I think that the discussion has revolved around Turtle somewhat and it can be said that is centring Turtle in that way.
I also have mixed feelings about that because Turtle’s style of communication has been clearly snide at times. Even so, women have patiently persisted in posting replies at length with detailed perspectives and have asked pertinent questions to ascertain what Turtle thinks. Questions very often ignored while Turtle then asks new ones.
I believe that TroubledWaters picked up that communication feature too and commented on it. If there was the intention to engage in good faith, it was giving very mixed signals. Mostly it felt like a nightly drive by ‘whataboutery’ session aimed at finding an aspect that would give permission to access provisions not meant for male people.
This is an open site and there really is no restriction on who posts here. However, it is an example of utilising women as resources - either for information or as sounding boards for his benefit and, potentially for a degree, as some aspect of therapeutic resource.
Those of us who continued interaction accepted this, but only if they recognised it. I am not sure all female posters did recognise it. It also doesn’t mean that Turtle recognised he was doing it either. Perhaps though, this is the source of frustration that women responded to. I wonder….
In that way, this thread became a live demonstration of the dynamics some of us were discussing.
In saying that, I hope that Cautious and Taz stay on the board as this is a board where women’s perspectives should be heard and discussion had.