Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Has anyone left their spouse over GC views / pro-Islam stance

336 replies

PinkTreeFrog · 25/12/2025 13:47

Husband and I could never find common ground on gender critical views and his blindness to the harms of Islam to women. He has an inability to take in information that contradicts his world view. Has anyone left a spouse over this?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
Judgejudysno1fan · 26/12/2025 13:26

Yes thanks for clarifying that and I appreciate it @Greyskybluesky ❤️

Judgejudysno1fan · 26/12/2025 13:25

Greyskybluesky · 26/12/2025 12:40

Are you able to say a bit more about why you don't want people outside your family seeing your hair @Judgejudysno1fan ? I'd genuinely like to understand more about that viewpoint. To me it's just...hair. But it has more significance than that for you?

(I'm asking in good faith, for the purpose of learning something. I'm not being goady like some on this thread)

Because I see it more than just hair. I see it as beauty. And some Muslim women in Africa who have short almost bald hair still cover.
All Women can see my hair.
My husband, my father, father in law, grandfather, grandfather in law, maternal uncles and paternal uncles, my nephews and my brothers can see my hair, young cousins but not older cousins can see my hair, young kids can see my hair.

Its also about not showing your figure too. Men are attracted to women, if a man sees a nice good looking lady hes going to turn his head. Its all about protecting your beauty from unwanted glances and stares or awful men trying to chat you up.

RedTagAlan · 26/12/2025 13:23

Judgejudysno1fan · 26/12/2025 12:16

Ok so just forget the old Testament? Chuck that out it doesn't matter anymore? Really? The ten commandments are over ridden by the new Testament? Wow.

For some reason @ThatBlackCat is missing out the rules for women that are in the new testament

Eph 5:22-23 " Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. "

1 Tim 2:9-12 "In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works. Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence."

1Pe 3:1-3 " Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives.While they behold your chaste conversation coupled with fear. Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel."

Col 3:18 " Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord. "

1 Cor 14:34-35 "Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church. "

There is more, but I will tag this bit on here, because it's about head covering.

1 Cor 11:5 " But every wife who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head, since it is the same as if her head were shaven."

And of course, re the OT rules, Jesus himself mentioned that in Matt 5:18 " For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled."

So that was Jesus saying the Mosaic law still stands. What fulfilled means ? No idea.

So the NT is totally clear, women are to be silent, be obedient to their husbands, and cover their head when they prey.

Just because many Christians of today choose to ignore what is written in the NT, it does not mean the rules are not written there.

All verses I quoted are from the KJV.

And no, this is not a chatGPT post. I am ex Christian and have a bible app to cut and paste from.

.

Anactor · 26/12/2025 13:09

@KitWyn
”I've lived in London for over 2 decades. I've seen an Orthodox Jewish man/group of men in public only a dozen or so times. Never a woman. Which is, of course, a red flag itself.”

That’s weird, and makes me think that you’re expecting Charedi women to be wearing different clothes than they are - so you didn’t recognise them. They tend to be the ones who work - the men are often studying - and there’s no ‘you shouldn’t go out unless a man is with you’.

Greyskybluesky · 26/12/2025 12:40

Are you able to say a bit more about why you don't want people outside your family seeing your hair @Judgejudysno1fan ? I'd genuinely like to understand more about that viewpoint. To me it's just...hair. But it has more significance than that for you?

(I'm asking in good faith, for the purpose of learning something. I'm not being goady like some on this thread)

Judgejudysno1fan · 26/12/2025 12:32

KitWyn · 25/12/2025 22:57

The majority of the very small number of UK women who convert to islam each year, do so largely for a Muslim man they are romantically interested in. This is unsurprising as Islam is very misogynistic.

Who would want to join a religion where you're not even allowed in the main prayer hall, and can never ever be a priest, just because you don't have a penis and Y-chromosome? Why should those irrelevant aspects matter at all to an all-knowing/powerful/loving God? Can women not sufficiently learn/understand/speak the religious texts? And can they not be sufficiently good, wise, charismatic & brave? Do women not matter as much in Islam because they are considered inferior and so may only follow/watch/obey the men?

The reverting (not converting) aspect is odd. Believing all humans are born Muslim, so a convert is merely returning to the 'one true and definitely final faith' is not very respectful. We live in a multifaith and no-faith society. We don't impose our religion on people we don't know. It's very rude.

Requiring women to always cover their hair to be 'modest' and avoid attracting male attention implies that men are unable to control themselves. It's very controlling of women and very insulting of men.

The Old Testament also forbids eating shellfish and wearing clothes made from two different fibres. One of the benefits of Christianity is it doesn't claim perfection. And I understand from Christian friends that the teachings of the New Testament are considered paramount. The Old Testament is more for context.

If you convert to islam for a man, not from your heart and own beliefs then shes not a true Muslim.
I reverted after learning from my husband and felt it in my heart thats what I wanted. I was Christian before but lost my interest in the church as I couldn't fathom worshipping jesus who God created. Not the other way round or how he can be God and son of God. I beleived in one God , one creator, one lord.

Youre right to say no one should impose their religion but its also good to share knowledge and learn similarities and differences. For example Muslims believe in Jesus and mother Mary. And we love jesus as a mighty prophet. And we beleive in his miraculous birth and his second coming and the miracles which he performed through God's will.

I wear hijab. For the reasons being : God said to do so, in the quran and the old Testament. I believe in a lot of verses that mirror the old ans new Testament and quran and i wont have anyone tell me otherwise.
Secondly, I dont want any man outside my husbans and family regardless of who they are to see my hair, neck and chest. I really dont.

I dont care if anyone thinks im.opressed. really couldn't give a monkeys bananas. I love hijab and my non Muslim family and friends comment on how pretty my scarves are and that they suit me. And if a nun covers her hair ,and someone said shes opressed I wouldn't be happy with that either. I dont see myself lesser than my husband. I dont cover because men cant control themselves. I cover simply because I don't want any one seeing my hair, if they're Hindu, Christian, Buddhist, Sikh, atheist, Muslim, whatever. Im happy. My husband actually never once asked or told me to wear the hijab and I did it off my own back ine year after reverting to islam. Thats really it.

Judgejudysno1fan · 26/12/2025 12:16

ThatBlackCat · 25/12/2025 20:03

Wearing the burqa is about preserving a woman's 'honor', as if being fully covered does that. But men don't need to be fully covered. That there, is the sexism, the misogyny, and how it's out of touch with western values.

And the difference is the New Testament over-rides the Old Testament. We don't live by the Old Testament. Christianity has changed. Islam, has not.

Ok so just forget the old Testament? Chuck that out it doesn't matter anymore? Really? The ten commandments are over ridden by the new Testament? Wow.

Lovelyview · 26/12/2025 08:46

I haven't read all the comments. I think it's probably very common over the course of a long relationship for political views to diverge somewhat. I don't think it's essential for two people to agree on everything in a relationship but I think agreeing to disagree is probably the best solution rather than trying to change someone else's mind.

KitWyn · 26/12/2025 08:36

Whatwerewetalkingabout · 26/12/2025 00:21

I'm curious if transphobia is a gateway drug to Islamaphobia or if Islamaphobia is a gateway drug to transphobia. 😬

If you care about women's rights, safety and freedoms, then it's very logical to be opposed to:

  • adult males (however they identify) using women-only spaces, and
  • misogynistic religious practices

Islam is much larger in number in the UK, than the (also awful, misogynistic and controlling) Orthodox Judaism. Hence people's primary focus on Islam.

I've lived in London for over 2 decades. I've seen an Orthodox Jewish man/group of men in public only a dozen or so times. Never a woman. Which is, of course, a red flag itself.

But I see multiple women in hijabs (often with floor-sweeping baggy black tunics) on a daily basis in central Westminster. In nearby Edgware Road and Paddington, women in full face-covering burqas are very common.

No woman should be required to shroud herself in fabric in order to be 'modest' and not inflame men's 'uncontrollable lusts'. It is regressive, depressing and insulting.

redmountain · 26/12/2025 07:36

YesIReallyDidOK · 25/12/2025 21:03

Your initial point, in the post I relied to, was that nuns don't wear the habit. This is inaccurate, although I wonder why you even made the (non-factual) point in the first place, since it's apparently irrelevant.

How about you answer the questions I asked, instead of trying to avoid them? Is their choice valid to you?

I live in Ireland and used to see the occasional nun wearing a habit in the 1980s. I dont’t see any nowadays. There is a house near me with 3 nuns working in the parish and they just wear ordinary clothes.

VashtaNerada · 26/12/2025 05:51

I don’t agree with your views at all OP but I think that can almost be put to one side to get to the heart of what you’re asking - should partners agree on these sorts of things? I think for me it does matter. DH and I don’t agree on absolutely everything (for example he is more GC than me) but we are able to have good-natured conversation about things and our views aren’t fundamentally opposed. I think if we did disagree completely on big issues like gender and race, that would make our relationship extremely difficult.

BoxesBoxesEverywhere · 26/12/2025 02:55

I haven't said that women should or shouldn't be nice
Erm.. yes, I know. That was kind of the point.
It's usually what's said on here. Double standards, seemingly ok from you when it's against viewpoints/posters you don't agree with.

Your posts were patronising and rude - sounds pretty tone policing. Was just saying that the usual "women don't have to be nice" stance doesn't seem to apply today.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/12/2025 02:35

You seem to be on a different thread, @BoxesBoxesEverywhere- I haven’t said that women should or shouldn’t be “nice”. I made an observation about the specific posts another poster was making, as is my right. I’ll leave you to it as you clearly want an argument and have a bee in your bonnet about FWR.

BoxesBoxesEverywhere · 26/12/2025 02:28

BettyBooper · 26/12/2025 01:34

Er, no. Are you?

The poster I was quoting was "scolding" for patronising and rude. Not you?
What happened to "women don't have to be nice?"

Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/12/2025 02:19

Ereshkigalangcleg · 25/12/2025 21:59

The E&W one is based on the number of “trans women” as self declared in the 2021 census as the men who identify as women population. It’s not a figure the website made up. The sex offenders in prison figure comes from a government report. The male figure is the adult male population compared to the number of male sex offenders in prison. They are all based on official figures whether you want to deny it or not.

I will say there is quite an interesting discussion about these figures on the author’s website, where the workings are shown in detail and links are available to the data for anyone who wants to check the sources.

https://scientificparentofatranskid.substack.com/p/fact-check-rates-of-sexual-offending

Fact Check: Rates of Sexual Offending

I don’t think many people will dispute the fact that males are responsible for the vast majority of sexual offences, and females make up the vast majority of victims.

https://scientificparentofatranskid.substack.com/p/fact-check-rates-of-sexual-offending

Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/12/2025 02:05

BettyBooper · 26/12/2025 01:31

These stats are so readily available (notwithstanding just using one's own brain for a nanosecond) that arguing the opposite at this stage is a complete own-goal.

Just Google it.

Or think.

I agree and I’m wasting no more time on it.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/12/2025 02:04

YesIReallyDidOK · 26/12/2025 01:34

Statistics presented without any source given, and therefore no context as to whether they are appropriate in support of her opinion.

You've made all manner of assumptions about me, simply because I've asked for evidence based information and actual sources, and the end result is akin to "look it up yourself". Ok.

She did give sources! They are census and MoJ or US gov sources, and the authors of the infographics’ posts are linked! Why are you misrepresenting her posts now?

BettyBooper · 26/12/2025 01:47

BettyBooper · 26/12/2025 01:41

Put this into Google and have a read:

trans women prisoners uk stats offences

I tend to read the official gov sites myself.

Noone here is trying to trick you. Look for yourself.

BettyBooper · 26/12/2025 01:41

YesIReallyDidOK · 26/12/2025 01:34

Statistics presented without any source given, and therefore no context as to whether they are appropriate in support of her opinion.

You've made all manner of assumptions about me, simply because I've asked for evidence based information and actual sources, and the end result is akin to "look it up yourself". Ok.

Put this into Google and have a read:

trans women prisoners uk stats offences

YesIReallyDidOK · 26/12/2025 01:34

Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/12/2025 01:26

And your posts to @ThatBlackCat were patronising and rude, you said she had just posted a “picture” as if it was a picture of her cat, rather then statistics presented in an infographic format.

Edited

Statistics presented without any source given, and therefore no context as to whether they are appropriate in support of her opinion.

You've made all manner of assumptions about me, simply because I've asked for evidence based information and actual sources, and the end result is akin to "look it up yourself". Ok.

BettyBooper · 26/12/2025 01:34

BoxesBoxesEverywhere · 26/12/2025 01:28

And your posts to @ThatBlackCat were patronising and rude

Are we tone policing now?

Er, no. Are you?

BettyBooper · 26/12/2025 01:31

Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/12/2025 01:26

And your posts to @ThatBlackCat were patronising and rude, you said she had just posted a “picture” as if it was a picture of her cat, rather then statistics presented in an infographic format.

Edited

These stats are so readily available (notwithstanding just using one's own brain for a nanosecond) that arguing the opposite at this stage is a complete own-goal.

Just Google it.

Or think.

Holluschickie · 26/12/2025 01:29

We appear to have drifted away from the subject. Yes, OP should leave her husband.

BoxesBoxesEverywhere · 26/12/2025 01:28

And your posts to @ThatBlackCat were patronising and rude

Are we tone policing now?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/12/2025 01:26

And your posts to @ThatBlackCat were patronising and rude, you said she had just posted a “picture” as if it was a picture of her cat, rather then statistics presented in an infographic format.