Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Is it safety or separation?

660 replies

OneFlakyMaker · 20/09/2025 05:54

When opposing transgender people in women's spaces, are you looking for safe spaces or separate spaces?

They may overlap but are not the same thing, and while a lot of the discussion is focused on safety, the tone and some arguments hint that addressing safety won't be enough for many people to feel comfortable. Instead, a place without males is sought.

I read one woman described it "At the club we used the women's bathroom to get a break from interacting with men".

OP posts:
Taztoy · 22/09/2025 20:38

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 20:33

By even considering these men have some kind of claim - 'you're conflicted - to things that obviously don't belong to them - you are prioritising them.

If you weren't, you'd simply conclude that men should stay out of women's spaces. 🤷‍♀️

Also. This.

Taztoy · 22/09/2025 20:38

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 22/09/2025 20:24

what about this law makes it ok to break?

The fact that it is for the benefit of women and not men.

Exactly.

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 20:33

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 20:21

You keep saying 'prioritise men'. I've not said I wish to priorise men or even TW over women like Taztoy and myself. I've said that I'm conflicted on the subject much like I have been over the entire trans rights debate. I'm certainly not a TRA but neither strongly GC.

So please don't jump to assume my experiences or viewpoint. I wouldn't do so with you or anyone else.

By even considering these men have some kind of claim - 'you're conflicted - to things that obviously don't belong to them - you are prioritising them.

If you weren't, you'd simply conclude that men should stay out of women's spaces. 🤷‍♀️

CassOle · 22/09/2025 20:31

@IHatePapaya There is a simple way to tell the difference between decent transwomen and the boundary-pushing ones.

The decent ones will understand that the law has been clarified, even if they used female single-sex spaces before, they will now use male single-sex spaces or unisex ones.

The non-decent, boundary-pushers will out themselves as the very males who should not be in female single-sex spaces by using them now that the law has been clarified.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 22/09/2025 20:24

Taztoy · 22/09/2025 20:09

The SC clarified the legal position. Which is. That those men should never have been allowed into women’s single sex spaces.

what about this law makes it ok to break? If we are breaking this law, does that mean the next one they’re going to come after is, say, drunk driving. Or murder. Or rape. Let’s just decide we don’t like those laws and stop obeying them. Sure that’s grand. It’s how I feel about it.

NO. And again for those at the back and the hard of hearing. NO. I SAY NO.

I SAY NO

Now. Please can you tell me why you’d override that no illegally? And then tell me if you see the comparison with my rape and how it isn’t a consent violation. Thank you.

what about this law makes it ok to break?

The fact that it is for the benefit of women and not men.

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 20:21

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 20:11

If you've been raped, then I would be more surprised to see you prioritise men over what @Taztoy needs and is legally entitled to.

Just because people have their own issues shouldnt give them Carte Blanche to discount other people's rights. If your friends need third spaces to 'navigate' their world then they should be campaigning for them. And leaving women's rights alone.

You keep saying 'prioritise men'. I've not said I wish to priorise men or even TW over women like Taztoy and myself. I've said that I'm conflicted on the subject much like I have been over the entire trans rights debate. I'm certainly not a TRA but neither strongly GC.

So please don't jump to assume my experiences or viewpoint. I wouldn't do so with you or anyone else.

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 20:12

Theswiveleyeballsinthesky · 22/09/2025 20:10

If I remember rightly in t'old days when there were, compared with today, very few men 'transitioning' doctors (who were nearly all men) told transsexual men that part of proving their wish to be a woman included using women's spaces like toilets

of course no one at any point thought to ask women if they minded about this.....

Exactly, which says it all really

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 20:12

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 20:10

I don't disagree with you nor agree with it, I never had a strong feeling about it in the past.

Fair enough, neither did I, because I was only very dimly aware of it.

But now that I am more aware, I can see it for what it is.

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 20:11

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 20:07

I am also a woman like Taztoy who has been raped and SA'd. Do you consider my conflict on this issue to me throwing myself under the bus also to prioritise men? Because I don't wish to prioritise men.

I accept my conflict probably comes from the grey area in how I view transsexuals. I just see them as transsexuals who need to navigate the way things already are, as opposed to changing the world for them.

If you've been raped, then I would be more surprised to see you prioritise men over what @Taztoy needs and is legally entitled to.

Just because people have their own issues shouldnt give them Carte Blanche to discount other people's rights. If your friends need third spaces to 'navigate' their world then they should be campaigning for them. And leaving women's rights alone.

Theswiveleyeballsinthesky · 22/09/2025 20:10

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 20:03

I think that's where alot of my conflict is. The sense of entitlement now as opposed to just trying to quietly go un-noticed in society in general and navigating the world however they could.

I accept that generally I'm quite stuck in the past and have often tried to avoid media as much as possible but I see so much now I can't ignore.

If I remember rightly in t'old days when there were, compared with today, very few men 'transitioning' doctors (who were nearly all men) told transsexual men that part of proving their wish to be a woman included using women's spaces like toilets

of course no one at any point thought to ask women if they minded about this.....

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 20:10

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 20:05

It was still wrong though. It was still disrespectful to the women whose spaces were being used without their permission or consent.

I don't disagree with you nor agree with it, I never had a strong feeling about it in the past.

Taztoy · 22/09/2025 20:09

The SC clarified the legal position. Which is. That those men should never have been allowed into women’s single sex spaces.

what about this law makes it ok to break? If we are breaking this law, does that mean the next one they’re going to come after is, say, drunk driving. Or murder. Or rape. Let’s just decide we don’t like those laws and stop obeying them. Sure that’s grand. It’s how I feel about it.

NO. And again for those at the back and the hard of hearing. NO. I SAY NO.

I SAY NO

Now. Please can you tell me why you’d override that no illegally? And then tell me if you see the comparison with my rape and how it isn’t a consent violation. Thank you.

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 20:07

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 20:01

Also, we CAN'T know the difference.

So either you decide to protect women like @Taztoy amd others like her. Or you decide to throw her under the bus to prioritise men. There isn't any nice compromise between the two positions here.

I am also a woman like Taztoy who has been raped and SA'd. Do you consider my conflict on this issue to me throwing myself under the bus also to prioritise men? Because I don't wish to prioritise men.

I accept my conflict probably comes from the grey area in how I view transsexuals. I just see them as transsexuals who need to navigate the way things already are, as opposed to changing the world for them.

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 20:05

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 20:03

I think that's where alot of my conflict is. The sense of entitlement now as opposed to just trying to quietly go un-noticed in society in general and navigating the world however they could.

I accept that generally I'm quite stuck in the past and have often tried to avoid media as much as possible but I see so much now I can't ignore.

It was still wrong though. It was still disrespectful to the women whose spaces were being used without their permission or consent.

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 20:03

Arran2024 · 22/09/2025 20:00

Trans women may have sneaked in quietly in the past but there were relatively few of them, they tried to "pass", they knew it was wrong. Compare with today - numbers have exploded, they don't always try to pass, and they have a huge sense of entitlement.

I think that's where alot of my conflict is. The sense of entitlement now as opposed to just trying to quietly go un-noticed in society in general and navigating the world however they could.

I accept that generally I'm quite stuck in the past and have often tried to avoid media as much as possible but I see so much now I can't ignore.

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 20:01

Also, we CAN'T know the difference.

So either you decide to protect women like @Taztoy amd others like her. Or you decide to throw her under the bus to prioritise men. There isn't any nice compromise between the two positions here.

Arran2024 · 22/09/2025 20:00

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 19:55

It's hard to know the difference and that's what leaves me really conflicted about trans women/or those that claim to be so now because I see alot things that are much worse to before and perhaps I missed a great deal!

I understand the need for them I do and I'm horrified that you've been through those things because I also have been through them myself. I'm not going to tell you to 'get on with it' about TW in our spaces or how you should feel about it, you feel how you feel about it.

I've read so many interpretations of all these things that my head is spinning on the SC ruling still and I suppose thats why I chose to come back again.

Trans women may have sneaked in quietly in the past but there were relatively few of them, they tried to "pass", they knew it was wrong. Compare with today - numbers have exploded, they don't always try to pass, and they have a huge sense of entitlement.

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 19:58

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 19:55

It's hard to know the difference and that's what leaves me really conflicted about trans women/or those that claim to be so now because I see alot things that are much worse to before and perhaps I missed a great deal!

I understand the need for them I do and I'm horrified that you've been through those things because I also have been through them myself. I'm not going to tell you to 'get on with it' about TW in our spaces or how you should feel about it, you feel how you feel about it.

I've read so many interpretations of all these things that my head is spinning on the SC ruling still and I suppose thats why I chose to come back again.

What are you unclear about with regards to the SC ruling? It's very clear.

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 19:57

I mean, my husband is a really nice guy. I can vouch for him.

If he said he wanted access to women's spaces, I know he wouldn't hurt anyone.

That's true of many men. Including many vulnerable men.

But that doesnt mean they should be granted access to spaces that arent theirs. For many reasons.

Firstly, just because I can vouch for him, doesn't mean anyone else has to go along with that.

Secondly, if we grant access to him, how do we justify not granting access to other men?

Thirdly, how is anyone supposed to know who 'officially' has access and who doesn't?

Exactly the same applies to men who 'identify' as women.

Granting some men access to women's single sex spaces is totally unworkable and ultimately very disrespectful to women's needs.

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 19:55

Taztoy · 22/09/2025 19:44

So how do I know the difference between your sorts of trans women?

I NEED single sex spaces. Because if male violence towards me - rape and SA.

Why can I not have what I’m LAWFULLY entitled to? What is it about this law that means it isn’t to be obeyed?

It's hard to know the difference and that's what leaves me really conflicted about trans women/or those that claim to be so now because I see alot things that are much worse to before and perhaps I missed a great deal!

I understand the need for them I do and I'm horrified that you've been through those things because I also have been through them myself. I'm not going to tell you to 'get on with it' about TW in our spaces or how you should feel about it, you feel how you feel about it.

I've read so many interpretations of all these things that my head is spinning on the SC ruling still and I suppose thats why I chose to come back again.

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 19:44

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 19:39

I knew a few transsexuals in the 80s/90s and I also have an adult child who transitioned (which is why i initially joined mumsnet in the past), I don't consider that you change sex but that you become either a trans woman or trans man so it's not the same as before but you haven't changed sex. I don't know exactly what it makes them except a transsexual. So that's what I think transitioning is, I'm not a doctor or a biologist so I don't know much more than that.

I don't think women should give up their spaces to men much like men shouldn't give up theirs to us. But I also don't know about excluding TW entirely from all spaces because I don't see them as men but I have of course seen all the bad things that come from their side and the pisstakers and creeps that have taken over and I think the ideology has overridden so many things so honestly I just don't know now. I find it hard to see everything in black and white but grey areas are hard to work around.

Some things are black and white though.

Sex is one of them. Regardless of how you see them, they are men. They are born men and will die men. Scientific fact.

We need facts as a means of ordering society. We cannot depend on classifications based on how you, personally, feel. Surely you can see that?

I ask you again, on what grounds (beyond your feelings) would women allow this one group of men into their single sex spaces?

Taztoy · 22/09/2025 19:44

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 19:39

I knew a few transsexuals in the 80s/90s and I also have an adult child who transitioned (which is why i initially joined mumsnet in the past), I don't consider that you change sex but that you become either a trans woman or trans man so it's not the same as before but you haven't changed sex. I don't know exactly what it makes them except a transsexual. So that's what I think transitioning is, I'm not a doctor or a biologist so I don't know much more than that.

I don't think women should give up their spaces to men much like men shouldn't give up theirs to us. But I also don't know about excluding TW entirely from all spaces because I don't see them as men but I have of course seen all the bad things that come from their side and the pisstakers and creeps that have taken over and I think the ideology has overridden so many things so honestly I just don't know now. I find it hard to see everything in black and white but grey areas are hard to work around.

So how do I know the difference between your sorts of trans women?

I NEED single sex spaces. Because if male violence towards me - rape and SA.

Why can I not have what I’m LAWFULLY entitled to? What is it about this law that means it isn’t to be obeyed?

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 19:39

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 19:14

It doesn't. It's actually very simple.

There's no such thing as 'transitioning'. From what to what? Humans can't change sex.

On what grounds would women give up their single sex spaces for this one small group of men?

I knew a few transsexuals in the 80s/90s and I also have an adult child who transitioned (which is why i initially joined mumsnet in the past), I don't consider that you change sex but that you become either a trans woman or trans man so it's not the same as before but you haven't changed sex. I don't know exactly what it makes them except a transsexual. So that's what I think transitioning is, I'm not a doctor or a biologist so I don't know much more than that.

I don't think women should give up their spaces to men much like men shouldn't give up theirs to us. But I also don't know about excluding TW entirely from all spaces because I don't see them as men but I have of course seen all the bad things that come from their side and the pisstakers and creeps that have taken over and I think the ideology has overridden so many things so honestly I just don't know now. I find it hard to see everything in black and white but grey areas are hard to work around.

ThatBlackCat · 22/09/2025 19:17

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 19:05

I don't know I feel about it all still, I got so burned out on the whole subject I had to leave mumsnet for a while but felt the compulsion to come back.

I go back and forth: yes I think single sex is important but I don't know if I feel like excluding medically transitioning people from them (i.e TW from female spaces and TM from males spaces) is correct because I don't believe most of them are doing any harm and it makes sense if that's the side they're transitioning to. But I also know there ARE some who are and out of safety/dignity I would prefer to keep them out.

I don't know if I think it's right or wrong for a trans woman to share a space with me, I don't have an issue with the odd trans woman using the same toilet as me as frankly as much as people seem to think they're multiplying like rabbits, it's rare I even notice anybody in a toilet I would even think might be trans but I also don't speak for everyone. And I think other spaces and areas are a bit more sensitive.

I don't know why it has to be so difficult.

Less than 8% of males actually 'medically transition' (by that I presume you mean have genital surgery ie removing their penis and testicles). And, a question for you; how do we know who has and who hasn't? Do we do genital inspections? No, so the easiest way is to exclude all males.

Secondly, in the same way a de-nutted male dog is still a male dog, a human male who has had his penis amputated is still a male. He still has male height, he still has male strength. He still has male socialisation. He has never gone from a girl and gotten periods growing into a woman. He has no lived experience as the oppressed female sex. There is nothing remotely female about him. And his presence (as he will still be recognisably male, as they all are) will cause distress to women and girls.

Hence why all males, no matter the extremely rare ones who 'medically transition' need to be excluded by of their male advantage, male socialisation and the distress they cause on sight.

TheKeatingFive · 22/09/2025 19:14

IHatePapaya · 22/09/2025 19:05

I don't know I feel about it all still, I got so burned out on the whole subject I had to leave mumsnet for a while but felt the compulsion to come back.

I go back and forth: yes I think single sex is important but I don't know if I feel like excluding medically transitioning people from them (i.e TW from female spaces and TM from males spaces) is correct because I don't believe most of them are doing any harm and it makes sense if that's the side they're transitioning to. But I also know there ARE some who are and out of safety/dignity I would prefer to keep them out.

I don't know if I think it's right or wrong for a trans woman to share a space with me, I don't have an issue with the odd trans woman using the same toilet as me as frankly as much as people seem to think they're multiplying like rabbits, it's rare I even notice anybody in a toilet I would even think might be trans but I also don't speak for everyone. And I think other spaces and areas are a bit more sensitive.

I don't know why it has to be so difficult.

It doesn't. It's actually very simple.

There's no such thing as 'transitioning'. From what to what? Humans can't change sex.

On what grounds would women give up their single sex spaces for this one small group of men?

Swipe left for the next trending thread