“A school faces a threat of legal action over policies that protect all children – so we’re fighting back.”

Colleague/other are not family and friends. I originally specified family or friend.

If someone knows a trans person well enough to consider them a friend, or a family member. There is vastly more support for trans people. Gays and lesbians also saw this affect on support in the 80s and 90s.

Reader’s note:

When discussing the sex class of human people, this is only decided by a person having a body formed around the production of one gamete or the other, regardless of the production status of those gametes.

It is this basis, as per the Supreme Court clarification of the EA2010, that allows legitimate discrimination for the provision of single sex services and facilities.

This is not a ‘belief’ this is an established scientific fact that serves as the foundation of many aspects of life. Including the law.

I am unable to answer this in a form that aligns with gender critical belief reality.

You're unable to answer it in a way that aligns with reality

I am unable to answer this in a form that aligns with gender critical belief.

‘Gender critical’…? do you mean people that know for a fact that biology is fixed. No human can change their biological sex. Never have nor never will.

You, by your own admission, claim to have ‘lived’ as a woman for over 40 years but you’ll never be one and because of that fact, you and ‘trans lobbyists’ want society to abandon all safeguards for our children so that they grow up believing the impossible is possible!
GET AWAY FROM OUR CHILDREN 😣

However, when pollsters added Do you know 'a colleague/other' who is trans (in addition to 'family member or friend') that support starts to go down. People seem to generally support their trans-identifying family member or friend, but then remove some of that support for their trans-identifying acquaintances. We generally trust our family members and friends, less so acquaintances or strangers. Trans-identifying people are only friends or family to a handful of people, they are acquaintances or strangers to everyone else they meet.

I think in many ways it goes back to religions, of being unclean and the red tent.

Also, many men really dislike being around women and many women really dislike being around men. For drastically different reasons.

In what way are they girls that other boys are not girls?

No human ever changed sex even if you redefine the word ‘sex’.

"bullying" 😄

You are here voluntarily.
You have been invading women's spaces for 40 years voluntarily.

Who's the bully here?

Sex is more than just gametes and bodies formed around their use despite what anyone believes.

Why do we separate certain spaces and events by sex?

please answer this.

You ‘share a belief’ and that is all it is, a belief.

No human has ever changed sex despite what they or anyone else believes.

I can see how some stick their head in to witness the bullying for themselves and tweak the sadistic fetishes of the few who believe they are humiliating trans people.

Yup

Always good to remember some dudes get off on being humiliated and some dudes get off on continuing without enthusiastic consent.

It might be tedious AF, but it's great to have it so vividly illustrated for posters who were unaware.

Nice house and car and lifestyle wont pay for itsself.

Tax avoidance is big business and is always going to be steady income but needs a win rate or at least a reduction in liability but its Regulated 🤷‍♀️

It's not odd at all.

Men like that view women and girls simply as props in their own fantasy. They're not concerned about how the girls feel because they view them as things, not people.

No one mentions “trans girls” because it is males who are usually the problem in relation to predatory behaviour. Sex sometimes matters. Nothing to do with trans. And it’s about privacy and dignity as much as safety.

If I remember correctly, sometime on this thread it was suggested that ‘all’ children have the right to privacy in a change room.

This can be taken two ways. First, of course, if a child wishes to use a cubicle, they should if one is available.

However, schools don’t have the space or the time to allow every student to change in an individual cubicle. My child’s recent build primary school had their senior class changing in make shift rooms, not even purpose built change rooms.

There are also no rights governing policy for organisations in general to provide privacy from the same sex category of people in that way. Hence there are still communal changing rooms for each sex.

It is an unreasonable expectation that policy is changed purely to suit male people who have identities that have then rejecting male single sex provisions. As they are not female people, they should not and should never have been accessing female single sex provisions.

In school, it is unreasonable to say that the solution is to have individual cubicles because all children have a right to privacy, when that ‘right to privacy’ is being misrepresented.

Actually you are right @AnSolas
It's all part of the activity

Doesn't realise his own monopolising behaviour?

Nope imo he sees it and his strong and firm belief is that if he just keeps posting that he will continue to enjoy his activity.

[(Edit)
And he will continue to engage with the usual tropes😬 ]

I had a look on Companies House. The GLP has very little overhead - and very high consultancy/legal fees. Presumably JM’s (and others) private billing. Not a bad little income generator?!

Many people share my strong and firmly held belief.

The rest of your post is a bad faith straw man.

You are clearly enjoying your activity.

Yes.
Could have started his own thread.
Could have picked a more appropriate thread to post on (if there is one?)
Had to have this one.
A thread about a teen girl.
Doesn't realise his own monopolising behaviour.
Clearly enjoying the activity and the attention.