Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Another breastfeeding one

517 replies

MisssCackle · 16/09/2025 19:04

Couldn’t see a thread on this.
In the latest of Breastfeeding batshittery..‘Breastfeeding and Lactation Support UK’ have today posted this.

I am so angered by it. The UK breastfeeding rates are amongst some of the lowest globally. We should be empowering women, not erasing them. Encouraging them to leave if they disagree?? They should be ashamed.

Another breastfeeding one
OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
user892734543544 · 19/09/2025 07:23

Merrymouse · 18/09/2025 17:49

But then you have to assume that the group of people who will be upset because somebody says 'hey mamas' is larger that the group of people who naturally say 'hey mamas', but are going to feel excluded by a breast feeding group that regards their natural way of speaking as offensive.

I suspect the second group is much larger.

That's a good way of putting it, thank you.

Grammarnut · 18/09/2025 23:01

Not only exclude women but they seem to have excluded grammar as well.

TeiTetua · 18/09/2025 19:33

Merrymouse · 18/09/2025 17:49

But then you have to assume that the group of people who will be upset because somebody says 'hey mamas' is larger that the group of people who naturally say 'hey mamas', but are going to feel excluded by a breast feeding group that regards their natural way of speaking as offensive.

I suspect the second group is much larger.

I suppose the logic is that if the accepting-femaleness group never hears or uses the term "Hey mamas", it won't hurt them. Whereas the wishing-they-were-male group (even though it's a tiny number) would be deeply wounded by the idea that they're being called "mamas". So according to this organisation, it's not really the numbers that are most important, but the degree of harm done to one group versus another. Of course we'd tell them that nobody's obliged to cater to anyone else's delusions! And then they'd kick us out.

ShrankLastWinter · 18/09/2025 18:43

So there are a lot of new mothers who know that everyone who’s given birth and is breastfeeding is female.

And there’s a tiny number who believe that some new mothers might actually not be female or mothers, but might be male or in some unexplained way unsexed. An even smaller number of whom may try to insist on everyone else pretending to believe this too.

And you choose the tiny, controlling group with the daft belief?

Merrymouse · 18/09/2025 17:49

user892734543544 · 18/09/2025 09:32

They're not though and that's my point. This is helping women.
It's not to help men.

So I'm not mad at it becuase it's trying to help confused women. I don't want a baby to miss out on being breastfed their tailor-made lactation just because their mother is being silly and thinks she's a bloke. 💁

But then you have to assume that the group of people who will be upset because somebody says 'hey mamas' is larger that the group of people who naturally say 'hey mamas', but are going to feel excluded by a breast feeding group that regards their natural way of speaking as offensive.

I suspect the second group is much larger.

PrizedPickledPopcorn · 18/09/2025 16:13

I missed whatever it was that got deleted. Hope everyone is ok.

I was thinking about this today.

Language is what helps us find our tribe. We find ‘people like us’ in lots of ways, including by familiar language.

‘Hey Mammas!’ would irritate people like @Merrymouse and me, but appeal to others. Those people would respond, Merrymouse and I would scroll on by.

Someone might they’ve been blessed by God with their perfect little bundle, but struggle with… Some would scroll past with a shudder, others would offer prayers for things to get easier.

In controlling what language people use, you are stopping people making connections and finding friends.

user892734543544 · 18/09/2025 13:21

TomorrowisMonday · 18/09/2025 12:59

It's a bit condescending isn't? The transmen haven't asked that other group members must not have post using the phrase mothers, mums etc to refer to the group.

There's disadvantages to those who naturally use these terms and want to feel some shared motherhood ("how do other mums find...") as well as starting to erase these terms in general discourse. And time spend deleting posts and messaging.

It's not an in person group it's a large FB group, of which a few may have gender dysphoria who may or may not see some general posts. Along with many having all sorts of other conditions who ignore terms they dislike. Blind coping with "seeing."

You are on a site called Mumsnet. Do you think this should be renamed?

Should noone encourage men to get tested for prostate cancer because that excludes those who consider themselves women?

Oh sugar, that might come next! I saw the post from the employee around insurance.. and that applies to the in person group and organisation as a whole.

Yes I disagree with the changing of language. I was just pointing out that this is to help women and not men.

The whole thing is absolute nonsense.

TomorrowisMonday · 18/09/2025 12:59

user892734543544 · 18/09/2025 09:34

I can.

No, we don't. We can call ourselves women. But when addressing the group, to include women who pretend to be men, we address other people too.

I know it's fucking stupid. But I think babies being fed properly is a priority here.

It's a bit condescending isn't? The transmen haven't asked that other group members must not have post using the phrase mothers, mums etc to refer to the group.

There's disadvantages to those who naturally use these terms and want to feel some shared motherhood ("how do other mums find...") as well as starting to erase these terms in general discourse. And time spend deleting posts and messaging.

It's not an in person group it's a large FB group, of which a few may have gender dysphoria who may or may not see some general posts. Along with many having all sorts of other conditions who ignore terms they dislike. Blind coping with "seeing."

You are on a site called Mumsnet. Do you think this should be renamed?

Should noone encourage men to get tested for prostate cancer because that excludes those who consider themselves women?

Lavender14 · 18/09/2025 09:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Given that posts can take hours or days to be approved on a moderated site (which is appropriate and important for safeguarding), I'd think this was appropriate in a situation like mastitis that would need an urgent response so that sounds completely reasonable to me that a poster would go directly to inbox to get a faster response from a trained admin...

user892734543544 · 18/09/2025 09:34

KilkennyCats · 17/09/2025 13:48

Can you not see the utter nonsense inherent in having a baby whilst claiming to be a man?
And to appease these people, we have to stop calling ourselves women.
No fucking way.

I can.

No, we don't. We can call ourselves women. But when addressing the group, to include women who pretend to be men, we address other people too.

I know it's fucking stupid. But I think babies being fed properly is a priority here.

user892734543544 · 18/09/2025 09:33

LayerCakeOfStrangers · 17/09/2025 14:00

So women, then

Yes.

user892734543544 · 18/09/2025 09:32

HappyNewTaxYear · 17/09/2025 16:53

But I thought trans men were real men in the world of transness…

this lot want it all ways 🙄 ridiculous

They're not though and that's my point. This is helping women.
It's not to help men.

So I'm not mad at it becuase it's trying to help confused women. I don't want a baby to miss out on being breastfed their tailor-made lactation just because their mother is being silly and thinks she's a bloke. 💁

MisssCackle · 18/09/2025 09:13

TomorrowisMonday · 18/09/2025 01:00

I hope so @TaupeMember or there's genuinely a midwife out there analogising someone using the word "mum" in a breastfeeding group to racist slurs...🙄😂

Genuine, unfortunately. Depressing that this is the future of midwifery.

OP posts:
TomorrowisMonday · 18/09/2025 01:00

I hope so @TaupeMember or there's genuinely a midwife out there analogising someone using the word "mum" in a breastfeeding group to racist slurs...🙄😂

TaupeMember · 17/09/2025 23:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

TaupeMember · 17/09/2025 23:50

STMWBec · 16/09/2025 21:47

You're incorrect but okay, I work with health care professionals seeing new parents on a daily basis we don't reduce them to their parental status we respect them and use their names.

Most parents are proud and chuffed to be called mum and dad!

Sorry if you didnt feel that way

TaupeMember · 17/09/2025 23:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

TomorrowisMonday · 17/09/2025 23:31

@MisssCackle Very well put.. STMWBec has said they actually delete a posts that uses the term "mums" etc. and asks them to use "gender neutral" terms. In a breastfeeding FB group FFS.

How is that inclusive? For a lot of women with mental health issues or not that's going to be upsetting or demoralising.

It's not even at the request of anyone trans. Those transmen I've come across seem quite pragmatic, especially as these feminine terms aren't addressed at them personally.

I presume if STMWBec were running mumsnet they'd rename it and insist no OP addresses any questions to "mums"...

MisssCackle · 17/09/2025 21:15

I’ll never understand a woman, mother, trainee midwife who is happy with erasing the word ‘woman’ from the future of maternity care (I assume she also uses chestfeeding, birthing people, those who menstruate etc in practice), to the point where she has been aggressively demanding it on her group, mumsnet, X….. calling people bigots, transphobes, banning them…for refusing to bow down to this damaging gender ideology (still gobsmacked by your unprofessionalism here, by the way). From somebody whose very role is that of supporting women, primarily - it is unforgivable.
It makes me laugh that one of rules of the group is that they follow ‘biological norms not societal ones’ such as ‘early weaning’, but refuse to accept that the biological norm (fact) that a person who gives birth and breastfeeds is a WOMAN and a MOTHER. This from somebody who is currently studying female biology.
I am waiting for the day this is demanded of me in my job role. I will be ready to stand up for the majority of service users (women) and refuse to diminish the - as you put it - validity of their existence. Shame on you for playing a part in this @STMWBec.

OP posts:
Namelessnelly · 17/09/2025 20:43

STMWBec · 17/09/2025 14:07

Not everyone in the group identifies as female that I am very aware of, a lot of females also don't like or align with the word ladies and feel it's very classist and again a lot of grown adults don't want other adults to call them by their parental status or to be reduced solely down to their parental status..

I know I for one don't feel comfortable with other adults calling me mama.

But you have admitted you don’t even know what trans folx want or need. Why have you not asked those trans folx what they require from you? I mean, the title of your group is triggering enough, but your language in this thread, particularly your use of “cis” and your refusal to accept trans folx as they truly are shows you are not as inclusive as you pretend. You have said you don’t see TM as men, you refuse to allow TW in, even if they are lactating and you continue to use triggering and offensive language. You have even accused me of transphobia as you are obviously not educated enough in how to respect trans folx.

Haulage · 17/09/2025 20:41

Mmmnotsure · 17/09/2025 19:34

@STMWBec
I remember trying to breastfeed after a traumatic birth. I was very ill, in pain, frightened, and desperate. I had just become a mother and I was responsible for keeping this tiny thing alive.

If the price of breastfeeding support, in order to do what I thought was the best thing for my baby, was to agree that I would use specific language, or I wouldn't use specific language, I would have done it. I wouldn't have even realised at the time what I was doing, what I was actually agreeing to or what I was giving away. I would have thought I had to do so as the price of help for me and my baby. And I suppose I would then have had to remember not to use the most natural and obvious words, like mother, when I asked anything.

You may think that all the women who go along with this are happy with it and agree with you. I suspect that is not the case. It is far more likely that many of them feel they have no option.

You may think you are "being kind", but to the thousands of women who may be in a similar situation, it is a misuse of your position and a weaponising of their vulnerability. You are exercising power over them at a time when they may barely be able to function. It is cruel.

Yes, it’s cruel. These hideous people running these groups would’ve been very at home running workhouses back in the day, sitting in judgment on those who need their help.

Haulage · 17/09/2025 20:32

ShrankLastWinter · 17/09/2025 19:08

It’s about disciplining women not to say - or even allow ourselves to think - that maybe female bodies and female experiences might matter

That’s why it’s always aimed at women, often at our most vulnerable times, not at men’s groups.

Absolutely agree. It’s just rancid authoritarian guff, which just happens to alienate women from talking about and inhabiting their bodies at a time when they should be encouraged to feel confidence in their biology and acknowledge how astonishing it is.

Mmmnotsure · 17/09/2025 19:34

@STMWBec
I remember trying to breastfeed after a traumatic birth. I was very ill, in pain, frightened, and desperate. I had just become a mother and I was responsible for keeping this tiny thing alive.

If the price of breastfeeding support, in order to do what I thought was the best thing for my baby, was to agree that I would use specific language, or I wouldn't use specific language, I would have done it. I wouldn't have even realised at the time what I was doing, what I was actually agreeing to or what I was giving away. I would have thought I had to do so as the price of help for me and my baby. And I suppose I would then have had to remember not to use the most natural and obvious words, like mother, when I asked anything.

You may think that all the women who go along with this are happy with it and agree with you. I suspect that is not the case. It is far more likely that many of them feel they have no option.

You may think you are "being kind", but to the thousands of women who may be in a similar situation, it is a misuse of your position and a weaponising of their vulnerability. You are exercising power over them at a time when they may barely be able to function. It is cruel.

ShrankLastWinter · 17/09/2025 19:08

It’s about disciplining women not to say - or even allow ourselves to think - that maybe female bodies and female experiences might matter

That’s why it’s always aimed at women, often at our most vulnerable times, not at men’s groups.

PestoHoliday · 17/09/2025 18:38

"Inclusive" language isn't terribly inclusive of those for whom English is an additional language, of those with learning disabilities, or of GC women, is it?

In a female only group, insisting on the erasure of female terms like mother or woman is an act of misogyny. Our language matters. Without words to describe our sex and our experience, we are disempowered.

For the tiny number of women who have a gender identity (many of us don't, whatever Stonewall says) and regard themselves as not women despite having given birth and breastfeeding I imagine their cognitive dissonance between physical reality and mental gymnastics is something no amount of "hi everyone" can resolve. They've just been through the most female possible thing to do. Denying it is fruitless.