Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

URGENT help needed please re college socially transitioning daughter

134 replies

ConcernedmumofTIF · 19/12/2025 12:25

I just typed out a whole long post and it disappeared! I'll start again.

I did post about my daughter a few weeks ago under a different name. I am a long term user but name changed for this for anonymity.

TLDR: my daughter is autistic with health issues and mental health issues and has expressed to college she wants to be called a male name. She has told me she wants hormones and double mastectomy. College is socially transitioning her and are using the male name in her official EHCP review documents. I asked them not to but they are ignoring me. What do I do next? I have to reply TODAY as they break up for Christmas this afternoon. Should I raise a saeguarding concern or should I wait and see what happens with the finalised document? (And does anyone know if I can appeal it if they include this other name in it?)

Longer story: she first expressed a non binary identity 2-3 years ago and we talked amicably about it, she knows I am gender critical and I explained why I hold my views, and why I wouldn't use the male name. She seemed OK with this and we have a very close relationship as I am also her carer and she wants me to handle lots of things for her - we talk a lot and spend time together daily doing cetain things she likes as a daily ritual.

Since then, she has obviously become more radicalised (evident in the way she talks about trans although interestingly she was unaware of the Tavistock, or Cass Review, or much of the key stuff) and has said she now identifies as a man, but also as a lesbian (but in a queer way, apparently) and wants hormones and a double mastectomy.

I am deeply concerned that college socially transitioning her is legitimising these desires and also isolating her from us as her family by being all "we will support you when your parents won't".

I have the Bayswater Group guide on safeguarding and have also put my daughter on the waiting list with a therapist who understands the dangers of all of this but they can't see her until March.

I just don't know what to do. I feel sick seeing this other name on offical documents and knowing the damage that is doing. My daughter is vulnerable - autistic, disabled with mental health issues and I think also OCD which I am about to contact the GP about as it's only recently I have realised that some of her rituals are more likely OCD than autistic. I feel college have a duty of care not to just socially transtition her.

Please help me work out a good course of action.

This is the college safeguarding policy https://www.activatelearning.ac.uk/app/uploads/sites/2/2021/07/Safeguarding-Policy.pdf

I've also looked at other relevant policies and nothing specifically covers social transition though there is mention of not tolerating "transphobia".

https://www.activatelearning.ac.uk/app/uploads/sites/2/2021/07/Safeguarding-Policy.pdf

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
ScrollingLeaves · 21/12/2025 22:54

Arran2024 · 21/12/2025 22:48

Tbf, autism, adhd, personality disorder, attachment disorder....they are all just diagnosed by subjective analysis and often you get a particular diagnosis because of the specialism of the professional you see.

I have two adopted daughters and both have so many diagnoses - they score on everything they have ever been assessed for. And that's because they were severely traumatised from birth at the hands of their birth parents and they still suffer from the effects of what happened to them.

They have all the symptoms of adhd, learning disabilities, executive functioning disorder, speech and language disorder, adhd, personality disorder, OCD.....

All the professionals disagree with each other, preferring their diagnosis over the others.

And this is typical of kids who present as trans according to the Tavistock figures. 98% had another factor.

They are sad kids for a reason. Saying they tick the boxes for a trans diagnosis is therefore meaningless .

I am very interested by what you say, and can well believe it.

Arran2024 · 21/12/2025 22:48

AidaP · 21/12/2025 22:27

You mean DSM criteria and symptoms observed by clinician(s) trained in that speciality are not symptoms? Then yes, you are also dismissing ADHD/Autism and other conditions that have no CT scan or blood test or whatever is your new goal post evidence.

And hi new stalkers! Unlike you I don't hide my identity and life, funny how that works! I do enjoy in one post misgendering and insulting someone, while also claiming "good faith". Takes special level of self-gaslighing.

Edited

Tbf, autism, adhd, personality disorder, attachment disorder....they are all just diagnosed by subjective analysis and often you get a particular diagnosis because of the specialism of the professional you see.

I have two adopted daughters and both have so many diagnoses - they score on everything they have ever been assessed for. And that's because they were severely traumatised from birth at the hands of their birth parents and they still suffer from the effects of what happened to them.

They have all the symptoms of adhd, learning disabilities, executive functioning disorder, speech and language disorder, adhd, personality disorder, OCD.....

All the professionals disagree with each other, preferring their diagnosis over the others.

And this is typical of kids who present as trans according to the Tavistock figures. 98% had another factor.

They are sad kids for a reason. Saying they tick the boxes for a trans diagnosis is therefore meaningless .

AidaP · 21/12/2025 22:27

Seethlaw · 21/12/2025 20:29

So... many... untruths in there, it's staggering. PPs have pointed some of them out already.

What I'd like to remark on is the following two related things:

  1. @AidaP did not answer the question that had been asked of them, which was how to identify the kids who are mistaken about thinking they are trans.
  2. In fact, they go even further than that, by implying that there are only two categories of children: the immense majority who are right to think they are trans, and the very few ones who are lying about it. There's literally no room for the ones who mistakenly think they are trans.

Also, because it pisses me off:

That's just risk with every treatment and condition, and we do not stop treating other conditions, like depression, bipolar disorder, ADHD, because patient may be lying about symptoms

Those other conditions all have objectively observable symptoms. No kid is given medicine because they say they are depressed/bipolar/ADHD! They are given medicine because they exhibit symptoms of these conditions.

Not so with "trans kids", since there are NO such objective symptoms to observe to begin with.

You mean DSM criteria and symptoms observed by clinician(s) trained in that speciality are not symptoms? Then yes, you are also dismissing ADHD/Autism and other conditions that have no CT scan or blood test or whatever is your new goal post evidence.

And hi new stalkers! Unlike you I don't hide my identity and life, funny how that works! I do enjoy in one post misgendering and insulting someone, while also claiming "good faith". Takes special level of self-gaslighing.

ArabellaSaurus · 21/12/2025 20:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

He seems nice.

AMiddleClassWomanOfACertainAge · 21/12/2025 20:32

Would she be open to speaking with a therapist? If you join one of the support groups they should be able to signpost you to a non-affirming one. That’s what we did, my DD has not desisted socially with her friends and still dresses very gender neutral which we are obvs absolutely fine with, (but at home and wider family we do not affirm at all and all uni documents (in year 2) are in her original name). She hasn’t progressed to hormones or surgery though which to me is a massive win. It costs mind you, but far better that than the ideology addled NHS/educational system.
She is also autistic, suffers from anxiety and is bi, it’s like a tick list for ROGD girls.

Seethlaw · 21/12/2025 20:29

AidaP · 20/12/2025 10:19

By knowing how the system actually works for u18.

For u18, before the transphobic ban on blockers looked more or less like this:

  1. Child comes out trans, starts social transition in whatever form works best for them.
  2. Series of rapid assessment to get a baseline decision, this is held by multi-doctor panel, all of which are experts in the field.
  3. Puberty blockers for multiple years while regular assessment and observation continues. Those are safe, used for decades now, and the moment you come off them your puberty kicks back in with no lasting negative outcomes, it's literally a pause to prevent harm.
  4. If the multi-year observation supports a diagnosis, then it's possible to start HRT before 18 years old to ignite the correct puberty.
  5. That's that. Surgeries for U18 statistically just do not happen. It's technically possible, but just doesn't and is not part of WPATH recommendations in normal circumstances. There are exceptions, extremely hard to meet ones - and rightfully so.

Safeguards were always in place. Of course then there are very rare examples of a child and then young person who literally spent years lying to the doctors but... That's just risk with every treatment and condition, and we do not stop treating other conditions, like depression, bipolar disorder, ADHD, because patient may be lying about symptoms, standard that some demand to be applied to trans care, for some reason.

But unless you are trans or actually know someone who went through the process, but get the view from lying media, you would likely think you can just get something medical because you want it. Even for adults it doesn't work like that, and to get sex affirming surgery (privately as NHS wait is 10years+) you need to meet strict criteria, get multiple opinions (it can cost you 2k on opinions alone), and be on hormones for 1year+ under watch of a private endocrinologist.

And then it's worth adding that trans related care has LOWEST regret rade of any medica/cosmetic procedures, firmly study after study points it at below 1%. Nothing else medically comes even close to that outcome, even successful treatment of deadly cancer has regret rate of 13 to 40%. And that's when it literally saved your life from cancer. Hell, breast augmentation is between 5-9%.

So... many... untruths in there, it's staggering. PPs have pointed some of them out already.

What I'd like to remark on is the following two related things:

  1. @AidaP did not answer the question that had been asked of them, which was how to identify the kids who are mistaken about thinking they are trans.
  2. In fact, they go even further than that, by implying that there are only two categories of children: the immense majority who are right to think they are trans, and the very few ones who are lying about it. There's literally no room for the ones who mistakenly think they are trans.

Also, because it pisses me off:

That's just risk with every treatment and condition, and we do not stop treating other conditions, like depression, bipolar disorder, ADHD, because patient may be lying about symptoms

Those other conditions all have objectively observable symptoms. No kid is given medicine because they say they are depressed/bipolar/ADHD! They are given medicine because they exhibit symptoms of these conditions.

Not so with "trans kids", since there are NO such objective symptoms to observe to begin with.

moggly · 21/12/2025 20:03

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

WarriorN · 20/12/2025 18:17

To add; from 2026 children will be taught about parental responsibility in RSHE

teachers will not be allowed to teach as fact that everyone has a gender identity

they have to teach that biological sex has different rights afforded to it than people who believe they have a different gender identity

they are not allowed to perpetuate gender stereotypes

the term transphobia doesn’t feature. Homophobia and misogyny do.

WarriorN · 20/12/2025 12:04

GoodQueenWenceslaus · 20/12/2025 10:24

Under the Children and Families Act 2014, OP's child became a young person on reaching statutory school leaving age. The significance of that is that all the rights in relation to the EHCP pass over to the young person, in particular the right to be consulted about amendments to the EHCP and the right to have their wishes taken into account. The fact that OP is carer makes no difference, the young person always has the right to override that. The college therefore has little choice but to follow OP's child's wishes in relation to EHCP documentation.

There’s following wishes and there’s re naming the document when there’s been no legal precedent to do so!

borntobequiet · 20/12/2025 11:41

AidaP · 20/12/2025 10:19

By knowing how the system actually works for u18.

For u18, before the transphobic ban on blockers looked more or less like this:

  1. Child comes out trans, starts social transition in whatever form works best for them.
  2. Series of rapid assessment to get a baseline decision, this is held by multi-doctor panel, all of which are experts in the field.
  3. Puberty blockers for multiple years while regular assessment and observation continues. Those are safe, used for decades now, and the moment you come off them your puberty kicks back in with no lasting negative outcomes, it's literally a pause to prevent harm.
  4. If the multi-year observation supports a diagnosis, then it's possible to start HRT before 18 years old to ignite the correct puberty.
  5. That's that. Surgeries for U18 statistically just do not happen. It's technically possible, but just doesn't and is not part of WPATH recommendations in normal circumstances. There are exceptions, extremely hard to meet ones - and rightfully so.

Safeguards were always in place. Of course then there are very rare examples of a child and then young person who literally spent years lying to the doctors but... That's just risk with every treatment and condition, and we do not stop treating other conditions, like depression, bipolar disorder, ADHD, because patient may be lying about symptoms, standard that some demand to be applied to trans care, for some reason.

But unless you are trans or actually know someone who went through the process, but get the view from lying media, you would likely think you can just get something medical because you want it. Even for adults it doesn't work like that, and to get sex affirming surgery (privately as NHS wait is 10years+) you need to meet strict criteria, get multiple opinions (it can cost you 2k on opinions alone), and be on hormones for 1year+ under watch of a private endocrinologist.

And then it's worth adding that trans related care has LOWEST regret rade of any medica/cosmetic procedures, firmly study after study points it at below 1%. Nothing else medically comes even close to that outcome, even successful treatment of deadly cancer has regret rate of 13 to 40%. And that's when it literally saved your life from cancer. Hell, breast augmentation is between 5-9%.

This is one of the most disingenuous and dishonest things I have read on Mumsnet, and I include entirely made up stuff on AIBU. At least that’s sometimes entertaining. This is tragic and borderline malevolent.

Cantunseeit · 20/12/2025 11:32

AidaP · 20/12/2025 10:19

By knowing how the system actually works for u18.

For u18, before the transphobic ban on blockers looked more or less like this:

  1. Child comes out trans, starts social transition in whatever form works best for them.
  2. Series of rapid assessment to get a baseline decision, this is held by multi-doctor panel, all of which are experts in the field.
  3. Puberty blockers for multiple years while regular assessment and observation continues. Those are safe, used for decades now, and the moment you come off them your puberty kicks back in with no lasting negative outcomes, it's literally a pause to prevent harm.
  4. If the multi-year observation supports a diagnosis, then it's possible to start HRT before 18 years old to ignite the correct puberty.
  5. That's that. Surgeries for U18 statistically just do not happen. It's technically possible, but just doesn't and is not part of WPATH recommendations in normal circumstances. There are exceptions, extremely hard to meet ones - and rightfully so.

Safeguards were always in place. Of course then there are very rare examples of a child and then young person who literally spent years lying to the doctors but... That's just risk with every treatment and condition, and we do not stop treating other conditions, like depression, bipolar disorder, ADHD, because patient may be lying about symptoms, standard that some demand to be applied to trans care, for some reason.

But unless you are trans or actually know someone who went through the process, but get the view from lying media, you would likely think you can just get something medical because you want it. Even for adults it doesn't work like that, and to get sex affirming surgery (privately as NHS wait is 10years+) you need to meet strict criteria, get multiple opinions (it can cost you 2k on opinions alone), and be on hormones for 1year+ under watch of a private endocrinologist.

And then it's worth adding that trans related care has LOWEST regret rade of any medica/cosmetic procedures, firmly study after study points it at below 1%. Nothing else medically comes even close to that outcome, even successful treatment of deadly cancer has regret rate of 13 to 40%. And that's when it literally saved your life from cancer. Hell, breast augmentation is between 5-9%.

Echoing others who have already pointed out some of the inaccuracies in this. This is a load of dangerous twaddle.

Picking up specifically on the quoted 1% regret rate. If even life-saving cancer regret rates are higher, is it really plausible that they would be lower for surgeries with such high complication rates?

The supposed low regret rate makes sense in the context of an industry that keeps NO outcome data. However, more data from other countries is becoming available which puts desistence/ detransition rates as high as 30-60%. This still doesn’t account for those lost to follow up- so real figures could be even higher
https://segm.org/gender-dysphoria-diagnosis-desistance-germany

The Gender Dysphoria Diagnosis in Young People Has a “Low Diagnostic Stability,” Finds a New German Study

The study suggests that adolescent gender dysphoria may not persist for most

https://segm.org/gender-dysphoria-diagnosis-desistance-germany

BonfireLady · 20/12/2025 11:29

ConcernedmumofTIF · 20/12/2025 11:15

As OP I am happy for it to stay. I want sunlight on these vampires who seek to destroy our children with their lies.

Ironically, your own comment may end up being deleted..... Whether or not it does may well depend entirely on whether the poster self-IDs as described 🙃

But, yes.

ConcernedmumofTIF · 20/12/2025 11:15

BonfireLady · 20/12/2025 10:56

All of this.

On balance, it's a good thing that this post is wedged in the middle of this thread. I hope it stays there.

As OP I am happy for it to stay. I want sunlight on these vampires who seek to destroy our children with their lies.

OP posts:
BonfireLady · 20/12/2025 11:14

BonfireLady · 20/12/2025 10:55

Boom. That's your route in..... to both a sensitive conversation with your daughter and to challenge this falsified information on a legal document.

This (link ⬇️) article that I wrote nearly 3 years ago goes back to my own experience of when an organisation (in this case it was CAMHS) transed my daughter in paperwork without her asking for this. I've shared it before on other threads but not for a while now. Thankfully, it was the start of a long and positive journey towards sanity (within the CAMHS system, sadly not the school or the LA) where we're still seeing the benefits today. Those benefits have transposed across into the SALT and OT teams. At a simple level, that's what unlocked the conversations with these teams that I referred to above, even though none of it is actually in the EHCP itself.

https://www.transgendertrend.com/teenage-gender-identity-crisis/

I've mentioned some positive developments with the school in this article. Although that didn't fully realise itself, there are still people at the school who (I am as certain as I can be) are centring on the common sense side of things. In my experience OP, finding these people and keeping them on the journey with you is key.

I appreciate you're right in the thick of it in terms of building new relationships with the college but I really do recommend starting it. There will undoubtedly be people who will understand and help. Most professionals will remember what they know about children with autism if given some space and nudges to do so.

BruachAbhann · 20/12/2025 10:58

BonfireLady · 20/12/2025 10:30

Child comes out trans, starts social transition in whatever form works best for them.

And therein lies the start of the problem. Social transition is not a neutral act. The very act of doing it puts that child onto a pathway of ever more affirmative actions and interventions. And all of it is predicated on the unproven and unfalsifiable idea that we all have a gender identity that can differ from our sex: "true trans".

Well said!

BonfireLady · 20/12/2025 10:56

MrsOvertonsWindow · 20/12/2025 10:50

This post contains so many untruths I'm tempted to report it but won't because it demonstrates the level of deception that extreme transactivism deploys in order to persuade children that their uncomfortable developing bodies are flawed but a sex change is the cure.

Socially transitioning children is not a neutral act as the Cass Review pointed out.
Puberty blockers have been banned by this and the last government because they're considered unsafe for children.
We don't know the evidence about their long term safety as no data on outcomes has been kept - hence the proposals for the controversial "trials"

The only correct puberty for all children is that of their biological sex.

That's just a few of the inaccuracies.

We're not allowed to comment about this poster's previous deleted posts - suffice to say they suggested a powerful agenda that's not supportive of parents trying to safeguard their children

All of this.

On balance, it's a good thing that this post is wedged in the middle of this thread. I hope it stays there.

BonfireLady · 20/12/2025 10:55

ConcernedmumofTIF · 20/12/2025 10:34

Interestingly though, when I went through the draft with my daughter, when she saw the mention of trans in it she said "oh. They've put that in there have they?" and was surprised. She didn't ask them to do it.

Boom. That's your route in..... to both a sensitive conversation with your daughter and to challenge this falsified information on a legal document.

This (link ⬇️) article that I wrote nearly 3 years ago goes back to my own experience of when an organisation (in this case it was CAMHS) transed my daughter in paperwork without her asking for this. I've shared it before on other threads but not for a while now. Thankfully, it was the start of a long and positive journey towards sanity (within the CAMHS system, sadly not the school or the LA) where we're still seeing the benefits today. Those benefits have transposed across into the SALT and OT teams. At a simple level, that's what unlocked the conversations with these teams that I referred to above, even though none of it is actually in the EHCP itself.

https://www.transgendertrend.com/teenage-gender-identity-crisis/

Teenage gender identity crisis - a parent's story

A mother writes of her autistic daughter who went through a gender identity crisis, and how she achieved a positive result in school & CAMHS.

https://www.transgendertrend.com/teenage-gender-identity-crisis/

MrsOvertonsWindow · 20/12/2025 10:50

AidaP · 20/12/2025 10:19

By knowing how the system actually works for u18.

For u18, before the transphobic ban on blockers looked more or less like this:

  1. Child comes out trans, starts social transition in whatever form works best for them.
  2. Series of rapid assessment to get a baseline decision, this is held by multi-doctor panel, all of which are experts in the field.
  3. Puberty blockers for multiple years while regular assessment and observation continues. Those are safe, used for decades now, and the moment you come off them your puberty kicks back in with no lasting negative outcomes, it's literally a pause to prevent harm.
  4. If the multi-year observation supports a diagnosis, then it's possible to start HRT before 18 years old to ignite the correct puberty.
  5. That's that. Surgeries for U18 statistically just do not happen. It's technically possible, but just doesn't and is not part of WPATH recommendations in normal circumstances. There are exceptions, extremely hard to meet ones - and rightfully so.

Safeguards were always in place. Of course then there are very rare examples of a child and then young person who literally spent years lying to the doctors but... That's just risk with every treatment and condition, and we do not stop treating other conditions, like depression, bipolar disorder, ADHD, because patient may be lying about symptoms, standard that some demand to be applied to trans care, for some reason.

But unless you are trans or actually know someone who went through the process, but get the view from lying media, you would likely think you can just get something medical because you want it. Even for adults it doesn't work like that, and to get sex affirming surgery (privately as NHS wait is 10years+) you need to meet strict criteria, get multiple opinions (it can cost you 2k on opinions alone), and be on hormones for 1year+ under watch of a private endocrinologist.

And then it's worth adding that trans related care has LOWEST regret rade of any medica/cosmetic procedures, firmly study after study points it at below 1%. Nothing else medically comes even close to that outcome, even successful treatment of deadly cancer has regret rate of 13 to 40%. And that's when it literally saved your life from cancer. Hell, breast augmentation is between 5-9%.

This post contains so many untruths I'm tempted to report it but won't because it demonstrates the level of deception that extreme transactivism deploys in order to persuade children that their uncomfortable developing bodies are flawed but a sex change is the cure.

Socially transitioning children is not a neutral act as the Cass Review pointed out.
Puberty blockers have been banned by this and the last government because they're considered unsafe for children.
We don't know the evidence about their long term safety as no data on outcomes has been kept - hence the proposals for the controversial "trials"

The only correct puberty for all children is that of their biological sex.

That's just a few of the inaccuracies.

We're not allowed to comment about this poster's previous deleted posts - suffice to say they suggested a powerful agenda that's not supportive of parents trying to safeguard their children

BonfireLady · 20/12/2025 10:46

Urgghh. There are so many other red flags and holes in that whole comment from AidaP that it would derail the thread to unpick them all.

However, a good one to specifically call out is the idea that can you ignite the correct puberty.

What a dangerous load of nonsense. There is either puberty or no puberty. Taking cross-sex hormones after completely blocking puberty will not ignite any puberty whatsoever. It will simply lead to a mimicry of secondary sex characteristics in the body of a person who will never go through puberty. The important brain development that takes place during adolescence won't happen because instead of allowing puberty to happen, their endochrine systems will have been impacted by a flood of hormones that aren't supposed to be there in those quantities.

"Thankfully" Wes Streeting has decided to approve a trial where the impact of stopping a child's brain from developing will be measured as a dataset. Currently just 226 children but he did say ages ago that there wouldn't be a cap on numbers allowed into the trial. Mengele would no doubt be proud of this dedication to human experimentation. I imagine the majority of these labrat children will go on to take cross-sex hormones so at some point in the future the data which shows the impact of doing this can be lost along with the current data from the 2000+ children who took puberty blockers under GIDS analysed later too.

ConcernedmumofTIF · 20/12/2025 10:34

GoodQueenWenceslaus · 20/12/2025 10:24

Under the Children and Families Act 2014, OP's child became a young person on reaching statutory school leaving age. The significance of that is that all the rights in relation to the EHCP pass over to the young person, in particular the right to be consulted about amendments to the EHCP and the right to have their wishes taken into account. The fact that OP is carer makes no difference, the young person always has the right to override that. The college therefore has little choice but to follow OP's child's wishes in relation to EHCP documentation.

Interestingly though, when I went through the draft with my daughter, when she saw the mention of trans in it she said "oh. They've put that in there have they?" and was surprised. She didn't ask them to do it.

OP posts:
BonfireLady · 20/12/2025 10:30

Child comes out trans, starts social transition in whatever form works best for them.

And therein lies the start of the problem. Social transition is not a neutral act. The very act of doing it puts that child onto a pathway of ever more affirmative actions and interventions. And all of it is predicated on the unproven and unfalsifiable idea that we all have a gender identity that can differ from our sex: "true trans".

GoodQueenWenceslaus · 20/12/2025 10:24

Under the Children and Families Act 2014, OP's child became a young person on reaching statutory school leaving age. The significance of that is that all the rights in relation to the EHCP pass over to the young person, in particular the right to be consulted about amendments to the EHCP and the right to have their wishes taken into account. The fact that OP is carer makes no difference, the young person always has the right to override that. The college therefore has little choice but to follow OP's child's wishes in relation to EHCP documentation.

AidaP · 20/12/2025 10:19

Mmmnotsure · 20/12/2025 10:04

@AidaP

I was struck by your post, and agree with you that parents should offer love and support while their children try to figure out who they are. Best not to push, or allow them to be pushed, into decisions too early.

As you point out, such a tiny proportion of people - 'way under 1%' - are actually trans, and yet very many children and young people experiment around this. How do we stop the majority, who won’t be what you call actually trans, going too far either socially or physically/medically in their experimentation and taking decisions that are irreversible before they realise that they are not actually trans? How do we identify them?

By knowing how the system actually works for u18.

For u18, before the transphobic ban on blockers looked more or less like this:

  1. Child comes out trans, starts social transition in whatever form works best for them.
  2. Series of rapid assessment to get a baseline decision, this is held by multi-doctor panel, all of which are experts in the field.
  3. Puberty blockers for multiple years while regular assessment and observation continues. Those are safe, used for decades now, and the moment you come off them your puberty kicks back in with no lasting negative outcomes, it's literally a pause to prevent harm.
  4. If the multi-year observation supports a diagnosis, then it's possible to start HRT before 18 years old to ignite the correct puberty.
  5. That's that. Surgeries for U18 statistically just do not happen. It's technically possible, but just doesn't and is not part of WPATH recommendations in normal circumstances. There are exceptions, extremely hard to meet ones - and rightfully so.

Safeguards were always in place. Of course then there are very rare examples of a child and then young person who literally spent years lying to the doctors but... That's just risk with every treatment and condition, and we do not stop treating other conditions, like depression, bipolar disorder, ADHD, because patient may be lying about symptoms, standard that some demand to be applied to trans care, for some reason.

But unless you are trans or actually know someone who went through the process, but get the view from lying media, you would likely think you can just get something medical because you want it. Even for adults it doesn't work like that, and to get sex affirming surgery (privately as NHS wait is 10years+) you need to meet strict criteria, get multiple opinions (it can cost you 2k on opinions alone), and be on hormones for 1year+ under watch of a private endocrinologist.

And then it's worth adding that trans related care has LOWEST regret rade of any medica/cosmetic procedures, firmly study after study points it at below 1%. Nothing else medically comes even close to that outcome, even successful treatment of deadly cancer has regret rate of 13 to 40%. And that's when it literally saved your life from cancer. Hell, breast augmentation is between 5-9%.

gogomomo2 · 20/12/2025 10:07

I should add, this young lady still uses her adopted (now legally changed) name as she hated her traditional overly feminine birth name. She chooses a suit to formal events over a dress but a female suit etc. The key thing was all the adults supporting gave her validation (using new name and they pronouns) BUT shut down any talk of surgery or hormones, I spoke at length about it with her at one point (I’m a safeguarding officer) and this middle ground worked, and does for many “confused” young people. I know fully transitioned people too, I know how hard the surgeries were (4!) for female to male and i didn’t hold back on describing the pain

Mmmnotsure · 20/12/2025 10:04

AidaP · 19/12/2025 15:04

I love hearing that, genuinely. Setting aside your views, offering love and support to your kid and their friends as they try things out and figure out who they are. That also means when they found out that they are not trans, or lesbian, it's a non issue to consider experiment as conclusive and move on from there.

It's normal development, for children and adults. And yep, very few people are actually trans, way under 1%, and TONS of children/young people experiment in similar fashion, the difference is that because you care more about the kid than the anti-trans views, they were open with you through all of it. It's great.

And I'll tell you another thing that may shock you, being trans is not a blessing. I would not wish it on an enemy. But it's also not a choice, and when you find out that you are trans, support, medical and social, goes a long way to help through it. But that's also why it's important to let kids experiment, and if they are trans, offer the help they need to reduce the hurt as much as possible, especially as some of it is irreversible - like some changes going through the wrong puberty.

And by luck we live in an era where it's all available medically, and is done safely and with strict oversight.

@AidaP

I was struck by your post, and agree with you that parents should offer love and support while their children try to figure out who they are. Best not to push, or allow them to be pushed, into decisions too early.

As you point out, such a tiny proportion of people - 'way under 1%' - are actually trans, and yet very many children and young people experiment around this. How do we stop the majority, who won’t be what you call actually trans, going too far either socially or physically/medically in their experimentation and taking decisions that are irreversible before they realise that they are not actually trans? How do we identify them?

Swipe left for the next trending thread