Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Your Corbyn/Sultana Party - Discussion thread - Part 3

160 replies

fromorbit · 23/01/2026 07:54

Welcome to Part 3 of Mumsnet charting the drama inside Your Party. We have followed YP from the start when it looked liked it might be a major player to its ongoing internal row which has left it struggling.

We have the best and funniest commentary on British hard left wing politics, looking not just at YP itself, but wider issues plaguing the left. Dominated by the problem which weirdly didn't worry Marx, the Chartists, Anarchists, Trade Unionists, even Communist regimes, or much of the long history of left wing feminists, but suddenly in the last ten or so years has become huge. Is Human biology a thing ? Are men in dresses the most oppressed people on the planet even if they are billionaires?

Currently we are looking at Your Party internal elections which have been dominated by the split between the Corbyn and Sultana factions who have different visions of how the party should look. Summarised here:

Your Party? Whose elections?
https://www.workersliberty.org/story/2026-01-21/your-party-whose-elections?language_content_entity=en

Sultana's Grassroots Left slate not only added Corbyn without permission but others. It seems they are being denounced for undemocratic manoeuvres.

Fractures amongst Sultana's shadow caucus have opened up
https://skidrowradio.substack.com/p/the-slate-that-wasnt

As always the Men in Dresses have outsize importance. The Trans Liberation group are backing the Sultanate Grassroots Left faction, but things as always are messy.

The set up of the YP voting also means there are male and female posts in each region. The non binary types are claiming this is unfair what about them:
Is this trolling? LGBTQIA+ group demand "non-binary" CEC spots
A Your Party clique is infuriated that non-men/women isn't a category for the elections.
https://skidrowradio.substack.com/p/is-this-trolling-lgbtqia-group-demand

There is plenty more crazy to come.

Your Corbyn/Sultana Party - Discussion thread - Part 1
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5394557-your-corbynsultana-party-discussion-thread

Your Corbyn/Sultana Party - Discussion thread - Part 2
All about the conference and run up which really saw YP faction fighting intensify. Highlights included a Scottish "trans" male sex pest berating the conference.
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5440730-your-corbynsultana-party-discussion-thread-part-2?page=1

people's party

Your Party? Whose elections?

Edited 21.1.26 with updates. Ruth Cashman, a regular writer for Solidarity, was initially banned from standing for the Central Executive Committee of Your Party on grounds that YP rules exclude members of “other national political parties”. She appeale...

https://www.workersliberty.org/story/2026-01-21/your-party-whose-elections?language_content_entity=en

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
Lalgarh · 01/05/2026 13:56

Corbyn backed Newham independents attacking the greens as pro DrUgkz. Stats for lefties outraged

https://nitter.net/LeftieStats/status/2049926764332474786#m

(They've now deleted)

Lalgarh · 01/05/2026 08:49

Who knew Claudia Webbe was an intellectual pontificating on the future of socialism. It's just the capitalist fash media that knows her as the fckn deranged scorned vitriol plotter. I totally didn't read the factoids in that and think "that's chat GPT"

1984Now · 01/05/2026 08:20

fromorbit · 01/05/2026 05:49

YP booting out the SWP is justified by Webb as better socialism and gets into opposing vanguardism:

Your Party: what kind of socialist party does the British working class actually need in 2026?
https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/your-party-what-kind-socialist-party-does-british-working-class-actually-need-2026

Counter argument:

Your Party is weaker without the revolutionary left
https://www.counterfire.org/article/your-party-is-weaker-without-the-revolutionary-left/

Practical experience would indicate that not having a bunch of perianal losers involved would help.

I don't know what's worse about the revolutionary left...that they'll freeze you to death, or bore you to death?

fromorbit · 01/05/2026 05:49

YP booting out the SWP is justified by Webb as better socialism and gets into opposing vanguardism:

Your Party: what kind of socialist party does the British working class actually need in 2026?
https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/your-party-what-kind-socialist-party-does-british-working-class-actually-need-2026

Counter argument:

Your Party is weaker without the revolutionary left
https://www.counterfire.org/article/your-party-is-weaker-without-the-revolutionary-left/

Practical experience would indicate that not having a bunch of perianal losers involved would help.

OP posts:
SionnachRuadh · 30/04/2026 15:48

I assume Zarah is talking about a different intifada that goes to another school.

1984Now · 30/04/2026 15:38

Zara calling Starmer a liar is the perfect meme of a stuck clock telling the time correctly at least once a day.

Lalgarh · 30/04/2026 14:21

Sultana has also come to the attention of JK Rowling

https://nitter.net/jk_rowling/status/2049590762325630988#m

moto748e · 20/04/2026 22:48

Delicious! 😀

SionnachRuadh · 20/04/2026 22:38

From Maddie Grant's Spectator sketch:

Some MPs were actually prepared to name the large, grey, trunk-bearing mammal in the room and point out that the Prime Minister was almost certainly lying. To do so is considered un-parliamentary behaviour and so risks a chucking-out even if it is akin to looking up and commenting that what’s above you is a colour somewhere between Cyan and Magenta. Lee Anderson said the PM ‘couldn’t lie straight in bed’, which he was made to retract before being turfed out of the Commons.

Braver was Zarah Sultana, who repeated the claim that the PM was lying, to an incandescent Hoyle, who not only chucked her out but suspended her from the House, meaning five days’ banishment without pay. Quite the punishment for stating the obvious.

One wonders what she and Lee chatted about in the sin bin but then Starmer’s shamelessness has made some odd bedfellows. Corbynistas nodded along to Mrs Badenoch, the SNP cheered DUP questions, the Tories were in total thrall to Diane Abbott. Maybe the real friends were the ones we made along the way? It was like an unlikely Disney buddy film, all brought together by contempt for one man’s naked shamelessness. Sweet, eh?

SionnachRuadh · 20/04/2026 21:59

That corner of the chamber, with Corbyn and the Gaza MPs in the back row and the Reform MPs sitting in front of them, seems to be the House's naughty step. There's a lot of banter goes on. Ideology aside, they seem to get on reasonably well on a personal basis.

I've seen Rosie Duffield sitting there. Also Tim Farron, who seems to find it much more fun than hanging out with the Lib Dems.

I rarely see Sultana in the chamber. When she speaks, she often seems to come in late in a debate when there aren't many MPs around. I would feel sorry for her, but working with others is a key skill in politics and she doesn't have it.

Lalgarh · 20/04/2026 21:28

Was watching bits of the Starmer statement this afternoon. Lee Anderson had already been kicked out for calling Starmer a liar. By this evening Sultana had managed it too but seems to be getting the headlines and plaudits from Reform types on Twitter.

I did see she wasn't sitting close to Corbyn who'd tried to ask forensic questions from the backbenches

Lalgarh · 17/04/2026 00:41

Well this is a curve ball.

Remember the Together Alliance march on a few weekends back. Trade unions and left parties marching against the threat of populism and the far right. Zack Polanski twerking on stage. Vows to shun the like of Farage.

It turns out Unite (who cut their Labour party subs by 40%) have been holding secret talks with Reform about ending the Birmingham bin strikes. You know, the pivotal cause for Your Party that got Sultana on the picket line pledging solidarity

https://nitter.net/zarahsultana/status/2017320088454533552#m
https://nitter.net/patrickkmaguire/status/2044889712041635961#m

Times (paywalled) https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/unite-labour-reform-farage-birmingham-bin-strike-ftsk2707m

As noted in one of the replies, the whole impetus of the dispute is an equal pay claim that, if the union won and kept the specific role in place, would leave the council in breach potentially of the equality act. Reform have said they want to scrap the act, if I remember

https://nitter.net/DanielDieppe/status/2044911047476134359#m

Unite in secret talks with Reform over Birmingham bin strikes

Officials at Labour’s biggest union donor meet Nigel Farage’s team in anticipation of his party taking control of the West Midlands council

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/unite-labour-reform-farage-birmingham-bin-strike-ftsk2707m

SionnachRuadh · 14/04/2026 17:45

After all the endless faff about creating the most complex party constitution imaginable (Ben Habib doesn't know he's born), I suppose it was inevitable that someone would sue to force Corbzy to rerun the election under a different system that you need to be a mathematician to understand.

And then they wonder why they can't get normies to vote for them.

Lalgarh · 14/04/2026 16:34

A disgruntled candidate for Your Party CEC is now threatening to sue them for breach on contract (? Is that even possible? Iirc party of them are a private company) and has contacted the Good Law Project to begin proceedings.

https://nitter.net/Wrevolution/status/2043947231150027163#m.

So, a likely win for Corbzy after all😝

SionnachRuadh · 14/04/2026 09:38

fromorbit · 14/04/2026 09:02

Lavalette can't face the truth that a left style party can't survive without ethnic votes now and those voters in fact can be pretty right wing in economics and socially. Where Independent Gaza locals used to have supress their thinking they have a big enough bloc to do their own thing.

When those groups win a lot of seats in May they will be even more confident.

The same issue the Greens are facing in medium term. An alliance of Gaza voters, LGBTQ+, environmentalists, NIMBYs, socialists and liberals has serious issues especially without party structures to quiet dissent.

British politics is reordering.

I'd argue that this alliance of opposites has always really depended on Labour controlling serious layers of government (if not national then at least local/devolved) so it can be the mechanism for handing out goodies to preferred constituencies.

It doesn't have to be Labour - the SNP and in some local areas the Lib Dems have had a fair stab at it - but I'm not convinced the Greens are mature enough to pull it off, and Lavalette being disappointed that Muslim independents in Walsall aren't behaving like Militant Liverpool in the 1980s seems to me a bit of a category error.

fromorbit · 14/04/2026 09:02

SionnachRuadh · 14/04/2026 07:45

I might be wrong, but I think Lavalette only uses the word "Muslim" in that article when he's describing Sultana. Otherwise he just talks about networks of independent candidates who are anti-war and anti-austerity(*)

Michael isn't a deep thinker, but he knows who he owes his council seat in Preston to, and that is local Muslims who he's got a long term relationship with via his grassroots activism (basically Palestine plus hyperlocal concerns) and I doubt if many of them know Counterfire exists.

Also a bit cheeky to blame Corbyn's inner circle when CF's leadership (hello Lindsey, hello John) are deeply embedded in that circle, though in classic "the good tsar and his bad advisers" style Michael doesn't blame Corbyn himself for any of this, and similarly fudges Sultana's involvement in the dodgy portal etc. CF are talking up grassroots politics while playing Renaissance court politics and flattering the MPs to expand their own influence.

(*) Michael I'm sure knows much more than me about the independent councillors in Lancashire, but from my experience the one thing the Muslim independents in East London are unanimously opposed to is LTNs. Looking at the small business backgrounds of the people involved, it's not at all surprising that Newham Independents are very pro-motorist. I wonder if this will be a barrier to them forming an opportunistic coalition with the Greens. Again, it's amazing how lightly Michael skips over the nature of the community independent groups.

Lavalette can't face the truth that a left style party can't survive without ethnic votes now and those voters in fact can be pretty right wing in economics and socially. Where Independent Gaza locals used to have supress their thinking they have a big enough bloc to do their own thing.

When those groups win a lot of seats in May they will be even more confident.

The same issue the Greens are facing in medium term. An alliance of Gaza voters, LGBTQ+, environmentalists, NIMBYs, socialists and liberals has serious issues especially without party structures to quiet dissent.

British politics is reordering.

OP posts:
SionnachRuadh · 14/04/2026 07:45

fromorbit · 14/04/2026 00:39

The purge is causing huge drama. Counterfire reports:

https://www.counterfire.org/article/your-party-a-squandered-opportunity/

I don't think we have mentioned that the released list of YP backed Independents had to be revised when a bunch turned out to be former Tories from a Muslim background.

I might be wrong, but I think Lavalette only uses the word "Muslim" in that article when he's describing Sultana. Otherwise he just talks about networks of independent candidates who are anti-war and anti-austerity(*)

Michael isn't a deep thinker, but he knows who he owes his council seat in Preston to, and that is local Muslims who he's got a long term relationship with via his grassroots activism (basically Palestine plus hyperlocal concerns) and I doubt if many of them know Counterfire exists.

Also a bit cheeky to blame Corbyn's inner circle when CF's leadership (hello Lindsey, hello John) are deeply embedded in that circle, though in classic "the good tsar and his bad advisers" style Michael doesn't blame Corbyn himself for any of this, and similarly fudges Sultana's involvement in the dodgy portal etc. CF are talking up grassroots politics while playing Renaissance court politics and flattering the MPs to expand their own influence.

(*) Michael I'm sure knows much more than me about the independent councillors in Lancashire, but from my experience the one thing the Muslim independents in East London are unanimously opposed to is LTNs. Looking at the small business backgrounds of the people involved, it's not at all surprising that Newham Independents are very pro-motorist. I wonder if this will be a barrier to them forming an opportunistic coalition with the Greens. Again, it's amazing how lightly Michael skips over the nature of the community independent groups.

fromorbit · 14/04/2026 00:42

A pity they didn't do it soon enough to run candidates and damage the Scottish Greens.

OP posts:
fromorbit · 14/04/2026 00:39

Lalgarh · 10/04/2026 21:22

Friday night is Leninist affiliate Purge Night over at Your Party

https://nitter.net/charliemansell/status/2042679894014881929#m

"Your Party“ proscribe more Leninist organisations in a day than Labour did in the last 6 years!

Top factoid from Shanly that in 2016 Corbyn voted to abolish his incoming majority on the NEC bc he misunderstood the meaning of the vote

https://nitter.net/DouglasGibb2002/status/2042685319330312498#m

The purge is causing huge drama. Counterfire reports:

https://www.counterfire.org/article/your-party-a-squandered-opportunity/

I don't think we have mentioned that the released list of YP backed Independents had to be revised when a bunch turned out to be former Tories from a Muslim background.

OP posts:
Lalgarh · 13/04/2026 21:36

Dear oh dear

SionnachRuadh · 11/04/2026 09:40

Lalgarh · 10/04/2026 21:22

Friday night is Leninist affiliate Purge Night over at Your Party

https://nitter.net/charliemansell/status/2042679894014881929#m

"Your Party“ proscribe more Leninist organisations in a day than Labour did in the last 6 years!

Top factoid from Shanly that in 2016 Corbyn voted to abolish his incoming majority on the NEC bc he misunderstood the meaning of the vote

https://nitter.net/DouglasGibb2002/status/2042685319330312498#m

I have no problem with the idea of proscribing the SWP or the SPEW or the Weedy Wanker. I think the AWL would be more likely to be good boys, but their pro-Israel line probably doesn't make them popular.

If you're a Leninist group and you want to be in a bigger party, the least you can do is follow the example of Workers Power and pretend you've dissolved. Openly maintaining your own paper and membership and internal discipline is a bit much for any party to take.

For instance, in "People Before Profit" in Ireland, the SWP dropped their "party" designation and now claim to be a "network", even though they actually run the thing.

Lalgarh · 10/04/2026 21:22

Friday night is Leninist affiliate Purge Night over at Your Party

https://nitter.net/charliemansell/status/2042679894014881929#m

"Your Party“ proscribe more Leninist organisations in a day than Labour did in the last 6 years!

Top factoid from Shanly that in 2016 Corbyn voted to abolish his incoming majority on the NEC bc he misunderstood the meaning of the vote

https://nitter.net/DouglasGibb2002/status/2042685319330312498#m

SionnachRuadh · 08/04/2026 20:29

Rare example these days of a joke from HIGNY that lands.

Maybe in 2045 Hislop will tentatively try a joke about TRAs.

Swipe left for the next trending thread