Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Bristol Greens councillor quits over trans protests

68 replies

gopaula · 19/11/2025 12:37

Bristol Greens' ridiculous hostile anti-GC behaviour costs them dear in the council chamber...well done, that woman! Shero of the day.

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/bristol-councillor-resigns-greens-over-10654149

Councillor quits Greens over City Hall trans protests

It puts the Greens back below half the councillors at City Hall

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/bristol-councillor-resigns-greens-over-10654149

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
BlondeBonBon · 23/11/2025 23:25

I believe everyone should be able to be themselves and be treated with respect, including trans people. However the green response stating counsellors have a right to feel safe when they are hardly in any danger listening to a difference of opinion. If people are incapable of fulfilling their official role and upholding democracy then this isn’t the career for them.

JamieCannister · 23/11/2025 09:18

AstonsGerbil · 22/11/2025 09:29

I feel exactly the same way about gender ideology being indoctrinated to the kids in school now; year in year out. It also isn't normal (and is actually anti-science and anti-biological fact never mind anything else) but unlike you not wanting religious teaching to be legal, I would just want it taught as a "this is a belief some people believe" which is what I was taught about religions. None of my teachers told me that if I didn't believe in god I would be punished, which seems to be the case for gender ideology.

I did say "religious indoctrination" should be illegal, not "religious education".

That said I think there is a lot to be said for crazy ideas with no evidence behind them (the idea that some people would be happier as an amputee and seek amputation for example, but religion and trans ideology are arguably exactly the same) should not be introduced to kids until they are relatively old (as I believe younger people are more vulnerable to have insane ideas drummed into them)

AstonsGerbil · 22/11/2025 09:29

JamieCannister · 21/11/2025 08:25

Just because religious indoctrination of kids against their consent year in year out through childhood is normal does not mean it should be legal, let alone regarded as normal.

I feel exactly the same way about gender ideology being indoctrinated to the kids in school now; year in year out. It also isn't normal (and is actually anti-science and anti-biological fact never mind anything else) but unlike you not wanting religious teaching to be legal, I would just want it taught as a "this is a belief some people believe" which is what I was taught about religions. None of my teachers told me that if I didn't believe in god I would be punished, which seems to be the case for gender ideology.

ArabellaSaurus · 22/11/2025 08:58

LivelyFinch · 22/11/2025 08:56

I worked for the NHS, if I'd called a colleague trash let alone putting it on social media I'd have been in serious trouble. How is this humpty getting away with it, surely there is a standards committee to complain to?

He should be disciplined by both the council and the Green Party, but I'm not sure if there are any sensible people left in the GP anymore.

LivelyFinch · 22/11/2025 08:56

I worked for the NHS, if I'd called a colleague trash let alone putting it on social media I'd have been in serious trouble. How is this humpty getting away with it, surely there is a standards committee to complain to?

LivelyFinch · 22/11/2025 08:54

Ignore the derailer!

JamieCannister · 22/11/2025 08:18

Bosky · 22/11/2025 04:24

Kids who are certain god does not exist and who despise having religious indoctrination rammed down their throats day in day out should not have to put up with it.

You are talking about Christianity specifically and "day in day out" means at school and at home.

Where are kids in the UK today having Christianity"rammed down their throats day in day out" at school and at home?

There can't be many of them. Are they being home-schooled by parents who are religious zealots?

I was talking about myself. My response to christianity is a direct response to my experience.

Bosky · 22/11/2025 04:24

JamieCannister · 21/11/2025 10:01

The point is that it shouldn't be an everyday issue. Kids who are certain god does not exist and who despise having religious indoctrination rammed down their throats day in day out should not have to put up with it.

On the one hand I agree "it happens all the time, it is a fact of life, no point trying to get legal recompense, no point worrying about it, get over it" is good advice, on the other hand it is advice that many people with other historic trauma would not be given.

Kids who are certain god does not exist and who despise having religious indoctrination rammed down their throats day in day out should not have to put up with it.

You are talking about Christianity specifically and "day in day out" means at school and at home.

Where are kids in the UK today having Christianity"rammed down their throats day in day out" at school and at home?

There can't be many of them. Are they being home-schooled by parents who are religious zealots?

ArabellaSaurus · 21/11/2025 13:35

It's like taking one neighbour's unreasonable behaviour and assuming that all your other neighbours are the same.

JamieCannister · 21/11/2025 13:01

ArabellaSaurus · 21/11/2025 11:47

That is black-and-white thinking and lacking nuance.

Christianity is a very broad group of lots of very disparate strands/schools/sects.

Encompassing extreme evangelical views right up to the mildest and most rational, in fact including agnostic/atheist views sometimes, too.

It is not about the beliefs, I was brought up in Britain and broadly share our "western christian values" (which are kinda christian, but also heavily influenced by things like classical liberalism). It is about the principle that now I have the power to enforce boundaries and have my consent respected I will do so, absolutely.

It's a bit like if you had a neighbour who kept parking on your drive without asking, however much it inconvenienced or annoyed you, and however much you told her to stop. You inherit £200k, you build a big extension and quadruple the size of your drive. Would you say "well, I have loads of parking space now, so I'll go next door and tell my neighbour she can park then whenever she wants"? Or would you put up a big fence with a secure gate and never ever ever let her park on your drive, as a matter of principle, because she spent years taking the mick?

ArabellaSaurus · 21/11/2025 11:47

JamieCannister · 21/11/2025 11:38

My response is not as extreme as Alice's.

My response is actually more from a rational point of view than emotional one - christianity lost all rights to a single second of my time when christians decided they had a right to force me to listen to their propaganda. I am not going to start firebombing churches (for numerous and very obvious reasons), I cannot sue my deceased mother or old schools for compensation. The only punishment I can give, the only justice I can gain, is to refuse to listen to anyone who is speaking in a church or from a christian standpoint.

That is black-and-white thinking and lacking nuance.

Christianity is a very broad group of lots of very disparate strands/schools/sects.

Encompassing extreme evangelical views right up to the mildest and most rational, in fact including agnostic/atheist views sometimes, too.

ArabellaSaurus · 21/11/2025 11:46

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

Yep.

See also Mothin Ali supporting Palestine Action, a proscribed group.

JamieCannister · 21/11/2025 11:38

Shortshriftandlethal · 21/11/2025 11:17

Personal experiences and traumas do effect one's emotional 'climate', obviously. Take the example of humanist TV presenter, Alice Roberts, who vehemently rejects religion - seemingly because her mother was religious, and who was so rejecting of this that she did not even attend her own mother's funeral. Her mother sounded perfectly reasonable and rational in interviews.

That is quite an extreme response, I'd suggest, that was clearly rooted in childhood/parental issues ( not to attend your mother's funeral). My point being that extreme emotional responses are usually coming from a place of unresolved angst - and to let them continue to shape our responses to fairly typical life situations is probably not the healthiest way to proceeed.

I'm not saying your feelings are wrong. I'm more commenting on the nature of strong feelings.

Edited

My response is not as extreme as Alice's.

My response is actually more from a rational point of view than emotional one - christianity lost all rights to a single second of my time when christians decided they had a right to force me to listen to their propaganda. I am not going to start firebombing churches (for numerous and very obvious reasons), I cannot sue my deceased mother or old schools for compensation. The only punishment I can give, the only justice I can gain, is to refuse to listen to anyone who is speaking in a church or from a christian standpoint.

Shortshriftandlethal · 21/11/2025 11:17

JamieCannister · 21/11/2025 10:24

Not everyone is the same. You can tell me my response to my experience is wrong all you want.

Personal experiences and traumas do effect one's emotional 'climate', obviously. Take the example of humanist TV presenter, Alice Roberts, who vehemently rejects religion - seemingly because her mother was religious, and who was so rejecting of this that she did not even attend her own mother's funeral. Her mother sounded perfectly reasonable and rational in interviews.

That is quite an extreme response, I'd suggest, that was clearly rooted in childhood/parental issues ( not to attend your mother's funeral). My point being that extreme emotional responses are usually coming from a place of unresolved angst - and to let them continue to shape our responses to fairly typical life situations is probably not the healthiest way to proceeed.

I'm not saying your feelings are wrong. I'm more commenting on the nature of strong feelings.

JamieCannister · 21/11/2025 10:24

Shortshriftandlethal · 21/11/2025 10:10

I do think your response is over charged. I went to a C OF E school and was not indoctrinated or abused, and my granddaughter goes to a RC primary school ( even though we're not RC ourselves) and she is just fine. Very well balanced and happy at school

Not everyone is the same. You can tell me my response to my experience is wrong all you want.

Shortshriftandlethal · 21/11/2025 10:10

JamieCannister · 21/11/2025 10:01

The point is that it shouldn't be an everyday issue. Kids who are certain god does not exist and who despise having religious indoctrination rammed down their throats day in day out should not have to put up with it.

On the one hand I agree "it happens all the time, it is a fact of life, no point trying to get legal recompense, no point worrying about it, get over it" is good advice, on the other hand it is advice that many people with other historic trauma would not be given.

I do think your response is over charged. I went to a C OF E school and was not indoctrinated or abused, and my granddaughter goes to a RC primary school ( even though we're not RC ourselves) and she is just fine. Very well balanced and happy at school

JamieCannister · 21/11/2025 10:01

Shortshriftandlethal · 21/11/2025 09:46

Even taking that position about a mainstream Cof E or even Catholic school, for example, is quite extreme, though. Children are 'indoctrinated' with all sorts of things including ideas that abound within secularism.

Excessive emotional responses to everyday issues is not conducive to good mental health

Edited

The point is that it shouldn't be an everyday issue. Kids who are certain god does not exist and who despise having religious indoctrination rammed down their throats day in day out should not have to put up with it.

On the one hand I agree "it happens all the time, it is a fact of life, no point trying to get legal recompense, no point worrying about it, get over it" is good advice, on the other hand it is advice that many people with other historic trauma would not be given.

Shortshriftandlethal · 21/11/2025 09:46

JamieCannister · 21/11/2025 08:25

Just because religious indoctrination of kids against their consent year in year out through childhood is normal does not mean it should be legal, let alone regarded as normal.

Even taking that position about a mainstream Cof E or even Catholic school, for example, is quite extreme, though. Children are 'indoctrinated' with all sorts of things including ideas that abound within secularism.

Excessive emotional responses to everyday issues is not conducive to good mental health

JamieCannister · 21/11/2025 08:25

Shortshriftandlethal · 20/11/2025 16:01

Such extreme emotional reactions to quite normal things, even things one has an issue with, are not healthy and they should be minimised.

Edited

Just because religious indoctrination of kids against their consent year in year out through childhood is normal does not mean it should be legal, let alone regarded as normal.

NotAtMyAge · 20/11/2025 19:56

Waitwhat23 · 20/11/2025 19:08

Last time I saw his post, there were 49 replies and although the posts expressed astonished disbelief that he was speaking about a fellow councillor in such a contemptuous way, there wasn't personal abuse or similar to what women would have had in response.

If it was another party, I might have suspected that someone a bit more sensible had had a word but with the Greens, I suspect he's feeling mightly triggered at what he considers the lowly proles actually having the temerity to speak to him when he's not got the chance to hold up a sign or walk out in protest.

I'm sure you're right. I wonder how old he is? Many of the noisier Greens are really quite young and inexperienced, which I'm guessing is why they seem to behave like children not used to hearing the word No.

Waitwhat23 · 20/11/2025 19:08

NotAtMyAge · 20/11/2025 18:01

Just catching up and when I tried to view this I found that poor James has had to lock his account. Looks like not all the replies to his post were approving.

Last time I saw his post, there were 49 replies and although the posts expressed astonished disbelief that he was speaking about a fellow councillor in such a contemptuous way, there wasn't personal abuse or similar to what women would have had in response.

If it was another party, I might have suspected that someone a bit more sensible had had a word but with the Greens, I suspect he's feeling mightly triggered at what he considers the lowly proles actually having the temerity to speak to him when he's not got the chance to hold up a sign or walk out in protest.

NotAtMyAge · 20/11/2025 18:01

Waitwhat23 · 20/11/2025 08:31

And there's this he/him Green councillor openly showing his dislike of women and those constituents whose views he disagrees with -

'Good riddance to her, she is a TERF who wanted to simply cause issues internally (she isn't the saint that she claims to be externally). She shouldn't have been allowed to be a green councillor candidate and I'm glad the trash is taking itself out in this case.'

x.com/JamesNe78081707/status/1991164323813568808?s=20

Just catching up and when I tried to view this I found that poor James has had to lock his account. Looks like not all the replies to his post were approving.

Shortshriftandlethal · 20/11/2025 16:01

JamieCannister · 20/11/2025 15:27

Whilst I agree with your post overall, I do think that you're minimizing just how much some people absolute hate being in buildings that remind them of religion, or how much some peole hate the thought of the room costs for a room they are using being paid to a religious organization.

For most people - the vast majority - of course practical concerns like not being seen by your boss massively outweigh any dislike they might have towards religion.

Such extreme emotional reactions to quite normal things, even things one has an issue with, are not healthy and they should be minimised.

akkakk · 20/11/2025 15:49

She is still listed on the Green Party website here:
https://bristolgreenparty.org.uk/councillor/paula-orourke/

but correctly shown on the Bristol Council website as independent here:
https://democracy.bristol.gov.uk/mgUserInfo.aspx?UID=601

both list her council email address - I will be sending her an email of support / thanks.

Paula O'Rourke - Bristol Green Party

Paula O'Rourke is the Green Party Councillor for Clifton. She is standing again in 2024.

https://bristolgreenparty.org.uk/councillor/paula-orourke/

JamieCannister · 20/11/2025 15:27

TempestTost · 20/11/2025 12:42

This safe thing is really disturbing. It seems to

Had a conversation with some people at work recently, including a new Gen Z employee who is very in gender ideology. We were discussing why people might not want to come to an NA meeting in a semi-public space like a library and why the more common church basement approach is better. Her feeling was that "but some people might not feel safe in a church." And could not seem to see that some sense of discomfort in a room at a church, but not anything to actually do with a church, is not the same as people worried their employer or MIL might see them at a meeting for addicts. Because both are about feeling unsafe, right?

It's all about the feeling, I guess, in this view, not the chance that your boss might actually think an addict might not be the best person to be driving a school bus or something, and you'd lose your job.

Whilst I agree with your post overall, I do think that you're minimizing just how much some people absolute hate being in buildings that remind them of religion, or how much some peole hate the thought of the room costs for a room they are using being paid to a religious organization.

For most people - the vast majority - of course practical concerns like not being seen by your boss massively outweigh any dislike they might have towards religion.