Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Has anyone left their spouse over GC views / pro-Islam stance

336 replies

PinkTreeFrog · 25/12/2025 13:47

Husband and I could never find common ground on gender critical views and his blindness to the harms of Islam to women. He has an inability to take in information that contradicts his world view. Has anyone left a spouse over this?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 21:34

1984Now · 25/12/2025 21:29

Let's ignore the stats that show a big proportion of TIMs in US women's jails are sex offenders.

...but it doesn't follow that transgender people in the general population are more likely to be sex offenders.

BruisedPear · 25/12/2025 21:31

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 19:59

The hijab is optional? Tell that to 6 year old girls covered in head to toe at primary school on a hot summer's day. The 6 year old isn't the one who choses to be completely covered when the rest of her female classmates aren't, is she? I think you have a naive and romanticised idea in your head. I've seen 5 and 6 year old girls in hijab. Do you genuinely think they made that choice?

I've seem Muslim women completely covered in thick clothing on the beach on a scorching hot day, and the husband is in the water with their children. She is sitting completely covered in black thick clothes on the sand. Are you really asking us to believe she chooses that, and not to be in the water, too?

Islam teaches the hijab is optional and after puberty so what you’re describing are cultural and familial differences not religious teachings.

If a woman is being forced it’s men using religion as a tool of oppression similar to the use of Christianity to erode women’s rights in the US or Catholicism used to inflict reproductive abuse on women.

Muslims are not are monolith similar to Christianity, Judaism or Catholicism there are cultural differences. Men use religion, money, violence, shame and whatever else they can to oppress women.

You can see a head scarf to identify a Muslim hijabi but you don’t know how many women don’t wear the hijab but are practicing Muslims? There’s multiple women on this thread that have echoed this.

The Christian practices in the US mega churches are cultural and unlike the Christianity in the UK. A lot of people in this thread seem incapable of making that distinction culture and religion are different.

1984Now · 25/12/2025 21:29

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 21:09

I'm always eager to learn, and to keep myself safe, but I have never seen any actual evidence that trans women are more dangerous than cis men. So please, go ahead and post a link to the apparent multiple peer reviewed studies or official statistics which prove your point.

Let's ignore the stats that show a big proportion of TIMs in US women's jails are sex offenders.

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 21:27

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 21:26

Did you even look at the screenshots? It SAYS on them EXACTLY where they're from!!!

Humour me, where are they from?

I don't see any journals or official stats, but maybe I've missed it.

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 21:26

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 21:21

Except the Trans Ideology is targeting (mainly autistic) children, and encouraging gay children to chemically sterilise themselves. It is actually happening. That's the truth. Where it wasn't with the gay community.

I'm autistic. It didn't happen to me. Should we also take that as evidence?

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 21:26

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 21:25

I asked for peer reviewed studies and official statistics. You have given screenshots with no indication of where they came from.

Do you understand why I asked for official, verifiable facts? It's very easy to be taken in by infographics, but that doesn't mean they are actually accurate or are presenting statistics in a responsible way. It's easy to believe things we already believe, and easy to not actually check facts when the information given supports our view.

Can you give any actual, accurate facts (that aren't screenshots of tweets)?

Did you even look at the screenshots? It SAYS on them EXACTLY where they're from!!!

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 21:25

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 21:12

UK and US:

I asked for peer reviewed studies and official statistics. You have given screenshots with no indication of where they came from.

Do you understand why I asked for official, verifiable facts? It's very easy to be taken in by infographics, but that doesn't mean they are actually accurate or are presenting statistics in a responsible way. It's easy to believe things we already believe, and easy to not actually check facts when the information given supports our view.

Can you give any actual, accurate facts (that aren't screenshots of tweets)?

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 21:21

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 21:16

None of that is relevant to what I have said. The basic form of homophobia (they're perverted!, it's unnatural!, it's dangerous!, they want to indoctrinate our kids with their gay ideology!) is carrying through to the transphobic ideology that we see today.

If a random gay man or other people on the internet happen to be transphobic, it doesn't change that.

Except the Trans Ideology is targeting (mainly autistic) children, and encouraging gay children to chemically sterilise themselves. It is actually happening. That's the truth. Where it wasn't with the gay community.

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 21:16

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 21:05

Forgot to add that this is not 'Gay 2.0'. Gay people took nothing from women and girls. That there, is the difference. Here, from a gay man himself:

None of that is relevant to what I have said. The basic form of homophobia (they're perverted!, it's unnatural!, it's dangerous!, they want to indoctrinate our kids with their gay ideology!) is carrying through to the transphobic ideology that we see today.

If a random gay man or other people on the internet happen to be transphobic, it doesn't change that.

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 21:13

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 21:09

I'm always eager to learn, and to keep myself safe, but I have never seen any actual evidence that trans women are more dangerous than cis men. So please, go ahead and post a link to the apparent multiple peer reviewed studies or official statistics which prove your point.

Canada and New Zealand:

Has anyone left their spouse over GC views / pro-Islam stance
Has anyone left their spouse over GC views / pro-Islam stance
ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 21:12

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 21:09

I'm always eager to learn, and to keep myself safe, but I have never seen any actual evidence that trans women are more dangerous than cis men. So please, go ahead and post a link to the apparent multiple peer reviewed studies or official statistics which prove your point.

UK and US:

Has anyone left their spouse over GC views / pro-Islam stance
Has anyone left their spouse over GC views / pro-Islam stance
Has anyone left their spouse over GC views / pro-Islam stance
Has anyone left their spouse over GC views / pro-Islam stance
YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 21:09

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 21:01

No one is assuming that about all transgender people.

We are saying MALES are all potentially dangerous. This does not change if that male is wearing a dress (in fact, evidence over 4 countries shows transwomen commit sexual offences 5 times higher than other males). You appear to think it does. So yes, you do appear to think that calling a male a transgender is relabeling them.

I'm always eager to learn, and to keep myself safe, but I have never seen any actual evidence that trans women are more dangerous than cis men. So please, go ahead and post a link to the apparent multiple peer reviewed studies or official statistics which prove your point.

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 21:05

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 20:57

At no stage would I ever accuse someone of being transphobic for supporting women's rights (I support women's rights myself!), so I'm unsure why you chose to say that.

I didn't mention people who support women's rights, I mentioned people who are transphobic, which is a different thing.

Assuming all transgender people are somehow dangerous or perverted is transphobic (much in the same way that people used to have 'genuine concerns' about gay people when it was actually just simple homophobia).

It's just not accurate to say that calling someone transgender is 'relabeling' males.

Forgot to add that this is not 'Gay 2.0'. Gay people took nothing from women and girls. That there, is the difference. Here, from a gay man himself:

Has anyone left their spouse over GC views / pro-Islam stance
Has anyone left their spouse over GC views / pro-Islam stance
YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 21:03

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 20:46

You realise that while many women are Catholic, very, very, very few are nuns, right? And women who are not nun don't wear the habit?

So the comparison doesn't even work.

Your initial point, in the post I relied to, was that nuns don't wear the habit. This is inaccurate, although I wonder why you even made the (non-factual) point in the first place, since it's apparently irrelevant.

How about you answer the questions I asked, instead of trying to avoid them? Is their choice valid to you?

BeNoisyFish · 25/12/2025 21:01

I hope you're equally critical of other faiths and don't have a religion.

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 21:01

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 20:57

At no stage would I ever accuse someone of being transphobic for supporting women's rights (I support women's rights myself!), so I'm unsure why you chose to say that.

I didn't mention people who support women's rights, I mentioned people who are transphobic, which is a different thing.

Assuming all transgender people are somehow dangerous or perverted is transphobic (much in the same way that people used to have 'genuine concerns' about gay people when it was actually just simple homophobia).

It's just not accurate to say that calling someone transgender is 'relabeling' males.

No one is assuming that about all transgender people.

We are saying MALES are all potentially dangerous. This does not change if that male is wearing a dress (in fact, evidence over 4 countries shows transwomen commit sexual offences 5 times higher than other males). You appear to think it does. So yes, you do appear to think that calling a male a transgender is relabeling them.

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 20:57

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 20:44

Supporting WOMENS RIGHTS does not mean we "don't like" 'transgender' people. Believing fully intact males should not be in womens changing rooms does not mean we "don't like" 'transgender' people.

We all know males. We don't need to get to know males to know they shouldn't be in female only safe spaces, in our rape crisis centres, in our sports etc.

You know, you don't get to relabel males as 'transgender' and think that gives them the right to violate female only boundaries and spaces.

At no stage would I ever accuse someone of being transphobic for supporting women's rights (I support women's rights myself!), so I'm unsure why you chose to say that.

I didn't mention people who support women's rights, I mentioned people who are transphobic, which is a different thing.

Assuming all transgender people are somehow dangerous or perverted is transphobic (much in the same way that people used to have 'genuine concerns' about gay people when it was actually just simple homophobia).

It's just not accurate to say that calling someone transgender is 'relabeling' males.

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 20:46

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 20:44

I've met a fair few nuns who would be better very surprised to hear that they no longer wear the habit. It's not compulsory, but they still choose it.

Is their choice valid to you? Or would you tell them they are they subjugated and forced to cover their hair? Would you accept their reasoning, or would you tell them they don't know their own minds?

You realise that while many women are Catholic, very, very, very few are nuns, right? And women who are not nun don't wear the habit?

So the comparison doesn't even work.

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 20:44

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 20:08

Always with the nuns...

Nuns stopped wearing the habit in the 1960s after Vatican 2. Christianity has evolved and modernised. Islam doesn't, and it stays the same.

I've met a fair few nuns who would be better very surprised to hear that they no longer wear the habit. It's not compulsory, but they still choose it.

Is their choice valid to you? Or would you tell them they are they subjugated and forced to cover their hair? Would you accept their reasoning, or would you tell them they don't know their own minds?

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 20:44

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 20:35

Right. So you don't like Muslims and transgender people. Unfortunately for you, this doesn't mean that you get to decide that anyone who doesn't subscribe to your views are 'anti-woman'. It's simply not logical to decide anyone who won't automatically discriminate against a person for your reasons doesn't like or respect women.

Have you ever known a woman who wore a hijab, or a trans person? Have you ever considered that their lives may be more complex and nuanced than your opinions?

It's possible to be wary of the harms of radical religion without deciding all members of that religion are harmful. It's possible to respect transgender people without assuming that they are all harmful or are somehow trying to erase women with their existence.

The things that you are saying are not reasonable fears, they are bigotry and unfounded hatred.

Edited

Supporting WOMENS RIGHTS does not mean we "don't like" 'transgender' people. Believing fully intact males should not be in womens changing rooms does not mean we "don't like" 'transgender' people.

We all know males. We don't need to get to know males to know they shouldn't be in female only safe spaces, in our rape crisis centres, in our sports etc.

You know, you don't get to relabel males as 'transgender' and think that gives them the right to violate female only boundaries and spaces.

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 20:35

Right. So you don't like Muslims and transgender people. Unfortunately for you, this doesn't mean that you get to decide that anyone who doesn't subscribe to your views are 'anti-woman'. It's simply not logical to decide anyone who won't automatically discriminate against a person for your reasons doesn't like or respect women.

Have you ever known a woman who wore a hijab, or a trans person? Have you ever considered that their lives may be more complex and nuanced than your opinions?

It's possible to be wary of the harms of radical religion without deciding all members of that religion are harmful. It's possible to respect transgender people without assuming that they are all harmful or are somehow trying to erase women with their existence.

The things that you are saying are not reasonable fears, they are bigotry and unfounded hatred.

TY78910 · 25/12/2025 20:20

Frogbear · 25/12/2025 14:58

I understand that in some contexts women are treated unfairly, and that should absolutely be criticised. But saying that wearing the hijab automatically means women are worth less than men is a huge generalisation and doesn’t reflect the reality I see.

I personally know many hijab-wearing women who are respected, educated, financially independent, and treated no less favourably than their male family members. For them, the hijab is a choice tied to faith and identity, not a symbol of inferiority.

The generalisation in your viewpoint is actually quite damaging too.

This. OP your views on Islam are questionable. If I was him, I’d be divorcing you too.

nameobsessed · 25/12/2025 20:18

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 19:59

The hijab is optional? Tell that to 6 year old girls covered in head to toe at primary school on a hot summer's day. The 6 year old isn't the one who choses to be completely covered when the rest of her female classmates aren't, is she? I think you have a naive and romanticised idea in your head. I've seen 5 and 6 year old girls in hijab. Do you genuinely think they made that choice?

I've seem Muslim women completely covered in thick clothing on the beach on a scorching hot day, and the husband is in the water with their children. She is sitting completely covered in black thick clothes on the sand. Are you really asking us to believe she chooses that, and not to be in the water, too?

I work with children, I have worked with a lot of children from Muslim families and yes they absolutely do ask to wear it at 5,6,7 years old.

Mum, sisters, aunties, friends older sisters, neighbours etc. wear them and celebrate them and the children pick up on that and want to be included. I have also worked with girls who didn’t want to wear it, and didn’t.

nameobsessed · 25/12/2025 20:15

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 19:31

b) started being some kind of anti trans activist I would leave.

Yet if he became some kind of anti women activist you would stay?

As I said misogyny is absolutely a leaving worthy offence.

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 20:08

Judgejudysno1fan · 25/12/2025 17:59

Well ur certainly not wearing it so why become sad with something you dont wear.
You are making assumptions that we are forced to wear and our husbands superglue to it our heads before pummelling it into us that we are haram sluts without it. Hahaha.

What about nuns, they look fab dont you think

Always with the nuns...

Nuns stopped wearing the habit in the 1960s after Vatican 2. Christianity has evolved and modernised. Islam doesn't, and it stays the same.

Swipe left for the next trending thread