Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Transgender women to be banned from all female Olympic events

383 replies

Misla · 10/11/2025 11:54

About time!!

IOC likely to announce new policy early in new year after findings of a scientific review about the permanent physical advantages of being born male

The International Olympic Committee is set to announce a ban on transgender women in female competition early next year after a science-based review of evidence about permanent physical advantages of being born male.

The IOC’s guidance to Olympic sports has until now been that transgender women can compete with reduced testosterone levels but leaves it up to individual sports to decide. That is now set to change under its new president, Kirsty Coventry, who has promised to protect the female category.

The committee’s medical and scientific director, Dr Jane Thornton, last week presented to IOC members at a meeting in Lausanne the initial findings of a science-based review into the issues of transgender athletes and athletes with differences of sexual development (DSD) competing in female sport.

Free-to-read link: https://archive.is/kGpyI

Transgender women to be banned from all female Olympic events

Transgender women to be banned from all female Olympic events

IOC likely to announce new policy early in new year after findings of a scientific review about the permanent physical advantages of being born male

https://www.thetimes.com/sport/olympics/article/olympic-ioc-transgender-athlete-ban-womens-sports-zhlpfll3b

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
PropertyD · 10/11/2025 15:21

About time! Who on earth thinks having men compete against women is a good idea. Woke rubbish!

ErrolTheDragon · 10/11/2025 15:10

logiccalls · 10/11/2025 14:36

Wrong thread title. Mumsnet must lead ahead in NOT using Stonewall Cult invented language: Biology, and Supreme Court, say a man can NOT become a woman: Therefore, there is no such thing as 'trans'. There are sex fetishists including autogynophiles, getting kicks from pretending to be women. When they do it at home, with or without consenting adults, it is their own concern. But when they force unwilling members of the public to be dragged into seeing them, it is a form of exhibitionism. They are dangerous men: Exhibitionism is now correctly recognised as a red flag for pre-rape.

The OP is quoting the headline on the Times article.
It’s the mainstream media which primarily needs to stop using these misleading terms. The very first thing the IPSO editors code of practice says is
i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information or images, including headlines not supported by the text.

https://www.ipso.co.uk/editors-code-of-practice/

The Editors' Code of Practice - IPSO

The Editors' Code of Practice is the framework IPSO uses to promote the highest professional standards and hold publishers to account.

https://www.ipso.co.uk/editors-code-of-practice/

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 10/11/2025 14:54

BendoftheBeginning · 10/11/2025 14:22

One bloody step at a time, we’re getting there! Or as we’ve been saying on here for years now - “Puuullllllll!”

No, Heave - push them back over the line so we can drop and score a try.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 10/11/2025 14:51

Excellent result. Ridiculous that the problem ever existed.

mamagogo1 · 10/11/2025 14:50

The bbc are reporting the Times story but when the bbc approached the IOC they were told they were still working on it. The bbc are reporting that is likely there will be change.

Yes we need to ensure only natal women compete in women’s elite sports but it needs to be done in a legal way which states clearly why, the IOC is obviously being very careful to ensure nobody can fight it

OnlyOnAFriday · 10/11/2025 14:49

Good, hopefully any records and medals are also removed retrospectively.

RoamingToaster · 10/11/2025 14:49

The previous studies used to justify males competing in the female category were so ridiculously poor. One was of fewer than 10 men who had “transitioned” and it included the researcher. One person was excluded as they didn’t fit the pattern and had better times after transition. They didn’t account for age so were comparing the self reported times someone got in their 20s versus their 40/50s. It’d be hard to invent such a bad study.

So many people were taken with this craze that their brains stopped working.

The next time you hear about something mad happening in history and think how crazy they were to believe such nonsense you just have to think of this and what people will think in the future.

Fiftyandme · 10/11/2025 14:41

Good

briq · 10/11/2025 14:40

It is galling that they still pandered to the insanity to the point of pretending that a 'scientific review' was necessary to determine what anyone with an ounce of common sense has known all along, but at least they (finally) made the right call on this one.

theilltemperedmaggotintheheartofthelaw · 10/11/2025 14:36

WandaSiri · 10/11/2025 14:21

If CAIS males are female, then why are they not exactly like CAIS females in terms of their development?

I can get on board with CAIS males being regarded as women and girls in the general scheme of things, but not when it comes to sport.

The simple solution is to ban anyone with an SRY gene, as the number of Swyer Syndrome individuals affected is likely to be vanishingly small. Or, ban anyone who has ever had normal testes including internal ones. But I am wondering whether they actually will do this, or whether they will seek to continue to include CAIS.

logiccalls · 10/11/2025 14:36

Wrong thread title. Mumsnet must lead ahead in NOT using Stonewall Cult invented language: Biology, and Supreme Court, say a man can NOT become a woman: Therefore, there is no such thing as 'trans'. There are sex fetishists including autogynophiles, getting kicks from pretending to be women. When they do it at home, with or without consenting adults, it is their own concern. But when they force unwilling members of the public to be dragged into seeing them, it is a form of exhibitionism. They are dangerous men: Exhibitionism is now correctly recognised as a red flag for pre-rape.

MyObservations · 10/11/2025 14:36

littlbrowndog · 10/11/2025 12:11

I mean just why did it need a scientific review to stop men competing against women

absolute bonkers

In part because of the fake information that was being out around. The simple fact is that if someone has gender reassignment before puberty, they take on the strengths and weaknesses of their new gender. If they have gender reassignment after puberty, they take with them the strengths and weaknesses of their former gender.

ThatCyanCat · 10/11/2025 14:34

Doris86 · 10/11/2025 14:31

Did they really need a scientific survey to tell them that anyone born male will always have a physical advantage?

Of course not, but the androgen suppressant stuff, which still let men compete as women with a T level that would get a woman disqualified for doping, was not brought in because it removed male advantage, it was brought in because it was possible. And women athletes were not consulted.

Even if it did remove male advantage, the women's section is not for artificially hobbled men, and it still denies women opportunities because women can't dope up to gain equivalent male advantage and compete as men.

Doris86 · 10/11/2025 14:31

Did they really need a scientific survey to tell them that anyone born male will always have a physical advantage?

ICouldHaveCheckedFirst · 10/11/2025 14:29

It's great news, obviously. But something tells me the TRAs won't just shrug and wish women all the best on hearing this news.

Tofufuton · 10/11/2025 14:28

damemaggiescurledupperlip · 10/11/2025 12:22

Will they re-award past medals to the rightful winners as with doping scandal ?

This should be a priority.

ThatCyanCat · 10/11/2025 14:26

Genevieva · 10/11/2025 14:20

Quite.

Unfortunately all women’s sports in which men have participated under false pretences have medal tables that are demonstrably false and the result of corruption. The simplest remedy is to remove the men from the list and give the top performing women the medals, but it will never make up for those women who were knocked out of the competition early because they were unfortunate enough to meet a male opponent sooner rather than later.

Yes, it's easy for something fully measurable like a race where you can just compare the speeds and finishing places, but for match-based sports like boxing or badminton, it's impossible because the cheating men will have fucked up the entire process. Every result and dependency will be off. And even in races, the men will have denied competitive spots to women, so actually for all we know, the ones who would have won medals never got to compete in the first place.

I could absolutely weep for all the women who lost out on opportunities, medals, prize money, careers, for this absolute shitfest that literally everyone knows is a lie.

MassiveWordSalad · 10/11/2025 14:26

WhyamIinahandcartandwherearewegoing · 10/11/2025 13:58

MEN are excluded from a women's Olympic sport and we are in a place in todays world where women have to class this as a win? FFS

Agreed, and I love your username 😁

BendoftheBeginning · 10/11/2025 14:22

One bloody step at a time, we’re getting there! Or as we’ve been saying on here for years now - “Puuullllllll!”

Arbel · 10/11/2025 14:21

Good!

WandaSiri · 10/11/2025 14:21

double post

WandaSiri · 10/11/2025 14:21

If CAIS males are female, then why are they not exactly like CAIS females in terms of their development?

I can get on board with CAIS males being regarded as women and girls in the general scheme of things, but not when it comes to sport.

eyeses · 10/11/2025 14:21

Men no longer permited (encouraged) to cheat by pretending (badly) to be women when entering the olympics. About bloody time.

Still waiting for the realisation that "transgender women" can only logically refer to women who are (or claim to be) transgender, not effing men.

Genevieva · 10/11/2025 14:20

ThatCyanCat · 10/11/2025 14:19

In future, there'll be studies on how this absurd shite ever got off the ground in the first place and why so many people pretended to be so stupid.

Quite.

Unfortunately all women’s sports in which men have participated under false pretences have medal tables that are demonstrably false and the result of corruption. The simplest remedy is to remove the men from the list and give the top performing women the medals, but it will never make up for those women who were knocked out of the competition early because they were unfortunate enough to meet a male opponent sooner rather than later.

LostMySocks · 10/11/2025 14:20

Dominoodles · 10/11/2025 13:29

I'm not sure, could they? If you're a female taking male levels of testosterone surely that would be akin to doping. And a certain group of people would lose their minds if they had to stop their transition to play sports.

There have already been a number of trans identified females playing sport at high level and delaying taking hormones until they retire.
I'm not knowledgeable enough to name them all but there have definitely been two non binary identified females in the skateboarding at an Olympics. The commentator went to great lengths to explain they they could enter the category as they were female....
Also a New Zealand rugby player waited until retirement to publicly transition although team mates were aware.
I am sure they are not alone as women know that they cannot compete against men.