Page 3 | Genocide in the US

LeftieRightsHoarder · 07/01/2026 23:03

SoftBalletShoes · 07/01/2026 22:43

Since trans women are women, imo, being told to use the men's when you're actually a woman is a violation of your rights. I'm sure you wouldn't like to be told to use the men's, so why is it different for a trans woman?

Show quote history

If a man’s fantasy is that he’s a three-year-old, would you mind him playing in your child’s nursery? If his fantasy is that he’s a surgeon, would you let him operate on you? Why does the fantasy of being a woman somehow trump all safety concerns?

AnneLovesGilbert · 07/01/2026 22:54

They’re sterilising themselves. That’s not anyone else’s fault.

TempestTost · 07/01/2026 22:53

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 07/01/2026 20:04

This claim fails on two grounds:

Genocide is, by definition, a crime that can only be committed against a racial, ethnic, national, or religious group. Unless you are trying to claim with a straight face that trans ideology is a religion, this definition cannot apply to trans people.

Being told to use your own sex's facilities isn't a human rights violation. Neither is being told to compete in the sports team for own sex, nor being housed in your own sex's prison. Genocide requires human rights violations on a large scale, and the US simply isn't doing that.

Edited

Human rights violations aren't genocide though. You can do all kinds of things that are against human rights of a group that are not genocide.

LeftieRightsHoarder · 07/01/2026 22:52

TheAmusedQuail · 07/01/2026 19:42

Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention sounds the alarm over transgender genocide.

I’ve just had the awful thought that maybe these fantasists actually believe what they’re saying. Is that possible?

A lot of them obviously have mental health issues. They talk about men being “literally killed” by being called men.
And they seem to believe that some part of their self somehow slipped into the wrong body before they were born.
And apparently some of them think their internal organs can change, eg they can grow a cervix.

Paranoia wouldn’t be that surprising.

Helleofabore · 07/01/2026 22:51

SoftBalletShoes · 07/01/2026 22:43

Since trans women are women, imo, being told to use the men's when you're actually a woman is a violation of your rights. I'm sure you wouldn't like to be told to use the men's, so why is it different for a trans woman?

Show quote history

Toilets are segregated by sex category and not gender identity or by philosophical belief. A male person being told to use the male toilet is not controversial at all.

Boiledbeetle · 07/01/2026 22:48

SoftBalletShoes · 07/01/2026 22:43

Since trans women are women, imo, being told to use the men's when you're actually a woman is a violation of your rights. I'm sure you wouldn't like to be told to use the men's, so why is it different for a trans woman?

Show quote history

It doesn't matter how many times you say a man is a woman it doesn't make it true. They are men, I don't care where they go as long as it's not the women's. And having spent my working life being misgendered often It wouldn't upset me to be told to use the men's. I'd be rather bemused but that's about it.

SoftBalletShoes · 07/01/2026 22:43

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 07/01/2026 20:04

This claim fails on two grounds:

Genocide is, by definition, a crime that can only be committed against a racial, ethnic, national, or religious group. Unless you are trying to claim with a straight face that trans ideology is a religion, this definition cannot apply to trans people.

Being told to use your own sex's facilities isn't a human rights violation. Neither is being told to compete in the sports team for own sex, nor being housed in your own sex's prison. Genocide requires human rights violations on a large scale, and the US simply isn't doing that.

Edited

Since trans women are women, imo, being told to use the men's when you're actually a woman is a violation of your rights. I'm sure you wouldn't like to be told to use the men's, so why is it different for a trans woman?

SoftBalletShoes · 07/01/2026 22:41

Trans people do face a huge risk of violence, but I think calling it genocide is a bit much. Genocide is state-sponsored mass killing. Trans people are at risk from individual right-wing bigots, not armies.

Helleofabore · 07/01/2026 22:07

Didn’t we get warned in July last years that the SC judgement meant the UK was heading to genocidal territory?

Surely that warning was 15 years too late? After all the EA came in in 2010?

Helleofabore · 07/01/2026 22:02

https://archive.is/JFcLc

Archive link

potpourree · 07/01/2026 21:30

Oops, didn't realise I wasn't allowed to allude to similar threads that have already discussed this topic.
But no threats were involved, fear not!

SquirrelSoShiny · 07/01/2026 21:08

Every time I think I've reached peak contempt for these revolting narcissists they surprise me anew.

NecessaryScene · 07/01/2026 21:07

Is that a coded threat?

Must be stage 7 of genocide, surely?

Original poster

TheAmusedQuail · 07/01/2026 21:06

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Is that a coded threat?

OP posts:

SionnachRuadh · 07/01/2026 21:03

NecessaryScene · 07/01/2026 20:56

And there was me thinking the OP had omitted whatever they wrote to minimise the chance of embarrassment.

This is nitpicking on top of the more fundamental issues, but the IAGC is the International Association of GeoChemistry. Which in turn is its own sort of capital offence.

Edited

I wouldn't worry about it. I sometimes go on dating sites and see women saying "no ONS", and I wonder for a moment why they've got it in for the Office of National Statistics.

Cocomelon67 · 07/01/2026 20:58

Seethlaw · 07/01/2026 20:32

For those who want to waste a few minutes reading the whole nonsense: https://www.lemkininstitute.com/single-post/experts-warn-u-s-in-early-stages-of-genocide-against-trans-americans

And yes, they go there:

"He cautioned that transgender Americans are more vulnerable than other groups due to their population size. Today, they make up roughly one percent of the total U.S. population—a rough equivalent to Jews in 1933 Germany. "

I would say that you couldn't make this up, but, well, they do.

I have kept re-reading this thinking I must have misunderstood because it’s so unbelievably shocking.

Original poster

TheAmusedQuail · 07/01/2026 20:57

NecessaryScene · 07/01/2026 20:56

And there was me thinking the OP had omitted whatever they wrote to minimise the chance of embarrassment.

This is nitpicking on top of the more fundamental issues, but the IAGC is the International Association of GeoChemistry. Which in turn is its own sort of capital offence.

Edited

Worry not. No embarrassment here.

OP posts:

potpourree · 07/01/2026 20:56

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Seethlaw · 07/01/2026 20:56

TheAmusedQuail · 07/01/2026 20:47

Images didn't attach.

10 Stages of Genocide:

Classification: People are divided into "us and them" - it's trans people who divide the entire world into "trans and cis people".
Symbolisation: People are forced to identify themselves - it's trans people who insist on declaring themselves and children as trans.
Discrimination: People begin to face systematic discrimination - trans people have exactly the same rights as everyone else in the US and the UK.

So according to that list, the very first steps of genocide are not reached, not even close.

NecessaryScene · 07/01/2026 20:56

And there was me thinking the OP had omitted whatever they wrote to minimise the chance of embarrassment.

This is nitpicking on top of the more fundamental issues, but the IAGC is the International Association of GeoChemistry. Which in turn is its own sort of capital offence.

LeftieRightsHoarder · 07/01/2026 20:51

Greyskybluesky · 07/01/2026 20:30

Oh, well in that case it must be true then 🙄

Raphael Lemkin, after whom this institute was named (without the consent of his descendants*) knew what genocide really was. He was a Holocaust survivor.

*the family are pursuing the institute's founders in court

Show quote history

Oh that is truly disgusting. Christ, stealing the name of a real Holocaust survivor to big up their silly little whinge-factory. They really have no shame.

Original poster

TheAmusedQuail · 07/01/2026 20:47

Images didn't attach.

OP posts:

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 07/01/2026 20:42

MarieDeGournay · 07/01/2026 20:41

Can they sink any further? Have they no shame? Is nothing safe from them? Is nothing sacred to them?
all rhetorical questions, they constantly amaze with the new depths they sink to.

The only think sacred to them is the demands of men.

MarieDeGournay · 07/01/2026 20:41

Can they sink any further? Have they no shame? Is nothing safe from them? Is nothing sacred to them?
all rhetorical questions, they constantly amaze with the new depths they sink to.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 07/01/2026 20:40

Greyskybluesky · 07/01/2026 20:30

Oh, well in that case it must be true then 🙄

Raphael Lemkin, after whom this institute was named (without the consent of his descendants*) knew what genocide really was. He was a Holocaust survivor.

*the family are pursuing the institute's founders in court

Show quote history

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250915579317/en/European-Jewish-Association-and-Lemkin-Family-Demand-Halt-to-Misuse-of-Raphael-Lemkins-Name-by-Lemkin-Institute

Grifters gonna grift.