive. They are about restricting and defining groups that do not belong.

Sex realist arguments are reality. it's right there in in the words, and it includes the whole human race because there are only 2 sexes. How much more inclusive can you get. 🤯

solerolover · 24/02/2026 20:02

I must say, "sex fantasist" would make an amazing band name!😄

CassOle · 24/02/2026 19:42

If onepost is using 'sex realist' in a derogatory way, does that mean that the opposite (a 'sex fantasist'?) is meant to be a good thing to be?

Greyskybluesky · 24/02/2026 19:38

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 19:38

'male' and 'female' are not clubs that you can join or leave.

And all the wheedling and arguing in the world won't get you entry if you don't belong.