Macrons to offer 'scientific' court evidence to prove Brigitte is a woman, lawyer says

These podcasts and you tube formats are easily absorbed .It is far easier to listen to somone else's take on things rather than reading widely and researching issues for yourself. The problem is these podcasters make their living from presenting listeners with a ready made world view, inscribed with their own unique and individual take on matters.....complete with 'evidence' to support it.....and once you subscribe you are chanelled towards other very similar content.

I've witnessed this with two very close friends....they've both gone down very similar rabbit holes complete with all the same theories and talking points...and at times I have to step back and just let them speak......without response from me......I simply don't know what to say to them. I don't want to say " Don't be daft" because they really seem to believe in this stuff, and i don't want to destroy friendships which I've had with them for over 35 years on account if it.

"Etymology
The term cisgender has its origin in the Latin-derived prefix cis-, meaning 'on this side of', which is the opposite of trans-, meaning 'across from' or 'on the other side of'. This usage can be seen in the cis–trans distinction in chemistry, the cis and trans sides of the Golgi apparatus in cellular biology, the ancient Roman term Cisalpine Gaul (i.e. 'Gaul on this side of the Alps'), and Cisjordan (as distinguished from Transjordan). In cisgender, cis- describes the alignment of gender identity with assigned sex.[6][7]"

😂

CO will never accept any evidence. And why should BM have to provide it?
What has it got to do with CO, anyway...what is the relevence of it?

It sucks when people tell lies about you. Most of us just have to suck it up. The Macrons are privileged enough to have the money and resources to initiate court action. This is a choice but obviously to win they will need to provide evidence to show that CO is wrong. Personally I think they are making things much worse for themselves.

Very obviously see? The fact someone wears a dress doesn't mean....

Oh it's no sense explaining logic to those that lack common sense and you haven't bothered to look at what anyone's on about so discussing any points would be a painfully futile act. Wait and see, the truth shall set thee free...

Oh dear, you ARE new here, aren't you?

😂

"Cis" is literally not a real thing. It's a nonsensical and loaded term used by genderists in THEIR belief framework. (Similarly to, say, calling non-believers in religions "sinners" or "infidels" ) Which, if you knew anything about us here, you'd know we don't believe or use. It's from your belief framework, not ours. It's non factual. It seems like a lot of the newly emerged nutters on here you have great difficulty distinguishing between "fact" and "belief".

You're welcome.

The obvious difference being that Imane khelif has been competing in a highly dangerous contact sport against female opponents, whereas Brigiite Macron's sex has got nothing to do with anyone else, nor does it have any negative impact upon them.

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/cis

You’re welcome.

And even if BM is a man (she isn’t), so what?

Very obviously see? The fact someone wears a dress doesn't mean....

Oh it's no sense explaining logic to those that lack common sense and you haven't bothered to look at what anyone's on about so discussing any points would be a painfully futile act. Wait and see, the truth shall set thee free...

Who is ‘they’ in this scenario?

BM themselves, obviously

"I'm not one for conspiracy theories".

😂

Course not. Yes, the facts will speak for themselves when what we all know and can very obviously see because we're not cognitively impaired still turns out to be the case.

Who is ‘they’ in this scenario?

What on earth does this sentence mean?

There's no such thing as "cis" for a start. We don't follow that particular religion here on FWS. Other than that, your sentence makes zero sense, sorry. What are you attempting to say exactly?

If BM is in fact male-they need to answer why woman face is acceptable when black face isn't.

If BM is in fact male-they need to answer why woman face is acceptable when black face isn't.

And that is exactly what they would be saying now about Khelif & co if their medical information hadn’t been leaked by the IBA. We would now be in this exact situation where accusations of conspiracy theories and judging women on their looks and behaviour would be being made.

Funnily enough the Khelif did threaten to sue JKR and then didn’t presumably because he knows full well that he’s a man.

Brigitte finds herself in the same situation as Khelif. If she wants to prove that she is female there is a very simple way for her to do this IF she actually is female.

Including rare photo evidence although this is not by far the most compelling of all the evidence uncovered

Whats the alternative if you don't want men in women's spaces?

All the women at the current Athletics championships have had to prove their sex. And that's good.

And that is exactly what they would be saying now about Khelif & co if their medical information hadn’t been leaked by the IBA. We would now be in this exact situation where accusations of conspiracy theories and judging women on their looks and behaviour would be being made.

Funnily enough the Khelif did threaten to sue JKR and then didn’t presumably because he knows full well that he’s a man.

Brigitte finds herself in the same situation as Khelif. If she wants to prove that she is female there is a very simple way for her to do this IF she actually is female.

Personally I think the accusations of high profile women being men are linked to the breakdown of trust in societies that allow men to pretend to be women, allow them to keep that fact a secret and harshly sanction those who object.

As I already posted up thread we have just experienced 2 men competing in the female boxing competition at the Olympics with numerous officials lying through their teeth that they are female. The ONLY reason we knew about this is because of testing information released by the Russian boxing organisation IBA. If the IBA hadn’t provided that information we would have had to rely on appearance which would have lead to accusations of judging women on “Western beauty standards” or their level of femininity.

We are being lied to by governments, and all of our institutions. The police are recording rapists as women and the press are reporting this without question. When the media reports a murder by a woman now I am always suspicious that they are being truthful.

we ALL know this is happening. So it shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise when people start pointing the finger at famous or high profile women and claim that they are men. This breakdown of trust is what happens when those who govern us lie. The Macrons and the Obamas are complicit in allowing this state of affairs to continue and I can’t bring myself to have very much sympathy tbh.