archive.ph/e0u3Z
https://bulletin.appliedtransstudies.org/article/4/1-3/7/
Another data scrape. I'd say it's also defamatory against Mumsnet.
I've archived.
Article is a load of tedious wank, as you'd expect.
'In this study, however, we excavate what it means to write like a GC by analyzing how GC forum users rely on reactionary language and deploy storytelling practices in ways that calcify their anti-trans ideologies as personal and natural while rendering transgender people as anti-feminist, dangerous, and monstrous. To identify how GC groups perform political mythmaking and construct extremist identities, we undertook a computationally assisted discursive analysis of two popular GC forums: Ovarit and Mumsnet’s “Feminism: Sex & Gender” board (abbreviated to “FSG”). Through comparative platform discourse analysis, we analyzed over 80k posts and comments scraped from Ovarit and over 60k posts and comments scraped from Mumsnet (Burgess and Matamoros-Fernández 2016; Lewis and Marwick 2017)'
The only mildly amusing thing about it is the name of the Journal.
BATS.