Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Leading journal accused of abandoning science over ‘social justice agenda’

136 replies

IwantToRetire · 27/10/2025 17:45

A top journal publisher has been accused of abandoning science in favour of a “social justice agenda”.

Nature, which produces several leading science journals, has faced criticism over its position on equality, diversity and inclusion from leading scientists.

Prof Anna Krylov, a professor of chemistry at the University of Southern California, shared an open letter online encouraging fellow scientists to boycott Nature until it “recommits to scientific excellence”.

She said: “The Nature group has abandoned its mission in favour of advancing a social justice agenda.”

She accused it of trying to play identity politics and promote specific demographics instead of focusing on science, which is supposed to be “guided by a commitment to finding objective truth”.

The letter was backed by Prof Richard Dawkins, an expert in evolutionary biology, who said on X: “Nature used to be the world’s most prestigious science journal. Now it’s one of many accused of favouring authors because of their identity group rather than the excellence and importance of their science.”

Full article at https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/10/26/bbc-allows-work-from-home-if-worried-about-trans-toilet/

And at https://archive.is/q5JlX

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
JanesLittleGirl · 27/10/2025 20:40

Howseitgoin · 27/10/2025 20:16

Oh yeah and lets not forget all those misogyny 'papers'…

www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/18/richard-dawkins-sexist-atheists-bad-name

None of which detracts from the fact that he is a world renowned scientist.

Howseitgoin · 27/10/2025 20:16

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 27/10/2025 19:32

😂"spent his life"

Apart from the 50 odd years he spent teaching biology, and all the time it took to write 24 books not to mention all the time it took to write 80 plus academic papers.

Oh yeah and lets not forget all those misogyny 'papers'…

www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/18/richard-dawkins-sexist-atheists-bad-name

Igneococcus · 27/10/2025 19:39

It's not like the TRAs are paragons of virtue.
Whatever anyone thinks about RD (I happen to be rather fond of him) scientific truth doesn't depend on if the person saying it is nice or not, and I do think abandoning scientific integrity will come to bite Nature (and some other instititutions) on their arse.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 27/10/2025 19:34

When you add politics to science it becomes politics not science, it's the reason why the book The War On Science was written.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 27/10/2025 19:32

Howseitgoin · 27/10/2025 19:06

Well if world renowned scientist Richard Dawkins who spent his life weaponising islamophobia said so, he would know…

😂"spent his life"

Apart from the 50 odd years he spent teaching biology, and all the time it took to write 24 books not to mention all the time it took to write 80 plus academic papers.

OP posts:
Howseitgoin · 27/10/2025 19:06

IwantToRetire · 27/10/2025 17:45

A top journal publisher has been accused of abandoning science in favour of a “social justice agenda”.

Nature, which produces several leading science journals, has faced criticism over its position on equality, diversity and inclusion from leading scientists.

Prof Anna Krylov, a professor of chemistry at the University of Southern California, shared an open letter online encouraging fellow scientists to boycott Nature until it “recommits to scientific excellence”.

She said: “The Nature group has abandoned its mission in favour of advancing a social justice agenda.”

She accused it of trying to play identity politics and promote specific demographics instead of focusing on science, which is supposed to be “guided by a commitment to finding objective truth”.

The letter was backed by Prof Richard Dawkins, an expert in evolutionary biology, who said on X: “Nature used to be the world’s most prestigious science journal. Now it’s one of many accused of favouring authors because of their identity group rather than the excellence and importance of their science.”

Full article at https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/10/26/bbc-allows-work-from-home-if-worried-about-trans-toilet/

And at https://archive.is/q5JlX

Well if world renowned scientist Richard Dawkins who spent his life weaponising islamophobia said so, he would know…

moto748e · 27/10/2025 18:57

Is that the right link you've got there, OP? I can remember similar comment about Scientific American, and no doubt others.

Chersfrozenface · 27/10/2025 18:13

I happen to know that one Nature editor has a trans identified child. Others also may do.

And of course you have the capture of academia in general by genderism.

Unsurprising though disgraceful.

TempestTost · 27/10/2025 18:04

They aren't wrong.