Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Statement from Southall Black Sisters on decision to leave X

57 replies

IwantToRetire · 15/01/2026 16:30

After careful and principled consideration, Southall Black Sisters (SBS) has taken the decision to leave X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

This is not a symbolic gesture. It is a political and ethical refusal to participate in a platform that has become a conduit for misogyny, racism, disinformation, and the normalisation of violence – particularly violence against women and girls (VAWG). X increasingly facilitates the spread of dehumanising narratives that target marginalised communities and, in doing so, creates conditions that enable real-world harm. We will not be complicit in this.

We are unequivocal: VAWG is not an unfortunate by-product of online spaces – it is being actively enabled by them. These harms fall most heavily on women and children from Black, minoritised, and migrant communities, the very communities SBS has worked alongside for over four decades. A platform that tolerates, amplifies, or profits from such abuse stands in direct opposition to our values and our mission.

The recent misuse of X’s AI chatbot, Grok, to generate and circulate non-consensual sexualised images of women and children (BBC, 2026) starkly illustrates their endemic misogyny. The platform’s initial response – restricting this capability to fee-paying subscribers – did not constitute safeguarding. It was a commercial workaround that avoided accountability, trivialised gender-based violence, and signalled a profound disregard for women’s safety. While the full impact of emerging developments remains to be seen, the absence of timely and robust protections leaves us unconvinced that the platform treats VAWG with the seriousness it warrants, sending a clear message that abuse is acceptable so long as it is profitable. This environment actively silences women, deters political participation, and reinforces misogynistic norms that extend well beyond the digital sphere.

Under Elon Musk’s ownership, far-right and fascist ideologies have been allowed to flourish and be rebranded as legitimate political discourse. This has had grave consequences in the UK and internationally (The Guardian, 2025; NBC News, 2025; Sky News, 2025). X’s algorithm and the dismantling of moderation safeguards have created fertile ground for misinformation and hate. Following the 2024 Southport murders, the platform amplified false and inflammatory content, fuelling anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim narratives that contributed directly to fear, violence, and unrest in parts of the UK (Amnesty International, 2025). This is not neutral technology – it’s political infrastructure, and it is being wielded irresponsibly.

In this context, leaving X is an act of resistance. SBS refuses to lend credibility, content, or engagement to a platform that systematically undermines the safety and dignity of the communities we serve. Our commitment has always been to victim-survivors. We will not remain in a space where their lived realities are dismissed, distorted, or erased, and where abuse is allowed to thrive.

We call on the UK government to move beyond mere recognition of online harms to meaningful, sustained action that confronts structural violence and unequal impacts online. While recent policy efforts, including the Online Safety Act, signal an acknowledgement of these issues, the reality on the ground remains deeply concerning – particularly for women and girls from Black, minoritised, and migrant communities who continue to experience disproportionate levels of abuse, silencing, and exclusion. We urge the government to work in genuine partnership with SBS and the communities we serve to ensure that online spaces are safe, accountable and equitable – where protections are not just theoretical, but real, enforceable, and grounded in the lived experiences of those most harmed. We further call on policymakers to actively resist attempts by far-right and fascist actors to exploit online platforms for political influence and legitimacy, and to reaffirm an unwavering commitment to public safety, human rights, and equality for all.

We encourage everyone unsettled by X’s harmful environment to also walk away and engage in constructive alternative spaces for discussion.

SBS will continue to engage with communities on other platforms:
Facebook: @Southall Black Sisters
Instagram: @southallblacksisters
LinkedIn: @Southall Black Sisters
Bluesky: @sbsisters.bsky.social

We remain fully committed to supporting victim-survivors through our helpline (020 8571 0800) and via our website: southallblacksisters.org.uk.

https://southallblacksisters.org.uk/news/our-decision-to-leave-x/

Statement on Our Decision to Leave X - Southall Black Sisters

After careful and principled consideration, Southall Black Sisters (SBS) has taken the decision to leave X, the platform formerly known as

https://southallblacksisters.org.uk/news/our-decision-to-leave-x/

OP posts:
Chersfrozenface · 15/01/2026 18:09

Aren't SBS fairly firm on single sex spaces?

In which case, the best of luck to them on Bluesky.

TooBigForMyBoots · 15/01/2026 18:08

Good for SBS and Refuge before them.👏👏👏

On one of the many Grok Porn threads I asked X users if they knew of any feminist pushback on the site itself. No one knew of any. I find this suss as fuck as so many fearless, vocal feminists are on X.

Niminy · 15/01/2026 18:05

Oh yawn.

Do we really think Grok is the only AI tool that can be used for ill? Also, it wasn't creating deepfake porn. I'll stay on Twix as long as Helen Joyce does, and as for Bluesky, well, if you want a real echo-chamber, you can go there.

Lovelyview · 15/01/2026 18:02

I'm not defending it at all but for accuracy they weren't nudes. Grok was allowing people to create images of people including children in swimwear. It was gross, non consensual and upsetting but not nudes.

persephonia · 15/01/2026 17:54

Good for them
I agree it's hard if you are a woman's group or similar and need to get information or advice out - the more platforms the better. But I hate how people are essentially held hostage to sites like that.for that reason. Even the algorithm is designed to get in the way of proper communication. And that was before it started creating nudes and child nudes. On the one hand "women shouldn't post on X if they don't want people to generate nudes of their pictures" on the other "if you don't want to post on X then you aren't willing to reach out to other groups" etc.

Eventually though it will turn so many people of it eventually goes the way of MySpace. Or that's my hope anyway. There has to come a tipping point where it's just not worthwhile any more.

Lovelyview · 15/01/2026 17:41

I don't know how much influence X actually has but I do think you need to be on a site if you want your views represented. Most of it is probably a huge waste of time anyway. I'm not leaving X because I like all the GC commentators on there. And there was a lot of feminist pushback to the undressing images. ( I'm not claiming that's why that function was deactivated) It's interesting to see the AI function play out in real time. People are seeing what it can do. It often makes stuff up or lies. Interesting times.

IwantToRetire · 15/01/2026 16:36

Had a quick search and as far as I can see not many other women's groups who provide services to women survivors of male violence have done this.

Although it turns out Refuge left X a year ago, which as a group seen as being less radical than other women's groups is quite interesting.

I think Solace WA has also left, and Rape Crisis South London. Also Women's Aid Ireland.

Probably others.

OP posts: