Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Curious why pro-sex worker advocates have been so silent since Epstein file release??

35 replies

ThatZanyFatball · 05/02/2026 13:59

The latest release of Epstein files has further laid bare what most of us already know, that powerful men exploit vulnerable women.

Not intending to cast aside the minors who were abused by these men, but being that there were also many women who were over the age of consent, I'm curious as to why pro-sex worker advocates haven't come out in defense of the men implicated in the Epstein files. I mean after all, they're all allegedly consenting adults, right?

Where are the pro-prostitution advocates who would simply label these activities as sex work? A woman is offered the opportunity to sell her body to a man, she accepts, what's the harm, right? No different than a desk job? I mean, could it be that Epstein and his ilk truly show the depths of danger and depravity that occurs when men believe they should have free rein over women's bodies? And that women who are coerced (or forced) into such situations are actually at risk of being abused and exploited, not "empowered?"

Would love to hear statements from sex worker advocates on all this.

OP posts:
Beowulfa · 05/02/2026 15:05

Epstein wasn't investigated and arrested for hiring adult prostitutes.

Perhaps if he had been, his sleazy predilections wouldn't have escalated.

deadpan · 05/02/2026 15:05

I haven't seen any condemnation from Katy Hopkins either. Mind you didn't she say she'd be happy to be felt up by Trump when his "grab them by the...." comment was circulated.

onepostwonder · 05/02/2026 15:02

ThatZanyFatball · 05/02/2026 13:59

The latest release of Epstein files has further laid bare what most of us already know, that powerful men exploit vulnerable women.

Not intending to cast aside the minors who were abused by these men, but being that there were also many women who were over the age of consent, I'm curious as to why pro-sex worker advocates haven't come out in defense of the men implicated in the Epstein files. I mean after all, they're all allegedly consenting adults, right?

Where are the pro-prostitution advocates who would simply label these activities as sex work? A woman is offered the opportunity to sell her body to a man, she accepts, what's the harm, right? No different than a desk job? I mean, could it be that Epstein and his ilk truly show the depths of danger and depravity that occurs when men believe they should have free rein over women's bodies? And that women who are coerced (or forced) into such situations are actually at risk of being abused and exploited, not "empowered?"

Would love to hear statements from sex worker advocates on all this.

Child grooming, trafficking and rape and/or facilitating their rape are violence and crimes.

The trafficking and rape and/or facilitating the rape of adult women are also violence and crimes.

Epstein wasn't investigated and arrested for hiring adult prostitutes.

Sex work supporters are discussing this everywhere.

ItsCoolForCats · 05/02/2026 15:01

There is another conundrum I can't get my head around. Whenever trans awareness month etc. comes around, various stats are cited regarding trans people who are murdered worldwide. The.majority of these murders are committed against people working in prostitution in Brazil and other parts of the world.

Yet, TRAs are often fervently pro "sex work". Can they not see the issue here 🤔

ReadingCrimeFiction · 05/02/2026 15:00

A year or two ago, or maybe longer - I lose track - I do remember quite a few people saying things like, "these girls were partying, travelling aroudn the world on private planes, wearing designer clothes.... they knew what they were getting into." Which I found extreemely irritating at the time.

But there's been a shift. Which I welcome. But I do wonder if those people are still out there, they're just less vocal because public opinion has changed a bit.

Beowulfa · 05/02/2026 14:53

Sex work is work. So working for rich, powerful and famous men is aspirational. Plus these women got to go to parties on an exclusive luxury island!

Maggie Chapman can probably explain it better, but defending prostitution is definitely righteous and progressive. Definitely.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 05/02/2026 14:51

Yes, you would think the 'feminist's' would be all over this wouldn't you. Could it be they can't touch it because they support women being used as sex objects. Because that's what actively working to make prostitution legal and promoting it as a good career choice for poor women, so they can work they're way out of poverty, is.

It's just like the Omnicause Feminist's who are oh so silent about the plight of women in Iran, they can't object to the way the regime is treating them without torpedoing they're own assertion that the Hijabs are empowering for women.

guinnessguzzler · 05/02/2026 14:49

100% OP.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 05/02/2026 14:40

Yes, exactly, MrsT

MrsTerryPratchett · 05/02/2026 14:14

I agree. Terry Pratchett said that evil starts when you begin to treat people like things. And this is where it ends. The problem with all the liberal choosy choose sex stuff is that men LIKE transgressive sex. If you make BDSM, anal, sex work and cross dressing (to pick a few) vanilla, they have to find worse and worse things to try. Kink shaming is actually the point for many men. Fetishes are supposed to be perverted.

These poor girls are the object that these men project their exclusivity onto. They can do anything. And appear to be getting away with it. Why aren’t they all bailed to appear?

And see if the usual suspects appear on this thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread