I cant fathom it @PermanentTemporary. The trialling process is so competitive. Rivalry is intense. You are measured against each other objectively and incessantly. How could one person who very obviously doesn't meet eligibility criteria be tolerated in that environment?
Erg scores must have made no sense. Women's blue boat you'd expect 7-7.20, blondie 7.15-7.30. Mens college 1st boat roughly 6.40-7. If pulling 7.30 he'd be a college 2nd boat standard rower in the uni squad. Or was he more like a mens lightweight pulling 6.40 but sitting in blondie with a close to world record time? Either way everybody would have known!
Surely the entirety of the squad, coaching and support team weren't all happy with it? Surely similar issues had come up at college level and been challenged before? Surely it would have inspired lots of average male college rowers to trial as a joke?
I know there has been some mad stuff happen in recent years but I simply cannot get my head around it happening in this specific environment.
Do you know if CUW ever apologised to Oxford for cheating, or to the women that year? I feel shame by association.