I'm confused what gender critical people want. Could someone clarify?

The fundamental - and, to me, fairly clear - difference between the Lineham post and those you cite in the OP is that Lineham's reference to "punching" is in reference to an illegal action and consequent potential physical threat, whereas the other threats of aggression are advocated as a response to an individual either expressing their opinions, or simply having certain opinions.

This is a huge difference.

I think being male may make this distinction more difficult to comprehend, though. As females, we're intensely conscious of our physical vulnerability to stronger males, and the statistically proven proportionate risk of violence that they present to us, so the difference in your two sets of examples is painfully plain.

Ooh, is there a GC version of that meme - you know the one with a cutesy anime character pointing a gun with the caption "shut the fuck up TERF" that's a favourite with the TRAs?

lol personally what I'd like is for you to stop endlessly reposting the same disproven shite about eg stats around suicide but that's not going to happen cos you love it here sooooo much but you know free speech. You're allowed to post nonsense and we're allowed to tell you it's nonsense without either one of us calling the police.

and after all the hours/months/years you've spent here reading and scolding and telling us why you think we are wrong and you still don't know whst we want, I can't help you.

(tho if you don't know what it is we want why are you so keen to tell us we're wrong all the time?)

Yet another “I’m so smart I’ve found the contradiction that will convince the silly wims they’re wrong and I’ll finally get my Reddit medal.” It’s so fucking boring.

The only controversy: is this a drive-by scolding? Or a flood-and-and flounce? Time will tell.

EDIT: sorry- just seen the OP’s name. F&F, most likely.

Whatever the law is it needs to apply to everyone equally. You can't have one rule for GCs and another rule for LGBT people and allies.

Well look. You’ve answered your own question! Well done.

Theres a very clear asymmetry in the way this is currently being policed showing bias in favour of TRAs.

I don't think that Chris really wants to discuss free speech BTW. I have a suspicion that what Chris wants is to tell us off.

I'm confused what gender critical people want.

No you're not

Lol.
Poor old chris. All those years spent moaning on here yet still has no idea that women want VAWG to be taken seriously, child safeguarding a priority and no men in women's single sex spaces.

Sad times.

I want anyone who promotes violence to anyone (except in self defence) for their beliefs punished if that helps.

Including real transphobia, misogyny, racism, homophobia, xenophobia... the lot really.

If GL has committed a crime, I'm fine with him being prosecuted.
I'm also fine with so called "TRA"s being prosecuted for murder threats.

I'm not ok with anyone being hounded for their beliefs, like sex and gender being completely different.

Oh it's yourself Chris. You've been on these boards for long enough, so read back through everything you've been told and you'll be able to answer your own questions.

People who are Gender Critical want 'gender stereotypes' to be put in the bin.

If you wish to discuss free speech Vs restricted speech and where the 'incitement of violence' line should be (or if it should be removed), that is a much bigger issue and is not restricted to people who are critical of 'gender stereotypes'. I suspect that you will find that people who are critical of 'gender stereotypes' will have different opinions on free speech/incitement to violence.

I don’t think anyone should be arrested for a tweet. And it’s usually the TRA side whinging and crying and setting the police on people. It’s the two tier thing that pisses people off, there are dangerous deranged men in dresses screaming threats at women and the police do fuck all about that.

.

AFAIK There has not been a single censure against the GI community for inciting violence. In fact police officers have often been pictured at events where such threats are actively being made been made ignoring the evolving situation. Politicians have also been photographed with protestors holding signs inciting violence too,

Whereas there was a coordinated effort made to intercept GL on arrival back in the UK with FIVE armed police officers after he wrote one thing on Twitter.

Can you not see the double standards at play here?