Glinner: let's hire a private detective

He took a phone from a man who was harassing him walking down the street and skimmed it across the road. The details are on video and available in court records if you are confused about it.

Morning @Christinapple nothing to say about Bash Back and their terrorism?

TERFs have an entire forum(kiwifarms) dedicated to doxxing LGBT people.

GL is also a convicted violent criminal for damaging property of a trans person and is currently being sued for defamation by a gay man.

Interesting you object to “stalking” (as you call it) when it would be detective doing work the police should be doing but won’t - and not, for example, the kind of activity that saw young Tarquin stating on oath that he had worked out Glinner’s address from a photo of him in the paper & obtained his personal mobile phone from “an anonymous Twitter account since deleted”; or Tarquin claiming to be a detransitioned woman in order to “infiltrate” a group of women whose meetings are public; or Tarquin & Fred threatening women that “we know where you live, we know where you work, we know where your kids go to school” etc.

That’s stalking.

[deleted - wrong thread]

So he’s doing the same as the TRA but just outsourcing it? Tell me again which group has just had a high court injunction applied for doxxing people?

Translation: Graham Linehan wants to pay someone to stalk trans people he doesn't like.

Am I right?

Shame on you @Glinner

We’ll continue the fight for women without you now that we can see what you think of the shooting of a woman by agents of the State.

"Short on cash" The money I've raised has either gone to lawyers or Vancouver rape relief. I'm still heavily in debt you'll be happy to know.

Troll or droll, I wonder.

As is their right just like anyone else.

I may be critical of Glinner but he isn't Tommy Robinson either.

The frustratinI have that, if you disagree with this you must be TR aligned is bizaree.

It seems like an appropriate time for a gif.

To clarify:

I don't know what TR or GL's nuanced views are on Israel, Trump, DEI, when to ask for money etc.

I do however, expect that both men will have some views in common. I think TR is hideous and self-serving. I don't think that of Glinner. I also accept that sometimes I will share the same view on a particular issue as someone who I find hideous.

For example, I'm going to put it out there that Tommy Robinson, Donald Trump, Glinner and I all agree that the grass is green and that it's dangerous and irresponsible to permanently fuck up the endochrine system and/or chop body parts off vulnerable teenagers and young adults. I'm OK with knowing that we share these specific views and will highly likely differ on many other issues (out of all of them, I reckon I've probably got the most in common with Glinner).

I bet they both think that grass is green too.

...and neither of them are shy about starting a crowdfunder when they're a bit short on cash.

I’d like to see the evidence for most of that, but I don’t expect it will be forthcoming.

I disagree - they share many values beyond those mentioned above. Both are patriotic free speech absolutists who warn about the threat of Islamism in the UK. They’re also pro-Israel, pro-Trump, anti-DEI, and anti-woke, as well as being strong supporters of Elon Musk.

From everything I have seen of him, this seems to sum him up very well.

I didn't post the above in support of Tommy Robinson. It was to illustrate a point about an airport being an interesting place to arrest someone.

Obviously there could be no nefarious activity at play regarding the arrest location of either of these men. It was simply an observation that I thought worth sharing.

The only thing Tommy Robinson is committed to is Tommy Robinson.

What a disingenuous and mischief making comment. I can hardly think of two men with less in common in their personalities, politics and beliefs.

The establishment’s attacks on Graham Linehan and Tommy Robinson for their continued commitment to protecting women and girls have been very telling.

Apologies if this already came to light on the previous thread about Glinner's arrest at the airport, but this paragraph in an article Robinson police stop at Channel Tunnel unlawful, court hears - BBC News www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rpwkp9xz2o from the BBC caught my eye today regarding the recent arrest of Tommy Robinson:

Mr Williamson described the power that police officers have at ports and airport as "extraordinary" and said there needed to be "assiduous oversight" of this power, which he described as the only one there was to "compel people under pain of criminal penalty to answer questions".

I remember people asking at the time why the police did the arrest at the airport, rather than waiting, given Glinner was going to be in the UK at a known location during a known time. I don't remember this being suggested as a motivation behind the decision to do so but either way, perhaps a private investigation could uncover if an airport arrest was specifically requested for this reason.

(As an aside, I love the masterclass in collaborative comedy writing on the first couple of pages of this thread 😂 To paraphrase from Jen Barber.. this MN board really does present the wonders of The Internet to ordinary folk 😉)

Okay I've turned off donations for the moment because I need to find that independent observer and I need to decide what account I'm going to send it to. I think we've raised enough to show that we're serious so it's a great start. Give me a few days to sort these out

I'll have a look. Since it's blown up, there might be verification details I need to check.