Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
OP posts:
Thread gallery
42
CrocsNotDocs · 21/02/2026 01:44

FeralWoman · 21/02/2026 00:23

Not entirely true. No new patients receiving puberty blockers in the public system. Private system is still there as an option. Those is the public system already being prescribed puberty blockers are still on them if they want to be. The Queensland government is doing their own review to make a decision about puberty blockers.

If Crisafulli really wanted to put his money where his big mouth is then he’d get Dr Jillian Spencer reinstated to Queensland Health.

Yes, Dr Spencer needs to come back.

I’m still reeling from the revelations from the report into Cairns Sexual Health. This is my hometown. Poor kids. Apparently running an unapproved clinic since 2008.

OP posts:
Mollyollydolly · 21/02/2026 01:39

There's no new information, HOW did it get so far?
Hopefully now it will be kicked into the long grass for good.
It's all politics.

FeralWoman · 21/02/2026 00:23

CrocsNotDocs · 20/02/2026 23:22

My Australian state of Queensland has paused puberty blockers, pending the outcome of this trial. If this trial doesn’t proceed, the children in my state will be safe.

Not entirely true. No new patients receiving puberty blockers in the public system. Private system is still there as an option. Those is the public system already being prescribed puberty blockers are still on them if they want to be. The Queensland government is doing their own review to make a decision about puberty blockers.

If Crisafulli really wanted to put his money where his big mouth is then he’d get Dr Jillian Spencer reinstated to Queensland Health.

moto748e · 20/02/2026 23:59

Surely this is a get out of jail free card for Starmer and Streeting. They can crack on with their favourite policy option of kicking the can down the road.

TempestTost · 20/02/2026 23:58

I am sure here in Canada they will bury their heads in the sand, but every new study that shows how little backing there is for all of these "therapies' is good. At some point they will be forced to look, probably because of the health disasters that start to become public, and then all of those damning reports will be there.

RiderOfTheBlue · 20/02/2026 23:37

CrocsNotDocs · 20/02/2026 23:22

My Australian state of Queensland has paused puberty blockers, pending the outcome of this trial. If this trial doesn’t proceed, the children in my state will be safe.

That's quite remarkable. Other countries waiting to see what happens with the British guinea piglets.

CrocsNotDocs · 20/02/2026 23:22

TempestTost · 20/02/2026 23:01

I think that if they carry on investigating this now, and realise it doesn't meet ethical standards, it could be a very good thing, big picture, internationally.

My Australian state of Queensland has paused puberty blockers, pending the outcome of this trial. If this trial doesn’t proceed, the children in my state will be safe.

OP posts:
TempestTost · 20/02/2026 23:01

I think that if they carry on investigating this now, and realise it doesn't meet ethical standards, it could be a very good thing, big picture, internationally.

LizzieSiddal · 20/02/2026 22:41

Thank god they’ve seen sense.

StrongPoison · 20/02/2026 22:19

Great news!

HerefordshireLass · 20/02/2026 22:17

happypelican2 · 20/02/2026 21:55

Well I wrote to my MP about this last year, and he wrote back with a very long email to say he supported the trial.
Will Forster, Lib Dem MP for Woking if anyone is interested.

Shout out to Ellie Chowns, Green Party for doing the same 😡

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 20/02/2026 22:14

So glad to hear this, I heard it from another source and thought it was 'mis-information', so I didn't get my hopes up, but it's true, it's true. 😁

Thanks for the link to everything, I'm off to read them again and thanks to everyone who helped make this happen, this is a good day, a very good day.

tropicaltrance · 20/02/2026 22:04

Thank goodness. Hopefully this will lead to "new" information requiring its cancellation.

teawamutu · 20/02/2026 21:57

IW is either totally fucking tonto or an unforgivable fucking ghoul. As I understand it, the '50 suicides of trans kids' is an outright lie, but he's happy to keep telling parents their kids will die if not given harmful, sterilising meds. All in the service of him being able to bully women into pretending he's not a man.

BonfireLady · 20/02/2026 21:57

CrocsNotDocs · 20/02/2026 20:05

Yes! 👏👏👏👏👏👏

Not yet RTFT but hooray for common sense starting to creep through.

Obviously no 14+ year old should be experimented upon but this is a huge step in the right direction.

For me, top billing should be the impact on the developing brain. From what we already know about development milestones, and can extrapolate from that, PBs stop important adolescent brain development from ever happening. Causing infertility is bad enough, but no child should ever be left with a very high risk of permanent brain damage as a consequence of medical "treatment".

Edited to add: video is Sallie Baxendale explaining the impact of PBs on the developing brain.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=z5ZnRKqqByg

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=z5ZnRKqqByg

happypelican2 · 20/02/2026 21:55

Well I wrote to my MP about this last year, and he wrote back with a very long email to say he supported the trial.
Will Forster, Lib Dem MP for Woking if anyone is interested.

IwantToRetire · 20/02/2026 21:54

PP referred to Hannah Barnes tweets (or is that Xes?) explainer

Thread unroll of this useful break down
https://twitter-thread.com/t/2024940290050535563

WeMeetInFairIthilien · 20/02/2026 21:54

I raise my glass of Calvados to everyone involved in this decision.

First of all, do no harm.

Soontobe60 · 20/02/2026 21:50

CraftandGlamour · 20/02/2026 21:39

Well done James and Kiera! This is good news although I would love to know what new information has come forward. Same as the old information I imagine

I’d put money on it being brought about following Sex Matters letter sent yesterday regarding the discord between prescribing PBs to children yet schools will have to follow the law and not allow children to use opposite sex facilities / join opposite sex teams
“here little Johnny, these drugs will mean you can carry on and pretend to be a girl, but don’t forget you’ll still have to use the boys toilets”

Dollymylove · 20/02/2026 21:43

Praise the Lord 😊

Datun · 20/02/2026 21:41

There IS no new information. There is only new politics.

Somebody, at long fucking last, is reading the writing on the wall.

And shame on them for not taking an ethical stance, rather than a political one.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 20/02/2026 21:40

ProfDrLapwing · 20/02/2026 21:35

How could children and young people ever be able to give informed consent to this potentially life altering experiment? It’s just not possible. I can’t understand how it could gain ethical approval in the first place.

Apparently the ethcs committee met by Zoom for one meeting of nine participants. Members asked questions, made some recommendations and passed the matter to a sub-committee. The next meeting had five decision-makers. The final decision in November was made by a sub-committee of three.

That's how little they were concerned about the ethics of strerilising children as young as 8 . A typical NHS shambles.

CraftandGlamour · 20/02/2026 21:39

Well done James and Kiera! This is good news although I would love to know what new information has come forward. Same as the old information I imagine

Soontobe60 · 20/02/2026 21:37

Hannah Barnes has done an epic job of pulling the whole Pathways abomination to pieces. In reading about one of the questionnaires proposed, it’s clear that too many people haven’t already done a deep dive into the ethics of the project.
Photos to follow.

Puberty Blocker Trial Paused
Puberty Blocker Trial Paused
MrsOvertonsWindow · 20/02/2026 21:36

Ambergris123 · 20/02/2026 21:33

This is already sometimes done / should be considered for children facing cancer treatment …the crucial difference though is the reason for doing so.

Yes. Children with cancer are physically unwell. The children confused about what sex they are will be physically healthy but mentally unwell.

The idea we've allowed the NHS to sterilise and physically mutilate healthy children in the name of this ideology is sickening.