Grokipedia.com version 0.1 is now live. Efforts to replace wikipedia with a less biased root source for the world.

"who reduced the cost to orbit by a factor of 20, created the electric car market"

Perspective matters.

Musk's 300 odd million campaign dollars & support on X effectively ushered in a climate change denier who immediately went to work smashing down all climate change progress including the subsidies for electric cars that largely contributed to Tesla's collapse.

"rebuilt X as an actual free speech bastion"

For a market place ideas to function, ideas need to be heard of which Musk's algorithmic controls easily stifled.

"got Trump elected and by doing so had the largest effect on the fight back against transgender nonsense - is incompetent."

There's this thing called 'the 3 branches of government' in the US one of which is the judiciary that Trump has been losing to hand over fist including for trans issues. Executive orders don't mean a thing if they can't stand up in court.

"Thats before you notice he's the only person who has made any headway getting the species interplanetary"

Lol, a fool & his money are soon parted…
The idea that interplanetary travel is a priority let alone even ranks as an issue is for those drunk on ketamine kool aid…

Um, his proven incompetency & corruption is unrelated to whether I personally 'like' him.

You are only as good as your last achievement of which was the monumental disaster that was Doge. And it's not just that he achieved the opposite of what he said he would do but that he achieved his intention at destroying any regulatory checks on his businesses. That you can seriously consider this person as a trustworthy source of information after this shameless assault on checks & balances not to mention flooding X with algorithmic propaganda then I have a bridge to sell you.

The willingness to look the other way by GCs as their 'allies' burn civilisation down ought to give anyone with half a brain cell pause about their true nature.

This new encyclopedia is simply marvellous: https://grokipedia.com/page/Vladimir_Putin#2022-ukraine-operation-objectives-execution-and-global-repercussions manages to excuse Russia invading Ukraine, shedding that ridiculous bias of expecting sovereign states to be able to make their own decisions about their own country.

Or maybe it's as reliable as one of EMs exploding cars...

Is it a full moon because all the loonies are out in force. 🤣

Amen. These tech bros are a danger to women, musk is simply trying to take down the one who hates us less.

IMHO, Nazis posting white supremicist great replacement rubbish and more can legitimately be called Nazis. Before EM they got banned. No longer in the cess pit of a forum.

None of them.

Peace be upon her??? Is she a prophet from God or something now?

Except possible potential harassment (she has singled out individual trans people for her followers to harass) she hasn't directly threatened violence against LGBT people or their supporters (to my knowledge, I haven't seen all her posts) like GL has.

From Grok: "Grokpedia leverages xAI's Grok to synthesize knowledge from diverse sources, prioritizing maximum truth-seeking over consensus-driven editing. Wikipedia, by contrast, depends on volunteer editors whose biases—often left-leaning—can distort entries on controversial topics. Grokpedia minimizes human subjectivity, focusing on verifiable facts and logical reasoning for a more reliable reference. Version 0.1 already outperforms Wikipedia in neutrality, with rapid improvements ahead."

https://x.com/grok/status/1982984392562913324

In other words "Wikipedia bad because it isn't as racist as I want it to be. So here's an alternative I want to replace it with that aligns more with my own [elon musk's] personal views"

There is no doubt that Wikipedia is so biased on some topics that it undermines it on all topics.

But I don't really see how Musk's model here is in any way built of stronger foundations, whether it happens to be more accurate on any particular topic or now.

Ultimatly, with all sources, be it a work from a publisher, university output, the journal Nature, or AI content - depend on trust. And if we don't trust the process and the source, they are useless.

I've really be shocked by the degree of bias in Google Gemini compared to MS Copilot. It's been a real eye opener. The number of times when it simply refuses to answer questions on anything related to trans, gender critical, Trump, or left omni-cause orthodoxy is striking.

On many occasions it will suggest further questions on a topic and then refuse to answer those questions due to safety concerns. Sometimes refusing to respond to questions about why a certain question was wasn't answered, requiring a elliptical phrasing: "why is it forbidden to ask questions about why it's forbidden to ask questions about <X>."

Graham Linehan, Helen Staniland, Megan Murphy were, I suppose it depends on who you consider 'of any note'. 🤔

Oh that’s ok that lots of ordinary women were then 🙄

There are degrees of bias…

At least Wikipedia is a collaborative model with reliance on citations that you can link to judge how reliable they are.

Are you seriously suggesting that Wikipedia is free from bias 😆

IIRC, JKR - peace be upon her - wasn't banned before he invited Nazis back onto the platform and nor was anyone else of any note.

Putin is way ahead of him

Neither Musk (a right-wing bigot) or his stupid AI are free from bias. How about you stop infecting a feminist board with this toxic rubbish because it happens to somewhat align with the commonsense position on one particular issue?