Your first sentence could be interpreted as:
I have never experienced anything negative, therefore nothing negative has every been experienced by anyone, therefore nothing negative exists, and therefore anybody claiming to have experienced anything negative must be motivated by hate.
Do you extend this 'it never happened to me so it never happens' to other social phenomena I wonder?
It's not that trans people are 'less than' anybody else, or that they are not entitled to the same rights as anybody else, the problem arises when trans people claim to actually be opposite sex, and claim the rights and facilities - and even the words - reserved for that group.
That is unacceptable on a purely factual basis - it is not possible for human beings to change sex, you are born either male or female, it is encoded in every part of your body, and there's nothing you can do to 'transition' to the opposite sex.
It is also unacceptable on an ethical level - appropriation of other people's identities for personal gain or gratification is not acceptable, and indeed as a PP has pointed out, not legal: an able-bodied person who claims to be disabled to get a blue badge is committing fraud.
So how is that different from a male-bodied person claiming to be female and insisting on using spaces reserved for women?
So the problem is trans people, particularly trans identifying men, claiming to be 'more than' what they actually are, not posters on this board claiming they are 'less than' anybody or anything. They are entitled to the same rights as anyone else, but so are women.
To paraphrase an old slogan from the 1980s that I came across a while ago:
To transwomen, their rights and no more.
To women, our rights and no less.