Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Girlguiding faces legal action from parent over trans policy

266 replies

Misla · 07/11/2025 16:11

Good. Well done that parent!

Charity is accused of failing to follow Supreme Court ruling on gender, leaving girls ‘exposed to harassment’

Girlguiding is facing legal action from a parent over its transgender policy which she claims discriminates against her seven-year-old daughter.

The claimant, who has asked to remain anonymous to protect her daughter’s identity, has alleged in a pre-action letter to Girlguiding that the organisation’s policy “exposes girls to harassment”.

Under the policy, trans girls — boys who identify as girls — are allowed to join Girlguiding, and trans women — adult males who identify as female — are permitted to undertake volunteer roles previously reserved for women.

“It constitutes and encourages unwanted conduct which violates their [girls’] dignity or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment,” the correspondence said.

“This includes, but is not limited to: sharing toilets, showers or changing facilities with boys, contact sports with boys, and sharing accommodation with boys, all without their prior knowledge or consent.”

The letter goes on to point out that Girlguiding operates “as a charity for the benefit of girls and young women”.

Girlguiding faces legal action from parent over trans policy

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Datun · 08/11/2025 18:31

MistyGreenAndBlue · 08/11/2025 18:23

Yes. You really have to wonder what kind of grown man wants to be a girl guide leader?
I mean, girl guides, like cheerleaders schoolgirls etc are a known fetish for some men. Horrendous as that is.

This kind

Girlguiding faces legal action from parent over trans policy
Waitwhat23 · 08/11/2025 18:28

MistyGreenAndBlue · 08/11/2025 18:23

Yes. You really have to wonder what kind of grown man wants to be a girl guide leader?
I mean, girl guides, like cheerleaders schoolgirls etc are a known fetish for some men. Horrendous as that is.

I found it quite unsettling that currently on the GG shop, they are selling adult sized 90's style Brownie t-shirts. Not adult uniform for Brownie Guiders but the old style children's uniform in adult sizes.

DuesToTheDirt · 08/11/2025 18:23

RedToothBrush · 08/11/2025 08:08

I expect safeguarding regardless of how children or adults identify. Safeguarding in various situations - overnight, changing facilities and contact sport definitely needs to be applied. Otherwise why do we have them at all? And we know we have these safeguards for good reason. We therefore don't abandon them the second someone identifies out of their gender because sex and gender are separate things and physically sex doesn't change regardless of how you identify. This is recognised legally.

In terms of how girls/ women have less confidence and different physical abilities and physical barriers I have come to appreciate some single sex only groups.

It is recognised by a number of outdoor adventure sports that the macho nature of boys puts off female participation. The official governing bodies have been putting these on, because they recognise this and they recognise that women want to talk about biological issues without men present. They have realised that different coaching styles work better for different sexes as a result. For example for kayaking women face certain challenges in terms of simply carrying equipment and physical strength in the water. They don't want men to patronise them and necessarily pick up boats for them. They prefer to work in pairs so they don't have to rely on the physical strength of the men. In coaching they tend take longer to build confidence to approach the same obstacle and this is largely because the men have more brute force and ignorance whereas the women - even the bigger ones - can't match them for strength and have to rely far more on strength. There's also a whole bunch of issues around periods etc. It's not that women can't do these activities - it's just that in practice they have to do them differently. It's about time we recognised this.

It's totally understandable for Guides too. In school from primary age the boys do dominate physical activity with a much more rough and tumble aspect. This is fine and great and some girls are happy with that. Others less so. That doesn't mean they don't want to do the same activities. It means they want to do them without being dominated by the boys.

Guiding and Scouting have completely different cultures and ways of doing things. Personally I think guiding isn't well run and needs a rocket up it's arse, but I also think there's a place for it, if it gets it act together.

Anyone who doesn't understand all this is following outdated bullshit and needs to get their head out of their arse before they find themselves legally up shit creek.

That's really interesting. Whatever the "trans girls are girls" idiots think, safeguarding is an obvious issue, and so is privacy, especially for teenagers going through puberty. But I hadn't thought at all about outdoor activities and how they are different for boys and girls.

MistyGreenAndBlue · 08/11/2025 18:23

dynamiccactus · 08/11/2025 13:25

And are not the problem anyway.

The people who are the problem are the trans identifying Guide Leaders. There is no world in which a male bodied trans identifying Guide leader has a benign intent. A genuine trans identifying person would volunteer with the scouts instead. Or at parkrun. Or a chess club. Anything mixed-sex.

Yes. You really have to wonder what kind of grown man wants to be a girl guide leader?
I mean, girl guides, like cheerleaders schoolgirls etc are a known fetish for some men. Horrendous as that is.

MistyGreenAndBlue · 08/11/2025 18:20

RedToothBrush · 08/11/2025 14:16

There are plenty of incidents of sexual assault happening in primary schools unfortunately.

Perhaps you would like to keep in touch with reality on this. It's been extensively reported in the press just how young some kids who are behaving this way are.

These kids now have access to porn on their phones. Ten year olds! And younger. As well as a whole load of grooming sites and trans nonsense. They ARE a danger and they are IN danger themselves. None of it is good

Misla · 08/11/2025 18:18

Lowzi · 08/11/2025 14:13

So can 10 year old girls.

So why the focus on a small number of boys and not harmful behaviours and beliefs. Like hatred, bullying and harmful online content/violent content.

Yes, I'm sure the Guides and Brownies have never focussed on those things 🙄

OP posts:
MistyGreenAndBlue · 08/11/2025 18:08

Mammamumma · 08/11/2025 12:38

Logging off from this toxic thread — I’d rather spend my time with people who don’t mistake empathy for weakness, and who see that compassion and inclusion aren’t threats to feminism

"I'd rather spend time with people who affirm my misogynistic bullshit and don't make reasonable arguments as to why I'm wrong"

MistyGreenAndBlue · 08/11/2025 18:03

TheAutumnalCrow · 08/11/2025 13:04

That’s legal garbage.

If this gross misunderstanding of the SCJ and the EA is common, then I might be on the way to understanding why so many companies etc. are having trouble implementing the law and are wailing for "guidance"

It's not an excuse mind you, legal advice is available. Lawyers exist.

But I had no idea that the above nonsense was what some people actually believe.
BTW "wailing" is not a typo lol.

SockQueen · 08/11/2025 17:58

Missproportionate · 08/11/2025 16:10

Yes that’s great - but the very big difference is that girls are kept safe as they have separate sleeping arrangements and safeguarding in place and everyone knows who is who. Same with Air Cadets and other youth groups

Last I checked, while Scouts is mixed sex, they still allow self-ID, so there's nothing stopping trans-identifying children from using the bathrooms/sleeping facilities of their chosen gender rather than biological sex. I don't think this has changed since the SC judgement, but could be wrong.

So while I'm a Guide leader and share everyone's concerns about current policies, I think it's only fair that other organisations face similar scrutiny.

MistyGreenAndBlue · 08/11/2025 17:55

Waitwhat23 · 08/11/2025 12:41

If your main priority is the inclusion of men and boys to the detriment of women and girls, you aren't a feminist. You are a male rights activist.

Edited

I smell a trans parent here. As Helen Joyce has noted, they can't ever admit that trans kids are not a thing, because to do so, would be to admit to abusing their own children horribly. They're in it for life.

KatieAlcock · 08/11/2025 17:53

dynamiccactus · 08/11/2025 13:25

And are not the problem anyway.

The people who are the problem are the trans identifying Guide Leaders. There is no world in which a male bodied trans identifying Guide leader has a benign intent. A genuine trans identifying person would volunteer with the scouts instead. Or at parkrun. Or a chess club. Anything mixed-sex.

I've had two teenagers become romantically involved during my time as a Guide leader. They were both actual girls and all we had to do was say "if you want to gaze into each others' eyes save it for an actual date" but at camp with one of those "girls" being male? That IS a risk and not one GG is acknowledging.

MyAmpleSheep · 08/11/2025 17:25

Lowzi · 08/11/2025 14:15

To differentiate itself from the mixed sex scouts and precursors to it.

(I did scouts. I was never harmed by any one. Despite males both young and old being present).

Explain carefully which boys you're going to allow to join GG and which are excluded.

EuclidianGeometryFan · 08/11/2025 17:18

TheignT · 08/11/2025 17:12

Plenty join scouting.

Scouts is not specifically for children with a feminine presentation, i.e. those who want to do "girly" things.
Not that GG is just for girly things (far from it) but I assume that is what the trans girls are looking for.
If a trans girl (male child) was happy to join scouts instead of GG, he would have done that already.

Waitwhat23 · 08/11/2025 17:15

DustyWindowsills · 08/11/2025 14:32

You may be forgetting Ranger Guides.

I suspect that poster has only a vague knowledge of the sections of Girl Guidiing and has clung onto the one to two they've heard of. Anyone who has actually been involved in Guiding could name - Rainbows (4 -7), Brownies (7 - 10), Guides (10 - 14), Rangers (14 - 18).

Even a quick look at the GG website could have told them this.

TheignT · 08/11/2025 17:12

EuclidianGeometryFan · 08/11/2025 16:56

Those posters who want to support trans girls (male children) should go and set up their own mixed-sex activities group for anyone with a feminine presentation.

You could call it "glitter club" or something.
Unfortunately the name 'rainbows' is already taken.

You don't get to hijack the existing female-only organisation without a fight.
Go set up your own.
(Then wait to see how many female children actually want to join.)

Plenty join scouting.

lcakethereforeIam · 08/11/2025 17:06

Regarding Scouts, although they are a mixed sex organisation, I believe they're still allowing children who have been encouraged to believe they're the wrong sex to sleep, etc. with children of the sex they identify as. I hope I'm wrong, if anyone knows better?

WalterHWhite · 08/11/2025 17:00

MetricMs · 08/11/2025 13:19

I would just like to express my gratitude to all the women who respond so effectively on these threads - I wish I had the ability to verbalise in the same way as some of the responses I am seeing!

I feel exactly the same MetricMs. Incredible (and patient!) aren’t they?

EuclidianGeometryFan · 08/11/2025 16:56

Those posters who want to support trans girls (male children) should go and set up their own mixed-sex activities group for anyone with a feminine presentation.

You could call it "glitter club" or something.
Unfortunately the name 'rainbows' is already taken.

You don't get to hijack the existing female-only organisation without a fight.
Go set up your own.
(Then wait to see how many female children actually want to join.)

RedToothBrush · 08/11/2025 16:45

Girl guides is teaching girls that whilst they are 'pro-girls' and 'single sex' they must defer to boys at the first available opportunity and the meer concept of what it is to be female.

If that isn't fucked up sexist tripe, I don't know what else is.

Datun · 08/11/2025 16:32

Mammamumma · 08/11/2025 12:30

That's an offensive, nasty and manipulative response and an inaccurate reading of my post. I’ve never suggested women or girls exist to serve anyone, quite the opposite.

I believe all girls, including trans girls, deserve safety, respect, and the freedom to be themselves without being treated as a threat. Supporting a marginalised minority of young people doesn’t diminish women; it’s part of what equality actually means.

You seem to have very little compassion - do you work with young people?

Supporting a marginalised minority of young people doesn’t diminish women; it’s part of what equality actually means.

No it isn't. You're saying that young girls have to support a subsection of boys, to their detriment, because it's equality!

That's not equality. That's sexism.

If girls want to support their male peers, who wish they weren't male, they can do that outside of girl guides.

Why do they need to give up their name, their organisation, their privacy, their boundaries, their safeguarding and the very concept of being female, in order to do it??

Honestly. Girls really get a number done on them, don't they.

DoubleShotEspresso · 08/11/2025 16:27

GiddyMintRaven · 08/11/2025 07:21

Quite honestly, I'm disgusted by what a bunch of transphobes you are. What do you think we have the kids doing on guiding? Running around and flashing their genitals? As nice as it is to have a girl only space (any by girl I mean anyone who identifies as a girl, not just those who were born with female genitals), I sincerely hope that if the issue is curved on this, the way Girlguiding responds is to change who they accept so they accept girls and boys (but keep the name Girlguiding so it doesn't appeal to boys). We might have less of a struggle for leaders then too because we wouldn't be putting off dads/men.
Seriously, get a grip and stop hating on people for who they are.

You cannot be serious here surely?
This is not hating people for who they are, this is wanting the very clear law applied.
GG more than most organisations have high duties of care & safeguarding.
I am shocked anyone of sound mind would not want to see this challenged.

Datun · 08/11/2025 16:25

Lowzi · 08/11/2025 14:12

That's what I'm asking.

At what point does a child become a threat to other children. And why?

Ten year-old boys can, of course, present a threat to girls.

But even if they're not presenting a physical threat, they're absolutely representing a threat if you are telling those girls that the reason they are there is because the girls must not recognise the male sex.

Can people who think that this is only right and correct, because poor boys, drag their eyes off the bloody male sex for five fricking seconds??

Of course it's detrimental to girls to tell them they must not recognise the males, because some boys are sad about it, or have homophobic or sexist parents.

It's not our job to stand around making men and boys feel better about their self image.

JillyJoy · 08/11/2025 16:16

Missproportionate · 08/11/2025 16:10

Yes that’s great - but the very big difference is that girls are kept safe as they have separate sleeping arrangements and safeguarding in place and everyone knows who is who. Same with Air Cadets and other youth groups

And have female leader or parents on site or with activity.
If a Group has mixed Scouts and a Venture Unit, then Ventures have to be mixed, continuity.
My terminology might be out of date, I was there a few years back.

Datun · 08/11/2025 16:13

TheignT · 08/11/2025 12:42

Funnily enough I worked with other leaders and we were a safe space for all our children.

Again, you don't base a safeguarding policy on the say-so of the people who are meant to be doing the safeguarding.

Does it really not occur to why that might not be effective risk assessment?

Missproportionate · 08/11/2025 16:10

JillyJoy · 08/11/2025 16:08

Scouts have been mixed for years, long before we heard of 'trans'. One troop was pleased because several Leaders had daughters as well as sons. They started letting the girls join in the activities at camp, kayaking or hikes etc. That went well.

Yes that’s great - but the very big difference is that girls are kept safe as they have separate sleeping arrangements and safeguarding in place and everyone knows who is who. Same with Air Cadets and other youth groups