To find it heartening that despite so many famous people being anti JKR, their are still so many who are prepared to work on HP?

Cubicles make it even more dangerous. Get followed/pushed into one of those by a predatory male, and there’s no way out.

Oh absolutely but there is a group of be kinders out there that think a) transwomen have all had or are waiting to have their penis removed b) somehow men without a penis become if not women then certain not men which is bloody offensive to those who lose their sexed body parts to illness or injury.

True but around 95% of transwomen retain their penis and testicles, so I always make a deliberate point of saying fully intact because it drives home that they are male in every way possible and can (and do) rape with their male genitals. Some people confuse trans women with trans men.

Men do not have a right to enter female only spaces, no matter whether they think they are men or women.

Cubicles are not the answer and you know it.

Exactly. She is not a dick panderer, so to the Mens Rights Activists she is violating the 'human rights' of the male sex.

Actually I'd be more encouraged if they didn't agree with her and saw art and personality as separate points. I still want to see Picasso paintings, doesn't mean I condone his behaviour.

We've never had a problems 'policing' toilets or change rooms before, until around 10 to 15 years ago. Funny that. Funny how it has never for the almost century we've had female public toilets ever had a 'logistical nightmare' policing it. It's almost as if you are deliberately catastrophising and over-exaggerating the difficulty level to appease to men, as your argument doesn't hold any water.

The male sex is consistently a threat to females.

Wearing a dress instead of a suit and tie doesn't change that. In fact, the risk is then even higher. That the male sex as a whole is a threat to the female sex is consistency.

But we don't allow male teachers, priests, coaches or scout leaders to enter the ladies toilets or change rooms....

That there, is the difference.

They're cowards who never answer questions. It's why they lose each and every single time and why the feminists are winning the war and not them misogynists.

The misogynists are commenting on this thread...

For example, most rapes of women are not reported therefore its impossible to know the extent of male violence to compare it with trans women.

That would only make a difference if there is a difference in the rates women report rapes by men compared to how they report rapes by transwomen (also men).

Wrong. Reporting IS offending. SO that discredits your lies.

Now, it has not been proven a misrepresentation of women at all. You just don't like the facts handed to you. The fact is per capita representation of incarceration is an accurate marker and a fair representation and comparison. In fact, incarceration data is used for the benefit of many minority groups when data is compiled. So come up with another argument because that one does not wash.

And Canada:

At this point I think you are confusing trans women with trans men, because of the biological comment. Perhaps you don't know that transwomen are biological males and are male in every single way possible. I think you are confusing them with people born female (trans men).

Um, transwomen ARE biological men.

And here is all the evidence. UK, US, Canada and New Zealand.

You will see over only four countries that the trajectory is more than clear.

Why do you think male on male violence is a problem for women to solve? Why can't men solve male violence?

Why should hens be worried about fox on fox violence?

Your posts are nothing but misogyny.

Females don't rape. And 98% of all sex crimes are by males, so stop with the misogynistic 'women do it too' bs.

Just this!

Not womens problem. Women are not HUMAN SHIELDS for blokes in dresses. Male on male violence is a problem for.....males to solve. Not palm it off to women and make women uncomfortable.

After all, as we are often told, there are these things called, wait for it....CUBICLES in the male toilets. Wonderful invention.

Gay men used to get beaten up in the gents... they never asked to enter the female toilets.

And here is my usual reminder that men who are not 'fully intact' also remain male.
A woman who has a hysterectomy or a mastectomy or both is still a woman. The lad my husband held be medivac'd out of a war zone having lost much of his lower half to a IED was still a man.
Sex is encoded into every cell in the human body, it not located in an organ or two.
If a human is born male they will remain male until they die.

Transwomen by their own admission have said they are safe in the males, the worst they get is a smirk. It's never been about safety, it's about VALIDATION and using women in the space around them as props for their validation.

And as males, and fully intact males at that, transwomen are a risk to women. Evidence shows transwomen sexually offend 5 times higher than other males.

Yep, it's like they don't realise how batshit their argument about "cubicles" is and why it doesn't work since there are cubicles in the MALES too. That there demolishes their 'gotcha' argument. So therefore, transwomen can use the cubicles in the.....MALES. Micdrop.

But you are denying biological realities. You are denying that a fully intact male remains a male when he puts on a dress.

It's garden variety ignorance that says womens hard won rights to female only single sex spaces should be dismantled and that our foremother feminists who achieved those rights did all that work for nothing.