They scraped Mumsnet again.

All these terrible women sticking to their framework of discussing their rights and refusing to be bullied out of it into anyone elses, same shit different names.
It really does come down to no.

I think we can safely say there are a few flaws in the methodology, zero ethics process for starters. It's baffling how they assume posters are all women, or even prove it's not just their mates calling themselves women making up pearl clutching phrases that fit to their research which is what I suspect
I hope they aren't paying for university fees because I don't feel they are getting the most of them.

Howse seems to conveniently ignore this horrible side of transactivism, alongside the breadth of people included under the trans umbrella.

The label trans includes very vulnerable and mentally unwell people, quirky non conforming people, and dangerous and degenerate people. He is right to point out that the latter type heavily feature on FWR threads, but fails to recognise or acknowledge why.

Tbh though I have the choice of which posts are worth expending energy on.

In this case, the actual topic of the OP is important enough that I'm choosing to talk here about the scraping of MN data, that is now - I thought - clearly banned in the site's Ts and Cs, so I'm interested to see where it goes from here.

The liar is desperate for more Baileys chat!

Baileys in hot chocolate - yes or no?

Germonleen and Maud agree with you Dean.

….and younger, poorer straight men offend at a significantly higher rate than young, poorer straight women, and older wealthier gay men offend at a higher rate than their female counterparts.

On another thread you confirmed that you accepted that reproductive sex is immutable and therefore accept that reproductive sex is a category. This is the category that posters on this thread are referring to when discussing offending rates.

Plus the framing of anyone GC as 'far right' (not just right wing, although they can never explain the difference), hateful bigots (degeneracy framing).

Okay so. I'll continue to know that you are telling a big fat lie. Again.

Authoritarianism and desire to close people down is very typical of far left behaviour; especially in recent years.

Many of us have been around the left for most of our lives because we have roots in left wing type activism. We know it very well.

Howseitgoin · Today 09:29

The left wing one's tend to be more moderate as in they stick to the issues of conflicts in rights sans the 'degeneracy' framing.

Oh, you are funny! I suppose that general physical intimidation of women, judo throwing them and stealing their cameras, punching them hard enough to fracture a skull, doxxing and turning up at their houses, concerted, co-ordinated campaigns to cance and sack them, (enabled and encouraged by employers) not to mention online death threats, complete with men in fetish gear, brandishing their pet knives, axes and barbed wire wrapped rounders bats are...

Erm ... moderate?

And I dont mean "Funny ha ha."

It's good to know that all those who smear groups of GC people as old hags are also part of the far right. How inclusive they are these days!

Plenty of examples recently of gay men being prosecuted for sexual offences...not so many lesbians. Funny that!

But we don’t know if a man is poor, straight, gay, bi, rich or has labelled his feelings as being womanly to then estimate his risk to us. It is like the pit of snakes. Some snakes in the pit are poisonous, but only a few. Will you get in the pit?

You can only go on that which you are presented with.

'Trans people' are not some unique category of human being. They are either male or female - like all of us; complete with recognisable patterns of behaviour and often a typical range of interests, preferences, talking points etc

Oversimplification.
The categorical error you keep conveniently making is assuming all male bodied people offend at the same rate when they don't. IE younger, poorer straight men offend at significantly higher rates than older, wealthier gay men. In fact studies show gay men convict at lower rates that lesbians.

And the trans population being so minuscule it's not possible to make any meaningful statistical conclusions.

Like most if not all corrupted causes, they start off with kernels of truth/legitimate grievances but has ended up as a gate way to extremism.

Except in the case of trans extremist zealotry, they skipped any pretence at a kernel of truth and leapt straight into violent extremism.

"but I suppose that all goes with the far right package of smearing an entire group."

Stereotyping is a far right trait, now?

The left wing one's tend to be more moderate as in they stick to the issues of conflicts in rights sans the 'degeneracy' framing.