Who is ignoring the TIF?
The men who are pushing into womens spaces claiming that mens spaces are too dangerous him but totally safe for a TIF?
The TRA who are busy trying to BS (eg the US government) that men can grow babies and need mens health care to Abortion Rights?
The TRA who are removing the meaning of the word woman claiming it means some males and some females and also replacing woman with terms like Bleeder or Breeder?
The social change was not and is not a grass root movement. US money helped paid for the promotion of transgenderism in the UK. And its homophobic.
Stonewall runs its anti-LG policy to support transgenderism. Such that less than 5 years after the right to marry was legislated it is condeming Lesbians for saying she is only same sex attracted. Its still busy claiming heterosexual men are same sex gender attracted "women".
In the OPs childs school the men and women who are responsible for safeguarding the young girl in their care.
Its a male who is running that fundraise with the objective of forcing the OPs girl into having males in
▪︎ her shower area
▪︎ her changing room and
▪︎ her toilet block
The OPs child is being subjected to Bullying and subjected to Coercive Control. The fund raising is openly advocating for current Bullying and Coercive Control to continue.
You here on the OPs thread advocate to force the OPs girl to have males in
▪︎ her shower area
▪︎ her changing room and
▪︎ her toilet block
You dismiss the fact that the OPs child is the vulnerable party so too is the male involved in the fund raising.
You dismiss the fact that she has a right to be safeguarded by the school as is the male involved in the fund raising
You dismiss the fact that she has a lawful right to female only single sex provision in
▪︎ her shower area
▪︎ her changing room and
▪︎ her toilet block
So is the male involved in the fund raising
Again reframing my question to the male child who is making demands because he has been taught that he Has A Right which places his wants above girls needs.
How should the school safeguard the male student who wants to access the female only single sex space in the context of his wanting access to
▪︎ the girls showers when the girls showers are being used by girls
▪︎ the girls changing room when the girls changing rooms are being used by girls
▪︎ the girls toilet block when the girls toilet block is being used by girls
such that the school ensure he is not subjecting any girl to non-contact child sex abuse or contact child sex abuse and ends up with a criminal record for sex offending?
This ^ is the theory the OPs childs school is trying to upsell to the OP and the OPs child (and society as a whole).
Multiple Agency who have safeguarding roles are giving the adults in charge a soft pass rather than holding the adults to account.
The management claim they will risk assess each male before enforcing the decision of forcing the OPs child to participate in their qualifying males wants.
I'll bet they will not want to apply the same risk weighting to any girl who asked to be placed in the male only single sex provision.
Its would be much harder to explain to a jury how any resulting sex offending etc could not have been prevented.
Therefore questions still remain to be answered:
How may girls can be subjected to avoidable sexual offending to warm your heart?
Or to reframe
How many male students can be put at risk of engaging in avoidable sex offending on the school grounds?