Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Northumbria Police commission survey on Supreme Court ruling

95 replies

Imnobody4 · 23/01/2026 12:19

https://x.com/i/status/2014449882157752554

🚨 Why have Northumbria Police @northumbriapol commissioned a survey 👇 targeted at 18-25 yr olds using highly contested ideological language, to inform them how to ‘engage’ with the @ForWomenScot Supreme Court ruling?

Just comply with the law!

Women's Rights Network - WRN (@WomensRightsNet) on X

🚨 Why have Northumbria Police @northumbriapol commissioned a survey 👇 targeted at 18-25 yr olds using highly contested ideological language, to inform them how to ‘engage’ with the @ForWomenScot Supreme Court ruling? Just comply with the law! 1/...

https://x.com/i/status/2014449882157752554

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
5
MrsM1ggins · 21/02/2026 21:41

Hopefully the document Northumbria Police gave to UoS will answer that question

lcakethereforeIam · 21/02/2026 20:37

I wonder who it was exactly who commissioned this survey? And why? Whoever it was must have written some kind a rational for asking for this data to be sought. What did they want it for? What were they intending to do with it?

The screenshot in the OP, the 'purpose' is nothing of the sort. It's just a description of what the survey is.

Tunnocksmilkchocolatemallow · 25/01/2026 20:06

Next time they will try to make sure it is only circulated to organisations where they will get the ‘right’ answers…

MrsM1ggins · 25/01/2026 19:35

WRN did a thread on it on X, so plenty of opportunity for the Uni/researchers to expect that it was all going a bit Pete Tong and take a peek at the responses to date. Which I assume were hilarious 😁

334bu · 25/01/2026 19:31

Oh my was it something I said🤔

SirChenjins · 25/01/2026 19:28

Chersfrozenface · 25/01/2026 19:04

I'm rather hoping someone will start whining on social media, with details.

Show quote history

It's bound to happen - with 'unsafe', 'bigots' , 'vulnerable' and 'terfs' thrown into the tearful SM posts to show just how sad these times are.

CultureAndFisheriesTsarina · 25/01/2026 19:18

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 25/01/2026 19:03

Did someone in the Uni rumble to the fact that the survey was utter shite, or maybe the people who put up the survey were lying and using Uni resources to push they're own agenda.

Ooo I wants to know what's happened. 😱

Edited

And at a weekend too. Must have butt-hurt someone badly

Tunnocksmilkchocolatemallow · 25/01/2026 19:07

CultureAndFisheriesTsarina · 25/01/2026 18:55

No such thing as a wrong answer
All voices are valid
Terfs simply inclusioned themselves

Show quote history

Being inclusive in that way went against the study design.

Chersfrozenface · 25/01/2026 19:04

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 25/01/2026 19:03

Did someone in the Uni rumble to the fact that the survey was utter shite, or maybe the people who put up the survey were lying and using Uni resources to push they're own agenda.

Ooo I wants to know what's happened. 😱

Edited

I'm rather hoping someone will start whining on social media, with details.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 25/01/2026 19:03

Did someone in the Uni rumble to the fact that the survey was utter shite, or maybe the people who put up the survey were lying and using Uni resources to push they're own agenda.

Ooo I wants to know what's happened. 😱

CultureAndFisheriesTsarina · 25/01/2026 18:55

Tunnocksmilkchocolatemallow · 25/01/2026 18:48

Too many wrong answers perhaps?

No such thing as a wrong answer
All voices are valid
Terfs simply inclusioned themselves

Tunnocksmilkchocolatemallow · 25/01/2026 18:48

Too many wrong answers perhaps?

AnSolas · 25/01/2026 18:41

Oops😀
Was it
□• the thread
□• the data
□• @MrsM1ggins

And just because MN offered it first

Season 3 Episode 13 GIF by The Simpsons
SirChenjins · 25/01/2026 18:32

Sad Times indeed.

Did they not get the responses they expected from 18-25 year olds?

CultureAndFisheriesTsarina · 25/01/2026 18:28

Sad times

spannasaurus · 25/01/2026 18:27

The survey page now says

Sorry, this survey is not currently active.

SirChenjins · 25/01/2026 18:24

Mochudubh · 25/01/2026 18:20

Seems they've rumbled that they've been rumbled.

What's happened?

Mochudubh · 25/01/2026 18:21

Forgot to add screenshot

Northumbria Police commission survey on Supreme Court ruling
Mochudubh · 25/01/2026 18:20

Seems they've rumbled that they've been rumbled.

AnSolas · 25/01/2026 18:09

onlytherain · 25/01/2026 17:56

What is the point of ethics committees if they approve studies like this? This is research on sex and gender, so why are they not adhering to the recommendations of the Sullivan review? Why are highly contested terms deemed acceptable? Why is clear bias deemed ethical? The ethics committee should be facing disciplinary action.

The Uni world will be shocked when Regulation rolls down to the personal level.

AnSolas · 25/01/2026 18:07

ArabellaScott · 25/01/2026 18:01

This. Ridiculous. Since when did the police survey people for opinions on the law?!

I mean, I have some. 😁

Show quote history

TbF they do ask ones opinion on speed limits and other fancy road rules but that maaaaay be so that it can be quoted in Court
💅🤷‍♀️

And why would a TRA actually give their data to a Genocidal Police Collabrator (or some such) .......

ArabellaScott · 25/01/2026 18:01

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 23/01/2026 14:25

The SC is the highest authority on the law in the land, the police service are the law enforcement agency, they don't get to survey opinions on the law, their just required to enforce them. No more, no less, just do your jobs coppers.

Sack whoever authorised this, and bin the survey because the law isn't a popularity contest, the law is the law abide by it or suffer the consequences.

Edited

This. Ridiculous. Since when did the police survey people for opinions on the law?!

I mean, I have some. 😁

onlytherain · 25/01/2026 17:56

What is the point of ethics committees if they approve studies like this? This is research on sex and gender, so why are they not adhering to the recommendations of the Sullivan review? Why are highly contested terms deemed acceptable? Why is clear bias deemed ethical? The ethics committee should be facing disciplinary action.

Maryberrysbouffant · 24/01/2026 23:03

I enjoyed filling that in (I am 23)