Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

“Heated Rivalry” author Rachel Reid on J. K. Rowling - “the bar is pretty high in how evil you have to be,” “ I’m extremely the opposite of everything she believes”

764 replies

YankSplaining · 23/02/2026 17:20

Well, this is disappointing.

”[Reid] has a keen desire not to disappoint her fans, especially when they’re sending her photos of freshly inked tattoos of her words on their skin. ‘I know of another author that a lot of people got tattoos of but then wanted them gone. Like, J. K. Rowling,’ she says. ‘The bar is pretty high for how evil you have to be, but I don’t want to let a single person down.’ I ask if she’s a TERF. ‘No, I’m extremely the opposite of everything she believes,’ she replies.”

Well, too late, she let me down. “Extremely the opposite of everything she believes,” huh? I guess Rachel Reid thinks teenage girls should be forced to undress after PE in front of naked male classmates who gawp as their dicks get hard. Or that female inmates should be locked in cells with male inmates serving time for serial rape.

I don’t expect Reid to agree with Rowling on trans issues. It’s the monstering of Rowling that I take issue with - the “evil,” and the framing of Rowling as so extreme that Reid feels the need to be extremely the opposite of everything she believes.

Edit: title should read “on how evil you have to be”

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:51

Helleofabore · 24/02/2026 23:50

And that you claim to have never have belonged in a male single sex provision is just proving that your choices of using provisions is based on your philosophical belief about the sex category of your body.

I doubt you have used them for the range of purposes that female people have. So no, I doubt you understand the needs of female people and single sex toilets.

There is no philosophy. You have no ability to understand my experience. You are very anti-my experience as it is.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:50

Greyskybluesky · 24/02/2026 23:49

Nope.
Wrong.

I guess we'll see.

Helleofabore · 24/02/2026 23:50

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:46

I've never belonged with men. I know why toilets exist, I've used one or two in my lifetime.

And that you claim to have never have belonged in a male single sex provision is just proving that your choices of using provisions is based on your philosophical belief about the sex category of your body.

I doubt you have used them for the range of purposes that female people have. So no, I doubt you understand the needs of female people and single sex toilets.

Greyskybluesky · 24/02/2026 23:49

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:49

That is one interpretation. There is another interpretation that requires such a limitation to be based on a "proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim" in the context of gender exclusion.

Edited

Nope.
Wrong.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:49

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 23:48

Regardless of where you think you belong, in the UK, if you are a man you have no right to use women's single sex facilities.

Nothing in my life has changed.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:49

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 23:44

The High Court recently confirmed that provision that includes both men and women is not single sex and that for the purposes of the law men who identify as women are men.

That is one interpretation. There is another interpretation that requires such a limitation to be based on a "proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim" in the context of gender exclusion.

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 23:48

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:46

I've never belonged with men. I know why toilets exist, I've used one or two in my lifetime.

Regardless of where you think you belong, in the UK, if you are a man you have no right to use women's single sex facilities.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:46

Helleofabore · 24/02/2026 23:45

You most certainly focused on your own needs. Otherwise you would have used the male provisions.

They are not just ‘rooms’. Female people use female toilets for a wider range of needs than male people do. And often in the public space around the basin and hand dryer.

I've never belonged with men. I know why toilets exist, I've used one or two in my lifetime.

Helleofabore · 24/02/2026 23:45

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:42

I never gave any thought to my own needs either. These are rooms.

You most certainly focused on your own needs. Otherwise you would have used the male provisions.

They are not just ‘rooms’. Female people use female toilets for a wider range of needs than male people do. And often in the public space around the basin and hand dryer.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:45

buffyajp · 24/02/2026 23:43

And I find it offensive when I’m told to reframe my rape trauma simply for wishing a biological woman as my counsellor. Something I make no apologies for.

I sure as hell wouldn't apologize for speaking with the woman I saw after my rape.

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 23:44

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 22:52

women don't require an alternate solution to womens single sex provisions.

The High Court recently confirmed that provision that includes both men and women is not single sex and that for the purposes of the law men who identify as women are men.

buffyajp · 24/02/2026 23:43

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:19

That you reduce my existence to an identity is offensive. I do not identify. I have lived more than 50 years as me. It is the only experience I have; it's the only experience shared by people I know. It's silly to tell me that I require anyone to act in any way around me, or anyone else.

You can believe anything you wish that seems enlightening. Sex realists don't require trans people in the room to do that, they accomplish quite a lot amongst themselves.

And I find it offensive when I’m told to reframe my rape trauma simply for wishing a biological woman as my counsellor. Something I make no apologies for.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:42

Helleofabore · 24/02/2026 23:42

Yes. We understand that you never thought about female people’s needs, just your own.

I never gave any thought to my own needs either. These are rooms.

Helleofabore · 24/02/2026 23:42

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:40

Personally, I never gave change rooms or toilets any thought. It seems bizarre that they are so suddenly political.

Yes. We understand that you never thought about female people’s needs, just your own.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:42

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 23:40

I suspect more accurately, some doctors politely didn't discuss your sex because they thought you might be offended.

That's your belief. Though, I don't know how to feel, knowing that you have spent some time creating a belief system about my personal medical treatment.

Helleofabore · 24/02/2026 23:41

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:37

How have I been able to see other emoji responses to messages? I assumed they were public.

You could see that you reacted to the posts. The only other person to see that reaction was GreySky.

If you don’t understand appropriate behaviour, that is not something that GreySky should have had to deal with.

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 23:40

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 22:14

I have been treated by medical professionals my entire life. Some knew of my transition, others did not. I am quite alive and healthy.

I suspect more accurately, some doctors politely didn't discuss your sex because they thought you might be offended.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:40

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 23:37

'Until sex realism'?

If nothing else, centuries of farming suggest people have known about sex for quite a long time.

Personally, I never gave change rooms or toilets any thought. It seems bizarre that they are so suddenly political.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:37

Helleofabore · 24/02/2026 23:36

If it was more than once, it is deliberate. Repeated use in that way is abusive behaviour in part because it can only be seen by the two posters involved.

How have I been able to see other emoji responses to messages? I assumed they were public.

Greyskybluesky · 24/02/2026 23:37

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:28

this is your belief. ETA: Also, I apologise for forcing my 'thank you' emoji messages into your notifications.

Edited

No need to make a quick edit out of fear I might report you.

I rarely report anyone. I prefer to let comments stand so that others can draw their own conclusions.

nicepotoftea · 24/02/2026 23:37

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:27

Until sex realism, I'd never envisioned a public toilet to be a private exclusive environment.

'Until sex realism'?

If nothing else, centuries of farming suggest people have known about sex for quite a long time.

Helleofabore · 24/02/2026 23:36

Greyskybluesky · 24/02/2026 23:23

Thanks Helle

I just wanted to draw attention to the passive agressive behind the scenes oddness 😬

If it was more than once, it is deliberate. Repeated use in that way is abusive behaviour in part because it can only be seen by the two posters involved.

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:33

Helleofabore · 24/02/2026 23:31

And yet, it is an identity based on philosophical belief about yourself that doesn’t reflect the material reality of your sex category.

You can call it what you want to, it doesn’t change what it is. Just like describing yourself as female when you are male doesn’t change your sex category.

Your continued attempts at derogation using the term ‘sex realist’ is also enlightening. I imagine it feels good to you to do it.

My lived life isn't a philosophy. It is life experienced and shared with my friends, family, colleagues and the world around me. My sex category has been enforced for almost as long as I can remember. There's very little say I have.

Helleofabore · 24/02/2026 23:31

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:19

That you reduce my existence to an identity is offensive. I do not identify. I have lived more than 50 years as me. It is the only experience I have; it's the only experience shared by people I know. It's silly to tell me that I require anyone to act in any way around me, or anyone else.

You can believe anything you wish that seems enlightening. Sex realists don't require trans people in the room to do that, they accomplish quite a lot amongst themselves.

And yet, it is an identity based on philosophical belief about yourself that doesn’t reflect the material reality of your sex category.

You can call it what you want to, it doesn’t change what it is. Just like describing yourself as female when you are male doesn’t change your sex category.

Your continued attempts at derogation using the term ‘sex realist’ is also enlightening. I imagine it feels good to you to do it.

Greyskybluesky · 24/02/2026 23:30

onepostwonder · 24/02/2026 23:28

this is your belief. ETA: Also, I apologise for forcing my 'thank you' emoji messages into your notifications.

Edited

😂

Swipe left for the next trending thread