Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Far right women

505 replies

PermanentTemporary · 26/10/2025 10:37

Katie Lam and Pochin from Reform spouting stuff that makes me feel sick. Looking at all the glossy goons like Kristi Noem and Pam Bondi surrounding Trump. I am predicting that Erica Kirk will be the first woman President or perhaps more likely Vance’s Vice President. I’m not talking about women who would like to pay less tax, or Theresa May, but those who rise in extreme right wing circles.

I’m working my way extremely slowly through Andrea Dworkin’s ‘Right Wing Women’. Has anyone else read it? I don’t have any conclusions about this yet…

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/10/2025 12:52

There was an extremely pointless thread in AIBU a few weeks ago where the op professed that they wanted to understand why women would give their votes to right wing politicians. It turned out that they just wanted to pontificate and hand wring, rather than listen to the reasons people less out of touch with what the average person thinks explained to them. Seems familiar tbh.

DworkinWasRight · 26/10/2025 12:50

PermanentTemporary · 26/10/2025 10:37

Katie Lam and Pochin from Reform spouting stuff that makes me feel sick. Looking at all the glossy goons like Kristi Noem and Pam Bondi surrounding Trump. I am predicting that Erica Kirk will be the first woman President or perhaps more likely Vance’s Vice President. I’m not talking about women who would like to pay less tax, or Theresa May, but those who rise in extreme right wing circles.

I’m working my way extremely slowly through Andrea Dworkin’s ‘Right Wing Women’. Has anyone else read it? I don’t have any conclusions about this yet…

I’ve read it. A lot of it isn’t really about right-wing women at all, it’s about the various ways in which men subjugate and oppress women. It’s a hell of a depressing read.

Darkdiamond · 26/10/2025 12:49

As quite a conservative (small c) woman, I do find 'extreme right' a code word for 'conversation over', if it even gets that far. The phrase just reduces anyone with any kind of right-leading views to an unthinking, ignorant, uneducated megalith.

I'm a well educated woman who thinks in layers and nuance. I was raised by fairly liberal parents, and my husband is left of centre. Most of my friends fall somewhere on the spectrum and I feel able to have respectful conversations which put context to a lot of the trickier discussions, and why we feel like we do. I have my world view for a reason, based on a plethora of reasons that I have considered for myself.

There is an intersectionality where feminism and right wing beliefs overlap and fundamentally, most people that I know, feel that their beliefs are the way to make the world a better place. Finding those motivations and reasons for believing in whatever we believe is very important. Most people will have a 'why' that just isn't conveniently boxed off as hatred, racism or misogyny. Sometimes it is, but it's lazy to not try to find out why people feel as they do.

I understand the point of view of my more liberal, left leaning friends and they understand mine, and it's all respectful and thought provoking. Locking anyone behind a label instantly dehumanises and silences them, and if it doesn't, it taints heir argument with a sense of incredibility before they even get started. I want to know people and know their stories and find out what they think and why, because that's how growth and change happens.

I hear 'extreme right' and instantly know that the conversation will have a foregone conclusion before it even commences.

EasternStandard · 26/10/2025 12:48

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 26/10/2025 12:43

I think if we don’t agree to swallow any misgivings we have about left wing misogyny for the good of all women everywhere our poor lady brains have been corrupted by shadowy forces

or something

Oh I see. The post is a bit hard to decipher, but there was a dose of superiority and insult so wondered who was at fault. Usually women not doing as wanted.

From what I can tell some of the left on mn give far more headspace to what they consider to be far right figures online anyway.

RufustheFactuaIReindeer · 26/10/2025 12:44

Summerhillsquare · 26/10/2025 12:39

@EasternStandardwell that's helped illustrate my point about online influences, thanks I suppose.

No one here has mentioned (on this thread) about being supportive of the far right

to be fair I may have missed it so if you could point it out that would be great

user793847984375948 · 26/10/2025 12:44

Summerhillsquare · 26/10/2025 12:29

Yadnbu but as you can see from the responses, some Very Online women have embraced the far right because they know what a woman is (the ones they deny rights to, easy peasy).

Meanwhile radical feminists and those who work mainly IRL keep concentrating on women's material conditions and rights.

The right think women should be private property.
The left think women should be public property.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 26/10/2025 12:43

EasternStandard · 26/10/2025 12:39

No idea what you’re talking about. Can you specify?

I think if we don’t agree to swallow any misgivings we have about left wing misogyny for the good of all women everywhere our poor lady brains have been corrupted by shadowy forces

or something

user793847984375948 · 26/10/2025 12:42

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

She's talking to us, not you. What effect do you think it's meant to have? It's for us to know what she's on about. (us: women who aren't far right)

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 26/10/2025 12:41

LoveSandbanks · 26/10/2025 12:33

I whole heartedly disagree. Farages comment shows a blatant open disrespect for women which will be adopted by his supporters. Whataboutism is a weak argument where you can’t actually justify what farage said.

I wasn’t talking about the left I was talking about the right and they are clearly, deeply mysoginistic

Here is Dennis Jones, Peterborough Council’s Labour leader, a man who has views you may otherwise approve of describing children who have been raped as poor white trash from Rotherham.

you thinking he cares about women? Seems ever so nice, doesn’t he?

God knows I’m no fan of Farage, but this knee jerk assumption that the way to deal with right wing misogynists is to vote for left wing misogynists is self delusion of the highest order

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg7d93kyndxo

EasternStandard · 26/10/2025 12:39

Summerhillsquare · 26/10/2025 12:39

@EasternStandardwell that's helped illustrate my point about online influences, thanks I suppose.

No idea what you’re talking about. Can you specify?

Summerhillsquare · 26/10/2025 12:39

@EasternStandardwell that's helped illustrate my point about online influences, thanks I suppose.

PermanentTemporary · 26/10/2025 12:37

Advetising is the ultimate expression of commercial reality. If there are more people of colour in adverts - I’d certainly say there are compared to my youth in the 70s and 80s - it’s because it sells. For the ‘normal’ right, that should really be the end of it. The (soft) left might be pleased at the increased diversity. It would be interesting to know how the commercial benefit works, I can think of a lot of elements tangled up there.

Saying that it ‘drives you mad’ to see more black people on screen or that companies think there is a benefit to doing that is extreme right. Clearly Pochin thinks that message will sell to the audience she wants.

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 26/10/2025 12:36

Summerhillsquare · 26/10/2025 12:29

Yadnbu but as you can see from the responses, some Very Online women have embraced the far right because they know what a woman is (the ones they deny rights to, easy peasy).

Meanwhile radical feminists and those who work mainly IRL keep concentrating on women's material conditions and rights.

Who are you blaming here? Not sure who you’re being derisory to

LoveSandbanks · 26/10/2025 12:33

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 26/10/2025 12:15

And you think Sadiq Khan prioritises women’s interests?

if you think the left give any more of a shit about women than the right you’re delusional

I whole heartedly disagree. Farages comment shows a blatant open disrespect for women which will be adopted by his supporters. Whataboutism is a weak argument where you can’t actually justify what farage said.

I wasn’t talking about the left I was talking about the right and they are clearly, deeply mysoginistic

Summerhillsquare · 26/10/2025 12:29

Yadnbu but as you can see from the responses, some Very Online women have embraced the far right because they know what a woman is (the ones they deny rights to, easy peasy).

Meanwhile radical feminists and those who work mainly IRL keep concentrating on women's material conditions and rights.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 26/10/2025 12:27

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 26/10/2025 12:15

And you think Sadiq Khan prioritises women’s interests?

if you think the left give any more of a shit about women than the right you’re delusional

The difference between left-wing and right-wing when it comes to women is only about where exactly on our necks their boots should be placed. To right-wing men, we are private property. To left-wing men, we are public property.

Andrea Dworkin in Right Wing Women.

Men of all political shades shit on women. Women become stronger when we recognise this.

InSlovakiaTheCapitalOfCourseIsBratislava · 26/10/2025 12:27

I always feel the thing that women who are pro women’s rights and know that sex is real should bear in mind is the enemy of my enemy is not my friend
These ring wing Americans may be on the same page when it comes to trans women aren’t actually women, but the only thing they hate more than TW are actual women and their bodily autonomy

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 26/10/2025 12:15

LoveSandbanks · 26/10/2025 12:13

I don’t see how the far right represent any womens interests. Having seen farage speak to a journalist this week in the most condescending manner I’m shocked that any woman would want to align themselves to a party with him in it.

”listen love, you’re trying ever so hard”.

I’d expect an mp to at least demonstrate an element of professionalism when speaking to people and that just would not fly in any professional environment.

And you think Sadiq Khan prioritises women’s interests?

if you think the left give any more of a shit about women than the right you’re delusional

LoveSandbanks · 26/10/2025 12:13

I don’t see how the far right represent any womens interests. Having seen farage speak to a journalist this week in the most condescending manner I’m shocked that any woman would want to align themselves to a party with him in it.

”listen love, you’re trying ever so hard”.

I’d expect an mp to at least demonstrate an element of professionalism when speaking to people and that just would not fly in any professional environment.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 26/10/2025 12:12

PermanentTemporary · 26/10/2025 11:51

“It drives me mad when I see adverts full of black people” Pochin
Bondi turning the judiciary into an enforcement department for the executive branch
Noem posing in a vest in front of a detention cage

These are women of the extreme right. Argue that if you like, I don’t agree. My question is, what attracts women to this end of politics?

Are you somehow expecting women to be more morally correct (or more so in your opinion anyway) than men?

I’m struggling to see where you’re coming from tbh

EasternStandard · 26/10/2025 12:10

Tontostitis · 26/10/2025 11:43

Generally means you think anyone born with a penis is a man and shouldn't be in women's spaces therefore you are extremely Right Wing and can safely be ignored.

True there’s been so many accusations due to women pushing back on this.

timesublimelysilencesthewhys · 26/10/2025 12:06

PermanentTemporary · 26/10/2025 11:51

“It drives me mad when I see adverts full of black people” Pochin
Bondi turning the judiciary into an enforcement department for the executive branch
Noem posing in a vest in front of a detention cage

These are women of the extreme right. Argue that if you like, I don’t agree. My question is, what attracts women to this end of politics?

I agree its a bad take.

Whats actually happened is that advertisers want to represent everyone, and that has lead to black people being over represented in adverts.

Most people arent bothered by that in itself. There was a lots of jokes going around about the average couple must be mix race if the advert were to be believed, thats all.

But for some it show how inclusion and represention is prioritised over everything else.

Claim these people racist, but that isnt going to make them vote differently.

LangTeng · 26/10/2025 12:05

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 26/10/2025 12:05

nauticant · 26/10/2025 11:34

If the prospect of Erica Kirk or JD Vance being elected after 2028 is such a terrible prospect for the US, perhaps the Democrats could take responsibility for this and offer the electorate someone who would be more appealing. That wouldn't be Kamala Harris.

This, exactly.

PermanentTemporary · 26/10/2025 11:51

“It drives me mad when I see adverts full of black people” Pochin
Bondi turning the judiciary into an enforcement department for the executive branch
Noem posing in a vest in front of a detention cage

These are women of the extreme right. Argue that if you like, I don’t agree. My question is, what attracts women to this end of politics?

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread