Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Good Law Project and Virgin Active

42 replies

Justme56 · 04/10/2025 11:44

Tweets about this keep appearing on my X thread (unfortunately). I can’t see how they can say that VA are not following the law as the law allows for single sex spaces when justified. Obviously changing rooms are an example where it’s obvious that males changing in female spaces is a problem. Just because they don’t like the policy doesn’t mean it is not legal. Am I missing something or are they just lying?

goodlawproject.org/virgin-active-caves-in-to-transphobic-threats/

OP posts:
MurkyWeather2 · 04/10/2025 14:14

Xiaoxiong · 04/10/2025 14:00

I hope they do take them to court, so the reasoning outlined by @MurkyWeather2 above can be hammered home to these people, with full legal force.

I fear it will be a few more court cases going our way before they get the message, unfortunately.

That's why we need wins in each sector: private, public, employment, services. Within the public sector there is the NHS of course, but schools is the one that worries me. If we don't get this out of schools (and HE) we'll be fighting for several more generations.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 04/10/2025 14:12

"But the Supreme Court never said that trans people can’t use the bathroom of their choice. The law hasn’t changed. The Equality and Human Rights Commission’s guidance is just that: guidance......"

That level of stupid is deliberate, that's not caused because someone was born with only 2 braincells, it's a lie, with malicious aforethought.

Xiaoxiong · 04/10/2025 14:00

I hope they do take them to court, so the reasoning outlined by @MurkyWeather2 above can be hammered home to these people, with full legal force.

I fear it will be a few more court cases going our way before they get the message, unfortunately.

LadyQuackBeth · 04/10/2025 13:57

"But the Supreme Court never said that trans people can’t use the bathroom of their choice. The law hasn’t changed. The Equality and Human Rights Commission’s guidance is just that: guidance. Virgin Active is not following the law, it’s following transphobes."

It's an argument of the same semantic strength as "evolution is just a theory, so not proved," so tiresome to try and deliberately misunderstand wording.

MurkyWeather2 · 04/10/2025 13:34

I think that at this point the plan with all these TRA organisations is to try to force as many businesses as they can to hold out against the Law, in the hope that a weak government will change the Law rather than enforce it.

ThirdDesk · 04/10/2025 13:31

Helleofabore · 04/10/2025 12:32

Wouldn’t it be interesting if GLP actually took VA to court? I would look forward to watching that case.

It'd be over very quickly, and Jolly not being a barrister anymore would mean you'd not get to see him properly handed his arse in court. Sad times.

tripleginandtonic · 04/10/2025 13:30

What do the GLP actually think the law says? It couldn't be any clearer that they are talking about sex not gender.

MurkyWeather2 · 04/10/2025 13:26

GLP website says:
the Supreme Court judgment doesn’t force businesses to rip up their policies on changing rooms or toilets.

IANAL, but I imagine that this is twisting the point that businesses don't have to offer single- or separate-sex spaces.
However, if they label a sex-affected space 'women' then it must be for biological women only.
Businesses cannot offer a space for women & TW because that discriminates against all the men excluded.
Not offering a sex-affected space for women could lead to discrimination and/or harassment claims.

Merrymouse · 04/10/2025 13:19

GLP:

"But the Supreme Court never said that trans people can’t use the bathroom of their choice. The law hasn’t changed. The Equality and Human Rights Commission’s guidance is just that: guidance. Virgin Active is not following the law, it’s following transphobes."

I am sure that the Supreme Court judgement said nothing about bathrooms in their judgement and I am also sure that you can't have a bath in a Virgin Active gym, but the judgement was quite clear about who must be excluded from single sex services.

Are they trying to argue that the Supreme Court judgement only applied to boards?

Or are they just trying to goad Virgin Active into suing them so that they can spend some money on legal fees?

Mysticaldeer · 04/10/2025 13:13

I saw GLP described as The Good Laugh Project on X, and now can't think of them as anything else.

Merrymouse · 04/10/2025 13:10

Could VA take the GLP to court?

Aren't these posters libellous?

Helleofabore · 04/10/2025 12:32

Wouldn’t it be interesting if GLP actually took VA to court? I would look forward to watching that case.

Rightsraptor · 04/10/2025 12:31

You may think it obvious, @Justme56, that men being in female changing rooms is a problem but you think that because you are a sensible, rational person.

Unfortunately not everyone is.

NecessaryScene · 04/10/2025 12:06

Just because they don’t like the policy doesn’t mean it is not legal.

There is a reason the GLP have such an astounding win rate when they get to court.

dementedpixie · 04/10/2025 12:05

They're idiots

spannasaurus · 04/10/2025 11:48

You're not missing anything. GLP are liars.

Swipe left for the next trending thread