Thanks for sharing. Ms Sylvester clearly did really well presenting her case in person, appearing against counsel for the Respondents. I thought the judgment was well-written and clear - albeit depressing reading. It is particularly telling - though not news in any way - that the Respondents had made an effort to consult their EDI colleagues about transgender issues but had not done so about disability issues. Yet again, disability is relegated to the bottom of the heap. So infuriating.